< draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-11.txt   draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-12.txt >
Network Working Group C. Filsfils, Ed. Network Working Group C. Filsfils, Ed.
Internet-Draft S. Previdi, Ed. Internet-Draft S. Previdi, Ed.
Intended status: Standards Track Cisco Systems, Inc. Intended status: Standards Track Cisco Systems, Inc.
Expires: August 20, 2017 B. Decraene Expires: December 22, 2017 B. Decraene
S. Litkowski S. Litkowski
Orange Orange
R. Shakir R. Shakir
Google, Inc. Google, Inc.
February 16, 2017 June 20, 2017
Segment Routing Architecture Segment Routing Architecture
draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-11 draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-12
Abstract Abstract
Segment Routing (SR) leverages the source routing paradigm. A node Segment Routing (SR) leverages the source routing paradigm. A node
steers a packet through an ordered list of instructions, called steers a packet through an ordered list of instructions, called
segments. A segment can represent any instruction, topological or segments. A segment can represent any instruction, topological or
service-based. A segment can have a semantic local to an SR node or service-based. A segment can have a semantic local to an SR node or
global within an SR domain. SR allows to enforce a flow through any global within an SR domain. SR allows to enforce a flow through any
topological path and service chain while maintaining per-flow state topological path and service chain while maintaining per-flow state
only at the ingress nodes to the SR domain. only at the ingress nodes to the SR domain.
skipping to change at page 2, line 15 skipping to change at page 2, line 15
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on August 20, 2017. This Internet-Draft will expire on December 22, 2017.
Copyright Notice Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2017 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the Copyright (c) 2017 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved. document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents publication of this document. Please review these documents
skipping to change at page 24, line 23 skipping to change at page 24, line 23
[RFC4206] Kompella, K. and Y. Rekhter, "Label Switched Paths (LSP) [RFC4206] Kompella, K. and Y. Rekhter, "Label Switched Paths (LSP)
Hierarchy with Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching Hierarchy with Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching
(GMPLS) Traffic Engineering (TE)", RFC 4206, (GMPLS) Traffic Engineering (TE)", RFC 4206,
DOI 10.17487/RFC4206, October 2005, DOI 10.17487/RFC4206, October 2005,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4206>. <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4206>.
12.2. Informative References 12.2. Informative References
[I-D.ietf-6man-segment-routing-header] [I-D.ietf-6man-segment-routing-header]
Previdi, S., Filsfils, C., Field, B., Leung, I., Linkova, Previdi, S., Filsfils, C., Raza, K., Leddy, J., Field, B.,
J., Aries, E., Kosugi, T., Vyncke, E., and D. Lebrun, daniel.voyer@bell.ca, d., daniel.bernier@bell.ca, d.,
Matsushima, S., Leung, I., Linkova, J., Aries, E., Kosugi,
T., Vyncke, E., Lebrun, D., Steinberg, D., and R. Raszuk,
"IPv6 Segment Routing Header (SRH)", draft-ietf-6man- "IPv6 Segment Routing Header (SRH)", draft-ietf-6man-
segment-routing-header-05 (work in progress), February segment-routing-header-06 (work in progress), March 2017.
2017.
[I-D.ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions] [I-D.ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions]
Previdi, S., Filsfils, C., Bashandy, A., Gredler, H., Previdi, S., Filsfils, C., Bashandy, A., Gredler, H.,
Litkowski, S., Decraene, B., and j. jefftant@gmail.com, Litkowski, S., Decraene, B., and j. jefftant@gmail.com,
"IS-IS Extensions for Segment Routing", draft-ietf-isis- "IS-IS Extensions for Segment Routing", draft-ietf-isis-
segment-routing-extensions-09 (work in progress), October segment-routing-extensions-13 (work in progress), June
2016. 2017.
[I-D.ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping] [I-D.ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping]
Kumar, N., Swallow, G., Pignataro, C., Akiya, N., Kini, Kumar, N., Swallow, G., Pignataro, C., Akiya, N., Kini,
S., Gredler, H., and M. Chen, "Label Switched Path (LSP) S., Gredler, H., and M. Chen, "Label Switched Path (LSP)
Ping/Trace for Segment Routing Networks Using MPLS Ping/Traceroute for Segment Routing Networks with MPLS
Dataplane", draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-02 (work in Dataplane", draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-03 (work in
progress), December 2016. progress), June 2017.
