< draft-ietf-payload-tetra-01.txt   draft-ietf-payload-tetra-02.txt >
payload Reisenbauer payload Reisenbauer
Internet-Draft Frequentis Internet-Draft Frequentis
Intended status: Standards Track Brandhuber Intended status: Standards Track Brandhuber
Expires: April 26, 2019 eurofunk Expires: July 27, 2019 eurofunk
Hagedorn Hagedorn
Hagedorn Hagedorn
Hoehnsch Hoehnsch
T-Systems T-Systems
Wenk Wenk
Frequentis Frequentis
October 23, 2018 January 23, 2019
RTP Payload Format for the TETRA Audio Codec RTP Payload Format for the TETRA Audio Codec
draft-ietf-payload-tetra-01 draft-ietf-payload-tetra-02
Abstract Abstract
This document specifies a Real-time Transport Protocol (RTP) payload This document specifies a Real-time Transport Protocol (RTP) payload
format for TETRA encoded speech signals. The payload format is format for TETRA encoded speech signals. The payload format is
designed to be able to interoperate with existing TETRA transport designed to be able to interoperate with existing TETRA transport
formats on non-IP networks. A media type registration is included, formats on non-IP networks. A media type registration is included,
specifying the use of the RTP payload format and the storage format. specifying the use of the RTP payload format and the storage format.
Status of This Memo Status of This Memo
skipping to change at page 1, line 41 skipping to change at page 1, line 41
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on April 26, 2019. This Internet-Draft will expire on July 27, 2019.
Copyright Notice Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2018 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the Copyright (c) 2019 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved. document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
skipping to change at page 2, line 37 skipping to change at page 2, line 37
4.3.7. S: Spare (7 bits) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 4.3.7. S: Spare (7 bits) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
4.4. Payload Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 4.4. Payload Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
5. Payload example . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 5. Payload example . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
6. Congestion Control Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 6. Congestion Control Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
7. Payload Format Parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 7. Payload Format Parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
7.1. Media Type Definition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 7.1. Media Type Definition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
8. Mapping to SDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 8. Mapping to SDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
8.1. Offer/Answer Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 8.1. Offer/Answer Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
8.2. Declarative SDP Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 8.2. Declarative SDP Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
9. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 9. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
10. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 10. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
11. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 11. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
11.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 11.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
11.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 11.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
1. Introduction 1. Introduction
This document specifies the payload format for packetization of This document specifies the payload format for packetization of
TErrestial Trunked RAdio (TETRA) encoded speech signals TErrestial Trunked RAdio (TETRA) encoded speech signals
[ETSI-TETRA-Codec] into the Real-time Transport Protocol (RTP) [ETSI-TETRA-Codec] into the Real-time Transport Protocol (RTP)
[RFC3550]. The payload format supports transmission of multiple [RFC3550]. The payload format supports transmission of multiple
channels, multiple frames per payload, robustness against packet frames per payload, robustness against packet loss, and
loss, and interoperation with existing TETRA transport formats on interoperation with existing TETRA transport formats on non-IP
non-IP networks, as described in Section Section 3. networks, as described in Section Section 3.
The payload format itself is specified in Section Section 4. The payload format itself is specified in Section Section 4.
2. Conventions Used In This Document 2. Conventions Used In This Document
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119] when they document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119] when they
appear in ALL CAPS. These words may also appear in this document in appear in ALL CAPS. These words may also appear in this document in
lower case as plain English words, absent their normative meanings. lower case as plain English words, absent their normative meanings.
skipping to change at page 7, line 38 skipping to change at page 7, line 38
+-------+-----------------------------------------------------------+ +-------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| value | relevance | | value | relevance |
+-------+-----------------------------------------------------------+ +-------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| 00 | no audio signal relevance (level ? -72 dBm0) | | 00 | no audio signal relevance (level ? -72 dBm0) |
| 01 | low audio signal relevance (-52dBm0 ? level > -72dBm0) | | 01 | low audio signal relevance (-52dBm0 ? level > -72dBm0) |
| 10 | medium audio signal relevance (-32dBm0 ? level > -52dBm0) | | 10 | medium audio signal relevance (-32dBm0 ? level > -52dBm0) |
| 11 | high audio signal relevance (0dBm0 ? level > -32dBm0) | | 11 | high audio signal relevance (0dBm0 ? level > -32dBm0) |
+-------+-----------------------------------------------------------+ +-------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
NOTE: Receiver SHOULD consider stolen or erroneous blocks as not
available for audio decoding as indicated by control bits independent
of audio signal relevance bits.
4.3.7. S: Spare (7 bits) 4.3.7. S: Spare (7 bits)
The S bits bits are reserved for future use and set to "0" currently. The S bits bits are reserved for future use and set to "0" currently.
4.4. Payload Data 4.4. Payload Data
Reference [ETSI-TETRA-ISI] contains the definition for the generation Reference [ETSI-TETRA-ISI] contains the definition for the generation
of the codec data. Data bits D1..D137 in chapter 8 correspond to the of the codec data. Data bits D1..D137 in chapter 8 correspond to the
"Bit number in speech frame" row of table 4 of [ETSI-TETRA-ISI]. "Bit number in speech frame" row of table 4 of [ETSI-TETRA-ISI].
skipping to change at page 9, line 4 skipping to change at page 9, line 7
UDP layer RFC8085 [RFC8085] and MAY also implement a transport UDP layer RFC8085 [RFC8085] and MAY also implement a transport
circuit breaker RFC8083 [RFC8083]. Work in the RMCAT working group circuit breaker RFC8083 [RFC8083]. Work in the RMCAT working group
[RMCAT] describes the interactions and conceptual interfaces [RMCAT] describes the interactions and conceptual interfaces
necessary between the application components that relate to necessary between the application components that relate to
congestion control, including the RTP layer, the higher-level media congestion control, including the RTP layer, the higher-level media
codec control layer, and the lower-level transport interface, as well codec control layer, and the lower-level transport interface, as well
as components dedicated to congestion control functions. as components dedicated to congestion control functions.
