< draft-ietf-mboned-multicast-yang-model-04.txt   draft-ietf-mboned-multicast-yang-model-05.txt >
MBONED WG Z. Zhang MBONED WG Z. Zhang
Internet-Draft ZTE Corporation Internet-Draft ZTE Corporation
Intended status: Standards Track C. Wang Intended status: Standards Track C. Wang
Expires: May 2, 2021 Individual Expires: 26 February 2022 Individual
Y. Cheng Y. Cheng
China Unicom China Unicom
X. Liu X. Liu
Volta Networks Volta Networks
M. Sivakumar M. Sivakumar
Juniper networks Juniper networks
October 29, 2020 25 August 2021
Multicast YANG Data Model Multicast YANG Data Model
draft-ietf-mboned-multicast-yang-model-04 draft-ietf-mboned-multicast-yang-model-05
Abstract Abstract
This document provides a general multicast YANG data model, which This document provides a general multicast YANG data model, which
takes full advantages of existed multicast protocol models to control takes full advantages of existed multicast protocol models to control
the multicast network, and guides the deployment of multicast the multicast network, and guides the deployment of multicast
service. service.
Status of This Memo Status of This Memo
skipping to change at page 1, line 40 skipping to change at page 1, line 40
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on May 2, 2021. This Internet-Draft will expire on 26 February 2022.
Copyright Notice Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2020 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the Copyright (c) 2021 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved. document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document.
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are
described in the Simplified BSD License. provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.
Table of Contents Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.1. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 1.1. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.2. Conventions Used in This Document . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 1.2. Conventions Used in This Document . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1.3. Tree Diagrams . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 1.3. Tree Diagrams . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1.4. Prefixes in Data Node Names . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 1.4. Prefixes in Data Node Names . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1.5. Usage of Multicast Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 1.5. Usage of Multicast Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
2. Design of the multicast model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 1.5.1. Example . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
2.1. Scope of Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 2. Design of the multicast model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
2.2. Specification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 2.1. Scope of Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
3. Module Structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 2.2. Specification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
3.1. UML like Class Diagram for Multicast YANG data Model . . 7 3. Module Structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
3.2. Model Structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 3.1. UML like Class Diagram for Multicast YANG data Model . . 8
3.2. Model Structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
3.3. Multicast YANG data model Configuration . . . . . . . . . 12 3.3. Multicast YANG data model Configuration . . . . . . . . . 12
3.4. Multicast YANG data model State . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 3.4. Multicast YANG data model State . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
3.5. Multicast YANG data model Notification . . . . . . . . . 13 3.5. Multicast YANG data model Notification . . . . . . . . . 13
4. Multicast YANG data Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 4. Multicast YANG data Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
5. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 5. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
6. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 6. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
7. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 7. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
8. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 8. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
8.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 8.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
8.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 8.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
Appendix A. Data Tree Example . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 Appendix A. Data Tree Example . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
1. Introduction 1. Introduction
Currently, there are many multicast protocol YANG models, such as Currently, there are many multicast protocol YANG models, such as
PIM, MLD, and BIER and so on. But all these models are distributed PIM, MLD, and BIER and so on. But all these models are distributed
in different working groups as separate files and focus on the in different working groups as separate files and focus on the
protocol itself. Furthermore, they cannot describe a high-level protocol itself. Furthermore, they cannot describe a high-level
multicast service required by network operators. multicast service required by network operators.
This document provides a general and all-round multicast model, which This document provides a general and all-round multicast model, which
stands at a high level to take full advantages of these stands at a high level to take full advantages of these
aforementioned models to control the multicast network, and guide the aforementioned models to control the multicast network, and guide the
deployment of multicast service. deployment of multicast service.
This model is designed to be used along with other multicast YANG This document does not define any specific protocol model, instead,
models such as PIM [I-D.ietf-pim-yang], which are not covered in this it depends on many existing multicast protocol models and relates
document. several multicast information together to fulfill multicast service.
This model can be used along with other multicast YANG models such as
PIM [I-D.ietf-pim-yang], which are not covered in this document.
1.1. Terminology 1.1. Terminology
The terminology for describing YANG data models is found in [RFC6020] The terminology for describing YANG data models is found in [RFC6020]
and [RFC7950], including: and [RFC7950], including:
o augment * augment
o data model * data model
o data node * data node
o identity * identity
o module * module
The following abbreviations are used in this document and the defined The following abbreviations are used in this document and the defined
model: model:
BIER: Bit Index Explicit Replication [RFC8279]. BABEL: [RFC8966].
MLD: Multicast Listener Discovery [I-D.ietf-bier-mld]. BGP: Border Gateway Protocol [RFC4271].
PIM: Protocol Independent Multicast [RFC7761]. BIER: Bit Index Explicit Replication [RFC8279].
BGP: Border Gateway Protocol [RFC4271]. BIER-TE: Traffic Engineering for Bit Index Explicit Replication
[I-D.ietf-bier-te-arch].
MVPN: Multicast in MPLS/BGP IP VPNs [RFC6513]. ISIS: Intermediate System to Intermediate System Routeing Exchange
Protocol [RFC1195].
MLD: Multicast Listener Discovery [I-D.ietf-bier-mld].
MLDP: Label Distribution Protocol Extensions for Point-to-Multipoint MLDP: Label Distribution Protocol Extensions for Point-to-Multipoint
and Multipoint-to-Multipoint Label Switched Paths [RFC6388]. and Multipoint-to-Multipoint Label Switched Paths [RFC6388].
OSPF: Open Shortest Path First [RFC2328]. MVPN: Multicast in MPLS/BGP IP VPNs [RFC6513].
ISIS: Intermediate System to Intermediate System Routeing Exchange
Protocol [RFC1195].
BABEL: [I-D.ietf-babel-rfc6126bis]. OSPF: Open Shortest Path First [RFC2328].
P2MP-TE: Point-to-Multipoint Traffic Engineering [RFC4875]. P2MP-TE: Point-to-Multipoint Traffic Engineering [RFC4875].
BIER-TE: Traffic Engineering for Bit Index Explicit Replication PIM: Protocol Independent Multicast [RFC7761].
[I-D.ietf-bier-te-arch].
SR-P2MP: Segment Routing Point-to-Multipoint
[I-D.ietf-pim-sr-p2mp-policy].
1.2. Conventions Used in This Document 1.2. Conventions Used in This Document
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
"OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP
14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
capitals, as shown here. capitals, as shown here.
1.3. Tree Diagrams 1.3. Tree Diagrams
skipping to change at page 4, line 26 skipping to change at page 4, line 31
[RFC8340]. [RFC8340].
1.4. Prefixes in Data Node Names 1.4. Prefixes in Data Node Names
In this document, names of data nodes, actions, and other data model In this document, names of data nodes, actions, and other data model
objects are often used without a prefix, as long as it is clear from objects are often used without a prefix, as long as it is clear from
the context in which YANG module each name is defined. Otherwise, the context in which YANG module each name is defined. Otherwise,
names are prefixed using the standard prefix associated with the names are prefixed using the standard prefix associated with the
corresponding YANG module, as shown in Table 1. corresponding YANG module, as shown in Table 1.
+----------+--------------------+----------------------+ +==========+====================+===============================+
| Prefix | YANG module | Reference | | Prefix | YANG module | Reference |
+----------+--------------------+----------------------+ +==========+====================+===============================+
| inet | ietf-inet-types | [RFC6991] | | inet | ietf-inet-types | [RFC6991] |
| | | | +----------+--------------------+-------------------------------+
| rt-types | ietf-routing-types | [RFC8294] | | isis | ietf-isis | [I-D.ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg] |
| | | | +----------+--------------------+-------------------------------+
| rt | ietf-routing | [RFC8349] | | ospf | ietf-ospf | [I-D.ietf-ospf-yang] |
| | | | +----------+--------------------+-------------------------------+
| ospf | ietf-ospf | [I-D.ietf-ospf-yang] | | rt-types | ietf-routing-types | [RFC8294] |
+----------+--------------------+----------------------+ +----------+--------------------+-------------------------------+
| rt | ietf-routing | [RFC8349] |
+----------+--------------------+-------------------------------+
| yang | ietf-yang-types | [RFC6991] |
+----------+--------------------+-------------------------------+
Table 1 Table 1
1.5. Usage of Multicast Model 1.5. Usage of Multicast Model
This multicast YANG data model is mainly used by the management tools This multicast YANG data model is mainly used by the management tools
run by the network operators, in order to manage, monitor and debug run by the network operators, in order to manage, monitor and debug
the network resources which are used to deliver multicast service. the network resources that are used to deliver multicast service.
This model is used for gathering data from the network as well. This model is used for gathering data from the network as well.
+------------------------+ +------------------------+
| Multicast Model | | Multicast Model |
+------------------------+ +------------------------+
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| +---------+ +----------+ | +---------+ +----------+
| | EMS/NMS | |Controller| | | EMS/NMS | |Controller|
| +---------+ +----------+ | +---------+ +----------+
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
+------------------------------------------------+ +------------------------------------------------+
| Network Element1.....N | | Network Element1.....N |
+------------------------------------------------+ +------------------------------------------------+
Figure 1: Usage of Multicast Model Figure 1: Usage of Multicast Model
Detailly, in figure 1, there is an example of usage of this multicast Figure 1 illustrates example use cases for this multicast model.
model. Network operators can use this model in a controller which is Network operators can use this model in a controller which is
responsible to implement specific multicast flows with specific responsible to implement specific multicast flows with specific
protocols and invoke the corresponding protocols' model to configure protocols and work with the corresponding protocols' model to
the network elements through NETCONF/RESTCONF/CLI. Or network configure the network elements through NETCONF/RESTCONF/CLI. Or
operators can use this model to the EMS/NMS to manage the network network operators can use this model to the EMS (Element Management
elements or configure the network elements directly. System)/ NMS (Network Management System) to manage or configure the
network elements directly.
On the other hand, when the network elements detect failure or some
other changes, the network devices can send the affected multicast
flows and the associated overlay/ transport/ underlay information to
the controller. Then the controller/ EMS/NMS can respond immediately
due to the failure and distribute new model for the flows to the
network nodes quickly. Such as the changing of the failure overlay
protocol to another one, as well as transport and underlay protocol.
Specifically, in section 3, it provides a human readability of the
whole multicast network through UML like class diagram, which frames
different multicast components and correlates them in a readable
fashion. Then, based on this UML like class diagram, there is
instantiated and detailed YANG model in Section 4.
The usage of this model is flexible. The multicast-keys indicate the
flow characters. The flow can be L3 multicast flow, or L2 flow which
is also called BUM (Broadcast, Unknown unicast, Multicast) flow in
EVPN ([RFC7432]) deployment.
Among the multicast-keys, the group-address of L3 multicast flow and
the mac-address of BUM flow are the most important keys. The other
keys are optional, and need not be all set. For example, only group-
address is set, this is (*,G) analogous. If source-address and
group-address are both set, this is (S,G) analogous. In addition to
the source-address and group-address, when vpn-rd is also set, this
is MVPN use case. If mac-address and vpn-rd are set, this is EVPN
use case. In case vni-value is set with associated group-address,
etc., this is NVO3 multicast use case.
