< draft-ietf-ecrit-ecall-05.txt   draft-ietf-ecrit-ecall-06.txt >
ECRIT R. Gellens ECRIT R. Gellens
Internet-Draft Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Internet-Draft Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Intended status: Informational H. Tschofenig Intended status: Informational H. Tschofenig
Expires: May 8, 2016 (Individual) Expires: August 22, 2016 (Individual)
November 5, 2015 February 19, 2016
Next-Generation Pan-European eCall Next-Generation Pan-European eCall
draft-ietf-ecrit-ecall-05.txt draft-ietf-ecrit-ecall-06.txt
Abstract Abstract
This document describes how to use IP-based emergency services This document describes how to use IP-based emergency services
mechanisms to support the next generation of the Pan European in- mechanisms to support the next generation of the Pan European in-
vehicle emergency call service defined under the eSafety initiative vehicle emergency call service defined under the eSafety initiative
of the European Commission (generally referred to as "eCall"). eCall of the European Commission (generally referred to as "eCall"). eCall
is a standardized and mandated system for a special form of emergency is a standardized and mandated system for a special form of emergency
calls placed by vehicles. eCall deployment is required in the very calls placed by vehicles. eCall deployment is required in the very
near future in European Union member states, and eCall (and eCall- near future in European Union member states, and eCall (and eCall-
skipping to change at page 2, line 7 skipping to change at page 2, line 7
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on May 8, 2016. This Internet-Draft will expire on August 22, 2016.
Copyright Notice Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2015 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the Copyright (c) 2016 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved. document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
skipping to change at page 2, line 33 skipping to change at page 2, line 33
Table of Contents Table of Contents
1. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 1. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2. Document Scope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2. Document Scope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 3. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
4. eCall Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 4. eCall Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
5. Vehicle Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 5. Vehicle Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
6. Call Setup . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 6. Call Setup . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
7. Call Routing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 7. Call Routing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
7.1. ESInets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 8. Test Calls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
8. Test Calls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 9. eCall-Specific Control/Metadata . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
9. eCall-Specific Control/Metadata . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 9.1. The eCall Control Block . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
9.1. The eCall Control Block . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
9.1.1. The <ack> element . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 9.1.1. The <ack> element . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
9.1.1.1. Attributes of the <ack> element . . . . . . . . . 13 9.1.1.1. Attributes of the <ack> element . . . . . . . . . 12
9.1.1.2. Child Elements of the <ack> element . . . . . . . 13 9.1.1.2. Child Elements of the <ack> element . . . . . . . 12
9.1.1.3. Ack Examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 9.1.1.3. Ack Examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
9.1.2. The <capabilities> element . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 9.1.2. The <capabilities> element . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
9.1.2.1. Child Elements of the <capabilities> element . . 15 9.1.2.1. Child Elements of the <capabilities> element . . 14
9.1.2.2. Capabilities Example . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 9.1.2.2. Capabilities Example . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
9.1.3. The <request> element . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 9.1.3. The <request> element . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
9.1.3.1. Attributes of the <request> element . . . . . . . 17 9.1.3.1. Attributes of the <request> element . . . . . . . 16
9.1.3.2. Child Elements of the <request> element . . . . . 19 9.1.3.2. Child Elements of the <request> element . . . . . 18
9.1.3.3. Request Example . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 9.1.3.3. Request Example . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
9.2. The emergencyCallData.eCall INFO package . . . . . . . . 20 9.2. The emergencyCallData.eCall INFO package . . . . . . . . 19
10. Examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 10. Examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
11. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 11. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
12. Privacy Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 12. Privacy Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
13. XML Schema . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 13. XML Schema . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
14. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 14. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
14.1. Service URN Registrations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 14.1. Service URN Registrations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
