< draft-ietf-ospf-two-part-metric-05.txt   draft-ietf-ospf-two-part-metric-06.txt >
Open Shortest Path First Z. Zhang Network Working Group Z. Zhang
Internet-Draft L. Wang Internet-Draft L. Wang
Updates: 2328, 5340 (if approved) Juniper Networks, Inc. Updates: 2328, 5340 (if approved) Juniper Networks, Inc.
Intended status: Standards Track A. Lindem Intended status: Standards Track A. Lindem
Expires: November 6, 2016 Cisco Systems Expires: February 6, 2017 Cisco Systems
D. Dubois August 5, 2016
General Dynamics C4S
V. Julka
T. McMillan
L3 Communications, Linkabit
May 5, 2016
OSPF Two-part Metric OSPF Two-part Metric
draft-ietf-ospf-two-part-metric-05.txt draft-ietf-ospf-two-part-metric-06.txt
Abstract Abstract
This document specifies an optional extension to the OSPF protocol, This document specifies an optional extension to the OSPF protocol,
to represent the metric on a multi-access network as two parts: the to represent the metric on a multi-access network as two parts: the
metric from a router to the network, and the metric from the network metric from a router to the network, and the metric from the network
to the router. The router to router metric would be the sum of the to the router. The router to router metric would be the sum of the
two. This document updates RFC 2328 and RFC 5340. two. This document updates RFC 2328 and RFC 5340.
Requirements Language Requirements Language
skipping to change at page 1, line 47 skipping to change at page 1, line 42
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on November 6, 2016. This Internet-Draft will expire on February 6, 2017.
Copyright Notice Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2016 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the Copyright (c) 2016 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved. document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents publication of this document. Please review these documents
skipping to change at page 2, line 34 skipping to change at page 2, line 29
modifications of such material outside the IETF Standards Process. modifications of such material outside the IETF Standards Process.
Without obtaining an adequate license from the person(s) controlling Without obtaining an adequate license from the person(s) controlling
the copyright in such materials, this document may not be modified the copyright in such materials, this document may not be modified
outside the IETF Standards Process, and derivative works of it may outside the IETF Standards Process, and derivative works of it may
not be created outside the IETF Standards Process, except to format not be created outside the IETF Standards Process, except to format
it for publication as an RFC or to translate it into languages other it for publication as an RFC or to translate it into languages other
than English. than English.
Table of Contents Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2. Proposed Enhancement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2. Proposed Enhancement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3. Speficications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 3. Speficications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3.1. Router Interface Parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 3.1. Router Interface Parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3.2. Advertising Network-to-Router Metric in OSPFv2 . . . . . 5 3.2. Advertising Network-to-Router Metric in OSPFv2 . . . . . 4
3.3. Advertising Network-to-Router Metric in OSPFv3 . . . . . 5 3.3. Advertising Network-to-Router Metric in OSPFv3 . . . . . 5
3.4. Advertising Network-to-Router TE Metric . . . . . . . . . 5 3.4. Advertising Network-to-Router TE Metric . . . . . . . . . 5
3.5. OSPF Stub Router Behavior . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 3.5. OSPF Stub Router Behavior . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3.6. SPF Calculation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 3.6. SPF Calculation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
3.7. Backward Compatibility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 3.7. Backward Compatibility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
4. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 4. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
5. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 5. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
6. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 6. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
7. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 6.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
7.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 6.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
7.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Appendix A. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Appendix B. Contributors' Addreses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
1. Introduction 1. Introduction
With Open Shortest Path First (OSPF, [RFC2328], [RFC5340]) protocol, With Open Shortest Path First (OSPF, [RFC2328], [RFC5340]) protocol,
for a broadcast network, a Network-LSA is advertised to list all for a broadcast network, a Network-LSA is advertised to list all
routers on the network, and each router on the network includes a routers on the network, and each router on the network includes a
link in its Router-LSA to describe its connection to the network. link in its Router-LSA to describe its connection to the network.
The link in the Router-LSA includes a metric but the listed routers The link in the Router-LSA includes a metric but the listed routers
in the Network LSA do not include a metric. This is based on the in the Network LSA do not include a metric. This is based on the
assumption that from a particular router, all others on the same assumption that from a particular router, all others on the same
skipping to change at page 7, line 25 skipping to change at page 7, line 15
o A new Sub-TLV type in OSPFv3 Extended-LSA Sub-TLV registry, for o A new Sub-TLV type in OSPFv3 Extended-LSA Sub-TLV registry, for
the Network-to-Router Metric Sub-TLV. the Network-to-Router Metric Sub-TLV.
o A new Sub-TLV type in Types for sub-TLVs of TE Link TLV (Value 2) o A new Sub-TLV type in Types for sub-TLVs of TE Link TLV (Value 2)
registry, for the Network-to-Router TE Metric Sub-TLV. registry, for the Network-to-Router TE Metric Sub-TLV.
5. Security Considerations 5. Security Considerations
This document does not introduce new security risks. This document does not introduce new security risks.
6. Acknowledgements 6. References
The authors would like to thank Abhay Roy, Hannes Gredler, Peter
Psenak and Eric Wu for their comments and suggestions.