* When the controller manages all the ingress and egress routers for
the flow, it sends the model that is set with flow characters,
ingress and egress nodes information to the ingress and egress
nodes. Then the ingress and egress nodes can work without any
other dynamic overlay protocols.
* When the controller manages the ingress nodes only for the flow,
it sends the model that is set with the flow characters to the
ingress nodes. The dynamic overlay protocol can be set or not.
If the overlay protocol is set, the nodes use the protocol to
signal the flow information with other nodes. If the overlay
protocol is not set, the nodes use the local running overlay
protocol to signal the flow information.
* When the transport protocol is set in the model, the nodes
encapsulate the flow according to the transport protocol. When
the transport protocol is not set in the model, the nodes use the
local configured transport protocol for encapsulation.
* When the transport protocol is set in the model, the underlay
protocol may be set in the model also. In case the underlay
protocol is set, the nodes use the underlay protocol to signal and
build the transport/forwarding layer. In case the underlay
protocol is not set, the nodes use the local configured underlay
protocol to signal and build the transport/forwarding layer.
* More than one ingress node for a multicast flow can be set in the
model. In this situation, two or more ingress nodes can used for
a multicast flow forwarding, the ingress routers can be backup for
each other. More information can be found in
[I-D.szcl-mboned-redundant-ingress-failover].
1.5.1. Example
+------------+ +------------+
| +---------------------------+ | +---------------------------+
+--------------+ Controller | | +--------------+ Controller | |
| | +-----------+ | | | +-----------+ |
| +------------+ | | | +------------+ | |
| | | | | |
| +-----------------------------+ | | | +-----------------------------+ | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | +------+---+--+ | | | +------+---+--+ |
skipping to change at page 5, line 49 skipping to change at page 7, line 27
| | +------+------+ | | | +------+------+ |
+---+-----+----+ | | +---+-----+----+ | |
Source +-|Ingress router| BIER domain | | Source +-|Ingress router| BIER domain | |
+---------+----+ | | +---------+----+ | |
| +------+------+ | | +------+------+ |
| |Egress router+--+ Receiver| | |Egress router+--+ Receiver|
| +------+----+-+ | | +------+----+-+ |
| | | | | | | |
+-----------------------------+ +--------------+ +-----------------------------+ +--------------+
Figure 2: Example Figure 2: Example
The network administrator can use the multicast model and associated The network administrator can use the multicast model and associated
models to deploy the multicast service. For example, suppose that models to deploy the multicast service. For example, suppose that
the flow for a multicast service is 233.252.0.0/16, the flow should the flow for a multicast service is 233.252.0.0/16, the flow should
be forwarded by BIER [RFC8279] with MPLS encapsulation [RFC8296]. be forwarded by BIER [RFC8279] with MPLS encapsulation [RFC8296].
Correspoding IGP protocol which is used to build BIER transport layer Corresponding IGP protocol which is used to build BIER transport
is OSPF [RFC2328]. layer is OSPF [RFC2328].
In this model, the correspond key is set to 233.252.0.0/16, the
transport technology is set to BIER. The BIER underlay protocol is
set to OSPF. The model is sent to every egde router from the
controller. If the BIER transport layer which depends on OSPF has
not been built in the network, the multicast YANG model will invoke
the BIER YANG model which is defined in [I-D.ietf-bier-bier-yang]
generation in the controller. After the BIER transport layer is
built, the ingress router encapsulates the multicast flow with BIER
header and sends it into the network. Intermediate routers forward
the flows to all the egress nodes by BIER forwarding.
On the other hand, when the network elements detect failure or some
other changes, the network devices can send the affected multicast
flows and the associated overlay/ transport/ underlay information to
the controller. Then the controller/ EMS/NMS can response
immediately due to the failure and distribute new model for the flows
to the network nodes quickly. Such as the changing of the failure
overlay protocol to another one, as well as transport and underlay
protocol.
Specifically, in section 3, it provides a human readability of the In this model, the corresponding group-address that is in multicast-
whole multicast network through UML like class diagram, which frames keys is set to 233.252.0.0/16, the transport technology is set to
different multicast components and correlates them in a readable BIER. The BIER underlay protocol is set to OSPF. The model is sent
fashion. Then, based on this UML like class diagram, there is to every edge router from the controller. If the BIER transport
instantiated and detailed YANG model in Section 5. layer which depends on OSPF has not been built in the network, the
multicast YANG model may invoke the BIER YANG model that is defined
in [I-D.ietf-bier-bier-yang] generation in the controller. After the
BIER transport layer is built, the ingress router encapsulates the
multicast flow with BIER header and sends it into the network.
Intermediate routers forward the flows to all the egress nodes by
BIER forwarding.
In other words, this document does not define any specific protocol Another example for this figure is, the controller can act as the
model, instead, it depends on many existed multicast protocol models BIER overlay only. The routers in the domain build BIER forwarding
and relates several multicast information together to fulfill plane beforehand. The controller sends the multicast group-address
multicast service. and/or the source-address to the edge routers in BIER domain only,
without transport and underlay set in the model. Then the ingres
router can encapsulate the multicast flow with BIER encapsulation
automatically.
2. Design of the multicast model 2. Design of the multicast model
2.1. Scope of Model 2.1. Scope of Model
This model can be used to configure and manage Multicast service. This model can be used to configure and manage Multicast service.
The operational state data can be retrieved by this model. The The operational state data can be retrieved by this model. The
subscription and push mechanism defined in [RFC8639] and [RFC8641] subscription and push mechanism defined in [RFC8639] and [RFC8641]
can be implemented by the user to subscribe to notifications on the can be implemented by the user to subscribe to notifications on the
data nodes in this model. data nodes in this model.
skipping to change at page 7, line 17 skipping to change at page 8, line 30
not allow some of the advanced parameters to be configurable. The not allow some of the advanced parameters to be configurable. The
occasionally implemented parameters are modeled as optional features occasionally implemented parameters are modeled as optional features
in this model. This model can be extended, and it has been in this model. This model can be extended, and it has been
structured in a way that such extensions can be conveniently made. structured in a way that such extensions can be conveniently made.
2.2. Specification 2.2. Specification
The configuration data nodes cover configurations. The container The configuration data nodes cover configurations. The container
"multicast-model" is the top level container in this data model. The "multicast-model" is the top level container in this data model. The
presence of this container is expected to enable Multicast service presence of this container is expected to enable Multicast service
functionality. The notification includes the error reason and the functionality. The notification is used to notify the controller
associated data nodes. that there is error and the error reason.
3. Module Structure 3. Module Structure
This model imports and augments the ietf-routing YANG model defined This model imports and augments the ietf-routing YANG model defined
in [RFC8349]. Both configuration data nodes and state data nodes of in [RFC8349]. Both configuration data nodes and state data nodes of
[RFC8349] are augmented. [RFC8349] are augmented.
The YANG data model defined in this document conforms to the Network The YANG data model defined in this document conforms to the Network
Management Datastore Architecture (NMDA) [RFC8342]. The operational Management Datastore Architecture (NMDA) [RFC8342]. The operational
state data is combined with the associated configuration data in the state data is combined with the associated configuration data in the
skipping to change at page 8, line 16 skipping to change at page 9, line 16
+-----+Multi|keys | +-----+Multi|keys |
| +-----------+ | +-----------+
| |Group Addr | | |Group Addr |
| +-----------+ | +-----------+
| |Source Addr| +--------+-----------------+ | |Source Addr| +--------+-----------------+
| +-----------+ | | | | +-----------+ | | |
| |VPN Info | | | +------+-------+ | |VPN Info | | | +------+-------+
| +-----------+ | +-----+------+ | Ing/Eg Nodes | | +-----------+ | +-----+------+ | Ing/Eg Nodes |
| |VNI Info | | |Overlay Tech| +--------------+ | |VNI Info | | |Overlay Tech| +--------------+
| +-----------+ | +------------+ |Ingress Nodes | | +-----------+ | +------------+ |Ingress Nodes |
| | | MLD | +--------------+ | | | EVPN | +--------------+
| | +------------+ |Egress Nodes | | | +------------+ |Egress Nodes |
| Contain | | MVPN | +-------+------+ | Contain | | MLD | +-------+------+
| +-----------+ | +------------+ | relate | +-----------+ | +------------+ | relate
| | Multicast +----+ | BGP | \|/ | | Multicast +----+ |MLD-Snooping| \|/
+-----+ Overlay | +------------+ +----------------+ +-----+ Overlay | +------------+ +----------------+
| | | |MLD|Snooping| | BIER Nodes Info| | | | | MVPN | | BIER Nodes Info|
| +-----------+ +------------+ +----------------+ | +-----------+ +------------+ +----------------+
| | BFR|ID | | | PIM | | BFR-ID |
| +----------------+ | +------------+ +----------------+
| |
+--------+--+ +---------------+----------+----------+ +--------+--+ +---------------+----------+----------+
| Multicast |Contain | | | | | Multicast |Contain | | | |
| Model | | +--+---+ +---+----+ +--+---+ | Model | | +--+---+ +---+----+ +--+---+
+--------+--+ | | MPLS | |BIER|TE | | BIER | +--------+--+ | | BIER | |BIER-TE | | MPLS |
| +---------+--+ +------+ +--------+ +------+ | +---------+--+ +------+ +--------+ +------+
| | Multicast | | | Multicast |
+----+ Transport | invoke +-----+ +----------+ +----+ Transport | invoke +-----+ +----------+ +-------+
| | | | PIM | |Cisco Mode| | | | | PIM | |Cisco Mode| |SR-P2MP|
| +---------+--+ +--+--+ +----+-----+ | +---------+--+ +--+--+ +----+-----+ +---+---+
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| +---------------+-----------+ | +---------------+----------+-----------+
| |
| +--------------+---------+---------+ | +--------------+---------+---------+
| | | | | | | | | |
| | +--+---+ +--+---+ +--+--+ | | +--+---+ +--+---+ +--+--+
| +----------+-- | OSPF | | PIM | |BABEL| | +----------+-- | BABEL| | BGP | |ISIS |
| | Multicast | +------+ +------+ +-----+ | | Multicast | +------+ +------+ +-----+
+----+ Underlay | invoke +----+ Underlay | invoke
| | +------+ +------+ | | +------+ +------+ +-----+
+----------+-- | ISIS | | BGP | +----------+-- | OSPF | | PIM | |RIFT |
| +--+---+ +--+---+ | +--+---+ +--+---+ +--+--+
| | | | | | |
+--------------+---------+ +--------------+---------+---------+
Figure 3: UML like Class Diagram for Multicast YANG data Model Figure 3: UML like Class Diagram for Multicast YANG data Model
3.2. Model Structure 3.2. Model Structure
module: ietf-multicast-model module: ietf-multicast-model
+--rw multicast-model +--rw multicast-model
+--rw multicast-keys* +--rw multicast-keys*
[vpn-rd source-address group-address vni-type vni-value] [vpn-rd source-address group-address mac-address vni-value]
+--rw vpn-rd rt-types:route-distinguisher +--rw vpn-rd rt-types:route-distinguisher
+--rw source-address ip-multicast-source-address +--rw source-address ip-multicast-source-address
+--rw group-address +--rw group-address
rt-types:ip-multicast-group-address | rt-types:ip-multicast-group-address
+--rw vni-type virtual-type +--rw mac-address yang:mac-address
+--rw vni-value uint32 +--rw vni-value uint32
+--rw multicast-overlay +--rw multicast-overlay
| +--rw ingress-egress | +--rw vni-type? virtual-type
| | +--rw ingress-node? inet:ip-address | +--rw ingress-egress
| | +--rw egress-nodes* [egress-node] | | +--rw ingress-nodes* [ingress-node]
| | +--rw egress-node inet:ip-address | | | +--rw ingress-node inet:ip-address
| +--rw bier-ids | | +--rw egress-nodes* [egress-node]
| | +--rw sub-domain? uint16 | | +--rw egress-node inet:ip-address
| | +--rw ingress-node? uint16 | +--rw bier-ids {bier}?
