| < draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd-03.txt | draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd-04.txt > | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IS-IS Working Group J. Tantsura | IS-IS Working Group J. Tantsura | |||
| Internet-Draft Individual | Internet-Draft Individual | |||
| Intended status: Standards Track U. Chunduri | Intended status: Standards Track U. Chunduri | |||
| Expires: September 29, 2017 Huawei Technologies | Expires: December 6, 2017 Huawei Technologies | |||
| S. Aldrin | S. Aldrin | |||
| Google, Inc | Google, Inc | |||
| L. Ginsberg | L. Ginsberg | |||
| Cisco Systems | Cisco Systems | |||
| March 28, 2017 | June 04, 2017 | |||
| Signaling MSD (Maximum SID Depth) using IS-IS | Signaling MSD (Maximum SID Depth) using IS-IS | |||
| draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd-03 | draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd-04 | |||
| Abstract | Abstract | |||
| This document proposes a way to signal Maximum SID Depth (MSD) | This document proposes a way to signal Maximum SID Depth (MSD) | |||
| supported by a node at node and/or link granularity by an IS-IS | supported by a node at node and/or link granularity by an IS-IS | |||
| Router. In a Segment Routing (SR) enabled network a centralized | Router. In a Segment Routing (SR) enabled network a centralized | |||
| controller that programs SR tunnels needs to know the MSD supported | controller that programs SR tunnels needs to know the MSD supported | |||
| by the head-end at node and/or link granularity to push the SID stack | by the head-end at node and/or link granularity to push the SID stack | |||
| of an appropriate depth. MSD is relevant to the head-end of a SR | of an appropriate depth. MSD is relevant to the head-end of a SR | |||
| tunnel or Binding-SID anchor node where Binding-SID expansions might | tunnel or Binding-SID anchor node where Binding-SID expansions might | |||
| skipping to change at page 1, line 42 ¶ | skipping to change at page 1, line 42 ¶ | |||
| Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering | Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering | |||
| Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute | Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute | |||
| working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- | working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- | |||
| Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. | Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. | |||
| Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months | Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months | |||
| and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any | and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any | |||
| time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference | time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference | |||
| material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." | material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." | |||
| This Internet-Draft will expire on September 29, 2017. | This Internet-Draft will expire on December 6, 2017. | |||
| Copyright Notice | Copyright Notice | |||
| Copyright (c) 2017 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the | Copyright (c) 2017 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the | |||
| document authors. All rights reserved. | document authors. All rights reserved. | |||
| This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal | This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal | |||
| Provisions Relating to IETF Documents | Provisions Relating to IETF Documents | |||
| (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of | (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of | |||
| publication of this document. Please review these documents | publication of this document. Please review these documents | |||
| skipping to change at page 3, line 19 ¶ | skipping to change at page 3, line 19 ¶ | |||
| [I-D.ietf-isis-mpls-elc] defines Readable Label Depth Capability | [I-D.ietf-isis-mpls-elc] defines Readable Label Depth Capability | |||
| (RLDC) that is used by a head-end to insert Entropy Label (EL) at | (RLDC) that is used by a head-end to insert Entropy Label (EL) at | |||
| appropriate depth, so it could be read by transit nodes. MSD in | appropriate depth, so it could be read by transit nodes. MSD in | |||
| contrary signals ability to push SID's stack of a particular depth. | contrary signals ability to push SID's stack of a particular depth. | |||
| MSD of type 1 (IANA Registry), called Base MSD, is used to signal the | MSD of type 1 (IANA Registry), called Base MSD, is used to signal the | |||
| total number of SIDs a node is capable of imposing, to be used by a | total number of SIDs a node is capable of imposing, to be used by a | |||
| path computation element/controller. In case, there are additional | path computation element/controller. In case, there are additional | |||
| labels (e.g. service) that are to be pushed to the stack - this would | labels (e.g. service) that are to be pushed to the stack - this would | |||
| be signaled with an another MSD type (TBD), MSD SHOULD be adjusted to | be signaled with an another MSD type (TBD), no adjustment to the Base | |||
| reflect that. In the future, new MSD types could be defined to | MSD should be made. In the future, new MSD types could be defined to | |||
