| < draft-ietf-ecrit-car-crash-02.txt | draft-ietf-ecrit-car-crash-03.txt > | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ECRIT R. Gellens | ECRIT R. Gellens | |||
| Internet-Draft Qualcomm Technologies, Inc | Internet-Draft Qualcomm Technologies, Inc | |||
| Intended status: Informational B. Rosen | Intended status: Informational B. Rosen | |||
| Expires: September 8, 2015 NeuStar, Inc. | Expires: January 3, 2016 NeuStar, Inc. | |||
| H. Tschofenig | H. Tschofenig | |||
| (no affiliation) | ||||
| March 7, 2015 | July 4, 2015 | |||
| Next-Generation Vehicle-Initiated Emergency Calls | Next-Generation Vehicle-Initiated Emergency Calls | |||
| draft-ietf-ecrit-car-crash-02.txt | draft-ietf-ecrit-car-crash-03.txt | |||
| Abstract | Abstract | |||
| This document describes how to use IP-based emergency services | This document describes how to use IP-based emergency services | |||
| mechanisms to support the next generation of emergency calls placed | mechanisms to support the next generation of emergency calls placed | |||
| by vehicles (automatically in the event of a crash or serious | by vehicles (automatically in the event of a crash or serious | |||
| incident, or manually invoked by a vehicle occupant) and conveying | incident, or manually invoked by a vehicle occupant) and conveying | |||
| vehicle, sensor, and location data related to the crash or incident. | vehicle, sensor, and location data related to the crash or incident. | |||
| Such calls are often referred to as "Automatic Crash Notification" | Such calls are often referred to as "Automatic Crash Notification" | |||
| (ACN), or "Advanced Automatic Crash Notification" (AACN), even in the | (ACN), or "Advanced Automatic Crash Notification" (AACN), even in the | |||
| skipping to change at page 2, line 15 ¶ | skipping to change at page 2, line 15 ¶ | |||
| Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering | Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering | |||
| Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute | Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute | |||
| working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- | working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- | |||
| Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. | Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. | |||
| Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months | Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months | |||
| and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any | and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any | |||
| time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference | time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference | |||
| material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." | material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." | |||
| This Internet-Draft will expire on September 8, 2015. | This Internet-Draft will expire on January 3, 2016. | |||
| Copyright Notice | Copyright Notice | |||
| Copyright (c) 2015 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the | Copyright (c) 2015 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the | |||
| document authors. All rights reserved. | document authors. All rights reserved. | |||
| This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal | This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal | |||
| Provisions Relating to IETF Documents | Provisions Relating to IETF Documents | |||
| (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of | (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of | |||
| publication of this document. Please review these documents | publication of this document. Please review these documents | |||
| skipping to change at page 5, line 21 ¶ | skipping to change at page 5, line 21 ¶ | |||
| routed to an upgraded PSAP where the vehicle data is available to | routed to an upgraded PSAP where the vehicle data is available to | |||
| assist the call taker in assessing and responding to the situation. | assist the call taker in assessing and responding to the situation. | |||
| An ACN call may be either occupant-initiated or automatically | An ACN call may be either occupant-initiated or automatically | |||
| triggered. (The "A" in "ACN" does stand for "Automatic," but the | triggered. (The "A" in "ACN" does stand for "Automatic," but the | |||
| term is often used to refer to the class of calls that are placed by | term is often used to refer to the class of calls that are placed by | |||
| an in-vehicle system (IVS) and that carry incident-related data as | an in-vehicle system (IVS) and that carry incident-related data as | |||
| well as voice.) Automatically triggered calls indicate a car crash | well as voice.) Automatically triggered calls indicate a car crash | |||
| or some other serious incident (e.g., a fire) and carry a greater | or some other serious incident (e.g., a fire) and carry a greater | |||
| presumption of risk of injury. Manually triggered calls are often | presumption of risk of injury. Manually triggered calls are often | |||
| reports of serious hazards (such as drunk drivers) and may require | reports of serious hazards (such as impaired drivers or roadway | |||
| different responses depending on the situation. Manually triggered | debris) and may require different responses depending on the | |||
| calls are also more likely to be false (e.g., accidental) calls and | situation. Manually triggered calls are also more likely to be false | |||
| may thus be subject to different handling by the PSAP. | (e.g., accidental) calls and may thus be subject to different | |||
| handling by the PSAP. | ||||
| This document describes how the IETF mechanisms for IP-based | This document describes how the IETF mechanisms for IP-based | |||
