< draft-ietf-teas-fast-lsps-requirements-00.txt		draft-ietf-teas-fast-lsps-requirements-01.txt >
	Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) A. Malis, Ed.		Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) A. Malis, Ed.
	Internet-Draft Huawei Technologies		Internet-Draft Huawei Technologies
	Intended status: Informational R. Skoog		Intended status: Informational B. Wilson
	Expires: June 15, 2015 H. Kobrinski		Expires: December 13, 2015 Applied Communication Sciences
	Applied Communication Sciences
	G. Clapp		G. Clapp
	AT&T Labs Research		AT&T Labs Research
	V. Shukla		V. Shukla
	Verizon Communications		Verizon Communications
	December 12, 2014		June 11, 2015
	Requirements for Very Fast Setup of GMPLS LSPs		Requirements for Very Fast Setup of GMPLS LSPs
	draft-ietf-teas-fast-lsps-requirements-00		draft-ietf-teas-fast-lsps-requirements-01
	Abstract		Abstract
	Establishment and control of Label Switch Paths (LSPs) have become		Establishment and control of Label Switch Paths (LSPs) have become
	mainstream tools of commercial and government network providers. One		mainstream tools of commercial and government network providers. One
	of the elements of further evolving such networks is scaling their		of the elements of further evolving such networks is scaling their
	performance in terms of LSP bandwidth and traffic loads, LSP		performance in terms of LSP bandwidth and traffic loads, LSP
	intensity (e.g., rate of LSP creation, deletion, and modification),		intensity (e.g., rate of LSP creation, deletion, and modification),
	LSP set up delay, quality of service differentiation, and different		LSP set up delay, quality of service differentiation, and different
	levels of resilience.		levels of resilience.
	skipping to change at page 1, line 46 ¶		skipping to change at page 1, line 45 ¶
	Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering		Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
	Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute		Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
	working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-		working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
	Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.		Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
	Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months		Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
	and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any		and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
	time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference		time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
	material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."		material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
	This Internet-Draft will expire on June 15, 2015.		This Internet-Draft will expire on December 13, 2015.
	Copyright Notice		Copyright Notice
	Copyright (c) 2014 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the		Copyright (c) 2015 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
	document authors. All rights reserved.		document authors. All rights reserved.
	This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal		This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
	Provisions Relating to IETF Documents		Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
	(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of		(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
	publication of this document. Please review these documents		publication of this document. Please review these documents
	carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect		carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
	to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must		to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
	include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of		include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
	the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as		the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
	skipping to change at page 7, line 21 ¶		skipping to change at page 7, line 21 ¶
	This memo includes no requests to IANA.		This memo includes no requests to IANA.
	7. Security Considerations		7. Security Considerations
	Being able to support very fast setup and a high churn rate of GMPLS		Being able to support very fast setup and a high churn rate of GMPLS
	LSPs is not expected to adversely affect the underlying security		LSPs is not expected to adversely affect the underlying security
	issues associated with existing GMPLS signaling.		issues associated with existing GMPLS signaling.
	8. Acknowledgements		8. Acknowledgements
	The authors would like to thank Ann Von Lehmen, Joe Gannett, and		The authors would like to thank Ann Von Lehmen, Joe Gannett, Ron
	Brian Wilson of Applied Communication Sciences for their comments and		Skoog, and Haim Kobrinski of Applied Communication Sciences for their
	assistance on this document. Lou Berger provided editorial comments		comments and assistance on this document. Lou Berger provided
	on this document.		editorial comments on this document.
	9. References		9. References
	9.1. Normative References		9.1. Normative References
	[RFC3471] Berger, L., "Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching		[RFC3471] Berger, L., "Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching
	(GMPLS) Signaling Functional Description", RFC 3471,		(GMPLS) Signaling Functional Description", RFC 3471,
	January 2003.		January 2003.
	[RFC3945] Mannie, E., "Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching		[RFC3945] Mannie, E., "Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching
	skipping to change at page 8, line 20 ¶		skipping to change at page 8, line 20 ¶
	9.2. Informative References		9.2. Informative References
	[Chiu] A. Chiu, et al, "Architectures and Protocols for Capacity		[Chiu] A. Chiu, et al, "Architectures and Protocols for Capacity
	Efficient, Highly Dynamic and Highly Resilient Core		Efficient, Highly Dynamic and Highly Resilient Core
	Networks", Journal of Optical Communications and		Networks", Journal of Optical Communications and
	Networking vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 1-14, January 2012,		Networking vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 1-14, January 2012,
	<http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOCN.4.000001>.		<http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOCN.4.000001>.
	[Lehmen] A. Von Lehmen, et al, "CORONET: Testbeds, Demonstration		[Lehmen] A. Von Lehmen, et al, "CORONET: Testbeds, Demonstration
	and Lessons Learned", Journal of Optical Communications		and Lessons Learned", Journal of Optical Communications
	and Networking vol. 7, No. 1, January 2015 (expected).		and Networking Vol. 7, Issue 3, pp. A447-A458, March 2015,
			<http://www.osapublishing.org/jocn/
			abstract.cfm?uri=jocn-7-3-A447>.
	Authors' Addresses		Authors' Addresses
	Andrew G. Malis (editor)		Andrew G. Malis (editor)
	Huawei Technologies		Huawei Technologies
	Email: agmalis@gmail.com		Email: agmalis@gmail.com
	Ronald A. Skoog		Brian J. Wilson
	Applied Communication Sciences
	Email: rskoog@appcomsci.com
	Haim Kobrinski
	Applied Communication Sciences		Applied Communication Sciences
	Email: hkobrinski@appcomsci.com		Email: bwilson@appcomsci.com
	George Clapp		George Clapp
	AT&T Labs Research		AT&T Labs Research
	Email: clapp@research.att.com		Email: clapp@research.att.com
	Vishnu Shukla		Vishnu Shukla
	Verizon Communications		Verizon Communications
	Email: vishnu.shukla@verizon.com		Email: vishnu.shukla@verizon.com
End of changes. 9 change blocks.
	19 lines changed or deleted		15 lines changed or added
This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.48. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/