[I-D.ietf-ospf-ospfv3-segment-routing-extensions] [I-D.ietf-ospf-ospfv3-segment-routing-extensions]
Psenak, P., Previdi, S., Filsfils, C., Gredler, H., Psenak, P., Previdi, S., Filsfils, C., Gredler, H.,
Shakir, R., Henderickx, W., and J. Tantsura, "OSPFv3 Shakir, R., Henderickx, W., and J. Tantsura, "OSPFv3
Extensions for Segment Routing", draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3- Extensions for Segment Routing", draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-
segment-routing-extensions-07 (work in progress), October segment-routing-extensions-09 (work in progress), March
2016. 2017.
[I-D.ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions] [I-D.ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions]
Psenak, P., Previdi, S., Filsfils, C., Gredler, H., Psenak, P., Previdi, S., Filsfils, C., Gredler, H.,
Shakir, R., Henderickx, W., and J. Tantsura, "OSPF Shakir, R., Henderickx, W., and J. Tantsura, "OSPF
Extensions for Segment Routing", draft-ietf-ospf-segment- Extensions for Segment Routing", draft-ietf-ospf-segment-
routing-extensions-10 (work in progress), October 2016. routing-extensions-16 (work in progress), May 2017.
[I-D.ietf-pce-segment-routing] [I-D.ietf-pce-segment-routing]
Sivabalan, S., Medved, J., Filsfils, C., Crabbe, E., Sivabalan, S., Filsfils, C., Tantsura, J., Henderickx, W.,
Raszuk, R., Lopez, V., Tantsura, J., Henderickx, W., and and J. Hardwick, "PCEP Extensions for Segment Routing",
J. Hardwick, "PCEP Extensions for Segment Routing", draft- draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-09 (work in progress),
ietf-pce-segment-routing-08 (work in progress), October April 2017.
2016.
[I-D.ietf-spring-conflict-resolution] [I-D.ietf-spring-conflict-resolution]
Ginsberg, L., Psenak, P., Previdi, S., and M. Pilka, Ginsberg, L., Psenak, P., Previdi, S., and M. Pilka,
"Segment Routing Conflict Resolution", draft-ietf-spring- "Segment Routing MPLS Conflict Resolution", draft-ietf-
conflict-resolution-02 (work in progress), October 2016. spring-conflict-resolution-04 (work in progress), May
2017.
[I-D.ietf-spring-ipv6-use-cases] [I-D.ietf-spring-ipv6-use-cases]
Brzozowski, J., Leddy, J., Filsfils, C., Maglione, R., and Brzozowski, J., Leddy, J., Filsfils, C., Maglione, R., and
W. Townsley, "IPv6 SPRING Use Cases", draft-ietf-spring- M. Townsley, "IPv6 SPRING Use Cases", draft-ietf-spring-
ipv6-use-cases-09 (work in progress), February 2017. ipv6-use-cases-11 (work in progress), June 2017.
[I-D.ietf-spring-oam-usecase] [I-D.ietf-spring-oam-usecase]
Geib, R., Filsfils, C., Pignataro, C., and N. Kumar, "A Geib, R., Filsfils, C., Pignataro, C., and N. Kumar, "A
Scalable and Topology-Aware MPLS Dataplane Monitoring Scalable and Topology-Aware MPLS Dataplane Monitoring
System", draft-ietf-spring-oam-usecase-05 (work in System", draft-ietf-spring-oam-usecase-06 (work in
progress), February 2017. progress), February 2017.
[I-D.ietf-spring-resiliency-use-cases] [I-D.ietf-spring-resiliency-use-cases]
Filsfils, C., Previdi, S., Decraene, B., and R. Shakir, Filsfils, C., Previdi, S., Decraene, B., and R. Shakir,
"Resiliency use cases in SPRING networks", draft-ietf- "Resiliency use cases in SPRING networks", draft-ietf-
spring-resiliency-use-cases-08 (work in progress), October spring-resiliency-use-cases-11 (work in progress), May
2016. 2017.
[I-D.ietf-spring-segment-routing-central-epe] [I-D.ietf-spring-segment-routing-central-epe]
Filsfils, C., Previdi, S., Aries, E., and D. Afanasiev, Filsfils, C., Previdi, S., Aries, E., and D. Afanasiev,
"Segment Routing Centralized BGP Peer Engineering", draft- "Segment Routing Centralized BGP Egress Peer Engineering",
ietf-spring-segment-routing-central-epe-03 (work in draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-central-epe-05 (work in
progress), November 2016. progress), March 2017.
