< draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd-03.txt   draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd-04.txt >
IS-IS Working Group J. Tantsura IS-IS Working Group J. Tantsura
Internet-Draft Individual Internet-Draft Individual
Intended status: Standards Track U. Chunduri Intended status: Standards Track U. Chunduri
Expires: September 29, 2017 Huawei Technologies Expires: December 6, 2017 Huawei Technologies
S. Aldrin S. Aldrin
Google, Inc Google, Inc
L. Ginsberg L. Ginsberg
Cisco Systems Cisco Systems
March 28, 2017 June 04, 2017
Signaling MSD (Maximum SID Depth) using IS-IS Signaling MSD (Maximum SID Depth) using IS-IS
draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd-03 draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd-04
Abstract Abstract
This document proposes a way to signal Maximum SID Depth (MSD) This document proposes a way to signal Maximum SID Depth (MSD)
supported by a node at node and/or link granularity by an IS-IS supported by a node at node and/or link granularity by an IS-IS
Router. In a Segment Routing (SR) enabled network a centralized Router. In a Segment Routing (SR) enabled network a centralized
controller that programs SR tunnels needs to know the MSD supported controller that programs SR tunnels needs to know the MSD supported
by the head-end at node and/or link granularity to push the SID stack by the head-end at node and/or link granularity to push the SID stack
of an appropriate depth. MSD is relevant to the head-end of a SR of an appropriate depth. MSD is relevant to the head-end of a SR
tunnel or Binding-SID anchor node where Binding-SID expansions might tunnel or Binding-SID anchor node where Binding-SID expansions might
skipping to change at page 1, line 42 skipping to change at page 1, line 42
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on September 29, 2017. This Internet-Draft will expire on December 6, 2017.
Copyright Notice Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2017 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the Copyright (c) 2017 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved. document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents publication of this document. Please review these documents
skipping to change at page 3, line 19 skipping to change at page 3, line 19
[I-D.ietf-isis-mpls-elc] defines Readable Label Depth Capability [I-D.ietf-isis-mpls-elc] defines Readable Label Depth Capability
(RLDC) that is used by a head-end to insert Entropy Label (EL) at (RLDC) that is used by a head-end to insert Entropy Label (EL) at
appropriate depth, so it could be read by transit nodes. MSD in appropriate depth, so it could be read by transit nodes. MSD in
contrary signals ability to push SID's stack of a particular depth. contrary signals ability to push SID's stack of a particular depth.
MSD of type 1 (IANA Registry), called Base MSD, is used to signal the MSD of type 1 (IANA Registry), called Base MSD, is used to signal the
total number of SIDs a node is capable of imposing, to be used by a total number of SIDs a node is capable of imposing, to be used by a
path computation element/controller. In case, there are additional path computation element/controller. In case, there are additional
labels (e.g. service) that are to be pushed to the stack - this would labels (e.g. service) that are to be pushed to the stack - this would
be signaled with an another MSD type (TBD), MSD SHOULD be adjusted to be signaled with an another MSD type (TBD), no adjustment to the Base
reflect that. In the future, new MSD types could be defined to MSD should be made. In the future, new MSD types could be defined to
signal additional capabilities: entropy labels, labels that can be signal additional capabilities: entropy labels, labels that can be
pushed thru recirculation, or another dataplane e.g IPv6. pushed thru recirculation, or another dataplane e.g IPv6.
1.1. Conventions used in this document 1.1. Conventions used in this document
1.1.1. Terminology 1.1.1. Terminology
BGP-LS: Distribution of Link-State and TE Information using Border BGP-LS: Distribution of Link-State and TE Information using Border
Gateway Protocol Gateway Protocol
skipping to change at page 6, line 5 skipping to change at page 6, line 5
Also for link MSD, we request IANA to allocate new sub-TLV codes as Also for link MSD, we request IANA to allocate new sub-TLV codes as
defined in Section 4 from Sub-TLVs for TLVs 22, 23, 141, 222 and 223 defined in Section 4 from Sub-TLVs for TLVs 22, 23, 141, 222 and 223
registry. registry.
