< draft-ketant-idr-bgp-ls-bgp-only-fabric-02.txt   draft-ketant-idr-bgp-ls-bgp-only-fabric-03.txt >
Inter-Domain Routing K. Talaulikar Inter-Domain Routing K. Talaulikar
Internet-Draft C. Filsfils Internet-Draft C. Filsfils
Intended status: Standards Track K. Swamy Intended status: Standards Track K. Swamy
Expires: September 10, 2019 Cisco Systems Expires: March 12, 2020 Cisco Systems
S. Zandi S. Zandi
G. Dawra G. Dawra
LinkedIn LinkedIn
M. Durrani M. Durrani
Equinix Equinix
March 9, 2019 September 9, 2019
BGP Link-State Extensions for BGP-only Fabric BGP Link-State Extensions for BGP-only Fabric
draft-ketant-idr-bgp-ls-bgp-only-fabric-02 draft-ketant-idr-bgp-ls-bgp-only-fabric-03
Abstract Abstract
BGP is used as the only routing protocol in some networks today. In BGP is used as the only routing protocol in some networks today. In
such networks, it is useful to get a detailed view of the nodes and such networks, it is useful to get a detailed view of the nodes and
underlying links in the topology along with their attributes similar underlying links in the topology along with their attributes similar
to one available when using link state routing protocols. Such a to one available when using link state routing protocols. Such a
view of a BGP-only fabric enables use cases like traffic engineering view of a BGP-only fabric enables use cases like traffic engineering
and forwarding of services along paths other than the BGP best path and forwarding of services along paths other than the BGP best path
selection. selection.
skipping to change at page 2, line 7 skipping to change at page 2, line 7
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on September 10, 2019. This Internet-Draft will expire on March 12, 2020.
Copyright Notice Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2019 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the Copyright (c) 2019 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved. document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents publication of this document. Please review these documents
skipping to change at page 21, line 35 skipping to change at page 21, line 35
The authors would like to thank Bruno Decraene for his review and The authors would like to thank Bruno Decraene for his review and
comments on this document. comments on this document.
11. References 11. References
11.1. Normative References 11.1. Normative References
[I-D.ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext] [I-D.ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext]
Previdi, S., Talaulikar, K., Filsfils, C., Gredler, H., Previdi, S., Talaulikar, K., Filsfils, C., Gredler, H.,
and M. Chen, "BGP Link-State extensions for Segment and M. Chen, "BGP Link-State extensions for Segment
Routing", draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext-12 Routing", draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext-16
(work in progress), March 2019. (work in progress), June 2019.
[I-D.ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-msd] [I-D.ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-msd]
Tantsura, J., Chunduri, U., Mirsky, G., Sivabalan, S., and Tantsura, J., Chunduri, U., Talaulikar, K., Mirsky, G.,
N. Triantafillis, "Signaling MSD (Maximum SID Depth) using and N. Triantafillis, "Signaling MSD (Maximum SID Depth)
Border Gateway Protocol Link-State", draft-ietf-idr-bgp- using Border Gateway Protocol Link-State", draft-ietf-idr-
ls-segment-routing-msd-04 (work in progress), February bgp-ls-segment-routing-msd-06 (work in progress),
2019. September 2019.
[I-D.ietf-idr-bgp-prefix-sid] [I-D.ietf-idr-bgp-prefix-sid]
Previdi, S., Filsfils, C., Lindem, A., Sreekantiah, A., Previdi, S., Filsfils, C., Lindem, A., Sreekantiah, A.,
and H. Gredler, "Segment Routing Prefix SID extensions for and H. Gredler, "Segment Routing Prefix SID extensions for
BGP", draft-ietf-idr-bgp-prefix-sid-27 (work in progress), BGP", draft-ietf-idr-bgp-prefix-sid-27 (work in progress),
June 2018. June 2018.
[I-D.ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe] [I-D.ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe]
Previdi, S., Talaulikar, K., Filsfils, C., Patel, K., Ray, Previdi, S., Talaulikar, K., Filsfils, C., Patel, K., Ray,
S., and J. Dong, "BGP-LS extensions for Segment Routing S., and J. Dong, "BGP-LS extensions for Segment Routing
BGP Egress Peer Engineering", draft-ietf-idr-bgpls- BGP Egress Peer Engineering", draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-
segment-routing-epe-17 (work in progress), October 2018. segment-routing-epe-19 (work in progress), May 2019.
