< draft-ietf-stir-rph-emergency-services-06.txt   draft-ietf-stir-rph-emergency-services-07.txt >
STIR M. Dolly STIR M. Dolly
Internet-Draft AT&T Internet-Draft AT&T
Intended status: Standards Track C. Wendt Intended status: Standards Track C. Wendt
Expires: August 14, 2021 Comcast Expires: September 12, 2021 Comcast
February 10, 2021 March 11, 2021
Assertion Values for a Resource Priority Header Claim and a SIP Priority Assertion Values for a Resource Priority Header Claim and a SIP Priority
Header Claim in Support of Emergency Services Networks Header Claim in Support of Emergency Services Networks
draft-ietf-stir-rph-emergency-services-06 draft-ietf-stir-rph-emergency-services-07
Abstract Abstract
This document adds new assertion values for a Resource Priority This document adds new assertion values for a Resource Priority
Header ("rph") claim and a new SIP Priority Header claim ("sph") for Header ("rph") claim and a new SIP Priority Header claim ("sph") for
protection of the "psap-callback" value as part of the "rph" PASSporT protection of the "psap-callback" value as part of the "rph" PASSporT
extension, in support of the security of Emergency Services Networks extension, in support of the security of Emergency Services Networks
for emergency call origination and callback. for emergency call origination and callback.
Status of This Memo Status of This Memo
skipping to change at page 1, line 36 skipping to change at page 1, line 36
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on August 14, 2021. This Internet-Draft will expire on September 12, 2021.
Copyright Notice Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2021 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the Copyright (c) 2021 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved. document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents publication of this document. Please review these documents
skipping to change at page 3, line 39 skipping to change at page 3, line 39
3. New Assertion Values for "rph" claim 3. New Assertion Values for "rph" claim
This specification defines the ability to sign the SIP Resource- This specification defines the ability to sign the SIP Resource-
Priority Header field namespace for local emergency communications Priority Header field namespace for local emergency communications
defined in [RFC7135] and represented by the string "esnet.x" where x defined in [RFC7135] and represented by the string "esnet.x" where x
is the priority-level allowed in the esnet namespace. As of the is the priority-level allowed in the esnet namespace. As of the
writing of this specification the priority-level is between 0 and 4, writing of this specification the priority-level is between 0 and 4,
inclusive, but may be extended by future specifications. inclusive, but may be extended by future specifications.
Similar to the values allowed by [RFC8443] for the "auth" JSON object Similar to the values defined by [RFC8443] for the "auth" JSON object
key inside the "rph" claim, the string "esnet.x" with the appropriate key inside the "rph" claim, the string "esnet.x" with the appropriate
value should be used when resource priority is required for local value should be used when resource priority is required for local
emergency communications corresponding and exactly matching the SIP emergency communications corresponding and exactly matching the SIP
Resource-Priority header field representing the namespace invoked in Resource-Priority header field representing the namespace invoked in
the call. the call.
When using "esnet.x" as the "auth" assertion value in emergency When using "esnet.x" as the "auth" assertion value in emergency
service destined calls, the "orig" claim of the PASSporT MUST service destined calls, the "orig" claim of the PASSporT MUST
represent the calling party number that initiates the call to represent the calling party number that initiates the call to
emergency services. The "dest" claim MUST either be a country or emergency services. The "dest" claim MUST either be a country or
region specific dial string (e.g., "911" for North America or "112" region specific dial string (e.g., "911" for North America or "112"
GSM defined string used in Europe and other countries) or GSM defined string used in Europe and other countries) or
"urn:service:sos" as defined in [RFC5031], representing the emergency "urn:service:sos" as defined in [RFC5031], representing the emergency
services destination of the call. services destination of the call.
The following is an example of an "rph" claim for SIP 'Resource- The following is an example of an "rph" claim for SIP 'Resource-
Priority' header field with an "esnet.1" assertion: Priority' header field with an "esnet.1" assertion:
{ {
"orig":{"tn":"12155551212"},
"dest":{"uri":["urn:service:sos"]}, "dest":{"uri":["urn:service:sos"]},
"iat":1443208345, "iat":1615471428,
"orig":{"tn":"12155551212"},
"rph":{"auth":["esnet.1"]} "rph":{"auth":["esnet.1"]}
} }
For emergency services callbacks, the "orig" claim of the "rph" For emergency services callbacks, the "orig" claim of the "rph"
PASSporT MUST represent the Public Saftey Answering Point (PSAP) PASSporT MUST represent the Public Saftey Answering Point (PSAP)
telephone number. The "dest" claim MUST be the telephone number telephone number. The "dest" claim MUST be the telephone number
representing the original calling party of the emergency service call representing the original calling party of the emergency service call
that is being called back. that is being called back.