14.2. MIME Content-type Registration for 14.2. MIME Content-type Registration for
'application/emergencyCallData.eCall.MSD+xml' . . . . . 30 'application/emergencyCallData.eCall.MSD+xml' . . . . . 30
14.3. MIME Content-type Registration for 14.3. MIME Content-type Registration for
'application/emergencyCallData.eCall.control+xml' . . . 32 'application/emergencyCallData.eCall.control+xml' . . . 31
14.4. Registration of the 'eCall.MSD' entry in the Emergency 14.4. Registration of the 'eCall.MSD' entry in the Emergency
Call Additional Data Blocks registry . . . . . . . . . . 33 Call Additional Data Blocks registry . . . . . . . . . . 33
14.5. Registration of the 'eCall.control' entry in the 14.5. Registration of the 'eCall.control' entry in the
Emergency Call Additional Data Blocks registry . . . . . 34 Emergency Call Additional Data Blocks registry . . . . . 33
14.6. Registration of the emergencyCallData.eCall Info Package 34 14.6. Registration of the emergencyCallData.eCall Info Package 33
14.7. URN Sub-Namespace Registration . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 14.7. URN Sub-Namespace Registration . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
14.7.1. Registration for urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:eCall . . . 34 14.7.1. Registration for urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:eCall . . . 33
14.7.2. Registration for 14.7.2. Registration for
urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:eCall:control . . . . . . . . 35 urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:eCall:control . . . . . . . . 34
14.8. Registry creation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 14.8. Registry creation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
14.8.1. eCall Control Action Registry . . . . . . . . . . . 35 14.8.1. eCall Control Action Registry . . . . . . . . . . . 35
14.8.2. eCall Static Message Registry . . . . . . . . . . . 36 14.8.2. eCall Static Message Registry . . . . . . . . . . . 36
14.8.3. eCall Reason Registry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 14.8.3. eCall Reason Registry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
14.8.4. eCall Lamp ID Registry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 14.8.4. eCall Lamp ID Registry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
14.8.5. eCall Camera ID Registry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 14.8.5. eCall Camera ID Registry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
15. Contributors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 15. Contributors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
16. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 16. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
17. Changes from Previous Versions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 17. Changes from Previous Versions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
17.1. Changes from draft-ietf-04 to draft-ietf-05 . . . . . . 40 17.1. Changes from draft-ietf-05 to draft-ietf-06 . . . . . . 40
17.2. Changes from draft-ietf-03 to draft-ietf-04 . . . . . . 40 17.2. Changes from draft-ietf-04 to draft-ietf-05 . . . . . . 40
17.3. Changes from draft-ietf-02 to draft-ietf-03 . . . . . . 41 17.3. Changes from draft-ietf-03 to draft-ietf-04 . . . . . . 40
17.4. Changes from draft-ietf-01 to draft-ietf-02 . . . . . . 41 17.4. Changes from draft-ietf-02 to draft-ietf-03 . . . . . . 40
17.5. Changes from draft-ietf-00 to draft-ietf-01 . . . . . . 41 17.5. Changes from draft-ietf-01 to draft-ietf-02 . . . . . . 40
17.6. Changes from draft-gellens-03 to draft-ietf-00 . . . . . 41 17.6. Changes from draft-ietf-00 to draft-ietf-01 . . . . . . 41
17.7. Changes from draft-gellens-02 to -03 . . . . . . . . . . 42 17.7. Changes from draft-gellens-03 to draft-ietf-00 . . . . . 41
17.8. Changes from draft-gellens-01 to -02 . . . . . . . . . . 42 17.8. Changes from draft-gellens-02 to -03 . . . . . . . . . . 41
17.9. Changes from draft-gellens-00 to -01 . . . . . . . . . . 42 17.9. Changes from draft-gellens-01 to -02 . . . . . . . . . . 41
18. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 17.10. Changes from draft-gellens-00 to -01 . . . . . . . . . . 41
18. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
18.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 18.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
18.2. Informative references . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 18.2. Informative references . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
1. Terminology 1. Terminology
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119]. document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].
skipping to change at page 9, line 18 skipping to change at page 9, line 18
emergency calls because eCalls are special types of emergency calls emergency calls because eCalls are special types of emergency calls
(with implications for the types of response required) and need to be (with implications for the types of response required) and need to be
handled by specially designated PSAPs. In an environment that uses handled by specially designated PSAPs. In an environment that uses
ESInets, the originating network passes all types of emergency calls ESInets, the originating network passes all types of emergency calls
to an ESInet (which have a request URI containing the "SOS" service to an ESInet (which have a request URI containing the "SOS" service
URN). The ESInet is then responsible for routing such calls to the URN). The ESInet is then responsible for routing such calls to the
appropriate PSAP. In an environment without an ESInet, the emergency appropriate PSAP. In an environment without an ESInet, the emergency
services authorities and the originating network jointly determine services authorities and the originating network jointly determine
how such calls are routed. how such calls are routed.
