< draft-ietf-nvo3-use-case-13.txt		draft-ietf-nvo3-use-case-14.txt >
	skipping to change at page 1, line 16 ¶		skipping to change at page 1, line 16 ¶
	Verizon		Verizon
	A. Isaac		A. Isaac
	Juniper Networks		Juniper Networks
	V. Manral		V. Manral
	Ionos Networks		Ionos Networks
	Expires: June 2017 December 8, 2016		Expires: June 2017 December 8, 2016
	Use Cases for Data Center Network Virtualization Overlay Networks		Use Cases for Data Center Network Virtualization Overlay Networks
	draft-ietf-nvo3-use-case-13		draft-ietf-nvo3-use-case-14
	Abstract		Abstract
	This document describes data center network virtualization overlay		This document describes data center network virtualization overlay
	(NVO3) network use cases that can be deployed in various data		(NVO3) network use cases that can be deployed in various data
	centers and serve different data center applications.		centers and serve different data center applications.
	Status of this Memo		Status of this Memo
	This Internet-Draft is submitted to IETF in full conformance with		This Internet-Draft is submitted to IETF in full conformance with
	skipping to change at page 2, line 35 ¶		skipping to change at page 2, line 35 ¶
	3. DC NVO3 Network and External Network Interconnection...........6		3. DC NVO3 Network and External Network Interconnection...........6
	3.1. DC NVO3 Network Access via the Internet...................6		3.1. DC NVO3 Network Access via the Internet...................6
	3.2. DC NVO3 Network and SP WAN VPN Interconnection............8		3.2. DC NVO3 Network and SP WAN VPN Interconnection............8
	4. DC Applications Using NVO3.....................................8		4. DC Applications Using NVO3.....................................8
	4.1. Supporting Multiple Technologies..........................9		4.1. Supporting Multiple Technologies..........................9
	4.2. DC Application with Multiple Virtual Networks.............9		4.2. DC Application with Multiple Virtual Networks.............9
	4.3. Virtual Data Center (vDC)................................10		4.3. Virtual Data Center (vDC)................................10
	5. Summary.......................................................12		5. Summary.......................................................12
	6. Security Considerations.......................................12		6. Security Considerations.......................................12
	7. IANA Considerations...........................................12		7. IANA Considerations...........................................12
	8. References....................................................13		8. Informative References........................................13
	8.1. Normative References.....................................13
	8.2. Informative References...................................13
	Contributors.....................................................14		Contributors.....................................................14
	Acknowledgements.................................................14		Acknowledgements.................................................14
	Authors' Addresses...............................................14		Authors' Addresses...............................................14
	1. Introduction		1. Introduction
	Server virtualization has changed the Information Technology (IT)		Server virtualization has changed the Information Technology (IT)
	industry in terms of the efficiency, cost, and speed of providing		industry in terms of the efficiency, cost, and speed of providing
	new applications and/or services such as cloud applications. However		new applications and/or services such as cloud applications. However
	traditional data center (DC) networks have some limits in supporting		traditional data center (DC) networks have some limits in supporting
	skipping to change at page 13, line 5 ¶		skipping to change at page 13, line 5 ¶
	to protect against a tenant application attacking another tenant		to protect against a tenant application attacking another tenant
	application via the DC infrastructure network. For example, a tenant		application via the DC infrastructure network. For example, a tenant
	application attempts to generate a large volume of traffic to		application attempts to generate a large volume of traffic to
	overload the DC's underlying network. An NVO3 solution has to		overload the DC's underlying network. An NVO3 solution has to
	address these issues.		address these issues.
	7. IANA Considerations		7. IANA Considerations
	This document does not request any action from IANA.		This document does not request any action from IANA.
	8. References		8. Informative References
	8.1. Normative References
	[RFC7364] Narten, T., et al "Problem Statement: Overlays for Network
	Virtualization", RFC7364, October 2014.
