< draft-ietf-webpush-encryption-07.txt   draft-ietf-webpush-encryption-08.txt >
Network Working Group M. Thomson Network Working Group M. Thomson
Internet-Draft Mozilla Internet-Draft Mozilla
Intended status: Standards Track December 21, 2016 Intended status: Standards Track February 14, 2017
Expires: June 24, 2017 Expires: August 18, 2017
Message Encryption for Web Push Message Encryption for Web Push
draft-ietf-webpush-encryption-07 draft-ietf-webpush-encryption-08
Abstract Abstract
A message encryption scheme is described for the Web Push protocol. A message encryption scheme is described for the Web Push protocol.
This scheme provides confidentiality and integrity for messages sent This scheme provides confidentiality and integrity for messages sent
from an Application Server to a User Agent. from an Application Server to a User Agent.
Status of This Memo Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
skipping to change at page 1, line 32 skipping to change at page 1, line 32
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on June 24, 2017. This Internet-Draft will expire on August 18, 2017.
Copyright Notice Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2016 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the Copyright (c) 2017 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved. document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
skipping to change at page 6, line 38 skipping to change at page 6, line 38
record sequence number, since push messages contain only a single record sequence number, since push messages contain only a single
record (see Section 4) and the sequence number of the first record is record (see Section 4) and the sequence number of the first record is
zero. zero.
4. Restrictions on Use of "aes128gcm" Content Coding 4. Restrictions on Use of "aes128gcm" Content Coding
An Application Server MUST encrypt a push message with a single An Application Server MUST encrypt a push message with a single
record. This allows for a minimal receiver implementation that record. This allows for a minimal receiver implementation that
handles a single record. An application server MUST set the "rs" handles a single record. An application server MUST set the "rs"
parameter in the "aes128gcm" content coding header to a size that is parameter in the "aes128gcm" content coding header to a size that is
greater than the length of the plaintext, plus any padding (which is greater than the some of the length of the plaintext, the padding
at least 2 octets). delimiter (1 octet), any padding, and the authentication tag (16
octets).
A push message MUST include the application server ECDH public key in A push message MUST include the application server ECDH public key in
the "keyid" parameter of the encrypted content coding header. The the "keyid" parameter of the encrypted content coding header. The
uncompressed point form defined in [X9.62] (that is, a 65 octet uncompressed point form defined in [X9.62] (that is, a 65 octet
sequence that starts with a 0x04 octet) forms the entirety of the sequence that starts with a 0x04 octet) forms the entirety of the
"keyid". "keyid".
A push service is not required to support more than 4096 octets of A push service is not required to support more than 4096 octets of
payload body (see Section 7.2 of [I-D.ietf-webpush-protocol]). payload body (see Section 7.2 of [I-D.ietf-webpush-protocol]).
Absent header (86 octets), padding (minimum 2 octets), and expansion Absent header (86 octets), padding (minimum 2 octets), and expansion
skipping to change at page 7, line 13 skipping to change at page 7, line 15
of plaintext. of plaintext.
An Application Server MUST NOT use other content encodings for push An Application Server MUST NOT use other content encodings for push
messages. In particular, content encodings that compress could messages. In particular, content encodings that compress could
result in leaking of push message contents. The Content-Encoding result in leaking of push message contents. The Content-Encoding
header field therefore has exactly one value, which is "aes128gcm". header field therefore has exactly one value, which is "aes128gcm".
Multiple "aes128gcm" values are not permitted. Multiple "aes128gcm" values are not permitted.
A User Agent is not required to support multiple records. A User A User Agent is not required to support multiple records. A User
Agent MAY ignore the "rs" field. If a record size is unchecked, Agent MAY ignore the "rs" field. If a record size is unchecked,
decryption will fail with high probability for all valid cases. decryption will fail with high probability for all valid cases. The
However, decryption will succeed if the push message contains a padding delimiter octet MUST be checked, values other than 0x02 MUST
single record from a longer truncated message. Given that an cause the message to be discarded.
Application Server is prohibited from generating such a message, this
is not considered a serious risk.
5. Push Message Encryption Example 5. Push Message Encryption Example
The following example shows a push message being sent to a push The following example shows a push message being sent to a push
service. service.
POST /push/JzLQ3raZJfFBR0aqvOMsLrt54w4rJUsV HTTP/1.1 POST /push/JzLQ3raZJfFBR0aqvOMsLrt54w4rJUsV HTTP/1.1
Host: push.example.net Host: push.example.net
TTL: 10 TTL: 10
Content-Length: 145 Content-Length: 145
Content-Encoding: aes128gcm Content-Encoding: aes128gcm
DGv6ra1nlYgDCS1FRnbzlwAAEABBBP4z9KsN6nGRTbVYI_c7VJSPQTBtkgcy27ml DGv6ra1nlYgDCS1FRnbzlwAAEABBBP4z9KsN6nGRTbVYI_c7VJSPQTBtkgcy27ml
mlMoZIIgDll6e3vCYLocInmYWAmS6TlzAC8wEqKK6PBru3jl7A-l_-xdB7y6XwHb mlMoZIIgDll6e3vCYLocInmYWAmS6TlzAC8wEqKK6PBru3jl7A_yl95bQpu6cVPT
oeEO-lBPsSXN9axUBN3F53dcg7-wSrTIXywmEmPfWg78ZJX4LQzTaEaZMuHcWDuK pK4Mqgkf1CXztLVBSt2Ks3oZwbuwXPXLWyouBWLVWGNWQexSgSxsj_Qulcy4a-fN
6g
This example shows the ASCII encoded string, "When I grow up, I want This example shows the ASCII encoded string, "When I grow up, I want
to be a watermelon". The content body is shown here with line to be a watermelon". The content body is shown here with line
wrapping and URL-safe base64url encoding to meet presentation wrapping and URL-safe base64url encoding to meet presentation
constraints. constraints.