7. References
7.1. Normative References 6.1. Normative References
[I-D.ietf-ospf-ospfv3-lsa-extend] [I-D.ietf-ospf-ospfv3-lsa-extend]
Lindem, A., Mirtorabi, S., Roy, A., and F. Baker, "OSPFv3 Lindem, A., Mirtorabi, S., Roy, A., and F. Baker, "OSPFv3
LSA Extendibility", draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-lsa-extend-09 LSA Extendibility", draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-lsa-extend-10
(work in progress), November 2015. (work in progress), May 2016.
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>. <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
[RFC2328] Moy, J., "OSPF Version 2", STD 54, RFC 2328, [RFC2328] Moy, J., "OSPF Version 2", STD 54, RFC 2328,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2328, April 1998, DOI 10.17487/RFC2328, April 1998,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2328>. <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2328>.
skipping to change at page 8, line 29 skipping to change at page 8, line 15
[RFC7684] Psenak, P., Gredler, H., Shakir, R., Henderickx, W., [RFC7684] Psenak, P., Gredler, H., Shakir, R., Henderickx, W.,
Tantsura, J., and A. Lindem, "OSPFv2 Prefix/Link Attribute Tantsura, J., and A. Lindem, "OSPFv2 Prefix/Link Attribute
Advertisement", RFC 7684, DOI 10.17487/RFC7684, November Advertisement", RFC 7684, DOI 10.17487/RFC7684, November
2015, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7684>. 2015, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7684>.
[RFC7770] Lindem, A., Ed., Shen, N., Vasseur, JP., Aggarwal, R., and [RFC7770] Lindem, A., Ed., Shen, N., Vasseur, JP., Aggarwal, R., and
S. Shaffer, "Extensions to OSPF for Advertising Optional S. Shaffer, "Extensions to OSPF for Advertising Optional
Router Capabilities", RFC 7770, DOI 10.17487/RFC7770, Router Capabilities", RFC 7770, DOI 10.17487/RFC7770,
February 2016, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7770>. February 2016, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7770>.
7.2. Informative References 6.2. Informative References
[RFC6845] Sheth, N., Wang, L., and J. Zhang, "OSPF Hybrid Broadcast [RFC6845] Sheth, N., Wang, L., and J. Zhang, "OSPF Hybrid Broadcast
and Point-to-Multipoint Interface Type", RFC 6845, and Point-to-Multipoint Interface Type", RFC 6845,
DOI 10.17487/RFC6845, January 2013, DOI 10.17487/RFC6845, January 2013,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6845>. <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6845>.
[RFC6987] Retana, A., Nguyen, L., Zinin, A., White, R., and D. [RFC6987] Retana, A., Nguyen, L., Zinin, A., White, R., and D.
McPherson, "OSPF Stub Router Advertisement", RFC 6987, McPherson, "OSPF Stub Router Advertisement", RFC 6987,
DOI 10.17487/RFC6987, September 2013, DOI 10.17487/RFC6987, September 2013,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6987>. <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6987>.
Authors' Addresses Appendix A. Acknowledgements
Zhaohui Zhang
Juniper Networks, Inc.
10 Technology Park Drive
Westford, MA 01886
EMail: zzhang@juniper.net
Lili Wang
Juniper Networks, Inc.
10 Technology Park Drive
Westford, MA 01886
EMail: liliw@juniper.net The authors would like to thank Abhay Roy, Hannes Gredler, Peter
Psenak and Eric Wu for their comments and suggestions.
Acee Lindem The RFC text was produced using Marshall Rose's xml2rfc tool.
Cisco Systems
301 Midenhall Way
Cary, NC 27513
EMail: acee@cisco.com Appendix B. Contributors' Addreses
David Dubois David Dubois
General Dynamics C4S General Dynamics C4S
400 John Quincy Adams Road 400 John Quincy Adams Road
Taunton, MA 02780 Taunton, MA 02780
EMail: dave.dubois@gdc4s.com EMail: dave.dubois@gd-ms.com
Vibhor Julka Vibhor Julka
L3 Communications, Linkabit L3 Communications, Linkabit
9890 Towne Centre Drive 9890 Towne Centre Drive
San Diego, CA 92121 San Diego, CA 92121
EMail: vibhor.julka@l-3Com.com EMail: vjulka1@yahoo.com
Tom McMillan Tom McMillan
L3 Communications, Linkabit L3 Communications, Linkabit
9890 Towne Centre Drive 9890 Towne Centre Drive
San Diego, CA 92121 San Diego, CA 92121
EMail: tom.mcmillan@l-3com.com EMail: tom.mcmillan@l-3com.com
Authors' Addresses
Zhaohui Zhang
Juniper Networks, Inc.
10 Technology Park Drive
Westford, MA 01886
Email: zzhang@juniper.net
Lili Wang
Juniper Networks, Inc.
10 Technology Park Drive
Westford, MA 01886
Email: liliw@juniper.net
Acee Lindem
Cisco Systems
301 Midenhall Way
Cary, NC 27513
Email: acee@cisco.com
 End of changes. 20 change blocks. 
49 lines changed or deleted 27 lines changed or added

This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.48. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/