7.1. ESInets
This section provides background information on ESInets for
information only.
An Emergency Services IP Network (ESInet) is a network operated by
emergency services authorities. It handles emergency call routing
and processing before delivery to a PSAP. In the NG1-1-2
architecture adopted by EENA, each PSAP is connected to one or more
ESInets. Each originating network is also connected to one or more
ESInets. The ESInets maintain policy-based routing rules which
control the routing and processing of emergency calls. The
centralization of such rules within ESInets provides for a cleaner
separation between the responsibilities of the originating network
and that of the emergency services network, and provides greater
flexibility and control over processing of emergency calls by the
emergency services authorities. This makes it easier to react
quickly to unusual situations that require changes in how emergency
calls are routed or handled (e.g., a natural disaster closes a PSAP),
as well as ease in making long-term changes that affect such routing
(e.g., cooperative agreements to specially handle calls requiring
translation or relay services). ESInets might support the ability to
interwork NG-eCall to legacy eCall to handle eCall-capable PSAPs that
are not IP PSAPs (similarly to the ability to interwork IP emergency
calls to legacy non-IP PSAPs). Note that in order to support legacy
eCall-capable PSAPs that are not IP PSAPs and are not attached to an
ESInet, an originating network might need the ability to route an
eCall itself (e.g., to an interworking facility with interconnection
to a suitable legacy eCall capable PSAP) based on the eCall and
manual or automatic indications. The ETSI TR "Mobile Standards Group
(MSG); eCall for VoIP" [MSG_TR] discusses transition issues in Clause
7.
8. Test Calls 8. Test Calls
eCall requires the ability to place test calls. These are calls that eCall requires the ability to place test calls. These are calls that
are recognized and treated to some extent as eCalls but are not given are recognized and treated to some extent as eCalls but are not given
emergency call treatment and are not handled by call takers. The emergency call treatment and are not handled by call takers. The
test call facility allows the IVS or user to verify that an eCall can test call facility allows the IVS or user to verify that an eCall can
be successfully established with voice communication. The IVS can be successfully established with voice communication. The IVS can
also verify that the MSD was successfully received. also verify that the MSD was successfully received.
A service URN starting with "test." indicates a test call. For A service URN starting with "test." indicates a test call. For
skipping to change at page 26, line 43 skipping to change at page 25, line 43
Implementors need to be aware that, potentially, the data objects Implementors need to be aware that, potentially, the data objects
described here and elsewhere might be malformed, might contain described here and elsewhere might be malformed, might contain
unexpected characters, excessively long attribute values, elements, unexpected characters, excessively long attribute values, elements,
etc. (This applies across the board, not just to the 'text' etc. (This applies across the board, not just to the 'text'
attribute of a <request> element.) attribute of a <request> element.)
Since this document depends on [I-D.ietf-ecrit-additional-data], the Since this document depends on [I-D.ietf-ecrit-additional-data], the
security considerations discussed there apply here (see especially security considerations discussed there apply here (see especially
the discussion of TLS, TLS versions, cypher suites, and PKI). the discussion of TLS, TLS versions, cypher suites, and PKI).
When vehicle data or control/metadata is contained in a signed or
encrypted body part, the enclosing multipart (e.g., multipart/signed
or multipart/encrypted) has the same Content-ID as the data part.
This allows an entity to identify and access the data blocks it is
interested in without having to dive deeply into the message
structure or decrypt parts it is not interested in. (The 'purpose'
parameter in a Call-Info header field identifies the data, and the
CID URL points to the data block in the body, which has a matching
Content-ID body part header field).
