< draft-ietf-nvo3-bfd-geneve-00.txt   draft-ietf-nvo3-bfd-geneve-01.txt >
NVO3 Working Group X. Min NVO3 Working Group X. Min
Internet-Draft G. Mirsky Internet-Draft G. Mirsky
Intended status: Standards Track ZTE Corp. Intended status: Standards Track ZTE Corp.
Expires: May 19, 2021 S. Pallagatti Expires: August 25, 2021 S. Pallagatti
VMware VMware
J. Tantsura J. Tantsura
Apstra Juniper Networks
November 15, 2020 February 21, 2021
BFD for Geneve BFD for Geneve
draft-ietf-nvo3-bfd-geneve-00 draft-ietf-nvo3-bfd-geneve-01
Abstract Abstract
This document describes the use of the Bidirectional Forwarding This document describes the use of the Bidirectional Forwarding
Detection (BFD) protocol in point-to-point Generic Network Detection (BFD) protocol in point-to-point Generic Network
Virtualization Encapsulation (Geneve) tunnels used to make up an Virtualization Encapsulation (Geneve) tunnels used to make up an
overlay network. overlay network.
Status of This Memo Status of This Memo
skipping to change at page 1, line 37 skipping to change at page 1, line 37
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on May 19, 2021. This Internet-Draft will expire on August 25, 2021.
Copyright Notice Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2020 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the Copyright (c) 2021 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved. document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
skipping to change at page 2, line 18 skipping to change at page 2, line 18
Table of Contents Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2. Conventions Used in This Document . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2. Conventions Used in This Document . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2.1. Abbreviations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2.1. Abbreviations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2.2. Requirements Language . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2.2. Requirements Language . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3. BFD Packet Transmission over Geneve Tunnel . . . . . . . . . 3 3. BFD Packet Transmission over Geneve Tunnel . . . . . . . . . 3
3.1. BFD Encapsulation With Inner Ethernet/IP/UDP Header . . . 3 3.1. BFD Encapsulation With Inner Ethernet/IP/UDP Header . . . 3
3.2. BFD Encapsulation With Inner IP/UDP Header . . . . . . . 6 3.2. BFD Encapsulation With Inner IP/UDP Header . . . . . . . 6
4. Reception of BFD packet from Geneve Tunnel . . . . . . . . . 8 4. Reception of BFD packet from Geneve Tunnel . . . . . . . . . 8
4.1. Demultiplexing of the BFD packet . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 4.1. Demultiplexing of the BFD packet . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
5. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 5. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
6. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 6. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
7. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 7. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
8. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 8. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
8.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 8.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
8.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 8.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
1. Introduction 1. Introduction
"Generic Network Virtualization Encapsulation" (Geneve) "Generic Network Virtualization Encapsulation" (Geneve) [RFC8926]
[I-D.ietf-nvo3-geneve] provides an encapsulation scheme that allows provides an encapsulation scheme that allows building an overlay
building an overlay network by decoupling the address space of the network by decoupling the address space of the attached virtual hosts
attached virtual hosts from that of the network. from that of the network.
This document describes the use of Bidirectional Forwarding Detection This document describes the use of Bidirectional Forwarding Detection
(BFD) protocol [RFC5880] to enable monitoring continuity of the path (BFD) protocol [RFC5880] to enable monitoring continuity of the path
between two Geneve tunnel endpoints, which may be NVE (Network between two Geneve tunnel endpoints, which may be NVE (Network
Virtualization Edge) or other device acting as a Geneve tunnel Virtualization Edge) or other device acting as a Geneve tunnel
endpoint. Specifically, the asynchronous mode of BFD, as defined in endpoint. Specifically, the asynchronous mode of BFD, as defined in
[RFC5880], is used to monitor a p2p Geneve tunnel, and support for [RFC5880], is used to monitor a p2p Geneve tunnel, and support for
BFD Echo function is outside the scope of this document. For BFD Echo function is outside the scope of this document. For
simplicity, in this document, NVE is used to represent Geneve tunnel simplicity, in this document, NVE is used to represent Geneve tunnel
endpoint, TS (Tenant System) is used to represent the physical or endpoint, TS (Tenant System) is used to represent the physical or
virtual device attached to a Geneve tunnel endpoint from the outside. virtual device attached to a Geneve tunnel endpoint from the outside.
