< draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-02.txt   draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-03.txt >
Network Working Group S. Sivabalan Network Working Group S. Sivabalan
Internet-Draft J. Medved Internet-Draft J. Medved
Intended status: Standards Track C. Filsfils Intended status: Standards Track C. Filsfils
Expires: October 22, 2015 Cisco Systems, Inc. Expires: October 24, 2015 Cisco Systems, Inc.
E. Crabbe E. Crabbe
R. Raszuk R. Raszuk
Mirantis Inc. Mirantis Inc.
V. Lopez V. Lopez
Telefonica I+D Telefonica I+D
J. Tantsura J. Tantsura
Ericsson Ericsson
W. Henderickx W. Henderickx
Alcatel Lucent Alcatel Lucent
J. Hardwick J. Hardwick
Metaswitch Networks Metaswitch Networks
April 20, 2015 April 22, 2015
PCEP Extensions for Segment Routing PCEP Extensions for Segment Routing
draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-02.txt draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-03.txt
Abstract Abstract
Segment Routing (SR) enables any head-end node to select any path Segment Routing (SR) enables any head-end node to select any path
without relying on a hop-by-hop signaling technique (e.g., LDP or without relying on a hop-by-hop signaling technique (e.g., LDP or
RSVP-TE). It depends only on "segments" that are advertised by Link- RSVP-TE). It depends only on "segments" that are advertised by Link-
State Interior Gateway Protocols (IGPs). A Segment Routed Path can State Interior Gateway Protocols (IGPs). A Segment Routed Path can
be derived from a variety of mechanisms, including an IGP Shortest be derived from a variety of mechanisms, including an IGP Shortest
Path Tree (SPT), explicit configuration, or a Path Computation Path Tree (SPT), explicit configuration, or a Path Computation
Element (PCE). This document specifies extensions to the Path Element (PCE). This document specifies extensions to the Path
skipping to change at page 2, line 13 skipping to change at page 2, line 13
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on October 22, 2015. This Internet-Draft will expire on October 24, 2015.
Copyright Notice Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2015 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the Copyright (c) 2015 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved. document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents publication of this document. Please review these documents
skipping to change at page 17, line 8 skipping to change at page 17, line 8
Error-value = TBD (recommended 4): Bad label format Error-value = TBD (recommended 4): Bad label format
Error-value = TBD (recommended 5): Non-identical ERO Error-value = TBD (recommended 5): Non-identical ERO
subobjects subobjects
Error-value = TBD (recommended 6): Both SID and NAI Error-value = TBD (recommended 6): Both SID and NAI
are absent in ERO are absent in ERO
subobject subobject
Error-value = TBD (recommended 7): Both SID and NAI Error-value = TBD (recommended 7): Both SID and NAI
are absent in RRO are absent in RRO
subobject subobject
Error-value = TBD (recommended 8): Non-identical RRO
subobjects
Error-value = TBD (recommended 9): Default MSD is Error-value = TBD (recommended 9): Default MSD is
specified for the specified for the
PCEP session PCEP session
Error-value = TBD (recommended 10): Non-identical RRO
subobjects
9.3. PCEP TLV Type Indicators 9.3. PCEP TLV Type Indicators
IANA is requested to allocate a new code point in the PCEP TLV Type IANA is requested to allocate a new code point in the PCEP TLV Type
Indicators registry, as follows: Indicators registry, as follows:
Value Meaning Reference Value Meaning Reference
------------------------- ---------------------------- -------------- ------------------------- ---------------------------- --------------
TBD (recommended 26) SR-PCE-CAPABILITY This document TBD (recommended 26) SR-PCE-CAPABILITY This document
 End of changes. 6 change blocks. 
6 lines changed or deleted 6 lines changed or added

This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.48. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/