	[RFC7365] Lasserre, M., Motin, T., and et al, "Framework for DC
	Network Virtualization", RFC7365, October 2014.
	8.2. Informative References
	[IEEE802.1Q] IEEE, "IEEE Standard for Local and metropolitan area		[IEEE802.1Q] IEEE, "IEEE Standard for Local and metropolitan area
	networks -- Media Access Control (MAC) Bridges and Virtual		networks -- Media Access Control (MAC) Bridges and Virtual
	Bridged Local Area", IEEE Std 802.1Q, 2011.		Bridged Local Area", IEEE Std 802.1Q, 2011.
	[NVO3HYVR2NVE] Li, Y., et al, "Hypervisor to NVE Control Plane		[NVO3HYVR2NVE] Li, Y., et al, "Hypervisor to NVE Control Plane
	Requirements", draft-ietf-nvo3-hpvr2nve-cp-req-05, work in		Requirements", draft-ietf-nvo3-hpvr2nve-cp-req-05, work in
	progress.		progress.
	[NVO3ARCH] Black, D., et al, "An Architecture for Overlay Networks		[NVO3ARCH] Black, D., et al, "An Architecture for Overlay Networks
	skipping to change at page 13, line 45 ¶		skipping to change at page 13, line 35 ¶
	[RFC3022] Srisuresh, P. and Egevang, K., "Traditional IP Network		[RFC3022] Srisuresh, P. and Egevang, K., "Traditional IP Network
	Address Translator (Traditional NAT)", RFC3022, January		Address Translator (Traditional NAT)", RFC3022, January
	2001.		2001.
	[RFC4301] Kent, S., "Security Architecture for the Internet		[RFC4301] Kent, S., "Security Architecture for the Internet
	Protocol", rfc4301, December 2005		Protocol", rfc4301, December 2005
	[RFC4364] Rosen, E. and Y. Rekhter, "BGP/MPLS IP Virtual Private		[RFC4364] Rosen, E. and Y. Rekhter, "BGP/MPLS IP Virtual Private
	Networks (VPNs)", RFC 4364, February 2006.		Networks (VPNs)", RFC 4364, February 2006.
	[RFC7348] Mahalingam,M., Dutt, D., ific Multicast in etc "VXLAN: A		[RFC7348] Mahalingam, M., Dutt, D., et al, "Virtual eXtensible Local
	Framework for Overlaying Virtualized Layer 2 Networks over		Area Network (VXLAN): A Framework for Overlaying
	Layer 3 Networks", RFC7348 August 2014.		Virtualized Layer 2 Networks over Layer 3 Networks",
			RFC7348 August 2014.
			[RFC7364] Narten, T., et al "Problem Statement: Overlays for Network
			Virtualization", RFC7364, October 2014.
			[RFC7365] Lasserre, M., Motin, T., et al, "Framework for DC Network
			Virtualization", RFC7365, October 2014.
	[RFC7432] Sajassi, A., Ed., Aggarwal, R., Bitar, N., Isaac, A. and		[RFC7432] Sajassi, A., Ed., Aggarwal, R., Bitar, N., Isaac, A. and
	J. Uttaro, "BGP MPLS Based Ethernet VPN", RFC7432,		J. Uttaro, "BGP MPLS Based Ethernet VPN", RFC7432,
	February 2015		February 2015
	[RFC7637] Garg, P., and Wang, Y., "NVGRE: Network Virtualization		[RFC7637] Garg, P., and Wang, Y., "NVGRE: Network Virtualization
	using Generic Routing Encapsulation", RFC7637, Sept. 2015.		using Generic Routing Encapsulation", RFC7637, Sept. 2015.
	[VRF-LITE] Cisco, "Configuring VRF-lite", http://www.cisco.com		[VRF-LITE] Cisco, "Configuring VRF-lite", http://www.cisco.com
End of changes. 4 change blocks.
	18 lines changed or deleted		13 lines changed or added
This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.48. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/