| signal additional capabilities: entropy labels, labels that can be | signal additional capabilities: entropy labels, labels that can be | |||
| pushed thru recirculation, or another dataplane e.g IPv6. | pushed thru recirculation, or another dataplane e.g IPv6. | |||
| 1.1. Conventions used in this document | 1.1. Conventions used in this document | |||
| 1.1.1. Terminology | 1.1.1. Terminology | |||
| BGP-LS: Distribution of Link-State and TE Information using Border | BGP-LS: Distribution of Link-State and TE Information using Border | |||
| Gateway Protocol | Gateway Protocol | |||
| skipping to change at page 6, line 5 ¶ | skipping to change at page 6, line 5 ¶ | |||
| Also for link MSD, we request IANA to allocate new sub-TLV codes as | Also for link MSD, we request IANA to allocate new sub-TLV codes as | |||
| defined in Section 4 from Sub-TLVs for TLVs 22, 23, 141, 222 and 223 | defined in Section 4 from Sub-TLVs for TLVs 22, 23, 141, 222 and 223 | |||
| registry. | registry. | |||
| Type: 15 (suggested - to be assigned by IANA) | Type: 15 (suggested - to be assigned by IANA) | |||
| Description: Link MSD | Description: Link MSD | |||
| Per TLV information where LINK MSD sub-TLV can be part of: | Per TLV information where LINK MSD sub-TLV can be part of: | |||
| TLV 22 23 141 222 223 | TLV 22 23 25 141 222 223 | |||
| ---------------------- | -------------------- | |||
| y y y y y | y y y y y y | |||
| Figure 3: TLVs where LINK MSD Sub-TLV can be present | Figure 3: TLVs where LINK MSD Sub-TLV can be present | |||
| This document requests the creation of a new IANA managed registry to | This document requests the creation of a new IANA managed registry to | |||
| identify MSD types as proposed in Section 3, Section 4. The | identify MSD types as proposed in Section 3, Section 4. The | |||
| registration procedure is "Expert Review" as defined in [RFC5226]. | registration procedure is "Expert Review" as defined in [RFC5226]. | |||
| Suggested registry name is "MSD Sub-types". Types are an unsigned 8 | Suggested registry name is "MSD Sub-types". Types are an unsigned 8 | |||
| bit number. The following values are defined by this document | bit number. The following values are defined by this document | |||
| Value Name Reference | Value Name Reference | |||
| skipping to change at page 7, line 29 ¶ | skipping to change at page 7, line 29 ¶ | |||
| 10.2. Informative References | 10.2. Informative References | |||
| [I-D.ietf-isis-mpls-elc] | [I-D.ietf-isis-mpls-elc] | |||
| Xu, X., Kini, S., Sivabalan, S., Filsfils, C., and S. | Xu, X., Kini, S., Sivabalan, S., Filsfils, C., and S. | |||
| Litkowski, "Signaling Entropy Label Capability Using IS- | Litkowski, "Signaling Entropy Label Capability Using IS- | |||
| IS", draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-02 (work in progress), | IS", draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-02 (work in progress), | |||
| October 2016. | October 2016. | |||
| [I-D.ietf-pce-segment-routing] | [I-D.ietf-pce-segment-routing] | |||
| Sivabalan, S., Medved, J., Filsfils, C., Crabbe, E., | Sivabalan, S., Filsfils, C., Tantsura, J., Henderickx, W., | |||
| Raszuk, R., Lopez, V., Tantsura, J., Henderickx, W., and | and J. Hardwick, "PCEP Extensions for Segment Routing", | |||
| J. Hardwick, "PCEP Extensions for Segment Routing", draft- | draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-09 (work in progress), | |||
| ietf-pce-segment-routing-08 (work in progress), October | April 2017. | |||
| 2016. | ||||
| [I-D.tantsura-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-msd] | [I-D.tantsura-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-msd] | |||
| Tantsura, J., Chunduri, U., Mirsky, G., and S. Sivabalan, | Tantsura, J., Chunduri, U., Mirsky, G., and S. Sivabalan, | |||
| "Signaling Maximum SID Depth using Border Gateway Protocol | "Signaling Maximum SID Depth using Border Gateway Protocol | |||
| Link-State", draft-tantsura-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing- | Link-State", draft-tantsura-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing- | |||
| msd-03 (work in progress), March 2017. | msd-04 (work in progress), March 2017. | |||
| [RFC1195] Callon, R., "Use of OSI IS-IS for routing in TCP/IP and | [RFC1195] Callon, R., "Use of OSI IS-IS for routing in TCP/IP and | |||
| dual environments", RFC 1195, DOI 10.17487/RFC1195, | dual environments", RFC 1195, DOI 10.17487/RFC1195, | |||
| December 1990, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1195>. | December 1990, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1195>. | |||
| [RFC5120] Przygienda, T., Shen, N., and N. Sheth, "M-ISIS: Multi | [RFC5120] Przygienda, T., Shen, N., and N. Sheth, "M-ISIS: Multi | |||
| Topology (MT) Routing in Intermediate System to | Topology (MT) Routing in Intermediate System to | |||
| Intermediate Systems (IS-ISs)", RFC 5120, | Intermediate Systems (IS-ISs)", RFC 5120, | |||
| DOI 10.17487/RFC5120, February 2008, | DOI 10.17487/RFC5120, February 2008, | |||
| <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5120>. | <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5120>. | |||
| End of changes. 8 change blocks. | ||||
| 15 lines changed or deleted | 14 lines changed or added | |||
This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.48. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/ | ||||