| | +--rw egress-nodes* [egress-node] | | +--rw sub-domain? uint16
| | +--rw egress-node uint16 | | +--rw ingress-nodes* [ingress-node]
| +--rw (overlay-tech-type)? | | | +--rw ingress-node uint16
| +--:(bgp) | | +--rw egress-nodes* [egress-node]
| +--:(evpn) | | +--rw egress-node uint16
| +--:(mld) | +--rw dynamic-overlay
| | +--rw mld-instance-group? | +--rw type? identityref
rt-types:ip-multicast-group-address | +--rw mld
| +--:(mld-snooping) | +--rw mld-instance-group?
| +--:(mvpn) | rt-types:ip-multicast-group-address
| +--:(pim) +--rw multicast-transport
+--rw multicast-transport | +--rw type? identityref
| +--rw (transport)? | +--rw bier
| +--:(bier) | | +--rw sub-domain? uint16
| | +--rw bier | | +--rw bitstringlength? uint16
| | +--rw sub-domain? uint16 | | +--rw set-identifier? uint16
| | +--rw bitstringlength? uint16 | | +--rw (encap-type)?
| | +--rw set-identifier? uint16 | | +--:(mpls)
| | +--rw (encap-type)? | | +--:(eth)
| | +--:(mpls) | | +--:(ipv6)
| | +--:(eth) | +--rw bier-te
| | +--:(ipv6) | | +--rw sub-domain? uint16
| +--:(bier-te) | | +--rw bitstringlength? uint16
| | +--rw bier-te | | +--rw set-identifier? uint16
| | +--rw sub-domain? uint16 | | +--rw (encap-type)?
| | +--rw bitstringlength? uint16 | | | +--:(mpls)
| | +--rw set-identifier? uint16 | | | +--:(eth)
| | +--rw (encap-type)? | | | +--:(ipv6)
| | | +--:(mpls) | | +--rw bitstring* [name]
| | | +--:(eth) | | +--rw name string
| | | +--:(ipv6) | | +--rw bier-te-adj* [adj-id]
| | +--rw bier-te-adj* uint16 | | +--rw adj-id uint16
| +--:(cisco-mode) | +--rw cisco-mdt
| | +--rw cisco-mode | | +--rw p-group? rt-types:ip-multicast-group-address
| | +--rw p-group? | +--rw rsvp-te-p2mp
rt-types:ip-multicast-group-address | | +--rw template-name? string
| +--:(mpls) | +--rw pim
| | +--rw mpls | | +--rw source-address? ip-multicast-source-address
| | +--rw (mpls-lsp-type)? | | +--rw group-address
| | +--:(mldp) | | rt-types:ip-multicast-group-address
| | | +--rw mldp-lsp | +--rw sr-p2mp
| | | +--rw root-address? | +--rw ir-segment-lists* [name]
ip-multicast-source-address | | +--rw name string
| | | +--rw lsp-id? uint32 | +--rw replication-segment* [replication-id node-id]
| | | +--rw backup-lsp-id? uint32 | +--rw replication-id tree-sid
| | +--:(p2mp-te) | +--rw node-id inet:ip-address
| | +--rw p2mp-te-lsp +--rw multicast-underlay
| | +--rw root-address? +--rw type? identityref
ip-multicast-source-address +--rw ospf
| | +--rw lsp-id? uint32 | +--rw topology? string
| | +--rw backup-lsp-id? uint32 +--rw isis
| +--:(pim) | +--rw topology? string
| +--rw pim +--rw pim
+--rw multicast-underlay +--rw source-address? ip-multicast-source-address
+--rw (underlay)? +--rw group-address
+--:(bgp) rt-types:ip-multicast-group-address
+--:(ospf)
| +--rw ospf
| +--rw topology?
-> /rt:routing/control-plane-protocols
/control-plane-protocol/ospf:ospf
/topologies/topology/name
+--:(isis)
+--:(babel)
notifications: notifications:
+---n head-end-event +---n ingress-egress-event
+--ro event-type? enumeration +--ro event-type? enumeration
+--ro multicast-key +--ro multicast-key
| +--ro vpn-rd? rt-types:route-distinguisher | +--ro vpn-rd? rt-types:route-distinguisher
| +--ro source-address? ip-multicast-source-address | +--ro source-address? ip-multicast-source-address
| +--ro group-address? rt-types:ip-multicast-group-address | +--ro group-address? rt-types:ip-multicast-group-address
| +--ro vni-type? virtual-type | +--ro mac-address? yang:mac-address
| +--ro vni-value? uint32 | +--ro vni-value? uint32
+--ro (overlay-tech-type)? +--ro dynamic-overlay
| +--:(bgp) | +--ro type? identityref
| +--:(evpn) | +--ro mld
| +--:(mld) | +--ro mld-instance-group?
| | +--ro mld-instance-group? | rt-types:ip-multicast-group-address
rt-types:ip-multicast-group-address +--ro transport-tech
| +--:(mld-snooping) | +--ro type? identityref
| +--:(mvpn) | +--ro bier
| +--:(pim) | | +--ro sub-domain? uint16
+--ro transport-tech | | +--ro bitstringlength? uint16
| +--ro (transport)? | | +--ro set-identifier? uint16
| +--:(bier) | | +--ro (encap-type)?
| | +--ro bier | | +--:(mpls)
| | +--ro sub-domain? uint16 | | +--:(eth)
| | +--ro bitstringlength? uint16 | | +--:(ipv6)
| | +--ro set-identifier? uint16 | +--ro bier-te
| | +--ro (encap-type)? | | +--ro sub-domain? uint16
| | +--:(mpls) | | +--ro bitstringlength? uint16
| | +--:(eth) | | +--ro set-identifier? uint16
| | +--:(ipv6) | | +--ro (encap-type)?
| +--:(bier-te) | | | +--:(mpls)
| | +--ro bier-te | | | +--:(eth)
| | +--ro sub-domain? uint16 | | | +--:(ipv6)
| | +--ro bitstringlength? uint16 | | +--ro bitstring* [name]
| | +--ro set-identifier? uint16 | | +--ro name string
| | +--ro (encap-type)? | | +--ro bier-te-adj* [adj-id]
| | | +--:(mpls) | | +--ro adj-id uint16
| | | +--:(eth) | +--ro cisco-mdt
| | | +--:(ipv6) | | +--ro p-group? rt-types:ip-multicast-group-address
| | +--ro bier-te-adj* uint16 | +--ro rsvp-te-p2mp
| +--:(cisco-mode) | | +--ro template-name? string
| | +--ro cisco-mode | +--ro pim
| | +--ro p-group? | | +--ro source-address? ip-multicast-source-address
rt-types:ip-multicast-group-address | | +--ro group-address
| +--:(mpls) | | rt-types:ip-multicast-group-address
| | +--ro mpls | +--ro sr-p2mp
| | +--ro (mpls-lsp-type)? | +--ro ir-segment-lists* [name]
| | +--:(mldp) | | +--ro name string
| | | +--ro mldp-lsp | +--ro replication-segment* [replication-id node-id]
| | | +--ro root-address? | +--ro replication-id tree-sid
ip-multicast-source-address | +--ro node-id inet:ip-address
| | | +--ro lsp-id? uint32 +--ro underlay-tech
| | | +--ro backup-lsp-id? uint32 +--ro type? identityref
| | +--:(p2mp-te) +--ro ospf
| | +--ro p2mp-te-lsp | +--ro topology? string
| | +--ro root-address? +--ro isis
ip-multicast-source-address | +--ro topology? string
| | +--ro lsp-id? uint32 +--ro pim
| | +--ro backup-lsp-id? uint32 +--ro source-address? ip-multicast-source-address
| +--:(pim) +--ro group-address
| +--ro pim rt-types:ip-multicast-group-address
+--ro underlay-tech
+--ro (underlay)?
+--:(bgp)
+--:(ospf)
| +--ro ospf
| +--ro topology?
-> /rt:routing/control-plane-protocols
/control-plane-protocol/ospf:ospf
/topologies/topology/name
+--:(isis)
+--:(babel)
3.3. Multicast YANG data model Configuration 3.3. Multicast YANG data model Configuration
This model is used with other protocol data model to provide This model is used with other protocol data model to provide
multicast service. multicast service.
This model includes multicast service keys and three layers: the This model includes multicast service keys and three layers: the
multicast overlay, the transport layer and the multicast underlay multicast overlay, the transport layer and the multicast underlay
information. Multicast keys include the features of multicast flow, information. Multicast keys include the features of multicast flow,
such as(vpnid, multicast source and multicast group) information. In such as(vpnid, multicast source and multicast group) information. In
skipping to change at page 12, line 42 skipping to change at page 13, line 25
information including (Subdomain, ingress-node BFR-id, egress-nodes information including (Subdomain, ingress-node BFR-id, egress-nodes
BFR-id). If no (ingress-node, egress-nodes) information are defined BFR-id). If no (ingress-node, egress-nodes) information are defined
directly, there may need overlay multicast signaling technology, such directly, there may need overlay multicast signaling technology, such
as MLD or MVPN, to collect these nodes information. as MLD or MVPN, to collect these nodes information.
Multicast transport layer defines the type of transport technologies Multicast transport layer defines the type of transport technologies
that can be used to forward multicast flow, including BIER forwarding that can be used to forward multicast flow, including BIER forwarding
type, MPLS forwarding type, or PIM forwarding type and so on. One or type, MPLS forwarding type, or PIM forwarding type and so on. One or
several transport technologies could be defined at the same time. As several transport technologies could be defined at the same time. As
for the detailed parameters for each transport technology, this for the detailed parameters for each transport technology, this
multicast YANG data model can invoke the corresponding protocol model multicast YANG data model may invoke the corresponding protocol model
to define them. to define them.
