< draft-ietf-mpls-entropy-lsp-ping-01.txt   draft-ietf-mpls-entropy-lsp-ping-02.txt >
Internet Engineering Task Force N. Akiya Internet Engineering Task Force N. Akiya
Internet-Draft Big Switch Networks Internet-Draft Big Switch Networks
Updates: 4379,6424,6790 (if approved) G. Swallow Updates: 4379, 6424, 6790 (if approved) G. Swallow
Intended status: Standards Track C. Pignataro Intended status: Standards Track C. Pignataro
Expires: December 13, 2015 Cisco Systems Expires: July 7, 2016 Cisco
A. Malis A. Malis
Huawei Technologies Huawei Technologies
S. Aldrin S. Aldrin
Google Google
June 11, 2015 January 4, 2016
Label Switched Path (LSP) and Pseudowire (PW) Ping/Trace over Label Switched Path (LSP) and Pseudowire (PW) Ping/Trace over
MPLS Network using Entropy Labels (EL) MPLS Network using Entropy Labels (EL)
draft-ietf-mpls-entropy-lsp-ping-01 draft-ietf-mpls-entropy-lsp-ping-02
Abstract Abstract
The Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Label Switched Path (LSP) The Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Label Switched Path (LSP)
Ping and Traceroute are used to exercise specific paths of Equal-Cost Ping and Traceroute are used to exercise specific paths of Equal-Cost
Multipath (ECMP). When LSP is signaled to use Entropy Label (EL) Multipath (ECMP). When LSP is signaled to use Entropy Label (EL)
described in RFC6790, the ability for LSP Ping and Traceroute described in RFC 6790, the ability for LSP Ping and Traceroute
operation to discover and exercise ECMP paths has been lost in operation to discover and exercise ECMP paths has been lost in
scenarios which LSRs apply deviating load balance techniques. One scenarios which LSRs apply deviating load balance techniques. One
such scenario is when some LSRs apply EL based load balancing while such scenario is when some LSRs apply EL based load balancing while
other LSRs apply non-EL based load balancing (ex: IP). Another other LSRs apply non-EL based load balancing (ex: IP). Another
scenario is when EL based LSP is stitched with another LSP which can scenario is when EL based LSP is stitched with another LSP which can
be EL based or non-EL based. be EL based or non-EL based.
This document extends the MPLS LSP Ping and Traceroute mechanisms to This document extends the MPLS LSP Ping and Traceroute mechanisms to
restore the ability of exercising specific paths of ECMP over LSP restore the ability of exercising specific paths of ECMP over LSP
which make use of Entropy Label. This document updates RFC4379, which make use of the Entropy Label. This document updates RFC 4379,
RFC6424 and RFC6790. RFC 6424, and RFC 6790.
Requirements Language Requirements Language
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119]. document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].
Status of This Memo Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
skipping to change at page 2, line 12 skipping to change at page 2, line 12
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on December 13, 2015. This Internet-Draft will expire on July 7, 2016.
Copyright Notice Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2015 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the Copyright (c) 2016 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved. document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
skipping to change at page 20, line 8 skipping to change at page 20, line 8
13. Acknowledgements 13. Acknowledgements
Authors would like to thank Loa Andersson, Curtis Villamizar, Daniel Authors would like to thank Loa Andersson, Curtis Villamizar, Daniel
King, Sriganesh Kini and Victor Ji for performing thorough review and King, Sriganesh Kini and Victor Ji for performing thorough review and
providing valuable comments. providing valuable comments.
14. Contributing Authors 14. Contributing Authors
Nagendra Kumar Nagendra Kumar
Cisco Systems Cisco Systems, Inc.
Email: naikumar@cisco.com Email: naikumar@cisco.com
15. References 15. References
15.1. Normative References 15.1. Normative References
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
[RFC4379] Kompella, K. and G. Swallow, "Detecting Multi-Protocol [RFC4379] Kompella, K. and G. Swallow, "Detecting Multi-Protocol
Label Switched (MPLS) Data Plane Failures", RFC 4379, Label Switched (MPLS) Data Plane Failures", RFC 4379,
February 2006. DOI 10.17487/RFC4379, February 2006,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4379>.