VAP (Virtual Access Point) is the NVE side of the interface between VAP (Virtual Access Point) is the NVE side of the interface between
the NVE and the TS, and a VAP is a logical network port (virtual or the NVE and the TS, and a VAP is a logical network port (virtual or
physical) into a specific virtual network. For detailed definitions physical) into a specific virtual network. For detailed definitions
and descriptions of NVE, TS and VAP, please refer to [RFC7365] and and descriptions of NVE, TS and VAP, please refer to [RFC7365] and
[RFC8014]. [RFC8014].
The use cases and the deployment of BFD for Geneve are consistent The use cases and the deployment of BFD for Geneve are consistent
with what's described in Section 1 and 3 of [I-D.ietf-bfd-vxlan]. with what's described in Section 1 and 3 of [RFC8971] ("Bidirectional
Forwarding Detection (BFD) for Virtual eXtensible Local Area Network
The major difference between Geneve and "Virtual eXtensible Local (VXLAN)"), except for the usage of Management VNI, which is outside
Area Network" (VXLAN) [RFC7348] encapsulation is that Geneve supports the scope of this document. The major difference between Geneve and
multi-protocol payload and variable length options. VXLAN [RFC7348] is that Geneve supports multi-protocol payload and
variable length options.
2. Conventions Used in This Document 2. Conventions Used in This Document
2.1. Abbreviations 2.1. Abbreviations
BFD: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection BFD: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection
EVPN: Ethernet Virtual Private Networks
Geneve: Generic Network Virtualization Encapsulation Geneve: Generic Network Virtualization Encapsulation
NVE: Network Virtualization Edge NVE: Network Virtualization Edge
TS: Tenant System TS: Tenant System
VAP: Virtual Access Point VAP: Virtual Access Point
VNI: Virtual Network Identifier VNI: Virtual Network Identifier
skipping to change at page 3, line 48 skipping to change at page 3, line 51
or an IP packet, this document defines two formats of BFD packet or an IP packet, this document defines two formats of BFD packet
encapsulation in Geneve. BFD session is originated and terminated at encapsulation in Geneve. BFD session is originated and terminated at
VAP of an NVE, selection of the BFD packet encapsulation is based on VAP of an NVE, selection of the BFD packet encapsulation is based on
how the VAP encapsulates the data packets. how the VAP encapsulates the data packets.
3.1. BFD Encapsulation With Inner Ethernet/IP/UDP Header 3.1. BFD Encapsulation With Inner Ethernet/IP/UDP Header
If the VAP that originates the BFD packets is used to encapsulate If the VAP that originates the BFD packets is used to encapsulate
Ethernet data frames, then BFD packets are encapsulated in Geneve as Ethernet data frames, then BFD packets are encapsulated in Geneve as
described below. The Geneve packet format over IPv4 is defined in described below. The Geneve packet format over IPv4 is defined in
Section 3.1 of [I-D.ietf-nvo3-geneve]. The Geneve packet format over Section 3.1 of [RFC8926]. The Geneve packet format over IPv6 is
IPv6 is defined in Section 3.2 of [I-D.ietf-nvo3-geneve]. The Outer defined in Section 3.2 of [RFC8926]. The Outer IP/UDP and Geneve
IP/UDP and Geneve headers MUST be encoded by the sender as defined in headers MUST be encoded by the sender as defined in [RFC8926]. Note
[I-D.ietf-nvo3-geneve]. Note that the outer IP header and the inner that the outer IP header and the inner IP header may not be of the
IP header may not be of the same address family, in other words, same address family, in other words, outer IPv6 header accompanied
outer IPv6 header accompanied with inner IPv4 header and outer IPv4 with inner IPv4 header and outer IPv4 header accompanied with inner
header accompanied with inner IPv6 header are both possible. IPv6 header are both possible.
0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| | | |
~ Outer Ethernet Header ~ ~ Outer Ethernet Header ~
| | | |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| | | |
~ Outer IPvX Header ~ ~ Outer IPvX Header ~
skipping to change at page 5, line 19 skipping to change at page 5, line 19
Ethernet Header: Ethernet Header:
Source MAC: MAC address of a VAP of the originating NVE. Source MAC: MAC address of a VAP of the originating NVE.
Destination MAC: MAC address of a VAP of the terminating NVE. Destination MAC: MAC address of a VAP of the terminating NVE.