Multicast underlay defines the type of underlay technologies, such as Multicast underlay defines the type of underlay technologies, such as
OSPF, ISIS, BGP, PIM or BABEL and so on. One or several underlay OSPF, ISIS, BGP, PIM or BABEL and so on. One or several underlay
technologies could be defined at the same time if there is protective technologies could be defined at the same time if there is protective
requirement. As for the specific parameters for each underlay requirement. As for the specific parameters for each underlay
technology, this multicast YANG data model can depend the technology, this multicast YANG data model can depend the
corresponding protocol model to configure them as well. corresponding protocol model to configure them as well.
The configuration modeling branch is composed of the keys, overlay The configuration modeling branch is composed of the keys, overlay
layer, transport layer and underlay layer. layer, transport layer and underlay layer.
3.4. Multicast YANG data model State 3.4. Multicast YANG data model State
Multicast model states are the same with the configuration. Multicast model states are the same with the configuration.
3.5. Multicast YANG data model Notification 3.5. Multicast YANG data model Notification
The defined Notifications include the events of head end nodes. Like The defined Notifications include the events of ingress or egress
head node failer, overlay/ transport/ underlay module loading/ nodes. Like ingress node failure, overlay/ transport/ underlay
unloading. And the potential failer about some multicast flows and module loading/ unloading. And the potential failure about some
associated overlay/ transport/ underlay technologies. multicast flows and associated overlay/ transport/ underlay
technologies.
4. Multicast YANG data Model 4. Multicast YANG data Model
This module references [RFC1195], [RFC2328], [RFC4271], [RFC4541], This module references [RFC1195], [RFC2328], [RFC4271], [RFC4541],
[RFC4875], [RFC5340], [RFC6037], [RFC6388], [RFC6513], [RFC6991], [RFC4875], [RFC5340], [RFC6037], [RFC6388], [RFC6513], [RFC6991],
[RFC7348], [RFC7432], [RFC7637], [RFC7716], [RFC7761], [RFC8279], [RFC7348], [RFC7432], [RFC7637], [RFC7716], [RFC7761], [RFC8279],
[RFC8294], [RFC8296], [RFC8343], [RFC8344], [RFC8349], [RFC8639], [RFC8294], [RFC8296], [RFC8343], [RFC8344], [RFC8349], [RFC8639],
[RFC8641], [I-D.ietf-pim-yang], [I-D.ietf-bier-bier-yang], [RFC8641], [RFC8926], [RFC8966], [I-D.ietf-pim-yang],
[I-D.ietf-bier-te-arch], [I-D.ietf-nvo3-geneve], [I-D.ietf-bier-mld], [I-D.ietf-bier-bier-yang], [I-D.ietf-bier-te-arch],
[I-D.ietf-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates], [I-D.ietf-bier-evpn], [I-D.ietf-bier-mld], [I-D.ietf-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates],
[I-D.zhang-bier-bierin6], [I-D.ietf-babel-rfc6126bis], [I-D.ietf-bier-evpn], [I-D.ietf-bier-bierin6],
[I-D.ietf-bier-pim-signaling]. [I-D.ietf-bier-pim-signaling], [I-D.ietf-rift-rift],
[I-D.ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg].
<CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-multicast-model@2020-10-28.yang"
module ietf-multicast-model {
yang-version 1.1;
namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-multicast-model";
prefix multicast-model;
import ietf-inet-types { <CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-multicast-model@2021-08-26.yang"
prefix "inet"; module ietf-multicast-model {
reference
"RFC 6991: Common YANG Data Types";
}
import ietf-routing-types {
prefix "rt-types";
reference
"RFC 8294: Common YANG Data Types for the Routing Area";
}
import ietf-routing {
prefix "rt";
reference
"RFC 8349: A YANG Data Model for Routing Management
(NMDA Version)";
}
import ietf-ospf {
prefix "ospf";
reference
"I-D.ietf-ospf-yang: YANG Data Model for OSPF Protocol";
}
organization " IETF MBONED (MBONE Deployment) Working Group"; yang-version 1.1;
contact
"WG List: <mailto:mboned@ietf.org>
Editor: Zheng Zhang namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-multicast-model";
<mailto:zhang.zheng@zte.com.cn> prefix ietf-multicast-model;
Editor: Cui Wang
<mailto:lindawangjoy@gmail.com>
Editor: Ying Cheng
<mailto:chengying10@chinaunicom.cn>
Editor: Xufeng Liu
<mailto:xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com>
Editor: Mahesh Sivakumar
<mailto:sivakumar.mahesh@gmail.com>
";
// RFC Ed.: replace XXXX with actual RFC number and remove import ietf-yang-types {
// this note prefix "yang";
reference
"RFC 6991: Common YANG Data Types";
}
description import ietf-inet-types {
"The module defines the YANG definitions for multicast service prefix "inet";
management. reference
"RFC 6991: Common YANG Data Types";
}
import ietf-routing-types {
prefix "rt-types";
reference
"RFC 8294: Common YANG Data Types for the Routing Area";
}
import ietf-routing {
prefix "rt";
reference
"RFC 8349: A YANG Data Model for Routing Management
(NMDA Version)";
}
Copyright (c) 2020 IETF Trust and the persons identified as organization " IETF MBONED (MBONE Deployment) Working Group";
authors of the code. All rights reserved. contact
"WG List: <mailto:mboned@ietf.org>
Editor: Zheng Zhang
<mailto:zhang.zheng@zte.com.cn>
Editor: Cui Wang
<mailto:lindawangjoy@gmail.com>
Editor: Ying Cheng
<mailto:chengying10@chinaunicom.cn>
Editor: Xufeng Liu
<mailto:xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com>
Editor: Mahesh Sivakumar
<mailto:sivakumar.mahesh@gmail.com>
";
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or // RFC Ed.: replace XXXX with actual RFC number and remove
without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject // this note
to the license terms contained in, the Simplified BSD
License set forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).
This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX description
(https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfcXXXX); see the RFC "The module defines the YANG definitions for multicast service
itself for full legal notices. management.
The key words 'MUST', 'MUST NOT', 'REQUIRED', 'SHALL', Copyright (c) 2021 IETF Trust and the persons identified as
'SHALL NOT', 'SHOULD', 'SHOULD NOT', 'RECOMMENDED', authors of the code. All rights reserved.
'NOT RECOMMENDED', 'MAY', and 'OPTIONAL' in this document
are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 (RFC 2119)
(RFC 8174) when, and only when, they appear in all
capitals, as shown here.";
revision 2020-09-30 { Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or
description without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject
"Initial revision."; to the license terms contained in, the Simplified BSD
reference License set forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal
"RFC XXXX: A YANG Data Model for multicast YANG."; Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
} (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).
/* This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX
*typedef (https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfcXXXX); see the RFC
*/ itself for full legal notices.
typedef ip-multicast-source-address { The key words 'MUST', 'MUST NOT', 'REQUIRED', 'SHALL',
type union { 'SHALL NOT', 'SHOULD', 'SHOULD NOT', 'RECOMMENDED',
type rt-types:ipv4-multicast-source-address; 'NOT RECOMMENDED', 'MAY', and 'OPTIONAL' in this document
type rt-types:ipv6-multicast-source-address; are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 (RFC 2119)
} (RFC 8174) when, and only when, they appear in all
description capitals, as shown here.";
"This type represents a version-neutral IP multicast
source address. The format of the textual
representation implies the IP version.";
reference
"RFC8294: Common YANG Data Types for the Routing Area.";
}
typedef virtual-type { revision 2021-08-26 {
type enumeration { description
enum vxlan { "Initial revision.";
description reference
"The VXLAN encapsulation is used for flow encapsulation."; "RFC XXXX: A YANG Data Model for multicast YANG.";
reference }
"RFC 7348: Virtual eXtensible Local Area Network (VXLAN):
A Framework for Overlaying Virtualized Layer 2 Networks
over Layer 3 Networks.";
}
enum nvgre {
description
"The NVGRE encapsulation is used for flow encapsulation.";
reference
"RFC 7637: NVGRE: Network Virtualization Using Generic
Routing Encapsulation.";
}
enum geneve {
description
"The GENEVE encapsulation is used for flow encapsulation.";
reference /*
"I-D.ietf-nvo3-geneve: Geneve: Generic Network *feature
Virtualization Encapsulation."; */
} feature bier {
} description
description "Cooperation with BIER technology.";
"The encapsulation type used for the flow. In case the virtual reference
type is set, the associated vni-value should also be defined."; "RFC 8279:
} // virtual-type Multicast Using Bit Index Explicit Replication (BIER).";
}
/* /*
* Identities *typedef
*/ */
typedef ip-multicast-source-address {
type union {
type enumeration {
enum * {
description
"Any source address.";
}
}
type inet:ipv4-address;
type inet:ipv6-address;
}
description
"Multicast source IP address type.";
}
typedef tree-sid {
type union {
type rt-types:mpls-label;
type inet:ip-prefix;
}
description
"The type of the Segment Identifier of a Replication segment
is a SR-MPLS label or a SRv6 SID.";
}
typedef virtual-type {
type enumeration {
enum vxlan {
description
"The VXLAN encapsulation is used for flow encapsulation.";
reference
"RFC 7348: Virtual eXtensible Local Area Network (VXLAN):
A Framework for Overlaying Virtualized Layer 2 Networks
over Layer 3 Networks.";
}
enum nvgre {
description
"The NVGRE encapsulation is used for flow encapsulation.";
reference
"RFC 7637: NVGRE: Network Virtualization Using Generic
Routing Encapsulation.";
}
enum geneve {
description
"The GENEVE encapsulation is used for flow encapsulation.";
reference
"RFC 8926: Geneve: Generic Network
Virtualization Encapsulation.";
}
}
description
"The encapsulation type used for the flow.
When this type is set, the associated vni-value
MUST be set.";
} // virtual-type
identity multicast-model { /*
base rt:control-plane-protocol; * Identities
description "Identity for the Multicast model."; */
}
grouping general-multicast-key { identity multicast-model {
description base "rt:control-plane-protocol";
"The general multicast keys. They are used to distinguish description "Identity for the multicast model.";
different multicast service."; }
leaf vpn-rd { identity overlay-type {
type rt-types:route-distinguisher; description
description "Base identity for the type of multicast overlay technology.";
"A Route Distinguisher used to distinguish }
routes from different MVPNs."; identity transport-type {
reference description "Identity for the multicast transport technology.";
"RFC 8294: Common YANG Data Types for the Routing Area. }
RFC 6513: Multicast in MPLS/BGP IP VPNs."; identity underlay-type {
} description "Identity for the multicast underlay technology.";
leaf source-address { }
type ip-multicast-source-address; identity overlay-pim {
description base overlay-type;
"The IPv4/IPv6 source address of the multicast flow. The description
value set to zero means that the receiver interests "Using PIM as multicast overlay technology.
in all source that relevant to one given group."; For example, as BIER overlay.";
} reference
leaf group-address { "I-D.ietf-bier-pim-signaling:
type rt-types:ip-multicast-group-address; PIM Signaling Through BIER Core.";
description }
"The IPv4/IPv6 group address of multicast flow. This identity mld {
type represents a version-neutral IP multicast group base overlay-type;
address. The format of the textual representation description
implies the IP version."; "Using MLD as multicast overlay technology.
reference For example, as BIER overlay.";
"RFC8294: Common YANG Data Types for the Routing Area."; reference
"I-D.ietf-bier-mld:
BIER Ingress Multicast Flow Overlay
using Multicast Listener Discovery Protocols.";
}
identity mld-snooping {
base overlay-type;
description
"Using MLD as multicast overlay technology.
