| < draft-ietf-ippm-lmap-path-00.txt | draft-ietf-ippm-lmap-path-01.txt > | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Network Working Group M. Bagnulo | Network Working Group M. Bagnulo | |||
| Internet-Draft UC3M | Internet-Draft UC3M | |||
| Intended status: Standards Track T. Burbridge | Intended status: Standards Track T. Burbridge | |||
| Expires: January 09, 2014 BT | Expires: March 28, 2014 BT | |||
| S. Crawford | S. Crawford | |||
| SamKnows | SamKnows | |||
| P. Eardley | P. Eardley | |||
| BT | BT | |||
| A. Morton | A. Morton | |||
| AT&T Labs | AT&T Labs | |||
| July 08, 2013 | September 24, 2013 | |||
| A Reference Path and Measurement Points for LMAP | A Reference Path and Measurement Points for LMAP | |||
| draft-ietf-ippm-lmap-path-00 | draft-ietf-ippm-lmap-path-01 | |||
| Abstract | Abstract | |||
| This document defines a reference path for Large-scale Measurement of | This document defines a reference path for Large-scale Measurement of | |||
| Broadband Access Performance (LMAP) and measurement points for | Broadband Access Performance (LMAP) and measurement points for | |||
| commonly used performance metrics. | commonly used performance metrics. | |||
| Status of This Memo | Status of This Memo | |||
| This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the | This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the | |||
| skipping to change at page 1, line 39 ¶ | skipping to change at page 1, line 39 ¶ | |||
| Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering | Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering | |||
| Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute | Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute | |||
| working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- | working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- | |||
| Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. | Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. | |||
| Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months | Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months | |||
| and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any | and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any | |||
| time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference | time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference | |||
| material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." | material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." | |||
| This Internet-Draft will expire on January 09, 2014. | This Internet-Draft will expire on March 28, 2014. | |||
| Copyright Notice | Copyright Notice | |||
| Copyright (c) 2013 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the | Copyright (c) 2013 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the | |||
| document authors. All rights reserved. | document authors. All rights reserved. | |||
| This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal | This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal | |||
| Provisions Relating to IETF Documents | Provisions Relating to IETF Documents | |||
| (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of | (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of | |||
| publication of this document. Please review these documents | publication of this document. Please review these documents | |||
| skipping to change at page 2, line 23 ¶ | skipping to change at page 2, line 23 ¶ | |||
| 2. Purpose and Scope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 | 2. Purpose and Scope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 | |||
| 3. Terms and Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 | 3. Terms and Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 | |||
| 3.1. Reference Path . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 | 3.1. Reference Path . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 | |||
| 3.2. Subscriber . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 | 3.2. Subscriber . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 | |||
| 3.3. Dedicated Component (Links or Nodes) . . . . . . . . . . 4 | 3.3. Dedicated Component (Links or Nodes) . . . . . . . . . . 4 | |||
| 3.4. Shared Component (Links or Nodes) . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 | 3.4. Shared Component (Links or Nodes) . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 | |||
| 3.5. Resource Transition Point . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 | 3.5. Resource Transition Point . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 | |||
| 4. Reference Path . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 | 4. Reference Path . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 | |||
| 5. Measurement Points . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 | 5. Measurement Points . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 | |||
| 6. Translation Between Ref. Path and Tech. X . . . . . . . . . . 7 | 6. Translation Between Ref. Path and Tech. X . . . . . . . . . . 7 | |||
| 7. Security considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 | 7. Example Resource Transition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 | |||
| 8. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 | 8. Security considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 | |||
| 9. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 | 9. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 | |||