Type: 15 (suggested - to be assigned by IANA) Type: 15 (suggested - to be assigned by IANA)
Description: Link MSD Description: Link MSD
Per TLV information where LINK MSD sub-TLV can be part of: Per TLV information where LINK MSD sub-TLV can be part of:
TLV 22 23 141 222 223 TLV 22 23 25 141 222 223
---------------------- --------------------
y y y y y y y y y y y
Figure 3: TLVs where LINK MSD Sub-TLV can be present Figure 3: TLVs where LINK MSD Sub-TLV can be present
This document requests the creation of a new IANA managed registry to This document requests the creation of a new IANA managed registry to
identify MSD types as proposed in Section 3, Section 4. The identify MSD types as proposed in Section 3, Section 4. The
registration procedure is "Expert Review" as defined in [RFC5226]. registration procedure is "Expert Review" as defined in [RFC5226].
Suggested registry name is "MSD Sub-types". Types are an unsigned 8 Suggested registry name is "MSD Sub-types". Types are an unsigned 8
bit number. The following values are defined by this document bit number. The following values are defined by this document
Value Name Reference Value Name Reference
skipping to change at page 7, line 29 skipping to change at page 7, line 29
10.2. Informative References 10.2. Informative References
[I-D.ietf-isis-mpls-elc] [I-D.ietf-isis-mpls-elc]
Xu, X., Kini, S., Sivabalan, S., Filsfils, C., and S. Xu, X., Kini, S., Sivabalan, S., Filsfils, C., and S.
Litkowski, "Signaling Entropy Label Capability Using IS- Litkowski, "Signaling Entropy Label Capability Using IS-
IS", draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-02 (work in progress), IS", draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-02 (work in progress),
October 2016. October 2016.
[I-D.ietf-pce-segment-routing] [I-D.ietf-pce-segment-routing]
Sivabalan, S., Medved, J., Filsfils, C., Crabbe, E., Sivabalan, S., Filsfils, C., Tantsura, J., Henderickx, W.,
Raszuk, R., Lopez, V., Tantsura, J., Henderickx, W., and and J. Hardwick, "PCEP Extensions for Segment Routing",
J. Hardwick, "PCEP Extensions for Segment Routing", draft- draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-09 (work in progress),
ietf-pce-segment-routing-08 (work in progress), October April 2017.
2016.
[I-D.tantsura-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-msd] [I-D.tantsura-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-msd]
Tantsura, J., Chunduri, U., Mirsky, G., and S. Sivabalan, Tantsura, J., Chunduri, U., Mirsky, G., and S. Sivabalan,
"Signaling Maximum SID Depth using Border Gateway Protocol "Signaling Maximum SID Depth using Border Gateway Protocol
Link-State", draft-tantsura-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing- Link-State", draft-tantsura-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-
msd-03 (work in progress), March 2017. msd-04 (work in progress), March 2017.
[RFC1195] Callon, R., "Use of OSI IS-IS for routing in TCP/IP and [RFC1195] Callon, R., "Use of OSI IS-IS for routing in TCP/IP and
dual environments", RFC 1195, DOI 10.17487/RFC1195, dual environments", RFC 1195, DOI 10.17487/RFC1195,
December 1990, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1195>. December 1990, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1195>.
[RFC5120] Przygienda, T., Shen, N., and N. Sheth, "M-ISIS: Multi [RFC5120] Przygienda, T., Shen, N., and N. Sheth, "M-ISIS: Multi
Topology (MT) Routing in Intermediate System to Topology (MT) Routing in Intermediate System to
Intermediate Systems (IS-ISs)", RFC 5120, Intermediate Systems (IS-ISs)", RFC 5120,
DOI 10.17487/RFC5120, February 2008, DOI 10.17487/RFC5120, February 2008,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5120>. <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5120>.
 End of changes. 8 change blocks. 
15 lines changed or deleted 14 lines changed or added

This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.48. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/