[I-D.ietf-spring-segment-routing-ldp-interop] [I-D.ietf-spring-segment-routing-ldp-interop]
Filsfils, C., Previdi, S., Bashandy, A., Decraene, B., and Filsfils, C., Previdi, S., Bashandy, A., Decraene, B., and
S. Litkowski, "Segment Routing interworking with LDP", S. Litkowski, "Segment Routing interworking with LDP",
draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-ldp-interop-06 (work in draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-ldp-interop-08 (work in
progress), February 2017. progress), June 2017.
[I-D.ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls] [I-D.ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls]
Filsfils, C., Previdi, S., Bashandy, A., Decraene, B., Filsfils, C., Previdi, S., Bashandy, A., Decraene, B.,
Litkowski, S., Horneffer, M., Shakir, R., Litkowski, S., and R. Shakir, "Segment Routing with MPLS
jefftant@gmail.com, j., and E. Crabbe, "Segment Routing data plane", draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls-09
with MPLS data plane", draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing- (work in progress), June 2017.
mpls-07 (work in progress), February 2017.
[I-D.ietf-spring-sr-oam-requirement] [I-D.ietf-spring-sr-oam-requirement]
Kumar, N., Pignataro, C., Akiya, N., Geib, R., Mirsky, G., Kumar, N., Pignataro, C., Akiya, N., Geib, R., Mirsky, G.,
and S. Litkowski, "OAM Requirements for Segment Routing and S. Litkowski, "OAM Requirements for Segment Routing
Network", draft-ietf-spring-sr-oam-requirement-03 (work in Network", draft-ietf-spring-sr-oam-requirement-03 (work in
progress), January 2017. progress), January 2017.
[I-D.ietf-spring-sr-yang] [I-D.ietf-spring-sr-yang]
Litkowski, S., Qu, Y., Sarkar, P., and J. Tantsura, "YANG Litkowski, S., Qu, Y., Sarkar, P., and J. Tantsura, "YANG
Data Model for Segment Routing", draft-ietf-spring-sr- Data Model for Segment Routing", draft-ietf-spring-sr-
yang-05 (work in progress), October 2016. yang-06 (work in progress), March 2017.
[RFC4381] Behringer, M., "Analysis of the Security of BGP/MPLS IP [RFC4381] Behringer, M., "Analysis of the Security of BGP/MPLS IP
Virtual Private Networks (VPNs)", RFC 4381, Virtual Private Networks (VPNs)", RFC 4381,
DOI 10.17487/RFC4381, February 2006, DOI 10.17487/RFC4381, February 2006,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4381>. <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4381>.
[RFC4915] Psenak, P., Mirtorabi, S., Roy, A., Nguyen, L., and P. [RFC4915] Psenak, P., Mirtorabi, S., Roy, A., Nguyen, L., and P.
Pillay-Esnault, "Multi-Topology (MT) Routing in OSPF", Pillay-Esnault, "Multi-Topology (MT) Routing in OSPF",
RFC 4915, DOI 10.17487/RFC4915, June 2007, RFC 4915, DOI 10.17487/RFC4915, June 2007,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4915>. <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4915>.
skipping to change at page 27, line 41 skipping to change at page 27, line 41
Clarence Filsfils (editor) Clarence Filsfils (editor)
Cisco Systems, Inc. Cisco Systems, Inc.
Brussels Brussels
BE BE
Email: cfilsfil@cisco.com Email: cfilsfil@cisco.com
Stefano Previdi (editor) Stefano Previdi (editor)
Cisco Systems, Inc. Cisco Systems, Inc.
Via Del Serafico, 200
Rome 00142
Italy Italy
Email: sprevidi@cisco.com Email: stefano@previdi.net
Bruno Decraene Bruno Decraene
Orange Orange
FR FR
Email: bruno.decraene@orange.com Email: bruno.decraene@orange.com
Stephane Litkowski Stephane Litkowski
Orange Orange
FR FR
Email: stephane.litkowski@orange.com Email: stephane.litkowski@orange.com
Rob Shakir Rob Shakir
Google, Inc. Google, Inc.
1600 Amphitheatre Parkway 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway
Mountain View, CA 94043 Mountain View, CA 94043
 End of changes. 22 change blocks. 
42 lines changed or deleted 40 lines changed or added

This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.48. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/