< draft-ietf-tls-md5-sha1-deprecate-00.txt   draft-ietf-tls-md5-sha1-deprecate-01.txt >
Internet Engineering Task Force L. Velvindron Internet Engineering Task Force L. Velvindron
Internet-Draft cyberstorm.mu Internet-Draft cyberstorm.mu
Updates: 5246 7525 (if approved) K. Moriarty Updates: 5246 7525 (if approved) K. Moriarty
Intended status: Standards Track Dell EMC Intended status: Standards Track Dell EMC
Expires: March 5, 2020 A. Ghedini Expires: July 19, 2020 A. Ghedini
Cloudflare Inc. Cloudflare Inc.
September 2, 2019 January 16, 2020
Deprecating MD5 and SHA-1 signature hashes in TLS 1.2 Deprecating MD5 and SHA-1 signature hashes in TLS 1.2
draft-ietf-tls-md5-sha1-deprecate-00 draft-ietf-tls-md5-sha1-deprecate-01
Abstract Abstract
The MD5 and SHA-1 hashing algorithms are steadily weakening in The MD5 and SHA-1 hashing algorithms are steadily weakening in
strength and their deprecation process should begin for their use in strength and their deprecation process should begin for their use in
TLS 1.2 digital signatures. However, this document does not TLS 1.2 digital signatures. However, this document does not
deprecate SHA-1 in HMAC for record protection. deprecate SHA-1 in HMAC for record protection.
Status of This Memo Status of This Memo
skipping to change at page 1, line 36 skipping to change at page 1, line 36
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on March 5, 2020. This Internet-Draft will expire on July 19, 2020.
Copyright Notice Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2019 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the Copyright (c) 2020 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved. document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
skipping to change at page 2, line 21 skipping to change at page 2, line 21
2. Signature Algorithms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2. Signature Algorithms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
3. Certificate Request . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 3. Certificate Request . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
4. Server Key Exchange . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 4. Server Key Exchange . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
5. Certificate Verify . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 5. Certificate Verify . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
6. Updates to RFC5246 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 6. Updates to RFC5246 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
7. Updates to RFC7525 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 7. Updates to RFC7525 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
8. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 8. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
9. Acknowledgement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 9. Acknowledgement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
10. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 10. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
10.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 10.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
10.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 10.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
1. Introduction 1. Introduction
The usage of MD5 and SHA-1 for signature hashing in TLS 1.2 is The usage of MD5 and SHA-1 for signature hashing in TLS 1.2 is
specified in RFC 5246 [RFC5246]. MD5 and SHA-1 have been proven to specified in RFC 5246 [RFC5246]. MD5 and SHA-1 have been proven to
be insecure, subject to collision attacks. RFC 6151 [RFC6151] be insecure, subject to collision attacks. RFC 6151 [RFC6151]
details the security considerations, including collision attacks for details the security considerations, including collision attacks for
MD5, published in 2011. NIST formally deprecated use of SHA-1 in MD5, published in 2011. NIST formally deprecated use of SHA-1 in
2011 [NISTSP800-131A-R2] and disallowed its use for digital 2011 [NISTSP800-131A-R2] and disallowed its use for digital
skipping to change at page 2, line 51 skipping to change at page 3, line 4
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119]. document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].
2. Signature Algorithms 2. Signature Algorithms
Clients SHOULD NOT include MD5 and SHA-1 in signature_algorithms Clients SHOULD NOT include MD5 and SHA-1 in signature_algorithms
extension. If a client does not send a signature_algorithms extension. If a client does not send a signature_algorithms
extension, then the server MUST abort the handshake and send a extension, then the server MUST abort the handshake and send a
handshake_failure alert. handshake_failure alert, except when digital signatures are not used
(for example, when using PSK ciphers).
3. Certificate Request 3. Certificate Request
Servers SHOULD NOT include MD5 and SHA-1 in CertificateRequest Servers SHOULD NOT include MD5 and SHA-1 in CertificateRequest
message. message.
4. Server Key Exchange 4. Server Key Exchange
Servers MUST NOT include MD5 and SHA-1 in ServerKeyExchange message. Servers MUST NOT include MD5 and SHA-1 in ServerKeyExchange message.
If client does receive a MD5 or SHA-1 signature in the If client does receive a MD5 or SHA-1 signature in the
skipping to change at page 5, line 39 skipping to change at page 5, line 46
cyberstorm.mu cyberstorm.mu
Rose Hill Rose Hill
MU MU
Phone: +230 59762817 Phone: +230 59762817
Email: logan@cyberstorm.mu Email: logan@cyberstorm.mu
Kathleen Moriarty Kathleen Moriarty
Dell EMC Dell EMC
Email: Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com
Alessandro Ghedini Alessandro Ghedini
Cloudflare Inc. Cloudflare Inc.
Email: alessandro@cloudflare.com
 End of changes. 9 change blocks. 
7 lines changed or deleted 9 lines changed or added

This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.48. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/