| emergency calls, including [RFC6443] and | emergency calls, including [RFC6443] and | |||
| [I-D.ietf-ecrit-additional-data], are used to provide the realization | [I-D.ietf-ecrit-additional-data], are used to provide the realization | |||
| of next-generation ACN. | of next-generation ACN. | |||
| The Association of Public-Safety Communications Officials (APCO) and | The Association of Public-Safety Communications Officials (APCO) and | |||
| the National Emergency Number Association (NENA) have jointly | the National Emergency Number Association (NENA) have jointly | |||
| developed a standardized set of incident-related vehicle data for ACN | developed a standardized set of incident-related vehicle data for ACN | |||
| use, called the Vehicle Emergency Data Set (VEDS) [VEDS]. Such data | use, called the Vehicle Emergency Data Set (VEDS) [VEDS]. Such data | |||
| skipping to change at page 8, line 47 ¶ | skipping to change at page 8, line 47 ¶ | |||
| currently mandated, Europe has a mandated and standardized system for | currently mandated, Europe has a mandated and standardized system for | |||
| emergency calls by in-vehicle systems. This pan-European system is | emergency calls by in-vehicle systems. This pan-European system is | |||
| known as "eCall" and is the subject of a separate document, | known as "eCall" and is the subject of a separate document, | |||
| [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall]. Vehicles designed to operate in multiple | [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall]. Vehicles designed to operate in multiple | |||
| regions may need to support eCall as well as the ACN described here. | regions may need to support eCall as well as the ACN described here. | |||
| If other regions devise their own specifications or data formats, a | If other regions devise their own specifications or data formats, a | |||
| multi-region vehicle may need to support those as well. This | multi-region vehicle may need to support those as well. This | |||
| document adopts the call set-up and other technical aspects of | document adopts the call set-up and other technical aspects of | |||
| [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall], which uses [I-D.ietf-ecrit-additional-data], | [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall], which uses [I-D.ietf-ecrit-additional-data], | |||
| which makes it easy to substitute a different data set while keeping | which makes it easy to substitute a different data set while keeping | |||
| other technical aspects unchanges. Hence, both NG-eCall and the ACN | other technical aspects unchanged. Hence, both NG-eCall and the ACN | |||
| mechanism described here are fully compatible, differing only in the | mechanism described here are fully compatible, differing only in the | |||
| specific data block that is sent (the eCall MSD in the case of NG- | specific data block that is sent (the eCall MSD in the case of NG- | |||
| eCall, and the APCO/NENA VEDS used in this document). If other | eCall, and the APCO/NENA VEDS used in this document). If other | |||
| regions adopt their own data set, this can be similarly accomodated | regions adopt their own data set, this can be similarly accomodated | |||
| without changing other technical aspects. | without changing other technical aspects. | |||
| 5. Migration to Next-Generation | 5. Migration to Next-Generation | |||
| Migration of emergency calls placed by in-vehicle systems to next- | Migration of emergency calls placed by in-vehicle systems to next- | |||
| generation (all-IP) technology provides a standardized mechanism to | generation (all-IP) technology provides a standardized mechanism to | |||
| skipping to change at page 9, line 30 ¶ | skipping to change at page 9, line 30 ¶ | |||
| vehicle and the TSP for both emergency and non-emergency calls. | vehicle and the TSP for both emergency and non-emergency calls. | |||
| A next-generation IVS establishes an emergency call using the | A next-generation IVS establishes an emergency call using the | |||
| emergency call solution as described in [RFC6443] and [RFC6881], with | emergency call solution as described in [RFC6443] and [RFC6881], with | |||
| the difference that the Request-URI indicates an ACN type of | the difference that the Request-URI indicates an ACN type of | |||
| emergency call and a Call-Info header field indicates that vehicle | emergency call and a Call-Info header field indicates that vehicle | |||
| crash data is attached. When an ESInet is deployed the MNO only | crash data is attached. When an ESInet is deployed the MNO only | |||
| needs to recognize the call as an emergency call and route it to an | needs to recognize the call as an emergency call and route it to an | |||
| ESInet. The ESInet may recognize the call as an ACN with vehicle | ESInet. The ESInet may recognize the call as an ACN with vehicle | |||
| data and may route the call to an NG-ACN capable PSAP. Such a PSAP | data and may route the call to an NG-ACN capable PSAP. Such a PSAP | |||
| would interpet the vehicle data sent with the call and make it | would interpret the vehicle data sent with the call and make it | |||
| available to the call taker. | available to the call taker. | |||
| Because of the need to identify and specially process Next-Generation | Because of the need to identify and specially process Next-Generation | |||
| ACN calls (as discussed above), [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall] registers new | ACN calls (as discussed above), [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall] registers new | |||
| service URN children within the "sos" subservice. These URNs provide | service URN children within the "sos" subservice. These URNs provide | |||
| a mechanism by which an NG-ACN call is identified, and differentiate | a mechanism by which an NG-ACN call is identified, and differentiate | |||