The following is an example of an "rph" claim for SIP 'Resource- The following is an example of an "rph" claim for SIP 'Resource-
Priority' header field with a "esnet.0" assertion: Priority' header field with a "esnet.0" assertion:
{ {
"orig":{"tn":"12155551213"},
"dest":{"tn":["12155551212"]}, "dest":{"tn":["12155551212"]},
"iat":1443208345, "iat":1615471428,
"orig":{"tn":"12155551213"},
"rph":{"auth":["esnet.0"]} "rph":{"auth":["esnet.0"]}
} }
After the header and claims PASSporT objects have been constructed, After the header and claims PASSporT objects have been constructed,
their signature is generated normally per the guidance in [RFC8225] their signature is generated normally per the guidance in [RFC8225]
using the full form of PASSPorT. The credentials (i.e., Certificate) using the full form of PASSPorT. The credentials (i.e., Certificate)
used to create the signature must have authority over the namespace used to create the signature must have authority over the namespace
of the "rph" claim, and there is only one authority per claim. The of the "rph" claim, and there is only one authority per claim. The
authority MUST use its credentials associated with the specific authority MUST use its credentials associated with the specific
service supported by the resource priority namespace in the claim. service supported by the resource priority namespace in the claim.
skipping to change at page 5, line 32 skipping to change at page 5, line 32
callback case where both could exist. This document is not intended callback case where both could exist. This document is not intended
to be a general mechanism for protecting SIP Priority Header fields, to be a general mechanism for protecting SIP Priority Header fields,
this could be accomplished as part of future work with a new PASSporT this could be accomplished as part of future work with a new PASSporT
extension or new claim added to either an existing PASSporT or extension or new claim added to either an existing PASSporT or
PASSporT extension usage. PASSporT extension usage.
The following is an example of an "sph" claim for SIP 'Priority' The following is an example of an "sph" claim for SIP 'Priority'
header field with the value "psap-callback": header field with the value "psap-callback":
{ {
"orig":{"tn":"12155551213"},
"dest":{"tn":["12155551212"]}, "dest":{"tn":["12155551212"]},
"iat":1443208345, "iat":1615471428,
"orig":{"tn":"12155551213"},
"rph":{"auth":["esnet.0"]}, "rph":{"auth":["esnet.0"]},
"sph":"psap-callback" "sph":"psap-callback"
} }
5. Order of Claim Keys 5. Order of Claim Keys
The order of the claim keys MUST follow the rules of [RFC8225] The order of the claim keys MUST follow the rules of [RFC8225]
Section 9; the claim keys MUST appear in lexicographic order. Section 9 which defines the deterministic JSON serialization used for
Therefore, the claim keys discussed in this document appear in the signature generation (and validation); the claim keys MUST appear in
PASSporT Payload in the following order, lexicographic order. Therefore, the claim keys discussed in this
document appear in the PASSporT Payload in the following order,
o dest o dest
o iat o iat
o orig o orig
o rph o rph
o sph o sph
6. Compact Form of PASSporT 6. Compact Form of PASSporT
The use of the compact form of PASSporT is not specified in this The use of the compact form of PASSporT is not specified in this
document or recommended for 'rph' PASSporTs. document or recommended for 'rph' PASSporTs.
7. Acknowledgements 7. Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Brian Rosen, Terry Reese, and Jon The authors would like to thank Brian Rosen, Terry Reese, and Jon
skipping to change at page 6, line 33 skipping to change at page 6, line 35
Claim Name: "sph" Claim Name: "sph"
Claim Description: SIP Priority header field Claim Description: SIP Priority header field
Change Controller: IESG Change Controller: IESG
Specification Document(s): [RFCThis] Specification Document(s): [RFCThis]
9. Security Considerations 9. Security Considerations
The security considerations discussed in [RFC8224], Section 12, are The security considerations discussed in [RFC8224], [RFC8225], and
applicable here. [RFC8443] are applicable here.
10. References 10. References
10.1. Normative References 10.1. Normative References
[RFC4412] Schulzrinne, H. and J. Polk, "Communications Resource [RFC4412] Schulzrinne, H. and J. Polk, "Communications Resource
Priority for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)", Priority for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)",
RFC 4412, DOI 10.17487/RFC4412, February 2006, RFC 4412, DOI 10.17487/RFC4412, February 2006,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4412>. <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4412>.
 End of changes. 14 change blocks. 
17 lines changed or deleted 18 lines changed or added

This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.48. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/