| 10. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 | 10. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 | |||
| 10.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 | 11. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 | |||
| 10.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 | 11.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 | |||
| Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 | 11.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 | |||
| Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 | ||||
| 1. Introduction | 1. Introduction | |||
| This document defines a reference path for Large-scale Measurement of | This document defines a reference path for Large-scale Measurement of | |||
| Broadband Access Performance (LMAP). The series of IP Performance | Broadband Access Performance (LMAP). The series of IP Performance | |||
| Metrics (IPPM) RFCs have developed terms that are generally useful | Metrics (IPPM) RFCs have developed terms that are generally useful | |||
| for path description (section 5 of [RFC2330]). There are a limited | for path description (section 5 of [RFC2330]). There are a limited | |||
| number of additional terms needing definition here, and they will be | number of additional terms needing definition here, and they will be | |||
| defined in this memo. | defined in this memo. | |||
| skipping to change at page 4, line 4 ¶ | skipping to change at page 4, line 4 ¶ | |||
| A reference path is a serial combination of routers, switches, links, | A reference path is a serial combination of routers, switches, links, | |||
| radios, and processing elements that comprise all the network | radios, and processing elements that comprise all the network | |||
| elements traversed by each packet between the source and destination | elements traversed by each packet between the source and destination | |||
| hosts. The reference path is intended to be equally applicable to | hosts. The reference path is intended to be equally applicable to | |||
| all networking technologies, therefore the components are generically | all networking technologies, therefore the components are generically | |||
| defined, but their functions should have a clear counterpart or be | defined, but their functions should have a clear counterpart or be | |||
| obviously omitted in any network technology. | obviously omitted in any network technology. | |||
| 3.2. Subscriber | 3.2. Subscriber | |||
| An entity possessing one or more hosts participating in an Internet | An entity (associated with one or more users) that is engaged in a | |||
| access service. | subscription with a service provider. The subscriber is allowed to | |||
| subscribe and un-subscribe services, and to register a user or a list | ||||
| of users authorized to enjoy these services. [Q1741] Both the | ||||
| subscriber and service provider are allowed to set the limits | ||||
| relative to the use that associated users make of subscribed | ||||
| services. | ||||
| 3.3. Dedicated Component (Links or Nodes) | 3.3. Dedicated Component (Links or Nodes) | |||
| All resources of a Dedicated component (typically a link or node on | All resources of a Dedicated component (typically a link or node on | |||
| the Reference Path) are allocated to serving the traffic of an | the Reference Path) are allocated to serving the traffic of an | |||
| individual Subscriber. Resources include transmission time-slots, | individual Subscriber. Resources include transmission time-slots, | |||
| queue space, processing for encapsulation and address/port | queue space, processing for encapsulation and address/port | |||
| translation, and others. A Dedicated component can affect the | translation, and others. A Dedicated component can affect the | |||
| performance of the Reference Path, or the performance of any sub-path | performance of the Reference Path, or the performance of any sub-path | |||
| where the component is involved. | where the component is involved. | |||
| skipping to change at page 9, line 9 ¶ | skipping to change at page 9, line 21 ¶ | |||
| follows: | follows: | |||
| Subsc. -- Private -- Private -- Access -- Intra IP -- GRA -- Transit | Subsc. -- Private -- Private -- Access -- Intra IP -- GRA -- Transit | |||
| device Net #1 Net #2 Demarc. Access GW GRA GW | device Net #1 Net #2 Demarc. Access GW GRA GW | |||
| mp000 mp100 mp150 mp190 mp200 | mp000 mp100 mp150 mp190 mp200 | |||
| |--UE--|------------CPE/NAT--------|------|-CGN-|------| | |--UE--|------------CPE/NAT--------|------|-CGN-|------| | |||
| |---Access Network--| | |---Access Network--| | |||
| GRA = Globally Routable Address, GW = Gateway | GRA = Globally Routable Address, GW = Gateway | |||
| 7. Security considerations | 7. Example Resource Transition | |||
| This section gives an example of Shared and Dedicated portions with | ||||
| the reference path. This example shows two Resource Transition | ||||
| Points. | ||||
| Consider the case where: | ||||
| o The CPE is wired Residential GW and modem (Private Net#2) | ||||
| connected to a WiFi access point (Private Net#1). The Subscriber | ||||
| device (UE) attachs to the CPE though the WiFi access. | ||||
| o The Wi-Fi subnetwork (Private Net#1) shares unliscened radio | ||||
| channel resources with other W-Fi access networks (and potentially | ||||