[RFC6790] Kompella, K., Drake, J., Amante, S., Henderickx, W., and [RFC6790] Kompella, K., Drake, J., Amante, S., Henderickx, W., and
L. Yong, "The Use of Entropy Labels in MPLS Forwarding", L. Yong, "The Use of Entropy Labels in MPLS Forwarding",
RFC 6790, November 2012. RFC 6790, DOI 10.17487/RFC6790, November 2012,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6790>.
[RFC7537] Decraene, B., Akiya, N., Pignataro, C., Andersson, L., and [RFC7537] Decraene, B., Akiya, N., Pignataro, C., Andersson, L., and
S. Aldrin, "IANA Registries for LSP Ping Code Points", RFC S. Aldrin, "IANA Registries for LSP Ping Code Points",
7537, May 2015. RFC 7537, DOI 10.17487/RFC7537, May 2015,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7537>.
15.2. Informative References 15.2. Informative References
[I-D.ravisingh-mpls-el-for-seamless-mpls] [I-D.ravisingh-mpls-el-for-seamless-mpls]
Singh, R., Shen, Y., and J. Drake, "Entropy label for Singh, R., Shen, Y., and J. Drake, "Entropy label for
seamless MPLS", draft-ravisingh-mpls-el-for-seamless- seamless MPLS", draft-ravisingh-mpls-el-for-seamless-
mpls-04 (work in progress), October 2014. mpls-04 (work in progress), October 2014.
[IANA-MPLS-LSP-PING] [IANA-MPLS-LSP-PING]
IANA, "Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) Label IANA, "Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) Label
Switched Paths (LSPs) Ping Parameters", Switched Paths (LSPs) Ping Parameters",
<http://www.iana.org/assignments/mpls-lsp-ping-parameters/ <http://www.iana.org/assignments/mpls-lsp-ping-parameters/
mpls-lsp-ping-parameters.xhtml>. mpls-lsp-ping-parameters.xhtml>.
[RFC6391] Bryant, S., Filsfils, C., Drafz, U., Kompella, V., Regan, [RFC6391] Bryant, S., Ed., Filsfils, C., Drafz, U., Kompella, V.,
J., and S. Amante, "Flow-Aware Transport of Pseudowires Regan, J., and S. Amante, "Flow-Aware Transport of
over an MPLS Packet Switched Network", RFC 6391, November Pseudowires over an MPLS Packet Switched Network",
2011. RFC 6391, DOI 10.17487/RFC6391, November 2011,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6391>.
[RFC6424] Bahadur, N., Kompella, K., and G. Swallow, "Mechanism for [RFC6424] Bahadur, N., Kompella, K., and G. Swallow, "Mechanism for
Performing Label Switched Path Ping (LSP Ping) over MPLS Performing Label Switched Path Ping (LSP Ping) over MPLS
Tunnels", RFC 6424, November 2011. Tunnels", RFC 6424, DOI 10.17487/RFC6424, November 2011,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6424>.
[RFC7325] Villamizar, C., Kompella, K., Amante, S., Malis, A., and [RFC7325] Villamizar, C., Ed., Kompella, K., Amante, S., Malis, A.,
C. Pignataro, "MPLS Forwarding Compliance and Performance and C. Pignataro, "MPLS Forwarding Compliance and
Requirements", RFC 7325, August 2014. Performance Requirements", RFC 7325, DOI 10.17487/RFC7325,
August 2014, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7325>.
Authors' Addresses Authors' Addresses
Nobo Akiya Nobo Akiya
Big Switch Networks Big Switch Networks
Email: nobo.akiya.dev@gmail.com Email: nobo.akiya.dev@gmail.com
George Swallow George Swallow
Cisco Systems Cisco Systems, Inc.
Email: swallow@cisco.com Email: swallow@cisco.com
Carlos Pignataro Carlos Pignataro
Cisco Systems Cisco Systems, Inc.
Email: cpignata@cisco.com Email: cpignata@cisco.com
Andrew G. Malis Andrew G. Malis
Huawei Technologies Huawei Technologies
Email: agmalis@gmail.com Email: agmalis@gmail.com
Sam Aldrin Sam Aldrin
Google Google
 End of changes. 18 change blocks. 
25 lines changed or deleted 33 lines changed or added

This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.48. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/