12. Privacy Considerations 12. Privacy Considerations
Since this document builds on [I-D.ietf-ecrit-additional-data], the Since this document builds on [I-D.ietf-ecrit-additional-data], the
data structures specified there, and the corresponding privacy data structures specified there, and the corresponding privacy
considerations discussed there, apply here as well. The MSD carries considerations discussed there, apply here as well. The MSD carries
some additional identifying and personal information (mostly about some additional identifying and personal information (mostly about
the vehicle and less about the owner), as well as location the vehicle and less about the owner), as well as location
information, and so needs to be protected against unauthorized information, and so needs to be protected against unauthorized
disclosure. Local regulations may impose additional privacy disclosure. Local regulations may impose additional privacy
protection requirements. The additional functionality enabled by protection requirements. The additional functionality enabled by
skipping to change at page 40, line 24 skipping to change at page 39, line 42
Table 6: eCall Camera ID Registry Initial Values Table 6: eCall Camera ID Registry Initial Values
15. Contributors 15. Contributors
Brian Rosen was a co-author of the original document upon which this Brian Rosen was a co-author of the original document upon which this
document is based. document is based.
16. Acknowledgements 16. Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Bob Williams and Ban Al-Bakri for their We would like to thank Bob Williams and Ban Al-Bakri for their
feedback and suggestions, and Keith Drage, James Winterbottom, and feedback and suggestions, and Keith Drage, James Winterbottom, Wes
Wes George for their review and comments. We would like to thank George, and Rex Buddenber for their review and comments. We would
Michael Montag, Arnoud van Wijk, Gunnar Hellstrom, and Ulrich Dietz like to thank Michael Montag, Arnoud van Wijk, Gunnar Hellstrom, and
for their help with the original document upon which this document is Ulrich Dietz for their help with the original document upon which
based. this document is based.
17. Changes from Previous Versions 17. Changes from Previous Versions
17.1. Changes from draft-ietf-05 to draft-ietf-06
17.1. Changes from draft-ietf-04 to draft-ietf-05 o Added additional security and privacy clarifications regarding
signed and encrypted data
o Additional security and privacy text
o Deleted informative section on ESINets as unnecessary.
17.2. Changes from draft-ietf-04 to draft-ietf-05
o Reworked the security and privacy considerations material in the o Reworked the security and privacy considerations material in the
document as a whole and in the MIME registation sections of the document as a whole and in the MIME registation sections of the
MSD and control objects MSD and control objects
o Clarified that the <actionResult> element can appear multiple o Clarified that the <actionResult> element can appear multiple
times within an <ack> element times within an <ack> element
o Fixed IMS definition o Fixed IMS definition
o Added clarifying text for the 'msgid' attribute o Added clarifying text for the 'msgid' attribute
17.2. Changes from draft-ietf-03 to draft-ietf-04 17.3. Changes from draft-ietf-03 to draft-ietf-04
o Added Privacy Considerations section o Added Privacy Considerations section
o Reworded most uses of non-normative "may", "should", "must", and o Reworded most uses of non-normative "may", "should", "must", and
"recommended." "recommended."