IP Header: IP Header:
Source IP: IP address of a VAP of the originating NVE. If the Source IP: IP address of a VAP of the originating NVE. If the
VAP of the originating NVE has no IP address, then the IP VAP of the originating NVE has no IP address, then the IP
address of the originating NVE is used. address 0.0.0.0 for IPv4 or ::/128 for IPv6 SHOULD be used.
Destination IP: IP address of a VAP of the terminating NVE. If Destination IP: IP address of a VAP of the terminating NVE. If
the VAP of the terminating NVE has no IP address, then the IP the VAP of the terminating NVE has no IP address, then the IP
address MUST be chosen from the 127/8 range for IPv4, and from address SHOULD be selected from the range 127/8 for IPv4, or be
the ::ffff:127.0.0.0/104 range for IPv6. set to ::1/128 for IPv6.
TTL or Hop Limit: MUST be set to 255 in accordance with TTL or Hop Limit: MUST be set to 255 in accordance with
[RFC5881]. [RFC5881].
The fields of the UDP header and the BFD Control packet are The fields of the UDP header and the BFD Control packet are
encoded as specified in [RFC5881]. encoded as specified in [RFC5881].
When the BFD packets are encapsulated in Geneve in this way, the When the BFD packets are encapsulated in Geneve in this way, the
Geneve header defined in [I-D.ietf-nvo3-geneve] follows the value set Geneve header defined in [RFC8926] follows the value set below.
below.
Opt Len field SHOULD be set to 0, which indicates there isn't any Opt Len field SHOULD be set to 0, which indicates there isn't any
variable length option. variable length option.
O bit MUST be set to 1, which indicates this packet contains a O bit MUST be set to 1, which indicates this packet contains a
control message. control message.
C bit MUST be set to 0, which indicates there isn't any critical C bit MUST be set to 0, which indicates there isn't any critical
option. option.
Protocol Type field MUST be set to 0x6558 (Ethernet frame). Protocol Type field MUST be set to 0x6558 (Ethernet frame).
Virtual Network Identifier (VNI) field SHOULD be set to the VNI Virtual Network Identifier (VNI) field SHOULD be set to the VNI
number that the originating VAP is mapped to. number that the originating VAP is mapped to.
3.2. BFD Encapsulation With Inner IP/UDP Header 3.2. BFD Encapsulation With Inner IP/UDP Header
If the VAP that originates the BFD packets is used to encapsulate IP If the VAP that originates the BFD packets is used to encapsulate IP
data packets, then BFD packets are encapsulated in Geneve as data packets, then BFD packets are encapsulated in Geneve as
described below. The Geneve packet format over IPv4 is defined in described below. The Geneve packet format over IPv4 is defined in
Section 3.1 of [I-D.ietf-nvo3-geneve]. The Geneve packet format over Section 3.1 of [RFC8926]. The Geneve packet format over IPv6 is
IPv6 is defined in Section 3.2 of [I-D.ietf-nvo3-geneve]. The Outer defined in Section 3.2 of [RFC8926]. The Outer IP/UDP and Geneve
IP/UDP and Geneve headers MUST be encoded by the sender as defined in headers MUST be encoded by the sender as defined in [RFC8926]. Note
[I-D.ietf-nvo3-geneve]. Note that the outer IP header and the inner that the outer IP header and the inner IP header may not be of the
IP header may not be of the same address family, in other words, same address family, in other words, outer IPv6 header accompanied
outer IPv6 header accompanied with inner IPv4 header and outer IPv4 with inner IPv4 header and outer IPv4 header accompanied with inner
header accompanied with inner IPv6 header are both possible. IPv6 header are both possible.
0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| | | |
~ Ethernet Header ~ ~ Ethernet Header ~
| | | |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| | | |
~ Outer IPvX Header ~ ~ Outer IPvX Header ~
skipping to change at page 8, line 12 skipping to change at page 8, line 12
Destination IP: IP address of a VAP of the terminating NVE. Destination IP: IP address of a VAP of the terminating NVE.
TTL or Hop Limit: MUST be set to 255 in accordance with TTL or Hop Limit: MUST be set to 255 in accordance with
[RFC5881]. [RFC5881].
The fields of the UDP header and the BFD Control packet are The fields of the UDP header and the BFD Control packet are
encoded as specified in [RFC5881]. encoded as specified in [RFC5881].
