< draft-ietf-kitten-pkinit-alg-agility-01.txt   draft-ietf-kitten-pkinit-alg-agility-02.txt >
Kitten Working Group L. Hornquist Astrand Kitten Working Group L. Hornquist Astrand
Internet-Draft Apple, Inc Internet-Draft Apple, Inc
Updates: 4556 (if approved) L. Zhu Updates: 4556 (if approved) L. Zhu
Intended status: Standards Track Microsoft Corporation Intended status: Standards Track Microsoft Corporation
Expires: October 1, 2017 M. Wasserman Expires: February 27, 2019 M. Wasserman
Painless Security Painless Security
B. Kaduk, Ed. B. Kaduk, Ed.
Akamai Technologies Akamai Technologies
March 30, 2017 August 26, 2018
PKINIT Algorithm Agility PKINIT Algorithm Agility
draft-ietf-kitten-pkinit-alg-agility-01.txt draft-ietf-kitten-pkinit-alg-agility-02
Abstract Abstract
This document updates PKINIT, as defined in RFC 4556, to remove This document updates PKINIT, as defined in RFC 4556, to remove
protocol structures tied to specific cryptographic algorithms. The protocol structures tied to specific cryptographic algorithms. The
PKINIT key derivation function is made negotiable, the digest PKINIT key derivation function is made negotiable, the digest
algorithms for signing the pre-authentication data and the client's algorithms for signing the pre-authentication data and the client's
X.509 certificates are made discoverable. X.509 certificates are made discoverable.
These changes provide preemptive protection against vulnerabilities These changes provide preemptive protection against vulnerabilities
skipping to change at page 1, line 36 skipping to change at page 1, line 36
algorithm, and allow incremental deployment of newer algorithms. algorithm, and allow incremental deployment of newer algorithms.
Status of This Memo Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on October 1, 2017. This Internet-Draft will expire on February 27, 2019.
Copyright Notice Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2017 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the Copyright (c) 2018 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved. document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License. described in the Simplified BSD License.
This document may contain material from IETF Documents or IETF This document may contain material from IETF Documents or IETF
Contributions published or made publicly available before November Contributions published or made publicly available before November
10, 2008. The person(s) controlling the copyright in some of this 10, 2008. The person(s) controlling the copyright in some of this
skipping to change at page 13, line 45 skipping to change at page 13, line 45
TD-CMS-DIGEST-ALGORITHMS 111 [ALG-AGILITY] TD-CMS-DIGEST-ALGORITHMS 111 [ALG-AGILITY]
TD-CERT-DIGEST-ALGORITHMS 112 [ALG-AGILITY] TD-CERT-DIGEST-ALGORITHMS 112 [ALG-AGILITY]
11. References 11. References
11.1. Normative References 11.1. Normative References
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>. <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
[RFC3961] Raeburn, K., "Encryption and Checksum Specifications for [RFC3961] Raeburn, K., "Encryption and Checksum Specifications for
Kerberos 5", RFC 3961, DOI 10.17487/RFC3961, February Kerberos 5", RFC 3961, DOI 10.17487/RFC3961, February
2005, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3961>. 2005, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3961>.
[RFC4120] Neuman, C., Yu, T., Hartman, S., and K. Raeburn, "The [RFC4120] Neuman, C., Yu, T., Hartman, S., and K. Raeburn, "The
Kerberos Network Authentication Service (V5)", RFC 4120, Kerberos Network Authentication Service (V5)", RFC 4120,
DOI 10.17487/RFC4120, July 2005, DOI 10.17487/RFC4120, July 2005,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4120>. <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4120>.
[RFC4556] Zhu, L. and B. Tung, "Public Key Cryptography for Initial [RFC4556] Zhu, L. and B. Tung, "Public Key Cryptography for Initial
Authentication in Kerberos (PKINIT)", RFC 4556, Authentication in Kerberos (PKINIT)", RFC 4556,
DOI 10.17487/RFC4556, June 2006, DOI 10.17487/RFC4556, June 2006,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4556>. <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4556>.
[RFC5280] Cooper, D., Santesson, S., Farrell, S., Boeyen, S., [RFC5280] Cooper, D., Santesson, S., Farrell, S., Boeyen, S.,
Housley, R., and W. Polk, "Internet X.509 Public Key Housley, R., and W. Polk, "Internet X.509 Public Key
Infrastructure Certificate and Certificate Revocation List Infrastructure Certificate and Certificate Revocation List
(CRL) Profile", RFC 5280, DOI 10.17487/RFC5280, May 2008, (CRL) Profile", RFC 5280, DOI 10.17487/RFC5280, May 2008,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5280>. <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5280>.