For example, as BIER overlay.";
reference
"RFC 4541:
Considerations for Internet Group Management
Protocol (IGMP) and Multicast Listener
Discovery (MLD) Snooping Switches.";
}
identity evpn {
base overlay-type;
description
"Using EVPN as multicast overlay technology.";
reference
"RFC 7432: BGP MPLS-Based Ethernet VPN.
I-D.ietf-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates:
Updates on EVPN BUM Procedures.
I-D.ietf-bier-evpn: EVPN BUM Using BIER.";
}
identity mvpn {
base overlay-type;
description
"Using MVPN as multicast overlay technology.";
reference
"RFC 6513: Multicast in MPLS/BGP IP VPNs.
RFC 7716:
Global Table Multicast with BGP Multicast VPN
(BGP-MVPN) Procedures.";
}
identity bier {
base transport-type;
description
"Using BIER as multicast transport technology.";
reference
"RFC 8279:
Multicast Using Bit Index Explicit Replication (BIER).";
}
identity bier-te {
base transport-type;
description
"Using BIER-TE as multicast transport technology.";
reference
"I-D.ietf-bier-te-arch:
Traffic Engineering for Bit Index Explicit Replication
(BIER-TE)";
}
identity mldp {
base transport-type;
description
"Using mLDP as multicast transport technology.";
reference
"RFC 6388:
Label Distribution Protocol Extensions
for Point-to-Multipoint and Multipoint-to-Multipoint
Label Switched Paths.
I-D.ietf-mpls-mldp-yang: YANG Data Model for MPLS mLDP.";
}
identity rsvp-te-p2mp {
base transport-type;
description
"Using P2MP TE as multicast transport technology.";
reference
"RFC 4875:
Extensions to Resource Reservation Protocol
- Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE) for Point-to-Multipoint
TE Label Switched Paths (LSPs).";
}
identity sr-p2mp {
base transport-type;
description
"Using Segment Routing as multicast transport technology.";
reference
"I-D.ietf-pim-sr-p2mp-policy:
Segment Routing Point-to-Multipoint Policy.";
}
identity cisco-mdt {
base transport-type;
description
"Using cisco MDT for multicast transport technology.";
reference
"RFC 6037:
Cisco Systems' Solution for Multicast in BGP/MPLS IP VPNs";
}
identity pim {
base transport-type;
base underlay-type;
description
"Using PIM as multicast transport technology.";
reference
"RFC 7761:
Protocol Independent Multicast - Sparse Mode
(PIM-SM): Protocol Specification (Revised).";
}
identity bgp {
base underlay-type;
description
"Using BGP as underlay technology to build the multicast
transport layer. For example, using BGP as BIER underlay.";
reference
"I-D.ietf-bier-idr-extensions: BGP Extensions for BIER.";
}
identity ospf {
base underlay-type;
description
"Using OSPF as multicast underlay technology.
For example, using OSPF as BIER underlay.";
reference
"RFC 8444:
OSPFv2 Extensions for Bit Index Explicit Replication (BIER),
I-D.ietf-bier-ospfv3-extensions:
OSPFv3 Extensions for BIER.";
}
identity isis {
base underlay-type;
description
"Using ISIS as multicast underlay technology.
For example, using ISIS as BIER underlay.";
reference
"RFC 8401:
Bit Index Explicit Replication (BIER) Support via IS-IS";
}
identity babel {
base underlay-type;
description
"Using BABEL as multicast underlay technology.
For example, using BABEL as BIER underlay.";
reference
"RFC 8966: The Babel Routing Protocol
I-D.zhang-bier-babel-extensions: BIER in BABEL";
}
identity rift {
base underlay-type;
description
"Using RIFT as multicast underlay technology.
} For example, using RIFT as BIER underlay.";
leaf vni-type { reference
type virtual-type; "I-D.ietf-rift-rift: RIFT: Routing in Fat Trees.
description I-D.zzhang-bier-rift: Supporting BIER with RIFT";
"The type of virtual network identifier. Includes the }
Vxlan, NVGRE and Geneve. This value and vni-value is
used to indicate a specific virtual multicast service.";
}
leaf vni-value {
type uint32;
description
"The value of Vxlan network identifier, virtual subnet ID
or virtual net identifier. This value and vni-type is used
to indicate a specific virtual multicast service.";
}
} // general-multicast-key
grouping encap-type { grouping general-multicast-key {
description description
"The encapsulation type used for flow forwarding."; "The general multicast keys. They are used to distinguish
choice encap-type { different multicast service.";
case mpls { leaf vpn-rd {
description "The BIER forwarding depends on mpls."; type rt-types:route-distinguisher;
reference description
"RFC 8296: Encapsulation for Bit Index Explicit "A Route Distinguisher used to distinguish
Replication (BIER) in MPLS and Non-MPLS Networks."; routes from different MVPNs.";
} reference
case eth { "RFC 8294: Common YANG Data Types for the Routing Area.
description "The BIER forwarding depends on ethernet."; RFC 6513: Multicast in MPLS/BGP IP VPNs.";
reference }
"RFC 8296: Encapsulation for Bit Index Explicit leaf source-address {
Replication (BIER) in MPLS and Non-MPLS Networks."; type ip-multicast-source-address;
} description
case ipv6 { "The IPv4/IPv6 source address of the multicast flow. The
description "The BIER forwarding depends on IPv6."; value set to zero means that the receiver interests
reference in all source that relevant to one given group.";
"I-D.zhang-bier-bierin6: BIER in IPv6 (BIERin6)"; }
} leaf group-address {
description "The encapsulation type in BIER."; type rt-types:ip-multicast-group-address;
} description
} // encap-type "The IPv4/IPv6 group address of multicast flow. This
type represents a version-neutral IP multicast group
address. The format of the textual representation
implies the IP version.";
reference
"RFC 8294: Common YANG Data Types for the Routing Area.";
}
leaf mac-address {
type yang:mac-address;
description
"The mac address of flow. In the EVPN situation, the L2
flow that is called
BUM (Broadcast, Unknown Unicast, Multicast)
can be sent to the other PEs that
are in a same broadcast domain.";
reference
"RFC 6991: Common YANG Data Types.
RFC 7432: BGP MPLS-Based Ethernet VPN.";
}
leaf vni-value {
type uint32;
description
"The value of Vxlan network identifier, virtual subnet ID
or virtual net identifier. This value and vni-type is used
to indicate a specific virtual multicast service.";
}
} // general-multicast-key
grouping bier-key { grouping encap-type {
description description
"The key parameters set for BIER/BIER TE forwarding."; "The encapsulation type used for flow forwarding.
reference This encapsulation acts as the inner encapsulation,
"RFC 8279: Multicast Using Bit Index Explicit Replication as compare to the outer multicast-transport encapsulation.";
(BIER)."; choice encap-type {
case mpls {
description "The BIER forwarding depends on mpls.";
reference
"RFC 8296: Encapsulation for Bit Index Explicit
Replication (BIER) in MPLS and Non-MPLS Networks.";
}
case eth {
description "The BIER forwarding depends on ethernet.";
reference
"RFC 8296: Encapsulation for Bit Index Explicit
Replication (BIER) in MPLS and Non-MPLS Networks.";
}
case ipv6 {
description "The BIER forwarding depends on IPv6.";
reference
"I-D.ietf-bier-bierin6: BIER in IPv6 (BIERin6)";
}
description "The encapsulation type in BIER.";
}
} // encap-type
leaf sub-domain { grouping bier-key {
type uint16; description
description "The key parameters set for BIER/BIER TE forwarding.";
"The subdomain id that the multicast flow belongs to."; reference
} "RFC 8279: Multicast Using Bit Index Explicit Replication
leaf bitstringlength { (BIER).";
type uint16;
description
"The bitstringlength used by BIER forwarding.";
}
leaf set-identifier {
type uint16;
description
"The set identifier used by the multicast flow.";
}
uses encap-type;
}
grouping lsp { leaf sub-domain {
description "The lsp information."; type uint16;
leaf root-address { description
type ip-multicast-source-address; "The subdomain id that the multicast flow belongs to.";
description }
"Root address of the mldp fec."; leaf bitstringlength {
} type uint16;
leaf lsp-id { description
type uint32; "The bitstringlength used by BIER forwarding.";
description }
"The lsp id that corresponding this flow."; leaf set-identifier {
} type uint16;
leaf backup-lsp-id { description
type uint32; "The set identifier used by the multicast flow.";
description }
"The backup lsp id that corresponding this flow. uses encap-type;
In case the lsp fails, the backup lsp can be used."; }
}
} // lsp
grouping transport-tech { grouping transport-tech {
choice transport { description
description "The selected transport technology."; "The transport technology selected for the multicast service.
container bier { For one specific multicast flow, it's better to use only one
description transport technology for forwarding.";
"The transport technology is BIER. The BIER technology
is introduced in RFC8279. The parameter is consistent
with the definition in BIER YANG data model.";
reference
"RFC 8279: Multicast Using Bit Index Explicit
Replication (BIER).
I-D.ietf-bier-bier-yang: YANG Data Model for BIER
Protocol.";
uses bier-key; leaf type {
} type identityref {
base transport-type;
}
description "The type of transport technology";
}
container bier {
when "../type = 'ietf-multicast-model:bier'" {
description
"Only when BIER is used as transport technology.";
}
description
"The transport technology is BIER. The BIER technology
is introduced in RFC8279. The parameters are consistent
with the definition in BIER YANG data model.";
reference
"I-D.ietf-bier-bier-yang:
YANG Data Model for BIER Protocol.";
uses bier-key;
}
container bier-te {
when "../type = 'ietf-multicast-model:bier-te'" {
description
"Only when BIER-TE is used as transport technology.";
}
description
"The BIER-TE parameter that may need to be set.