When the BFD packets are encapsulated in Geneve in this way, the When the BFD packets are encapsulated in Geneve in this way, the
Geneve header defined in [I-D.ietf-nvo3-geneve] follows the value set Geneve header defined in [RFC8926] follows the value set below.
below.
Opt Len field SHOULD be set to 0, which indicates there isn't any Opt Len field SHOULD be set to 0, which indicates there isn't any
variable length option. variable length option.
O bit MUST be set to 1, which indicates this packet contains a O bit MUST be set to 1, which indicates this packet contains a
control message. control message.
C bit MUST be set to 0, which indicates there isn't any critical C bit MUST be set to 0, which indicates there isn't any critical
option. option.
Protocol Type field MUST be set to 0x0800 (IPv4) or 0x86DD (IPv6), Protocol Type field MUST be set to 0x0800 (IPv4) or 0x86DD (IPv6),
depending on the address family of the inner IP packet. depending on the address family of the inner IP packet.
Virtual Network Identifier (VNI) field SHOULD be set to the VNI Virtual Network Identifier (VNI) field SHOULD be set to the VNI
number that the originating VAP is mapped to. number that the originating VAP is mapped to.
4. Reception of BFD packet from Geneve Tunnel 4. Reception of BFD packet from Geneve Tunnel
Once a packet is received, the NVE MUST validate the packet as Once a packet is received, the NVE MUST validate the packet as
described in [I-D.ietf-nvo3-geneve]. described in [RFC8926].
If the Protocol Type field equals 0x6558 (Ethernet frame), and the If the Protocol Type field equals 0x6558 (Ethernet frame), and the
Destination MAC of the inner Ethernet frame matches the MAC Destination MAC of the inner Ethernet frame matches the MAC
address of a VAP which is mapped to the same as received VNI, then address of a VAP which is mapped to the same as received VNI, then
the Destination IP, the UDP destination port and the TTL or Hop the Destination IP, the UDP destination port and the TTL or Hop
Limit of the inner IP packet MUST be validated to determine Limit of the inner IP packet MUST be validated to determine
whether the received packet can be processed by BFD. whether the received packet can be processed by BFD.
If the Protocol Type field equals 0x0800 (IPv4) or 0x86DD (IPv6), If the Protocol Type field equals 0x0800 (IPv4) or 0x86DD (IPv6),
and the Destination IP of the inner IP packet matches the IP and the Destination IP of the inner IP packet matches the IP
skipping to change at page 9, line 34 skipping to change at page 9, line 28
IP, the destination MAC, the destination IP, and the source UDP IP, the destination MAC, the destination IP, and the source UDP
port number present in the inner Ethernet/IP/UDP header. port number present in the inner Ethernet/IP/UDP header.
When the BFD Encapsulation With Inner IP/UDP Header is used, the When the BFD Encapsulation With Inner IP/UDP Header is used, the
BFD session MUST be identified using the VNI number, and the inner BFD session MUST be identified using the VNI number, and the inner
IP/UDP header, i.e., the source IP, the destination IP, and the IP/UDP header, i.e., the source IP, the destination IP, and the
source UDP port number present in the inner IP/UDP header. source UDP port number present in the inner IP/UDP header.
If the BFD packet is received with non-zero Your Discriminator, then If the BFD packet is received with non-zero Your Discriminator, then
the BFD session MUST be demultiplexed only with Your Discriminator as the BFD session MUST be demultiplexed only with Your Discriminator as
the key. the key. The exchange of BFD discriminators may be achieved by echo
request/reply, EVPN, etc. The detailed mechanism on how to exchange
the BFD discriminators is outside the scope of this document.
5. Security Considerations 5. Security Considerations
This document does not raise any additional security issues beyond This document does not raise any additional security issues beyond
those of the specifications referred to in the list of references. those of the specifications referred to in the list of references.
6. IANA Considerations 6. IANA Considerations
This document has no IANA action requested. This document has no IANA action requested.
skipping to change at page 10, line 9 skipping to change at page 10, line 9
The authors would like to acknowledge Reshad Rahman, Jeffrey Haas and The authors would like to acknowledge Reshad Rahman, Jeffrey Haas and
Matthew Bocci for their guidance on this work. Matthew Bocci for their guidance on this work.