| between manually and automatically triggered NG-ACN calls, which can | between manually and automatically triggered NG-ACN calls, which can | |||
| be subject to different treatment, depending on policy. (The two | be subject to different treatment, depending on policy. (The two | |||
| service URNs registered in [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall] are: | service URNs registered in [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall] are: | |||
| urn:service:sos.ecall.automatic and urn:service:sos.ecall.manual.) | urn:service:sos.ecall.automatic and urn:service:sos.ecall.manual.) | |||
| skipping to change at page 14, line 29 ¶ | skipping to change at page 14, line 29 ¶ | |||
| identify the call as an ACN call and handle it appropriately. The | identify the call as an ACN call and handle it appropriately. The | |||
| PSAP is able to identify the crash data as well as any other | PSAP is able to identify the crash data as well as any other | |||
| additional data attached to the INVITE by examining the Call-Info | additional data attached to the INVITE by examining the Call-Info | |||
| header fields for 'purpose' parameters whose values start with | header fields for 'purpose' parameters whose values start with | |||
| 'EmergencyCallData.' The PSAP is able to access and the data it is | 'EmergencyCallData.' The PSAP is able to access and the data it is | |||
| capable of handling and is interested in by checking the 'purpose' | capable of handling and is interested in by checking the 'purpose' | |||
| parameter values. | parameter values. | |||
| 8. Call Routing | 8. Call Routing | |||
| An Emergency Services IP Network (ESInet) is a network operated by | An Emergency Services IP Network (ESInet) is a network operated by or | |||
| emergency services authorities. It handles emergency call routing | on behalf of emergency services authorities. It handles emergency | |||
| and processing before delivery to a PSAP. In the NG9-1-1 | call routing and processing before delivery to a PSAP. In the | |||
| architecture adopted by NENA as well as the NG1-1-2 architecture | NG9-1-1 architecture adopted by NENA as well as the NG1-1-2 | |||
| adopted by EENA, each PSAP is connected to one or more ESInets. Each | architecture adopted by EENA, each PSAP is connected to one or more | |||
| originating network is also connected to one or more ESInets. The | ESInets. Each originating network is also connected to one or more | |||
| ESInets maintain policy-based routing rules which control the routing | ESInets. The ESInets maintain policy-based routing rules which | |||
| and processing of emergency calls. The centralization of such rules | control the routing and processing of emergency calls. The | |||
| within ESInets provides for a cleaner separation between the | centralization of such rules within ESInets provides for a cleaner | |||
| responsibilities of the originating network and that of the emergency | separation between the responsibilities of the originating network | |||
| services network, and provides greater flexibility and control over | and that of the emergency services network, and provides greater | |||
| processing of emergency calls by the emergency services authorities. | flexibility and control over processing of emergency calls by the | |||
| This makes it easier to react quickly to unusual situations that | emergency services authorities. This makes it easier to react | |||
| require changes in how emergency calls are routed or handled (e.g., a | quickly to unusual situations that require changes in how emergency | |||
| natural disaster closes a PSAP), as well as ease in making long-term | calls are routed or handled (e.g., a natural disaster closes a PSAP), | |||
| changes that affect such routing (e.g., cooperative agreements to | as well as ease in making long-term changes that affect such routing | |||
| specially handle calls requiring translation or relay services). | (e.g., cooperative agreements to specially handle calls requiring | |||
| translation or relay services). | ||||
| In an environment that uses ESInets, the originating network need | In an environment that uses ESInets, the originating network need | |||
| only detect that the service URN of an emergency call is or starts | only detect that the service URN of an emergency call is or starts | |||
| with "sos", passing all types of emergency calls to an ESInet. The | with "sos", passing all types of emergency calls to an ESInet. The | |||
| ESInet is then responsible for routing such calls to an appropriate | ESInet is then responsible for routing such calls to an appropriate | |||
| PSAP. In an environment without an ESInet, the emergency services | PSAP. In an environment without an ESInet, the emergency services | |||
| authorities and the originating carriers would need to determine how | authorities and the originating carriers would need to determine how | |||
| such calls are routed. | such calls are routed. | |||
| 9. Test Calls | 9. Test Calls | |||
| skipping to change at page 22, line 21 ¶ | skipping to change at page 22, line 21 ¶ | |||
| Brian Rosen | Brian Rosen | |||
| NeuStar, Inc. | NeuStar, Inc. | |||
| 470 Conrad Dr | 470 Conrad Dr | |||
| Mars, PA 16046 | Mars, PA 16046 | |||
| US | US | |||
| Email: br@brianrosen.net | Email: br@brianrosen.net | |||
| Hannes Tschofenig | Hannes Tschofenig | |||
| (no affiliation) | ||||
| Email: Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net | Email: Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net | |||
| URI: http://www.tschofenig.priv.at | URI: http://www.tschofenig.priv.at | |||
| End of changes. 9 change blocks. | ||||
| 29 lines changed or deleted | 30 lines changed or added | |||
This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.48. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/ | ||||