[RFC5652] Housley, R., "Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)", STD 70, [RFC5652] Housley, R., "Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)", STD 70,
RFC 5652, DOI 10.17487/RFC5652, September 2009, RFC 5652, DOI 10.17487/RFC5652, September 2009,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5652>. <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5652>.
[RFC6234] Eastlake 3rd, D. and T. Hansen, "US Secure Hash Algorithms [RFC6234] Eastlake 3rd, D. and T. Hansen, "US Secure Hash Algorithms
(SHA and SHA-based HMAC and HKDF)", RFC 6234, (SHA and SHA-based HMAC and HKDF)", RFC 6234,
DOI 10.17487/RFC6234, May 2011, DOI 10.17487/RFC6234, May 2011,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6234>. <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6234>.
[SP80056A] [SP80056A]
Barker, E., Don, D., and M. Smid, "Recommendation for Barker, E., Don, D., and M. Smid, "Recommendation for
Pair-Wise Key Establishment Schemes Using Discrete Pair-Wise Key Establishment Schemes Using Discrete
Logarithm Cryptography", March 2006. Logarithm Cryptography", March 2006.
[X680] ITU, "ITU-T Recommendation X.680 (2002) | ISO/IEC [X680] ITU, "ITU-T Recommendation X.680 (2002) | ISO/IEC
8824-1:2002, Information technology - Abstract Syntax 8824-1:2002, Information technology - Abstract Syntax
Notation One (ASN.1): Specification of basic notation", Notation One (ASN.1): Specification of basic notation",
November 2008. November 2008.
skipping to change at page 15, line 9 skipping to change at page 15, line 9
[X690] ITU, "ITU-T Recommendation X.690 (2002) | ISO/IEC [X690] ITU, "ITU-T Recommendation X.690 (2002) | ISO/IEC
8825-1:2002, Information technology - ASN.1 encoding 8825-1:2002, Information technology - ASN.1 encoding
Rules: Specification of Basic Encoding Rules (BER), Rules: Specification of Basic Encoding Rules (BER),
Canonical Encoding Rules (CER) and Distinguished Encoding Canonical Encoding Rules (CER) and Distinguished Encoding
Rules (DER)", November 2008. Rules (DER)", November 2008.
11.2. Informative References 11.2. Informative References
[RFC1321] Rivest, R., "The MD5 Message-Digest Algorithm", RFC 1321, [RFC1321] Rivest, R., "The MD5 Message-Digest Algorithm", RFC 1321,
DOI 10.17487/RFC1321, April 1992, DOI 10.17487/RFC1321, April 1992,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1321>. <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1321>.
[RFC3766] Orman, H. and P. Hoffman, "Determining Strengths For [RFC3766] Orman, H. and P. Hoffman, "Determining Strengths For
Public Keys Used For Exchanging Symmetric Keys", BCP 86, Public Keys Used For Exchanging Symmetric Keys", BCP 86,
RFC 3766, DOI 10.17487/RFC3766, April 2004, RFC 3766, DOI 10.17487/RFC3766, April 2004,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3766>. <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3766>.
[RFC6150] Turner, S. and L. Chen, "MD4 to Historic Status", [RFC6150] Turner, S. and L. Chen, "MD4 to Historic Status",
RFC 6150, DOI 10.17487/RFC6150, March 2011, RFC 6150, DOI 10.17487/RFC6150, March 2011,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6150>. <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6150>.
[RFC6194] Polk, T., Chen, L., Turner, S., and P. Hoffman, "Security [RFC6194] Polk, T., Chen, L., Turner, S., and P. Hoffman, "Security
Considerations for the SHA-0 and SHA-1 Message-Digest Considerations for the SHA-0 and SHA-1 Message-Digest
Algorithms", RFC 6194, DOI 10.17487/RFC6194, March 2011, Algorithms", RFC 6194, DOI 10.17487/RFC6194, March 2011,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6194>. <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6194>.
[WANG04] Wang, X., Lai, X., Fheg, D., Chen, H., and X. Yu, [WANG04] Wang, X., Lai, X., Fheg, D., Chen, H., and X. Yu,
"Cryptanalysis of Hash functions MD4 and RIPEMD", August "Cryptanalysis of Hash functions MD4 and RIPEMD", August
2004. 2004.
[X9.42] ANSI, "Public Key Cryptography for the Financial Services [X9.42] ANSI, "Public Key Cryptography for the Financial Services
Industry: Agreement of Symmetric Keys Using Discrete Industry: Agreement of Symmetric Keys Using Discrete
Logarithm Cryptography", 2003. Logarithm Cryptography", 2003.
Appendix A. PKINIT ASN.1 Module Appendix A. PKINIT ASN.1 Module
 End of changes. 18 change blocks. 
18 lines changed or deleted 18 lines changed or added

This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.48. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/