The authors would like to acknowledge David Black for his explanation The authors would like to acknowledge David Black for his explanation
on the mapping relation between VAP and VNI. on the mapping relation between VAP and VNI.
8. References 8. References
8.1. Normative References 8.1. Normative References
[I-D.ietf-nvo3-geneve]
Gross, J., Ganga, I., and T. Sridhar, "Geneve: Generic
Network Virtualization Encapsulation", draft-ietf-
nvo3-geneve-16 (work in progress), March 2020.
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>. <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
[RFC5880] Katz, D. and D. Ward, "Bidirectional Forwarding Detection [RFC5880] Katz, D. and D. Ward, "Bidirectional Forwarding Detection
(BFD)", RFC 5880, DOI 10.17487/RFC5880, June 2010, (BFD)", RFC 5880, DOI 10.17487/RFC5880, June 2010,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5880>. <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5880>.
[RFC5881] Katz, D. and D. Ward, "Bidirectional Forwarding Detection [RFC5881] Katz, D. and D. Ward, "Bidirectional Forwarding Detection
skipping to change at page 10, line 43 skipping to change at page 10, line 38
[RFC8014] Black, D., Hudson, J., Kreeger, L., Lasserre, M., and T. [RFC8014] Black, D., Hudson, J., Kreeger, L., Lasserre, M., and T.
Narten, "An Architecture for Data-Center Network Narten, "An Architecture for Data-Center Network
Virtualization over Layer 3 (NVO3)", RFC 8014, Virtualization over Layer 3 (NVO3)", RFC 8014,
DOI 10.17487/RFC8014, December 2016, DOI 10.17487/RFC8014, December 2016,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8014>. <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8014>.
[RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC [RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>. May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.
8.2. Informative References [RFC8926] Gross, J., Ed., Ganga, I., Ed., and T. Sridhar, Ed.,
"Geneve: Generic Network Virtualization Encapsulation",
RFC 8926, DOI 10.17487/RFC8926, November 2020,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8926>.
[I-D.ietf-bfd-vxlan] 8.2. Informative References
Pallagatti, S., Mirsky, G., Paragiri, S., Govindan, V.,
and M. Mudigonda, "BFD for VXLAN", draft-ietf-bfd-vxlan-16
(work in progress), October 2020.
[RFC7348] Mahalingam, M., Dutt, D., Duda, K., Agarwal, P., Kreeger, [RFC7348] Mahalingam, M., Dutt, D., Duda, K., Agarwal, P., Kreeger,
L., Sridhar, T., Bursell, M., and C. Wright, "Virtual L., Sridhar, T., Bursell, M., and C. Wright, "Virtual
eXtensible Local Area Network (VXLAN): A Framework for eXtensible Local Area Network (VXLAN): A Framework for
Overlaying Virtualized Layer 2 Networks over Layer 3 Overlaying Virtualized Layer 2 Networks over Layer 3
Networks", RFC 7348, DOI 10.17487/RFC7348, August 2014, Networks", RFC 7348, DOI 10.17487/RFC7348, August 2014,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7348>. <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7348>.
[RFC8971] Pallagatti, S., Ed., Mirsky, G., Ed., Paragiri, S.,
Govindan, V., and M. Mudigonda, "Bidirectional Forwarding
Detection (BFD) for Virtual eXtensible Local Area Network
(VXLAN)", RFC 8971, DOI 10.17487/RFC8971, December 2020,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8971>.
Authors' Addresses Authors' Addresses
Xiao Min Xiao Min
ZTE Corp. ZTE Corp.
Nanjing Nanjing
China China
Phone: +86 25 88013062 Phone: +86 25 88013062
Email: xiao.min2@zte.com.cn Email: xiao.min2@zte.com.cn
skipping to change at page 11, line 34 skipping to change at page 11, line 33
USA USA
Email: gregimirsky@gmail.com Email: gregimirsky@gmail.com
Santosh Pallagatti Santosh Pallagatti
VMware VMware
Email: santosh.pallagatti@gmail.com Email: santosh.pallagatti@gmail.com
Jeff Tantsura Jeff Tantsura
Apstra Juniper Networks
Email: jefftant.ietf@gmail.com Email: jefftant.ietf@gmail.com
 End of changes. 22 change blocks. 
50 lines changed or deleted 54 lines changed or added

This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.48. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/