| < draft-ietf-lsr-dynamic-flooding-05.txt | draft-ietf-lsr-dynamic-flooding-06.txt > | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Internet Engineering Task Force T. Li, Ed. | Internet Engineering Task Force T. Li, Ed. | |||
| Internet-Draft Arista Networks | Internet-Draft Arista Networks | |||
| Intended status: Standards Track P. Psenak, Ed. | Intended status: Standards Track P. Psenak, Ed. | |||
| Expires: November 18, 2020 L. Ginsberg | Expires: November 28, 2020 L. Ginsberg | |||
| Cisco Systems, Inc. | Cisco Systems, Inc. | |||
| H. Chen | H. Chen | |||
| Futurewei | Futurewei | |||
| T. Przygienda | T. Przygienda | |||
| Juniper Networks, Inc. | Juniper Networks, Inc. | |||
| D. Cooper | D. Cooper | |||
| CenturyLink | CenturyLink | |||
| L. Jalil | L. Jalil | |||
| Verizon | Verizon | |||
| S. Dontula | S. Dontula | |||
| ATT | ATT | |||
| May 17, 2020 | May 27, 2020 | |||
| Dynamic Flooding on Dense Graphs | Dynamic Flooding on Dense Graphs | |||
| draft-ietf-lsr-dynamic-flooding-05 | draft-ietf-lsr-dynamic-flooding-06 | |||
| Abstract | Abstract | |||
| Routing with link state protocols in dense network topologies can | Routing with link state protocols in dense network topologies can | |||
| result in sub-optimal convergence times due to the overhead | result in sub-optimal convergence times due to the overhead | |||
| associated with flooding. This can be addressed by decreasing the | associated with flooding. This can be addressed by decreasing the | |||
| flooding topology so that it is less dense. | flooding topology so that it is less dense. | |||
| This document discusses the problem in some depth and an | This document discusses the problem in some depth and an | |||
| architectural solution. Specific protocol changes for IS-IS, OSPFv2, | architectural solution. Specific protocol changes for IS-IS, OSPFv2, | |||
| skipping to change at page 1, line 49 ¶ | skipping to change at page 1, line 49 ¶ | |||
| Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering | Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering | |||
| Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute | Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute | |||
| working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- | working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- | |||
| Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. | Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. | |||
| Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months | Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months | |||
| and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any | and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any | |||
| time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference | time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference | |||
| material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." | material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." | |||
| This Internet-Draft will expire on November 18, 2020. | This Internet-Draft will expire on November 28, 2020. | |||
| Copyright Notice | Copyright Notice | |||
| Copyright (c) 2020 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the | Copyright (c) 2020 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the | |||
| document authors. All rights reserved. | document authors. All rights reserved. | |||
| This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal | This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal | |||
| Provisions Relating to IETF Documents | Provisions Relating to IETF Documents | |||
| (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of | (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of | |||
| publication of this document. Please review these documents | publication of this document. Please review these documents | |||
| skipping to change at page 42, line 28 ¶ | skipping to change at page 42, line 28 ¶ | |||
| IANA is requested to set up a registry called "IGP Algorithm Type For | IANA is requested to set up a registry called "IGP Algorithm Type For | |||
| Computing Flooding Topology" under an existing "Interior Gateway | Computing Flooding Topology" under an existing "Interior Gateway | |||
| Protocol (IGP) Parameters" IANA registries. | Protocol (IGP) Parameters" IANA registries. | |||
| Values in this registry come from the range 0-255. | Values in this registry come from the range 0-255. | |||
| The initial values in the IGP Algorithm Type For Computing Flooding | The initial values in the IGP Algorithm Type For Computing Flooding | |||
| Topology registry are: | Topology registry are: | |||
| 0: Reserved for centralized mode. Individual values are are to be | 0: Reserved for centralized mode. | |||
| assigned according to the "Specification Required" policy defined | ||||
| in [RFC8126] | ||||
| 1-127: Available for standards action.Individual values are are to | 1-127: Available for standards action. Individual values are to | |||
| be assigned according to the "Private Use" policy defined in | be assigned according to the "Specification Required" policy | |||
| [RFC8126] | defined in [RFC8126]. | |||
| 128-254: Reserved for private use. | 128-254: Reserved for private use. | |||
| 255: Reserved. | 255: Reserved. | |||
| 8. Security Considerations | 8. Security Considerations | |||
| This document introduces no new security issues. Security of routing | This document introduces no new security issues. Security of routing | |||
| within a domain is already addressed as part of the routing protocols | within a domain is already addressed as part of the routing protocols | |||
| themselves. This document proposes no changes to those security | themselves. This document proposes no changes to those security | |||
| End of changes. 6 change blocks. | ||||
| 10 lines changed or deleted | 8 lines changed or added | |||
This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.48. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/ | ||||