Congestion control for RTP SHALL be used in accordance with RFC 3550 Congestion control for RTP SHALL be used in accordance with RFC 3550
[RFC3550], and with any applicable RTP profile; e.g., RFC 3551 [RFC3550], and with any applicable RTP profile; e.g., RFC 3551
[RFC3551]. An additional requirement if best-effort service is being [RFC3551]. An additional requirement if best-effort service is being
used is: users of this payload format MUST monitor packet loss to used is: users of this payload format MUST monitor packet loss to
ensure that the packet loss rate is within acceptable parameters. ensure that the packet loss rate is within acceptable parameters.
7. Payload Format Parameters 7. Payload Format Parameters
This RTP payload format is identified using one media subtype (audio/ This RTP payload format is identified using one media subtype (audio/
TETRA) which is registered in accordance with RFC 4855 [RFC4855] and TETRA) which is registered in accordance with RFC 4855 [RFC4855] and
per media type registration template from RFC 6838 [RFC6838]. per media type registration template from RFC 6838 [RFC6838].
7.1. Media Type Definition 7.1. Media Type Definition
The media type for the TETRA codec is expected to be allocated from The media type for the TETRA codec is expected to be allocated from
the IETF tree once this draft turns into an RFC. This media type the IETF tree once this draft turns into an RFC. This media type
registration covers both real-time transfer via RTP and non-real-time registration covers both real-time transfer via RTP and non-real-time
transfers via stored files. transfers via stored files.
Media Type name: Type name:
audio audio
Media Subtype name: Subtype name:
TETRA TETRA
Required parameters: Required parameters:
none none
Optional parameters: Optional parameters:
These parameters apply to RTP transfer only.
These parameters apply to RTP transfer only. * maxptime: The maximum amount of media which can be encapsulated
in a payload packet, expressed as time in milliseconds. The
maxptime: time is calculated as the sum of the time that the media
The maximum amount of media which can be encapsulated in a payload present in the packet represents. The time SHOULD be an
packet, expressed as time in milliseconds. The time is calculated integer multiple of the frame size. If this parameter is not
as the sum of the time that the media present in the packet present, the sender MAY encapsulate any number of speech frames
represents. The time SHOULD be an integer multiple of the frame into one RTP packet.
size. If this parameter is not present, the sender MAY * ptime: see RFC 4566 [RFC4566].
encapsulate any number of speech frames into one RTP packet. Encoding considerations:
ptime: This media type is framed and binary according Section 4.8 of RFC
see RFC 4566 [RFC4566]. 6838 [RFC6838].
Security considerations: Security considerations:
See Section Section 10 of RFC XXXX. [RFC Editor: Upon publication See Section Section 10 of RFC XXXX. [RFC Editor: Upon publication
as an RFC, please replace "XXXX" with the number assigned to this as an RFC, please replace "XXXX" with the number assigned to this
document and remove this note.] document and remove this note.]
Interoperability considerations: Interoperability considerations: N/A
Published specification: Published specification:
RFC XXXX [RFC Editor: Upon publication as an RFC, please replace
"XXXX" with the number assigned to this document and remove this
note.]
Applications that use this media type: Applications that use this media type:
This media type is used in applications needing transport or
storage of encoded voice. Some examples include; Voice over IP,
streaming media, voice messaging, and voice recording on recording
systems.
This media type is used in applications needing transport or storage Additional Information:
of encoded voice. Some examples include; Voice over IP, streaming
media, voice messaging, and voice recording on recording systems. - Deprecated alias names for this type: N/A
- Magic number(s): N/A
- File extension(s): N/A
- Macintosh file type code(s): N/A
Person & email address to contact for further information:
Andreas Reisenbauer <mailto:andreas.reisenbauer@frequentis.com>
IETF Payload Working Group <mailto:payload@ietf.org>
Intended usage: Intended usage:
COMMON COMMON
Restrictions on usage:
This media subtype depends on RTP framing and hence is only
defined for transfer via RTP RFC 3550 [RFC3550]. Transport within
other framing protocols is not defined at this time.
Author:
Andreas Reisenbauer <mailto:andreas.reisenbauer@frequentis.com>
Change controller:
The IETF PAYLOAD Working Group, or other party as designated by
the IESG.
8. Mapping to SDP 8. Mapping to SDP
The information carried in the media type specification has a The information carried in the media type specification has a
specific mapping to fields in the Session Description Protocol specific mapping to fields in the Session Description Protocol
[RFC4566], which is commonly used to describe RTP sessions. When SDP [RFC4566], which is commonly used to describe RTP sessions. When SDP
is used to specify sessions employing the TETRA codec, the mapping is is used to specify sessions employing the TETRA codec, the mapping is
as follows: as follows:
Media Type name: Media Type name:
 End of changes. 20 change blocks. 
28 lines changed or deleted 53 lines changed or added

This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.48. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/