o Fixed nits in examples o Fixed nits in examples
17.3. Changes from draft-ietf-02 to draft-ietf-03 17.4. Changes from draft-ietf-02 to draft-ietf-03
o Added request to enable cameras o Added request to enable cameras
o Improved examples and XML schema o Improved examples and XML schema
o Clarifications and wording improvements o Clarifications and wording improvements
17.4. Changes from draft-ietf-01 to draft-ietf-02 17.5. Changes from draft-ietf-01 to draft-ietf-02
o Added clarifying text reinforcing that the data exchange is for o Added clarifying text reinforcing that the data exchange is for
small blocks of data infrequently transmitted small blocks of data infrequently transmitted
o Clarified that dynamic media is conveyed using SIP re-INVITE to o Clarified that dynamic media is conveyed using SIP re-INVITE to
establish a one-way media stream establish a one-way media stream
o Clarified that the scope is the needs of eCall within the SIP o Clarified that the scope is the needs of eCall within the SIP
emergency call environment emergency call environment
o Added informative statement that the document may be suitable for o Added informative statement that the document may be suitable for
reuse by other ACN systems reuse by other ACN systems
o Clarified that normative language for the control block applies to o Clarified that normative language for the control block applies to
both IVS and PSAP both IVS and PSAP
o Removed 'ref', 'supported-mime', and <media> elements o Removed 'ref', 'supported-mime', and <media> elements
o Minor wording improvements and clarifications o Minor wording improvements and clarifications
17.5. Changes from draft-ietf-00 to draft-ietf-01 17.6. Changes from draft-ietf-00 to draft-ietf-01
o Added further discussion of test calls o Added further discussion of test calls
o Added further clarification to the document scope o Added further clarification to the document scope
o Mentioned that multi-region vehicles may need to support other o Mentioned that multi-region vehicles may need to support other
crash notification specifications in addition to eCall crash notification specifications in addition to eCall
o Added details of the eCall metadata and control functionality o Added details of the eCall metadata and control functionality
o Added IANA registration for the MIME content type for the eCall o Added IANA registration for the MIME content type for the eCall
control object control object
o Added IANA registries for protocol elements and tokens used in the o Added IANA registries for protocol elements and tokens used in the
eCall control object eCall control object
o Minor wording improvements and clarifications o Minor wording improvements and clarifications
17.6. Changes from draft-gellens-03 to draft-ietf-00 17.7. Changes from draft-gellens-03 to draft-ietf-00
o Renamed from draft-gellens- to draft-ietf-. o Renamed from draft-gellens- to draft-ietf-.
o Added mention of and reference to ETSI TR "Mobile Standards Group o Added mention of and reference to ETSI TR "Mobile Standards Group
(MSG); eCall for VoIP" (MSG); eCall for VoIP"
o Added text to Introduction regarding migration/co-existence being o Added text to Introduction regarding migration/co-existence being
out of scope out of scope
o Added mention in Security Considerations that even if the network- o Added mention in Security Considerations that even if the network-
supplied location is just the cell site, this can be useful as a supplied location is just the cell site, this can be useful as a
sanity check on the IVS-supplied location sanity check on the IVS-supplied location
o Minor wording improvements and clarifications o Minor wording improvements and clarifications
17.7. Changes from draft-gellens-02 to -03 17.8. Changes from draft-gellens-02 to -03
o Clarifications and editorial improvements. o Clarifications and editorial improvements.
17.8. Changes from draft-gellens-01 to -02 17.9. Changes from draft-gellens-01 to -02
o Minor wording improvements o Minor wording improvements
o Removed ".automatic" and ".manual" from o Removed ".automatic" and ".manual" from
"urn:service:test.sos.ecall" registration and discussion text. "urn:service:test.sos.ecall" registration and discussion text.
17.9. Changes from draft-gellens-00 to -01 17.10. Changes from draft-gellens-00 to -01
o Now using 'EmergencyCallData' for purpose parameter values and o Now using 'EmergencyCallData' for purpose parameter values and
MIME subtypes, in accordance with changes to MIME subtypes, in accordance with changes to
[I-D.ietf-ecrit-additional-data] [I-D.ietf-ecrit-additional-data]
o Added reference to RFC 6443 o Added reference to RFC 6443
o Fixed bug that caused Figure captions to not appear o Fixed bug that caused Figure captions to not appear
18. References 18. References
18.1. Normative References 18.1. Normative References
[EN_16072] [EN_16072]
CEN, , "Intelligent transport systems - eSafety - Pan- CEN, , "Intelligent transport systems - eSafety - Pan-
European eCall operating requirements", December 2011. European eCall operating requirements", December 2011.
[I-D.ietf-ecrit-additional-data] [I-D.ietf-ecrit-additional-data]
Gellens, R., Rosen, B., Tschofenig, H., Marshall, R., and Gellens, R., Rosen, B., Tschofenig, H., Marshall, R., and
J. Winterbottom, "Additional Data Related to an Emergency J. Winterbottom, "Additional Data Related to an Emergency
Call", draft-ietf-ecrit-additional-data-37 (work in Call", draft-ietf-ecrit-additional-data-37 (work in
 End of changes. 26 change blocks. 
91 lines changed or deleted 73 lines changed or added

This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.48. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/