The parameters are consistent with the definition in
BIER and BIER TE YANG data model.";
container bier-te { reference
description "I-D.ietf-bier-bier-yang:
"The transport technology is BIER-TE."; YANG Data Model for BIER Protocol
reference I-D.ietf-bier-te-yang:
"I-D.ietf-bier-te-arch: Traffic Engineering for Bit Index A YANG data model for Traffic Engineering for Bit Index
Explicit Replication (BIER-TE)"; Explicit Replication (BIER-TE)";
uses bier-key; uses bier-key;
leaf-list bier-te-adj { list bitstring {
type uint16; key "name";
leaf name {
type string;
description "The name of the bitstring";
}
list bier-te-adj {
key "adj-id";
leaf adj-id {
type uint16;
description
"The link adjacency ID used for BIER TE forwarding.";
}
description
"The adjacencies ID used for BIER TE bitstring
encapsulation.";
}
description
"The bitstring name and detail used for BIER TE
forwarding encapsulation. One or more bitstring can be
used for backup path.";
}
}
container cisco-mdt {
when "../type = 'ietf-multicast-model:cisco-mdt'" {
description description
"The adjacencies ID used in BIER TE forwarding "Only when cisco MDT is used as transport technology.";
encapsulation."; }
} description "The MDT parameter that may need to be set.";
} leaf p-group {
type rt-types:ip-multicast-group-address;
container cisco-mode { description
"The address of p-group. It is used to encapsulate
and forward flow according to multicast tree from
ingress node to egress nodes.";
}
}
container rsvp-te-p2mp {
when "../type = 'ietf-multicast-model:rsvp-te-p2mp'" {
description description
"The transport technology is cisco-mode: Cisco MDT."; "Only when RSVP TE P2MP is used as transport technology.";
reference }
"RFC 6037: Cisco Systems' Solution for Multicast in description
BGP/MPLS IP VPNs"; "The parameter that may be set. They are consistent with
the definition in TE data model.";
reference
"RFC 8776: Common YANG Data Types for Traffic Engineering";
leaf p-group { leaf template-name {
type rt-types:ip-multicast-group-address; type string {
pattern '/?([a-zA-Z0-9\-_.]+)(/[a-zA-Z0-9\-_.]+)*';
}
description
"A type for the name of a TE node template or TE link
template.";
}
}
container pim {
when "../type = 'ietf-multicast-model:pim'" {
description description
"The address of p-group. It is used to encapsulate "Only when PIM is used as transport technology.";
and forward flow according to multicast tree from }
ingress node to egress nodes."; description "The PIM parameter that may need to be set.";
} uses pim;
uses transport-pim; }
} container sr-p2mp {
when "../type = 'ietf-multicast-model:sr-p2mp'" {
container mpls { description
description "Only when segment routing P2MP is used as transport
"The transport technology is mpls. Multicast overlay can use technology.";
mpls technologies to build transport layer."; }
reference description "The SR-P2MP parameter that may need to be set.";
"RFC 6513: Multicast in MPLS/BGP IP VPNs."; list ir-segment-lists {
key "name";
choice mpls-lsp-type { leaf name {
case mldp { type string;
description description "Segment-list name";
"The mldp type of lsp is used as multicast }
transportation. description
The YANG data model defined in 'ietf-mpls-mldp-yang' "The segment lists used for ingress replication.
can be invoked."; The name refers a segment list.";
reference }
"RFC 6388: Label Distribution Protocol Extensions
for Point-to-Multipoint and Multipoint-to-Multipoint
Label Switched Paths.
I-D.ietf-mpls-mldp-yang:
YANG Data Model for MPLS mLDP.";
container mldp-lsp {
description
"The specific parameters can be set to use
the specific mldp fec.";
uses lsp;
}
}
case p2mp-te {
description
"The p2mp te type of lsp is used as multicast
transportation.";
reference
"RFC 4875: Extensions to Resource Reservation Protocol
- Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE) for Point-to-Multipoint
TE Label Switched Paths (LSPs).";
container p2mp-te-lsp { list replication-segment {
description key "replication-id node-id";
"The specific parameters can be set to use leaf replication-id {
the specific mldp fec."; type tree-sid;
uses lsp; description
} "The identifier for a Replication segment that is
} unique in context of the Replication Node.
description "The collection types of mpls tunnels"; This is a SR-MPLS label or a SRv6 SID";
} }
} // mpls leaf node-id {
type inet:ip-address;
description
"The address of the Replication Node that the
Replication segment is for.";
}
description
"A Multi-point service delivery could be realized via
P2MP trees in a Segment Routing domain.
It may consist of one or more Replication segment";
reference
"I-D.ietf-spring-sr-replication-segment:
SR Replication Segment for Multi-point Service
Delivery.";
}
} // sr-p2mp
} // transport-tech
container pim { grouping underlay-tech {
description description
"The transport technology is PIM. PIM is used "The underlay technology selected for the transport layer.
commonly in traditional network."; The underlay technology has no straight relationship with
reference the multicast overlay, it is used for transport path
"RFC 7761: Protocol Independent Multicast - Sparse Mode building, for example BIER forwarding path building.";
(PIM-SM): Protocol Specification (Revised).";
uses transport-pim; leaf type {
} type identityref {
} // choice base underlay-type;
} // transport-tech }
description "The type of underlay technology";
}
container ospf {
when "../type = 'ietf-multicast-model:ospf'" {
description
"Only when OSPF is used as underay technology.";
}
description
"If OSPF protocol supports multiple topology feature,
the associated topology name may be assigned.
In case the topology name is assigned, the specific
OSPF topology is used for underly to building the
transport layer.";
reference
"RFC 4915: Multi-Topology Routing";
leaf topology {
type string;
description
"The designed topology name of ospf protocol.";
}
}
container isis {
when "../type = 'ietf-multicast-model:isis'" {
description
"Only when ISIS is used as underay technology.";
}
description
"If ISIS protocol supports multiple topology feature,
the associated topology name may be assigned.
In case the topology name is assigned, the specific
ISIS topology is used for underly to building the
transport layer.";
reference
"RFC 5120: M-IS-IS: Multi Topology Routing in IS-IS";
leaf topology {
type string;
description
"The designed topology name of isis protocol.";
}
}
container pim {
when "../type = 'ietf-multicast-model:pim'" {
description
"Only when PIM is used as underay technology.";
}
description "The PIM parameter that may need to be set.";
uses pim;
}
} // underlay-tech
grouping underlay-tech { /*overlay*/
choice underlay {
case bgp {
description
"The underlay technology is BGP. BGP protocol
should run if BGP is used as underlay protocol.";
reference
"RFC 4271: A Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4)";
}
container ospf {
description
"The underlay technology is OSPF. OSPF protocol
should be triggered to run if OSPF is used as underlay
protocol.";
reference
"RFC 2328: OSPF Version 2.
RFC 5340: OSPF for IPv6.
I-D.ietf-ospf-yang: YANG Data Model for OSPF Protocol.";
leaf topology { grouping overlay-tech {
type leafref { container dynamic-overlay {
path "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/" leaf type {
+ "rt:control-plane-protocol/ospf:ospf/" type identityref {
+ "ospf:topologies/ospf:topology/ospf:name"; base overlay-type;
} }
description description "The type of overlay technology";
"The designed topology name of ospf protocol."; }
} container mld {
} when "../type = 'ietf-multicast-model:mld'" {
case isis { description
description "Only when MLD is used as overlay technology.";
"The underlay technology is ISIS. ISIS protocol should }
be triggered to run if ISIS is used as underlay protocol. description "The MLD parameter that may need to be set.";
And the associated extensions can be used."; leaf mld-instance-group {
reference type rt-types:ip-multicast-group-address;
"RFC 1195: Use of OSI IS-IS for Routing in TCP/IP and description
Dual Environments"; "The multicast address used for multiple MLD instance
} support.";
case babel { }
description }
"The underlay technology is Babel. Babel protocol description
should be triggered to run if Babel is used as "The dynamic overlay technologies and associated parameter
underlay protocol."; that may be set.";
}
description "The overlay technology used for multicast service.";
} // overlay-tech
reference /*transport*/
"I-D.ietf-babel-rfc6126bis: The Babel Routing Protocol.";
}
} // choice
} // underlay-tech
/*overlay*/ grouping pim {
description
"The required information of pim transportion.";
leaf source-address {
type ip-multicast-source-address;
description
"The IPv4/IPv6 source address of the multicast flow. The
value set to zero means that the receiver interests
in all source that relevant to one given group.";
}
leaf group-address {
type rt-types:ip-multicast-group-address;
mandatory true;
description
"The IPv4/IPv6 group address of multicast flow. This
type represents a version-neutral IP multicast group
address. The format of the textual representation
implies the IP version.";
}
reference
"RFC 7761: Protocol Independent Multicast - Sparse Mode
(PIM-SM): Protocol Specification (Revised).";
} //pim
grouping overlay-tech { /*underlay*/
choice overlay-tech-type {
case bgp {
description
"BGP technology is used for multicast overlay.";
reference
"RFC 7716: Global Table Multicast with BGP Multicast
VPN (BGP-MVPN) Procedures.";
}
case evpn {
description
"EVPN technology is used for multicast overlay.";
reference
"RFC 7432: BGP MPLS-Based Ethernet VPN.
I-D.ietf-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates: Updates on
EVPN BUM Procedures.
I-D.ietf-bier-evpn: EVPN BUM Using BIER.";
}
case mld {
description
"MLD technology is used for multicast overlay.";
reference
"I-D.ietf-bier-mld: BIER Ingress Multicast Flow Overlay
using Multicast Listener Discovery Protocols.";
leaf mld-instance-group {
type rt-types:ip-multicast-group-address;
description
"The multicast address used for multiple MLD instance
support.";
}
}
case mld-snooping {
description
"MLD snooping technology is used for multicast overlay.";
reference
"RFC 4541: Considerations for Internet Group Management
Protocol (IGMP) and Multicast Listener
Discovery (MLD) Snooping Switches.";
}
case mvpn {
description
"MVPN technology is used for multicast overlay.";
reference
"RFC 6513: Multicast in MPLS/BGP IP VPNs.";
}
case pim {
description
"PIM technology is used for multicast overlay.";
reference
"I-D.ietf-bier-pim-signaling: PIM Signaling
Through BIER Core.";
}
description
"The overlay technology used for multicast service.";
}
description "The overlay technology used for multicast service.";
} // overlay-tech
/*transport*/ container multicast-model {
description
"The model of multicast YANG data. Include keys, overlay,
transport and underlay.";
grouping transport-pim { list multicast-keys{
description key "vpn-rd source-address group-address mac-address vni-value";
"The requirement information of pim transportion."; uses general-multicast-key;
reference
"RFC 7761: Protocol Independent Multicast - Sparse Mode
(PIM-SM): Protocol Specification (Revised).";
} //transport-pim
/*underlay*/ container multicast-overlay {
description
"The overlay information of multicast service.
Overlay technology is used to exchange multicast
flows information. Overlay technology may not be
used in SDN controlled completely situation, but
it can be used in partial SDN controlled situation
or non-SDN controlled situation. Different overlay
technologies can be choosed according to different
deploy consideration.";
container multicast-model { leaf vni-type {
description type virtual-type;
"The model of multicast YANG data. Include keys, overlay, description
transport and underlay."; "The encapsulated type for the multicast flow,
it is used to carry the virtual network identifier
for the multicast service.";
}
list multicast-keys{ container ingress-egress {
key "vpn-rd source-address group-address vni-type vni-value"; description
uses general-multicast-key; "The ingress and egress nodes address collection.
