< draft-ietf-dime-ovli-07.txt		draft-ietf-dime-ovli-08.txt >
	Diameter Maintenance and Extensions (DIME) J. Korhonen, Ed.		Diameter Maintenance and Extensions (DIME) J. Korhonen, Ed.
	Internet-Draft Broadcom		Internet-Draft Broadcom
	Intended status: Standards Track S. Donovan, Ed.		Intended status: Standards Track S. Donovan, Ed.
	Expires: July 30, 2015 B. Campbell		Expires: August 8, 2015 B. Campbell
	Oracle		Oracle
	L. Morand		L. Morand
	Orange Labs		Orange Labs
	January 26, 2015		February 4, 2015
	Diameter Overload Indication Conveyance		Diameter Overload Indication Conveyance
	draft-ietf-dime-ovli-07.txt		draft-ietf-dime-ovli-08.txt
	Abstract		Abstract
	This specification defines a base solution for Diameter overload		This specification defines a base solution for Diameter overload
	control, referred to as Diameter Overload Indication Conveyance		control, referred to as Diameter Overload Indication Conveyance
	(DOIC).		(DOIC).
	Status of This Memo		Status of This Memo
	This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the		This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
	skipping to change at page 1, line 36 ¶		skipping to change at page 1, line 36 ¶
	Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering		Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
	Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute		Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
	working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-		working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
	Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.		Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
	Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months		Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
	and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any		and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
	time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference		time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
	material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."		material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
	This Internet-Draft will expire on July 30, 2015.		This Internet-Draft will expire on August 8, 2015.
	Copyright Notice		Copyright Notice
	Copyright (c) 2015 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the		Copyright (c) 2015 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
	document authors. All rights reserved.		document authors. All rights reserved.
	This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal		This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
	Provisions Relating to IETF Documents		Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
	(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of		(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
	publication of this document. Please review these documents		publication of this document. Please review these documents
	skipping to change at page 27, line 31 ¶		skipping to change at page 27, line 31 ¶
	7.8. Attribute Value Pair flag rules		7.8. Attribute Value Pair flag rules
	+---------+		+---------+
	|AVP flag |		|AVP flag |
	|rules |		|rules |
	+----+----+		+----+----+
	AVP Section | |MUST|		AVP Section | |MUST|
	Attribute Name Code Defined Value Type |MUST| NOT|		Attribute Name Code Defined Value Type |MUST| NOT|
	+--------------------------------------------------+----+----+		+--------------------------------------------------+----+----+
	|OC-Supported-Features TBD1 6.1 Grouped | | V |		|OC-Supported-Features TBD1 7.1 Grouped | | V |
	+--------------------------------------------------+----+----+		+--------------------------------------------------+----+----+
	|OC-Feature-Vector TBD2 6.2 Unsigned64 | | V |		|OC-Feature-Vector TBD2 7.2 Unsigned64 | | V |
	+--------------------------------------------------+----+----+		+--------------------------------------------------+----+----+
	|OC-OLR TBD3 6.3 Grouped | | V |		|OC-OLR TBD3 7.3 Grouped | | V |
	+--------------------------------------------------+----+----+		+--------------------------------------------------+----+----+
	|OC-Sequence-Number TBD4 6.4 Unsigned64 | | V |		|OC-Sequence-Number TBD4 7.4 Unsigned64 | | V |
	+--------------------------------------------------+----+----+		+--------------------------------------------------+----+----+
	|OC-Validity-Duration TBD5 6.5 Unsigned32 | | V |		|OC-Validity-Duration TBD5 7.5 Unsigned32 | | V |
	+--------------------------------------------------+----+----+		+--------------------------------------------------+----+----+
	|OC-Report-Type TBD6 6.6 Enumerated | | V |		|OC-Report-Type TBD6 7.6 Enumerated | | V |
	+--------------------------------------------------+----+----+		+--------------------------------------------------+----+----+
	|OC-Reduction | | |		|OC-Reduction | | |
	| -Percentage TBD7 6.7 Unsigned32 | | V |		| -Percentage TBD7 7.7 Unsigned32 | | V |
	+--------------------------------------------------+----+----+		+--------------------------------------------------+----+----+
	As described in the Diameter base protocol [RFC6733], the M-bit usage		As described in the Diameter base protocol [RFC6733], the M-bit usage
	for a given AVP in a given command may be defined by the application.		for a given AVP in a given command may be defined by the application.
	8. Error Response Codes		8. Error Response Codes
	When a DOIC node rejects a Diameter request due to overload, the DOIC		When a DOIC node rejects a Diameter request due to overload, the DOIC
	node MUST select an appropriate error response code. This		node MUST select an appropriate error response code. This
	determination is made based on the probability of the request		determination is made based on the probability of the request
End of changes. 11 change blocks.
	11 lines changed or deleted		11 lines changed or added
This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.48. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/