| other sources of interference), thus this is a Shared portion of | ||||
| the path. | ||||
| o The wired subnetwork (Private Net#2) and a portion of the Access | ||||
| Network are Dedicated Resources (for a single Subscriber), thus | ||||
| there is a Resource Transition Point between (Private Net#1) and | ||||
| (Private Net#2). | ||||
| o Subscriber traffic shares common resources with other subscribers | ||||
| upon reaching the Carrier Grade NAT (CGN), thus there is a | ||||
| Resource Transition Point and further network components are | ||||
| designated as Shared Resources. | ||||
| We believe is becoming a fairly common configuration in parts of the | ||||
| world. | ||||
| This case would map into the defined reference measurement points as | ||||
| follows: | ||||
| Subsc. -- Private -- Private -- Access -- Intra IP -- GRA -- Transit | ||||
| device Net #1 Net #2 Demarc. Access GW GRA GW | ||||
| mp000 mp100 mp150 mp190 mp200 | ||||
| |--UE--|------------CPE/NAT--------|------|-CGN-|------| | ||||
| Wi-Fi wired |---Access Network--| | ||||
| |-Shared--|RT|------Dedicated------| RT |-----Shared------... | ||||
| GRA = Globally Routable Address, GW = Gateway, RT = Resource | ||||
| Transition Point | ||||
| 8. Security considerations | ||||
| Specification of a Reference Path and identification of measurement | Specification of a Reference Path and identification of measurement | |||
| points on the path represent agreements among interested parties, and | points on the path represent agreements among interested parties, and | |||
| they present no threat to the readers of this memo or to the Internet | they present no threat to the readers of this memo or to the Internet | |||
| itself. | itself. | |||
| 8. IANA Considerations | 9. IANA Considerations | |||
| TBD | TBD | |||
| 9. Acknowledgements | 10. Acknowledgements | |||
| Thanks to Matt Mathis for review and comments. | Thanks to Matt Mathis for review and comments. | |||
| 10. References | 11. References | |||
| 10.1. Normative References | 11.1. Normative References | |||
| [RFC2330] Paxson, V., Almes, G., Mahdavi, J., and M. Mathis, | [RFC2330] Paxson, V., Almes, G., Mahdavi, J., and M. Mathis, | |||
| "Framework for IP Performance Metrics", RFC 2330, May | "Framework for IP Performance Metrics", RFC 2330, May | |||
| 1998. | 1998. | |||
| [RFC3432] Raisanen, V., Grotefeld, G., and A. Morton, "Network | [RFC3432] Raisanen, V., Grotefeld, G., and A. Morton, "Network | |||
| performance measurement with periodic streams", RFC 3432, | performance measurement with periodic streams", RFC 3432, | |||
| November 2002. | November 2002. | |||
| [RFC2681] Almes, G., Kalidindi, S., and M. Zekauskas, "A Round-trip | [RFC2681] Almes, G., Kalidindi, S., and M. Zekauskas, "A Round-trip | |||
| skipping to change at page 10, line 18 ¶ | skipping to change at page 11, line 28 ¶ | |||
| [RFC3393] Demichelis, C. and P. Chimento, "IP Packet Delay Variation | [RFC3393] Demichelis, C. and P. Chimento, "IP Packet Delay Variation | |||
| Metric for IP Performance Metrics (IPPM)", RFC 3393, | Metric for IP Performance Metrics (IPPM)", RFC 3393, | |||
| November 2002. | November 2002. | |||
| [RFC5481] Morton, A. and B. Claise, "Packet Delay Variation | [RFC5481] Morton, A. and B. Claise, "Packet Delay Variation | |||
| Applicability Statement", RFC 5481, March 2009. | Applicability Statement", RFC 5481, March 2009. | |||
| [RFC5835] Morton, A. and S. Van den Berghe, "Framework for Metric | [RFC5835] Morton, A. and S. Van den Berghe, "Framework for Metric | |||
| Composition", RFC 5835, April 2010. | Composition", RFC 5835, April 2010. | |||
| 10.2. Informative References | 11.2. Informative References | |||
| [RFC4148] Stephan, E., "IP Performance Metrics (IPPM) Metrics | [RFC4148] Stephan, E., "IP Performance Metrics (IPPM) Metrics | |||
| Registry", BCP 108, RFC 4148, August 2005. | Registry", BCP 108, RFC 4148, August 2005. | |||
| [RFC6248] Morton, A., "RFC 4148 and the IP Performance Metrics | [RFC6248] Morton, A., "RFC 4148 and the IP Performance Metrics | |||
| (IPPM) Registry of Metrics Are Obsolete", RFC 6248, April | (IPPM) Registry of Metrics Are Obsolete", RFC 6248, April | |||
| 2011. | 2011. | |||
| [SK] Crawford, Sam., "Test Methodology White Paper", SamKnows | [SK] Crawford, Sam., "Test Methodology White Paper", SamKnows | |||
| Whitebox Briefing Note | Whitebox Briefing Note | |||
| http://www.samknows.com/broadband/index.php, July 2011. | http://www.samknows.com/broadband/index.php, July 2011. | |||
| Authors' Addresses | [Q1741] Q.1741.7, ., "IMT-2000 references to Release 9 of GSM- | |||
| evolved UMTS core network", | ||||
| http://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-Q.1741.7/en, November 2011. | ||||
| Authors' Addresses | ||||
| Marcelo Bagnulo | Marcelo Bagnulo | |||
| Universidad Carlos III de Madrid | Universidad Carlos III de Madrid | |||
| Av. Universidad 30 | Av. Universidad 30 | |||
| Leganes, Madrid 28911 | Leganes, Madrid 28911 | |||
| SPAIN | SPAIN | |||
| Phone: 34 91 6249500 | Phone: 34 91 6249500 | |||
| Email: marcelo@it.uc3m.es | Email: marcelo@it.uc3m.es | |||
| URI: http://www.it.uc3m.es | URI: http://www.it.uc3m.es | |||
| End of changes. 14 change blocks. | ||||
| 20 lines changed or deleted | 73 lines changed or added | |||
This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.48. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/ | ||||