The ingress node may use the egress nodes set
directly to encapsulate the multicast flow by
transport technology.";
container multicast-overlay { list ingress-nodes {
description key "ingress-node";
"The overlay information of multicast service. description
Overlay technology is used to exchange multicast "The egress nodes of multicast flow.";
flows information. Overlay technology may not be
used in SDN controlled completely situation, but
it can be used in partial SDN controlled situation
or non-SDN controlled situation. Different overlay
technologies can be choosed according to different
deploy consideration.";
container ingress-egress { leaf ingress-node {
description type inet:ip-address;
"The ingress and egress nodes address collection. description
The ingress node may use the egress nodes set "The ip address of ingress node for one or more
directly to encapsulate the multicast flow by multicast flow. Or the ingress node of MVPN and
transport technology."; BIER. In MVPN, this is the address of ingress
PE; in BIER, this is the BFR-prefix of ingress
nodes.
Two or more ingress nodes may existed for the
redundant ingress node protection.";
leaf ingress-node { }
type inet:ip-address; }
description
"The ip address of ingress node for one or more
multicast flow. Or the ingress node of MVPN and
BIER. In MVPN, this is the address of ingress
PE; in BIER, this is the BFR-prefix of ingress
nodes.";
}
list egress-nodes {
key "egress-node";
description
"The egress multicast nodes of the multicast flow.
Or the egress node of MVPN and BIER. In MVPN, this
is the address of egress PE; in BIER, this is the
BFR-prefix of ingress nodes.";
leaf egress-node { list egress-nodes {
type inet:ip-address; key "egress-node";
description description
"The ip-address set of egress multicast nodes."; "The egress multicast nodes of the multicast flow.
} Or the egress node of MVPN and BIER. In MVPN, this
} is the address of egress PE; in BIER, this is the
} BFR-prefix of ingress nodes.";
container bier-ids { leaf egress-node {
description type inet:ip-address;
"The BFR-ids of ingress and egress BIER nodes for description
one or more multicast flows. This overlay is used "The ip-address set of egress multicast nodes.";
with BIER transport technology. The egress nodes }
set can be used to encapsulate the multicast flow }
directly in the ingress node."; }
reference
"RFC 8279: Multicast Using Bit Index Explicit
Replication (BIER)";
leaf sub-domain { container bier-ids {
type uint16; if-feature bier;
description description
"The sub-domain that this multicast flow belongs to."; "The BFR-ids of ingress and egress BIER nodes for
} one or more multicast flows. This overlay is used
leaf ingress-node { with BIER transport technology. The egress nodes
type uint16; set can be used to encapsulate the multicast flow
description directly in the ingress node.";
"The ingress node of multicast flow. This is the reference
BFR-id of ingress nodes."; "RFC 8279: Multicast Using Bit Index Explicit
} Replication (BIER)";
list egress-nodes {
key "egress-node";
description
"The egress nodes of multicast flow.";
leaf egress-node { leaf sub-domain {
type uint16; type uint16;
description description
"The BFR-ids of egress multicast BIER nodes."; "The sub-domain that this multicast flow belongs to.";
} }
} list ingress-nodes {
} key "ingress-node";
uses overlay-tech; description
} "The ingress nodes of multicast flow.";
leaf ingress-node {
type uint16;
description
"The ingress node of multicast flow. This is the
BFR-id of ingress nodes.";
}
}
list egress-nodes {
key "egress-node";
description
"The egress nodes of multicast flow.";
container multicast-transport { leaf egress-node {
description type uint16;
"The transportion of multicast service. Transport description
protocol is responsible for delivering multicast "The BFR-ids of egress multicast BIER nodes.";
flows from ingress nodes to egress nodes with or }
without specific encapsulation. Different transport }
technology can be choosed according to different }
deploy consideration. Once a transport technology uses overlay-tech;
is choosed, associated protocol should be triggered }
to run.";
uses transport-tech; container multicast-transport {
} description
container multicast-underlay { "The transportion of multicast service. Transport
description protocol is responsible for delivering multicast
"The underlay of multicast service. Underlay protocol flows from ingress nodes to egress nodes with or
is used to build transport layer. Underlay protocol without specific encapsulation. Different transport
need not be assigned in ordinary network since technology can be choosed according to different
existed underlay protocol fits well, but it can be deploy consideration. Once a transport technology
assigned in particular networks for better is choosed, associated protocol should be triggered
controll. Once a underlay technology is choosed, to run.";
associated protocol should be triggered to run.";
uses underlay-tech; uses transport-tech;
} }
description container multicast-underlay {
"The model of multicast YANG data. Include keys, description
overlay, transport and underlay."; "The underlay of multicast service. Underlay protocol
} is used to build transport layer. Underlay protocol
} need not be assigned in ordinary network since
existed underlay protocol fits well, but it can be
assigned in particular networks for better
controll. Once a underlay technology is choosed,
associated protocol should be triggered to run.";
/*Notifications*/ uses underlay-tech;
}
description
"The model of multicast YANG data. Include keys,
overlay, transport and underlay.";
}
}
notification head-end-event { /*Notifications*/
leaf event-type {
type enumeration {
enum down {
description
"There is something wrong with head end node,
and head end node can't work properlay.";
}
enum module-loaded {
description
"The new modules that can be used by multicast
flows have been loaded.";
}
enum module-unloaded {
description
"The new modules that can be used by multicast
flows have been unloaded.";
}
}
description "Event type.";
}
container multicast-key {
uses general-multicast-key;
description
"The associated multicast keys that are influenced by
head end node failer.";
}
uses overlay-tech;
container transport-tech { notification ingress-egress-event {
description leaf event-type {
"The modules can be used to forward multicast flows."; type enumeration {
uses transport-tech; enum down {
} description
"There is something wrong with ingress or egress node,
and node can't work properlay.";
}
enum protocol-enabled {
description
"The protocol that is used for multicast
flows have been enabled.";
}
enum protocol-disabled {
description
"The protocol that is used by multicast
flows have been disabled.";
}
}
description "Event type.";
}
container multicast-key {
uses general-multicast-key;
description
"The associated multicast keys that are influenced by
ingress or egress node failer.";
}
uses overlay-tech;
container underlay-tech { container transport-tech {
description description
"There is something wrong with the module which is "The modules can be used to forward multicast flows.";
used to build multicast transport layer."; uses transport-tech;
uses underlay-tech; }
} container underlay-tech {
description description
"Notification events for the head end nodes. Like head "There is something wrong with the module which is
node failer, overlay/ transport/ underlay module used to build multicast transport layer.";
loading/ unloading. And the potential failer about some uses underlay-tech;
multicast flows and associated }
overlay/ transport/ underlay technologies."; description
} "Notification events for the ingress or egress nodes. Like
} node failer, overlay/ transport/ underlay module
<CODE ENDS> loading/ unloading. And the potential failer about some
multicast flows and associated
overlay/ transport/ underlay technologies.";
}
}
<CODE ENDS>
5. Security Considerations 5. Security Considerations
The YANG module specified in this document defines a schema for data The YANG module specified in this document defines a schema for data
that is designed to be accessed via network management protocols such that is designed to be accessed via network management protocols such
as NETCONF [RFC6241] or RESTCONF [RFC8040]. The lowest NETCONF layer as NETCONF [RFC6241] or RESTCONF [RFC8040]. The lowest NETCONF layer
is the secure transport layer, and the mandatory-to-implement secure is the secure transport layer, and the mandatory-to-implement secure
transport is Secure Shell (SSH) [RFC6242]. The lowest RESTCONF layer transport is Secure Shell (SSH) [RFC6242]. The lowest RESTCONF layer
is HTTPS, and the mandatory-to-implement secure transport is TLS is HTTPS, and the mandatory-to-implement secure transport is TLS
[RFC8446]. [RFC8446].
skipping to change at page 27, line 43 skipping to change at page 33, line 33
default). These data nodes may be considered sensitive or vulnerable default). These data nodes may be considered sensitive or vulnerable
in some network environments. Write operations (e.g., edit-config) in some network environments. Write operations (e.g., edit-config)
to these data nodes without proper protection can have a negative to these data nodes without proper protection can have a negative
effect on network operations. These are data nodes and their effect on network operations. These are data nodes and their
sensitivity/vulnerability: sensitivity/vulnerability:
Under /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/multicast-model, Under /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/multicast-model,
multicast-model multicast-model
These data nodes in this model specifies the configuration for the * These data nodes in this model specifies the configuration for the
multicast service at the top level. Modifying the configuration multicast service at the top level. Modifying the configuration
can cause multicast service to be deleted or reconstructed. can cause multicast service to be deleted or reconstructed.
Some of the readable data nodes in this YANG module may be considered Some of the readable data nodes in this YANG module may be considered
sensitive or vulnerable in some network environments. It is thus sensitive or vulnerable in some network environments. It is thus
important to control read access (e.g., via get, get-config, or important to control read access (e.g., via get, get-config, or
notification) to these data nodes. These are the data nodes and notification) to these data nodes. These are the data nodes and
their sensitivity/vulnerability: their sensitivity/vulnerability:
/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/multicast-model, /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/multicast-model,
skipping to change at page 28, line 38 skipping to change at page 34, line 32
name: ietf-multicast-model name: ietf-multicast-model
namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-multicast-model namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-multicast-model
prefix: multicast-model prefix: multicast-model
reference: RFC XXXX reference: RFC XXXX
7. Acknowledgements 7. Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Stig Venaas, Jake Holland, Min Gu for The authors would like to thank Stig Venaas, Jake Holland, Min Gu,
their valuable comments and suggestions. Gyan Mishra for their valuable comments and suggestions.
8. References 8. References
8.1. Normative References 8.1. Normative References
[RFC1195] Callon, R., "Use of OSI IS-IS for routing in TCP/IP and [RFC1195] Callon, R., "Use of OSI IS-IS for routing in TCP/IP and
dual environments", RFC 1195, DOI 10.17487/RFC1195, dual environments", RFC 1195, DOI 10.17487/RFC1195,
December 1990, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1195>. December 1990, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1195>.
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
skipping to change at page 31, line 44 skipping to change at page 37, line 34
Routing Management (NMDA Version)", RFC 8349, Routing Management (NMDA Version)", RFC 8349,
DOI 10.17487/RFC8349, March 2018, DOI 10.17487/RFC8349, March 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8349>. <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8349>.
[RFC8446] Rescorla, E., "The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol [RFC8446] Rescorla, E., "The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol
Version 1.3", RFC 8446, DOI 10.17487/RFC8446, August 2018, Version 1.3", RFC 8446, DOI 10.17487/RFC8446, August 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8446>. <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8446>.
8.2. Informative References 8.2. Informative References
[I-D.ietf-babel-rfc6126bis]
Chroboczek, J. and D. Schinazi, "The Babel Routing
Protocol", draft-ietf-babel-rfc6126bis-20 (work in
progress), August 2020.
[I-D.ietf-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates] [I-D.ietf-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates]
Zhang, Z., Lin, W., Rabadan, J., Patel, K., and A. Zhang, Z., Lin, W., Rabadan, J., Patel, K., and A.
Sajassi, "Updates on EVPN BUM Procedures", draft-ietf- Sajassi, "Updates on EVPN BUM Procedures", Work in
bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-08 (work in progress), Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-bess-evpn-bum-
November 2019. procedure-updates-09, 9 June 2021,
<https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-bum-
procedure-updates-09.txt>.