The keys used are shown below using the uncompressed form [X9.62] The keys used are shown below using the uncompressed form [X9.62]
encoded using base64url. encoded using base64url.
Authentication Secret: BTBZMqHH6r4Tts7J_aSIgg Authentication Secret: BTBZMqHH6r4Tts7J_aSIgg
skipping to change at page 8, line 47 skipping to change at page 8, line 47
Secure Hash Standard", March 2012, Secure Hash Standard", March 2012,
<http://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/FIPS/ <http://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/FIPS/
NIST.FIPS.180-4.pdf>. NIST.FIPS.180-4.pdf>.
[FIPS186] National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), [FIPS186] National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST),
"Digital Signature Standard (DSS)", NIST PUB 186-4 , July "Digital Signature Standard (DSS)", NIST PUB 186-4 , July
2013. 2013.
[I-D.ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding] [I-D.ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding]
Thomson, M., "Encrypted Content-Encoding for HTTP", draft- Thomson, M., "Encrypted Content-Encoding for HTTP", draft-
ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-04 (work in progress), ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-02 (work in progress),
October 2016. June 2016.
[I-D.ietf-webpush-protocol] [I-D.ietf-webpush-protocol]
Thomson, M., Damaggio, E., and B. Raymor, "Generic Event Thomson, M., Damaggio, E., and B. Raymor, "Generic Event
Delivery Using HTTP Push", draft-ietf-webpush-protocol-12 Delivery Using HTTP Push", draft-ietf-webpush-protocol-08
(work in progress), October 2016. (work in progress), July 2016.
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>. <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
[RFC4086] Eastlake 3rd, D., Schiller, J., and S. Crocker, [RFC4086] Eastlake 3rd, D., Schiller, J., and S. Crocker,
"Randomness Requirements for Security", BCP 106, RFC 4086, "Randomness Requirements for Security", BCP 106, RFC 4086,
DOI 10.17487/RFC4086, June 2005, DOI 10.17487/RFC4086, June 2005,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4086>. <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4086>.
skipping to change at page 10, line 52 skipping to change at page 10, line 52
Q29udGVudC1FbmNvZGluZzogYWVzMTI4Z2NtAA Q29udGVudC1FbmNvZGluZzogYWVzMTI4Z2NtAA
Content encryption key (CEK): oIhVW04MRdy2XN9CiKLxTg Content encryption key (CEK): oIhVW04MRdy2XN9CiKLxTg
Info for content encryption nonce derivation (nonce_info): Info for content encryption nonce derivation (nonce_info):
Q29udGVudC1FbmNvZGluZzogbm9uY2UA Q29udGVudC1FbmNvZGluZzogbm9uY2UA
Nonce (NONCE): 4h_95klXJ5E_qnoN Nonce (NONCE): 4h_95klXJ5E_qnoN
The salt, record size of 4096, and application server public key The salt, record size of 4096, and application server public key
produce an 86 octet header of produce an 86 octet header of DGv6ra1nlYgDCS1FRnbzlwAAEABBBP4z
DGv6ra1nlYgDCS1FRnbzlwAAEABBBP4z9KsN6nGR 9KsN6nGRTbVYI_c7VJSPQTBtkgcy27ml mlMoZIIgDll6e3vCYLocInmYWAmS6Tlz
TbVYI_c7VJSPQTBtkgcy27mlmlMoZIIgDll6e3vC AC8wEqKK6PBru3jl7A8.
YLocInmYWAmS6TlzAC8wEqKK6PBru3jl7A8.
The push message plaintext is padded to produce The push message plaintext has the padding delimiter octet (0x02)
AABXaGVuIEkgZ3JvdyB1cCwgSSB3YW50IHRvIGJl IGEgd2F0ZXJtZWxvbg. The appended to produce V2hlbiBJIGdyb3cgdXAsIEkgd2FudCB0
plaintext is then encrypted with AES-GCM, which emits ciphertext of byBiZSBhIHdhdGVybWVsb24C. The plaintext is then encrypted with AES-
pf_sXQe8ul8B26HhDvpQT7ElzfWsVATdxed3XIO_ sEq0yF8sJhJj31oO_GSV- GCM, which emits ciphertext of 8pfeW0KbunFT06SuDKoJH9Ql87S1QUrd
C0M02hGmTLh3Fg7iuo. irN6GcG7sFz1y1sqLgVi1VhjVkHsUoEs bI_0LpXMuGvnzQ.
The header and cipher text are concatenated and produce the result The header and cipher text are concatenated and produce the result
shown in the example. shown in Section 5.
Author's Address Author's Address
Martin Thomson Martin Thomson
Mozilla Mozilla
Email: martin.thomson@gmail.com Email: martin.thomson@gmail.com
 End of changes. 12 change blocks. 
29 lines changed or deleted 26 lines changed or added

This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.48. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/