< draft-ietf-spring-sr-yang-16.txt   draft-ietf-spring-sr-yang-17.txt >
skipping to change at page 1, line 16 skipping to change at page 1, line 16
Expires: January 10, 2021 Futurewei Expires: January 10, 2021 Futurewei
A. Lindem A. Lindem
Cisco Systems Cisco Systems
P. Sarkar P. Sarkar
Individual Individual
J. Tantsura J. Tantsura
Apstra Apstra
July 9, 2020 July 9, 2020
YANG Data Model for Segment Routing YANG Data Model for Segment Routing
draft-ietf-spring-sr-yang-16 draft-ietf-spring-sr-yang-17
Abstract Abstract
This document defines a YANG data model ([RFC6020], [RFC7950]) for This document defines a YANG data model for segment routing
segment routing ([RFC8402]) configuration and operation. This YANG configuration and operation, which is to be augmented by different
model is intended to be used on network elements to configure or segment routing data planes. The document also defines a YANG model
operate segment routing MPLS data plane [RFC8660]. This document that is intended to be used on network elements to configure or
defines also generic containers that SHOULD be reused by IGP protocol operate segment routing MPLS data plane, as well as some generic
modules to support segment routing. containers to be reused by IGP protocol modules to support segment
routing.
Status of This Memo Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
skipping to change at page 2, line 22 skipping to change at page 2, line 22
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License. described in the Simplified BSD License.
Table of Contents Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2. Terminology and Notation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2. Terminology and Notation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2.1. Tree diagram . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2.1. Tree diagram . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2.2. Prefixes in Data Node Names . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2.2. Prefixes in Data Node Names . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3. Design of the Data Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 3. Design of the Data Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
4. Configuration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 4. Configuration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
5. IGP Control plane configuration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 5. IGP Control plane configuration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
5.1. IGP interface configuration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 5.1. IGP interface configuration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
5.1.1. Adjacency SID properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 5.1.1. Adjacency SID properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
5.1.1.1. Bundling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 5.1.1.1. Bundling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
5.1.1.2. Protection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 5.1.1.2. Protection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
6. States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 6. States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
7. Notifications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 7. Notifications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
8. YANG Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 8. YANG Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
9. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 9. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
10. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 10. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
11. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 11. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
12. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 12. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
12.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 12.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
12.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 12.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
Appendix A. Configuration example . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 Appendix A. Configuration example . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
1. Introduction 1. Introduction
This document defines a YANG data model for segment routing This document defines a YANG data model [RFC7950] for segment routing
configuration and operation. This document does not define the IGP [RFC8402] configuration and operation. The document also defines a
extensions to support segment routing but defines generic groupings YANG model that is intended to be used on network elements to
that SHOULD be reused by IGP extension modules. The reason of this configure or operate segment routing MPLS data plane [RFC8660] This
design choice is to not require implementations to support all IGP document does not define the IGP extensions to support segment
extensions. For example, an implementation may support IS-IS routing but defines generic groupings that SHOULD be reused by IGP
extension but not OSPF. extension modules. The reason of this design choice is to not
require implementations to support all IGP extensions. For example,
an implementation may support IS-IS extension but not OSPF.
The YANG modules in this document conform to the Network Management The YANG modules in this document conform to the Network Management
Datastore Architecture (NMDA) [RFC8342]. Datastore Architecture (NMDA) [RFC8342].
2. Terminology and Notation 2. Terminology and Notation
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
"OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP
14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
skipping to change at page 7, line 18 skipping to change at page 7, line 24
5.1. IGP interface configuration 5.1. IGP interface configuration
The interface configuration is part of the "igp-interface-cfg" The interface configuration is part of the "igp-interface-cfg"
grouping and includes Adjacency SID properties. grouping and includes Adjacency SID properties.
5.1.1. Adjacency SID properties 5.1.1. Adjacency SID properties
5.1.1.1. Bundling 5.1.1.1. Bundling
This section is a first proposal on how to use S-bit in Adj-SID to
create bundles. Authors would like to trigger discussion based on
this first proposal.
In case of parallel IP links between routers, an additional Adjacency In case of parallel IP links between routers, an additional Adjacency
SID may be advertised representing more than one adjacency (i.e., a SID [RFC8402] may be advertised representing more than one adjacency
bundle of adjacencies). The "advertise-adj-group-sid" configuration (i.e., a bundle of adjacencies). The "advertise-adj-group-sid"
controls whether or not an additional adjacency SID is advertised. configuration controls whether or not an additional adjacency SID is
advertised.
The "advertise-adj-group-sid" would be a list of "group-id". The The "advertise-adj-group-sid" would be a list of "group-id". The
"group-id" will permit to identify interfaces that must be bundled "group-id" will permit to identify interfaces that must be bundled
together. together.
+-------+ +------+ +-------+ +------+
| | ------- L1 ---- | | | | ------- L1 ---- | |
| R1 | ------- L2 ---- | R2 | | R1 | ------- L2 ---- | R2 |
| | ------- L3 ---- | | | | ------- L3 ---- | |
| | ------- L4 ---- | | | | ------- L4 ---- | |
skipping to change at page 21, line 52 skipping to change at page 22, line 4
description description
"Name of the mapping policy."; "Name of the mapping policy.";
} }
container entries { container entries {
description description
"IPv4/IPv6 mapping entries."; "IPv4/IPv6 mapping entries.";
list mapping-entry { list mapping-entry {
key "prefix algorithm"; key "prefix algorithm";
description description
"Mapping entries."; "Mapping entries.";
uses sr-cmn:prefix-sid;
uses sr-cmn:prefix-sid;
} }
} }
} }
} }
container connected-prefix-sid-map { container connected-prefix-sid-map {
description description
"Prefix SID configuration."; "Prefix SID configuration.";
list connected-prefix-sid { list connected-prefix-sid {
key "prefix algorithm"; key "prefix algorithm";
description description
skipping to change at page 28, line 27 skipping to change at page 28, line 30
requested to be made: requested to be made:
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-segment-routing-commmon URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-segment-routing-commmon
Registrant Contact: The IESG. Registrant Contact: The IESG.
XML: N/A, the requested URI is an XML namespace. XML: N/A, the requested URI is an XML namespace.
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-segment-routing URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-segment-routing
Registrant Contact: The IESG. Registrant Contact: The IESG.
XML: N/A, the requested URI is an XML namespace. XML: N/A, the requested URI is an XML namespace.
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-segment-routing-mpls
Registrant Contact: The IESG.
XML: N/A, the requested URI is an XML namespace.
This document registers a YANG module in the YANG Module Names This document registers a YANG module in the YANG Module Names
registry [RFC6020]. registry [RFC6020].
name: ietf-segment-routing-common name: ietf-segment-routing-common
namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-segment-routing-common namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-segment-routing-common
prefix: sr-cmn prefix: sr-cmn
reference: RFC XXXX reference: RFC XXXX
name: ietf-segment-routing name: ietf-segment-routing
namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-segment-routing namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-segment-routing
prefix: sr prefix: sr
reference: RFC XXXX reference: RFC XXXX
name: ietf-segment-routing
namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-segment-routing-mpls
prefix: sr-mpls
reference: RFC XXXX
12. References 12. References
12.1. Normative References 12.1. Normative References
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>. <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
[RFC3688] Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688, [RFC3688] Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688,
 End of changes. 11 change blocks. 
28 lines changed or deleted 37 lines changed or added

This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.48. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/