[I-D.ietf-bier-bier-yang] [I-D.ietf-bier-bier-yang]
Chen, R., hu, f., Zhang, Z., dai.xianxian@zte.com.cn, d., Chen, R., Hu, F., Zhang, Z., Dai, X., and M. Sivakumar,
and M. Sivakumar, "YANG Data Model for BIER Protocol", "YANG Data Model for BIER Protocol", Work in Progress,
draft-ietf-bier-bier-yang-07 (work in progress), September Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-bier-bier-yang-07, 8 September
2020. 2020, <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-bier-
bier-yang-07.txt>.
[I-D.ietf-bier-bierin6]
Zhang, Z., Zhang, Z., Wijnands, I., Mishra, M., Bidgoli,
H., and G. Mishra, "Supporting BIER in IPv6 Networks
(BIERin6)", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-
bier-bierin6-00, 14 June 2021,
<https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-bier-
bierin6-00.txt>.
[I-D.ietf-bier-evpn] [I-D.ietf-bier-evpn]
Zhang, Z., Przygienda, T., Sajassi, A., and J. Rabadan, Zhang, Z., Przygienda, A., Sajassi, A., and J. Rabadan,
"EVPN BUM Using BIER", draft-ietf-bier-evpn-03 (work in "EVPN BUM Using BIER", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft,
progress), April 2020. draft-ietf-bier-evpn-04, 2 December 2020,
<https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-bier-evpn-
04.txt>.
[I-D.ietf-bier-mld] [I-D.ietf-bier-mld]
Pfister, P., Wijnands, I., Venaas, S., Wang, C., Zhang, Pfister, P., Wijnands, I., Venaas, S., Wang, C., Zhang,
Z., and M. Stenberg, "BIER Ingress Multicast Flow Overlay Z., and M. Stenberg, "BIER Ingress Multicast Flow Overlay
using Multicast Listener Discovery Protocols", draft-ietf- using Multicast Listener Discovery Protocols", Work in
bier-mld-04 (work in progress), March 2020. Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-bier-mld-05, 22
February 2021, <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-
ietf-bier-mld-05.txt>.
[I-D.ietf-bier-pim-signaling] [I-D.ietf-bier-pim-signaling]
Bidgoli, H., Xu, F., Kotalwar, J., Wijnands, I., Mishra, Bidgoli, H., Xu, F., Kotalwar, J., Wijnands, I., Mishra,
M., and Z. Zhang, "PIM Signaling Through BIER Core", M., and Z. Zhang, "PIM Signaling Through BIER Core", Work
draft-ietf-bier-pim-signaling-10 (work in progress), July in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-bier-pim-
2020. signaling-12, 25 July 2021,
<https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-bier-pim-
signaling-12.txt>.
[I-D.ietf-bier-te-arch] [I-D.ietf-bier-te-arch]
Eckert, T., Cauchie, G., and M. Menth, "Tree Engineering Eckert, T., Cauchie, G., and M. Menth, "Tree Engineering
for Bit Index Explicit Replication (BIER-TE)", draft-ietf- for Bit Index Explicit Replication (BIER-TE)", Work in
bier-te-arch-08 (work in progress), July 2020. Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-bier-te-arch-09, 30
October 2020, <https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-
ietf-bier-te-arch-09.txt>.
[I-D.ietf-nvo3-geneve] [I-D.ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg]
Gross, J., Ganga, I., and T. Sridhar, "Geneve: Generic Litkowski, S., Yeung, D., Lindem, A., Zhang, J., and L.
Network Virtualization Encapsulation", draft-ietf- Lhotka, "YANG Data Model for IS-IS Protocol", Work in
nvo3-geneve-16 (work in progress), March 2020. Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg-
42, 15 October 2019, <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/
draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg-42.txt>.
[I-D.ietf-ospf-yang] [I-D.ietf-ospf-yang]
Yeung, D., Qu, Y., Zhang, Z., Chen, I., and A. Lindem, Yeung, D., Qu, Y., Zhang, J., Chen, I., and A. Lindem,
"YANG Data Model for OSPF Protocol", draft-ietf-ospf- "YANG Data Model for OSPF Protocol", Work in Progress,
yang-29 (work in progress), October 2019. Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-ospf-yang-29, 17 October 2019,
<https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-ospf-yang-
29.txt>.
[I-D.ietf-pim-sr-p2mp-policy]
Voyer, D., Filsfils, C., Parekh, R., Bidgoli, H., and Z.
Zhang, "Segment Routing Point-to-Multipoint Policy", Work
in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-pim-sr-p2mp-
policy-02, 19 February 2021,
<https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pim-sr-p2mp-
policy-02.txt>.
[I-D.ietf-pim-yang] [I-D.ietf-pim-yang]
Liu, X., McAllister, P., Peter, A., Sivakumar, M., Liu, Liu, X., McAllister, P., Peter, A., Sivakumar, M., Liu,
Y., and f. hu, "A YANG Data Model for Protocol Independent Y., and F. Hu, "A YANG Data Model for Protocol Independent
Multicast (PIM)", draft-ietf-pim-yang-17 (work in Multicast (PIM)", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-
progress), May 2018. ietf-pim-yang-17, 19 May 2018,
<https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pim-yang-
17.txt>.
[I-D.zhang-bier-bierin6] [I-D.ietf-rift-rift]
Zhang, Z., Zhang, Z., Wijnands, I., Bidgoli, H., and M. Sharma, A., Thubert, P., Rijsman, B., and D. Afanasiev,
McBride, "BIER in IPv6 (BIERin6)", draft-zhang-bier- "RIFT: Routing in Fat Trees", Work in Progress, Internet-
bierin6-07 (work in progress), July 2020. Draft, draft-ietf-rift-rift-13, 12 July 2021,
<https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-rift-rift-
13.txt>.
[I-D.szcl-mboned-redundant-ingress-failover]
Shepherd, G., Zhang, Z., Liu, Y., and Y. Cheng, "Multicast
Redundant Ingress Router Failover", Work in Progress,
Internet-Draft, draft-szcl-mboned-redundant-ingress-
failover-01, 8 July 2021,
<https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-szcl-mboned-
redundant-ingress-failover-01.txt>.
[RFC3688] Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688, [RFC3688] Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688,
DOI 10.17487/RFC3688, January 2004, DOI 10.17487/RFC3688, January 2004,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3688>. <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3688>.
[RFC4541] Christensen, M., Kimball, K., and F. Solensky, [RFC4541] Christensen, M., Kimball, K., and F. Solensky,
"Considerations for Internet Group Management Protocol "Considerations for Internet Group Management Protocol
(IGMP) and Multicast Listener Discovery (MLD) Snooping (IGMP) and Multicast Listener Discovery (MLD) Snooping
Switches", RFC 4541, DOI 10.17487/RFC4541, May 2006, Switches", RFC 4541, DOI 10.17487/RFC4541, May 2006,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4541>. <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4541>.
skipping to change at page 34, line 9 skipping to change at page 40, line 31
[RFC8639] Voit, E., Clemm, A., Gonzalez Prieto, A., Nilsen-Nygaard, [RFC8639] Voit, E., Clemm, A., Gonzalez Prieto, A., Nilsen-Nygaard,
E., and A. Tripathy, "Subscription to YANG Notifications", E., and A. Tripathy, "Subscription to YANG Notifications",
RFC 8639, DOI 10.17487/RFC8639, September 2019, RFC 8639, DOI 10.17487/RFC8639, September 2019,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8639>. <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8639>.
[RFC8641] Clemm, A. and E. Voit, "Subscription to YANG Notifications [RFC8641] Clemm, A. and E. Voit, "Subscription to YANG Notifications
for Datastore Updates", RFC 8641, DOI 10.17487/RFC8641, for Datastore Updates", RFC 8641, DOI 10.17487/RFC8641,
September 2019, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8641>. September 2019, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8641>.
[RFC8926] Gross, J., Ed., Ganga, I., Ed., and T. Sridhar, Ed.,
"Geneve: Generic Network Virtualization Encapsulation",
RFC 8926, DOI 10.17487/RFC8926, November 2020,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8926>.
[RFC8966] Chroboczek, J. and D. Schinazi, "The Babel Routing
Protocol", RFC 8966, DOI 10.17487/RFC8966, January 2021,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8966>.
Appendix A. Data Tree Example Appendix A. Data Tree Example
This section contains an example of an instance data tree in JSON This section contains an example of an instance data tree in JSON
encoding [RFC7951], containing configuration data. encoding [RFC7951], containing configuration data.
The configuration example: The configuration example:
{ {
"ietf-multicast-model:multicast-model":{ "ietf-multicast-model:multicast-model":{
"multicast-keys":[ "multicast-keys":[
{ {
"vpn-rd":"0:65532:4294967292", "vpn-rd":"0:65532:4294967292",
"source-address":"*", "source-address":"*",
"group-address":"234.232.203.84", "group-address":"234.232.203.84",
"vni-type":"nvgre", "mac-address": "00:00:5e:00:53:01",
"vni-value":0, "vni-value":0,
"multicast-overlay":{ "multicast-overlay":{
"ingress-egress":{ "vni-type":"nvgre",
"ingress-node":"146.150.100.0", "ingress-egress":{
"egress-nodes":[ "ingress-nodes":[
{ {
"egress-node":"110.141.168.0" "ingress-node":"146.150.100.0"
} }
] ],
}, "egress-nodes":[
}, {
"multicast-transport":{ "egress-node":"110.141.168.0"
"bier":{ }
"sub-domain":0, ]
"bitstringlength":256, }
"set-identifier":0 },
} "multicast-transport":{
}, "type": "ietf-multicast-model:bier",
"multicast-underlay":{ "bier":{
"ospf":{ "sub-domain":0,
"topology":"2" "bitstringlength":256,
} "set-identifier":0
} }
} },
] "multicast-underlay":{
} "type": "ietf-multicast-model:ospf",
} "ospf":{
"topology":"2"
}
}
}
]
}
}
Authors' Addresses Authors' Addresses
Zheng Zhang Zheng Zhang
ZTE Corporation ZTE Corporation
China China
Email: zhang.zheng@zte.com.cn Email: zhang.zheng@zte.com.cn
Cui(Linda) Wang Cui(Linda) Wang
Individual Individual
Australia Australia
skipping to change at page 35, line 34 skipping to change at page 42, line 31
Email: chengying10@chinaunicom.cn Email: chengying10@chinaunicom.cn
Xufeng Liu Xufeng Liu
Volta Networks Volta Networks
Email: xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com Email: xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com
Mahesh Sivakumar Mahesh Sivakumar
Juniper networks Juniper networks
1133 Innovation Way 1133 Innovation Way
Sunnyvale, CALIFORNIA 94089 Sunnyvale, CALIFORNIA 94089,
USA United States of America
Email: sivakumar.mahesh@gmail.com Email: sivakumar.mahesh@gmail.com
 End of changes. 124 change blocks. 
967 lines changed or deleted 1307 lines changed or added

This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.48. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/