| < draft-ietf-genarea-datatracker-iana-rfced-extns-03.txt | draft-ietf-genarea-datatracker-iana-rfced-extns-04.txt > | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) S. Ginoza | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) S. Ginoza | |||
| Internet-Draft AMS | Internet-Draft AMS | |||
| Intended Status: Informational M. Cotton | Intended Status: Informational M. Cotton | |||
| Expires: December 16, 2011 ICANN | Expires: December 20, 2011 ICANN | |||
| A. Morris | A. Morris | |||
| AMS | AMS | |||
| June 16, 2011 | June 20, 2011 | |||
| Datatracker Extensions to | Datatracker Extensions to | |||
| Include IANA and RFC Editor Processing Information | Include IANA and RFC Editor Processing Information | |||
| <draft-ietf-genarea-datatracker-iana-rfced-extns-03.txt> | <draft-ietf-genarea-datatracker-iana-rfced-extns-04.txt> | |||
| Abstract | Abstract | |||
| This document captures the requirements for integrating IANA and RFC | This document captures the requirements for integrating IANA and RFC | |||
| Editor state information into the Datatracker to provide the | Editor state information into the Datatracker to provide the | |||
| community with a unified tool to track the status of their document | community with a unified tool to track the status of their document | |||
| as it progresses from Internet-Draft (I-D) version -00 to RFC. | as it progresses from Internet-Draft (I-D) version -00 to RFC. | |||
| Extending the Datatracker to hold document data from I-D version -00 | Extending the Datatracker to hold document data from I-D version -00 | |||
| to RFC allows for increased automation between the Datatracker, IANA, | to RFC allows for increased automation between the Datatracker, IANA, | |||
| and RFC Editor, thus reducing manual labor, processing errors, and | and RFC Editor, thus reducing manual labor, processing errors, and | |||
| skipping to change at page 3, line 18 ¶ | skipping to change at page 3, line 18 ¶ | |||
| Additionally, this document lists the processes between the IANA, RFC | Additionally, this document lists the processes between the IANA, RFC | |||
| Editor, and Secretariat (via the Datatracker) that should be | Editor, and Secretariat (via the Datatracker) that should be | |||
| automated for accuracy and timely processing. While this document | automated for accuracy and timely processing. While this document | |||
| includes some details of the IANA, RFC Editor, and Secretariat | includes some details of the IANA, RFC Editor, and Secretariat | |||
| process, this document does not define any of the processes. The | process, this document does not define any of the processes. The | |||
| processes are continually reviewed for process optimization and need | processes are continually reviewed for process optimization and need | |||
| to remain flexible to adapt to new changes in policy and environment. | to remain flexible to adapt to new changes in policy and environment. | |||
| Processes are defined and set by each of the entities respectively. | Processes are defined and set by each of the entities respectively. | |||
| NOTE: The IANA and RFC Editor are independent functions and they | The IANA and RFC Editor are functions independent of the IETF. When | |||
| retain ownership of their data, state names, and tracking | an Internet-Draft enters the IANA queue, IANA retains ownership of | |||
| systems once a document enters their queues. This document | its own data, state names, and tracking systems. Similarly, when an | |||
| discusses how the data from the IANA and RFC Editor queues | Internet-Draft enters the RFC Editor's queue, the RFC Editor retains | |||
| can be better reflected in the Datatracker for ease of the | ownership of its own data, state names, and tracking systems. This | |||
| community. If there is any discrepancy, the IANA and RFC | document discusses how the data from the IANA and RFC Editor queues | |||
| Editor data are definitive (post approval for publication). | can be better reflected in the Datatracker to help inform the IETF | |||
| Prior to a document being approved for publication, the | community what the state of a document is throughout its lifetime. | |||
| Datatracker is definitive for tracking IANA status | ||||
| information. The Datatracker should only allow for states | ||||
| in which it is definitive to be administratively edited. | ||||
| RFC Editor data is not editable via the Datatracker. The | Prior to when an Internet-Draft is approved for publication as an | |||
| only way for RFC Editor substates to be updated in the | RFC, the Datatracker is the definitive source for tracking IANA | |||
| Datatracker is to retrieve data from the definitive RFC | status information, and the IANA data is editable (by IANA and the | |||
| Editor database. | Secretariat) in the Datatracker. After an Internet-Draft is approved | |||
| for publication as an RFC, the IANA tracking system becomes the | ||||
| definitive source for tracking IANA status information, and the data | ||||
| can no longer be edited in the Datatracker. At that point, the data | ||||
| in the Datatracker is only a reflection of the data in the IANA | ||||
| tracking system. If there is a discrepancy at between the two after | ||||
| this point, the data in the IANA tracking system is assumed to be | ||||
| correct. | ||||
| Post approval, IANA data is not editable via the | The RFC Editor's tracking system is always the definitive source for | |||
| Datatracker. The only way for IANA substates to be updated | tracking RFC Editor status of a document. RFC Editor data is not | |||
| in the Datatracker is to retrieve data from the definitive | editable via the Datatracker. The information in the Datatracker is | |||
| IANA database. | always a reflection of the information in the RFC Editor's tracking | |||
| system. | ||||
| 2. Integration of Data between the IANA and Datatracker | 2. Integration of Data between the IANA and Datatracker | |||
| 2.1. IANA Information To Be Added to the Datatracker | 2.1. IANA Information To Be Added to the Datatracker | |||
| Currently, IANA reviews and touches documents at 4 different stages | Currently, IANA reviews and touches documents at 4 different stages | |||
| in the process from I-D to RFC for IETF stream documents: IETF Last | in the process from I-D to RFC for IETF stream documents: IETF Last | |||
| Call, IESG Review, Document Approval (for publication), and RFC | Call, IESG Review, Document Approval (for publication), and RFC | |||
| Publication. Most of these state changes and issues are not captured | Publication. Most of these state changes and issues are not captured | |||
| in the Datatracker. For the IRTF and INDEPENDENT streams, the IANA | in the Datatracker. For the IRTF and INDEPENDENT streams, the IANA | |||
| End of changes. 6 change blocks. | ||||
| 22 lines changed or deleted | 27 lines changed or added | |||
This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.48. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/ | ||||