< draft-ietf-l3vpn-mldp-vrf-in-band-signaling-00.txt   draft-ietf-l3vpn-mldp-vrf-in-band-signaling-01.txt >
Network Working Group IJ. Wijnands, Ed. Network Working Group IJ. Wijnands, Ed.
Internet-Draft Cisco Systems Internet-Draft Cisco Systems
Intended status: Standards Track P. Hitchen Intended status: Standards Track P. Hitchen
Expires: June 23, 2013 BT Expires: December 23, 2013 BT
N. Leymann N. Leymann
Deutsche Telekom Deutsche Telekom
W. Henderickx W. Henderickx
Alcatel-Lucent Alcatel-Lucent
A. Gulko A. Gulko
Thomson Reuters Thomson Reuters
December 20, 2012 June 21, 2013
Multipoint Label Distribution Protocol Multipoint Label Distribution Protocol
In-Band Signaling in a VRF Context In-Band Signaling in a VRF Context
draft-ietf-l3vpn-mldp-vrf-in-band-signaling-00 draft-ietf-l3vpn-mldp-vrf-in-band-signaling-01
Abstract Abstract
Sometimes an IP multicast distribution tree (MDT) traverses both Sometimes an IP multicast distribution tree (MDT) traverses both
MPLS-enabled and non-MPLS-enabled regions of a network. Typically MPLS-enabled and non-MPLS-enabled regions of a network. Typically
the MDT begins and ends in non-MPLS regions, but travels through an the MDT begins and ends in non-MPLS regions, but travels through an
MPLS region. In such cases, it can be useful to begin building the MPLS region. In such cases, it can be useful to begin building the
MDT as a pure IP MDT, then convert it to an MPLS Multipoint LSP MDT as a pure IP MDT, then convert it to an MPLS Multipoint LSP
(Label Switched Path) when it enters an MPLS-enabled region, and then (Label Switched Path) when it enters an MPLS-enabled region, and then
convert it back to a pure IP MDT when it enters a non-MPLS-enabled convert it back to a pure IP MDT when it enters a non-MPLS-enabled
skipping to change at page 2, line 7 skipping to change at page 2, line 7
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on June 23, 2013. This Internet-Draft will expire on December 23, 2013.
Copyright Notice Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2012 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the Copyright (c) 2013 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved. document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
skipping to change at page 11, line 21 skipping to change at page 11, line 21
The same security considerations apply as for the base LDP The same security considerations apply as for the base LDP
specification, described in [RFC5036], and the base mLDP specification, described in [RFC5036], and the base mLDP
specification, described in [RFC6388] specification, described in [RFC6388]
5. IANA considerations 5. IANA considerations
[RFC6388] defines a registry for "The LDP MP Opaque Value Element [RFC6388] defines a registry for "The LDP MP Opaque Value Element
Basic Type". This document requires the assignment of four new code Basic Type". This document requires the assignment of four new code
points in this registry: points in this registry:
Transit VPNv4 Source TLV type Transit VPNv4 Source TLV type - requested 250
Transit VPNv6 Source TLV type Transit VPNv6 Source TLV type - requested 251
Transit VPNv4 Bidir TLV type Transit VPNv4 Bidir TLV type - requested 9
Transit VPNv6 Bidir TLV type Transit VPNv6 Bidir TLV type - requested 10
6. Acknowledgments 6. Acknowledgments
Thanks to Eric Rosen, Andy Green and Yakov Rekhter for their comments Thanks to Eric Rosen, Andy Green and Yakov Rekhter for their comments
on the draft. on the draft.
7. References 7. References
7.1. Normative References 7.1. Normative References
 End of changes. 9 change blocks. 
9 lines changed or deleted 9 lines changed or added

This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.48. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/