[I-D.ietf-idr-eag-distribution] [I-D.ietf-idr-eag-distribution]
Wang, Z., Wu, Q., and J. Tantsura, "Distribution of MPLS- Wang, Z., Wu, Q., and J. Tantsura, "Distribution of MPLS-
TE Extended admin Group Using BGP", draft-ietf-idr-eag- TE Extended admin Group Using BGP", draft-ietf-idr-eag-
distribution-08 (work in progress), October 2018. distribution-08 (work in progress), October 2018.
[I-D.ietf-idr-te-lsp-distribution] [I-D.ietf-idr-te-lsp-distribution]
Previdi, S., Talaulikar, K., Dong, J., Chen, M., Gredler, Previdi, S., Talaulikar, K., Dong, J., Chen, M., Gredler,
H., and J. Tantsura, "Distribution of Traffic Engineering H., and J. Tantsura, "Distribution of Traffic Engineering
(TE) Policies and State using BGP-LS", draft-ietf-idr-te- (TE) Policies and State using BGP-LS", draft-ietf-idr-te-
lsp-distribution-10 (work in progress), February 2019. lsp-distribution-11 (work in progress), May 2019.
[I-D.ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp] [I-D.ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp]
Ginsberg, L., Previdi, S., Wu, Q., Tantsura, J., and C. Ginsberg, L., Previdi, S., Wu, Q., Tantsura, J., and C.
Filsfils, "BGP-LS Advertisement of IGP Traffic Engineering Filsfils, "BGP-LS Advertisement of IGP Traffic Engineering
Performance Metric Extensions", draft-ietf-idr-te-pm- Performance Metric Extensions", draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-
bgp-18 (work in progress), December 2018. bgp-18 (work in progress), December 2018.
[I-D.ietf-lsr-flex-algo] [I-D.ietf-lsr-flex-algo]
Psenak, P., Hegde, S., Filsfils, C., Talaulikar, K., and Psenak, P., Hegde, S., Filsfils, C., Talaulikar, K., and
A. Gulko, "IGP Flexible Algorithm", draft-ietf-lsr-flex- A. Gulko, "IGP Flexible Algorithm", draft-ietf-lsr-flex-
algo-01 (work in progress), November 2018. algo-03 (work in progress), July 2019.
[I-D.ketant-idr-bgp-ls-flex-algo] [I-D.ketant-idr-bgp-ls-flex-algo]
Talaulikar, K., Psenak, P., Zandi, S., and G. Dawra, Talaulikar, K., Psenak, P., Zandi, S., and G. Dawra,
"Flexible Algorithm Definition Advertisement with BGP "Flexible Algorithm Definition Advertisement with BGP
Link-State", draft-ketant-idr-bgp-ls-flex-algo-01 (work in Link-State", draft-ketant-idr-bgp-ls-flex-algo-01 (work in
progress), February 2019. progress), February 2019.
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
skipping to change at page 23, line 14 skipping to change at page 23, line 14
[RFC7752] Gredler, H., Ed., Medved, J., Previdi, S., Farrel, A., and [RFC7752] Gredler, H., Ed., Medved, J., Previdi, S., Farrel, A., and
S. Ray, "North-Bound Distribution of Link-State and S. Ray, "North-Bound Distribution of Link-State and
Traffic Engineering (TE) Information Using BGP", RFC 7752, Traffic Engineering (TE) Information Using BGP", RFC 7752,
DOI 10.17487/RFC7752, March 2016, DOI 10.17487/RFC7752, March 2016,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7752>. <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7752>.
11.2. Informative References 11.2. Informative References
[I-D.ietf-idr-segment-routing-te-policy] [I-D.ietf-idr-segment-routing-te-policy]
Previdi, S., Filsfils, C., Jain, D., Mattes, P., Rosen, Previdi, S., Filsfils, C., Mattes, P., Rosen, E., Jain,
E., and S. Lin, "Advertising Segment Routing Policies in D., and S. Lin, "Advertising Segment Routing Policies in
BGP", draft-ietf-idr-segment-routing-te-policy-05 (work in BGP", draft-ietf-idr-segment-routing-te-policy-07 (work in
progress), November 2018. progress), July 2019.
[I-D.ietf-pce-segment-routing] [I-D.ietf-pce-segment-routing]
Sivabalan, S., Filsfils, C., Tantsura, J., Henderickx, W., Sivabalan, S., Filsfils, C., Tantsura, J., Henderickx, W.,
and J. Hardwick, "PCEP Extensions for Segment Routing", and J. Hardwick, "PCEP Extensions for Segment Routing",
draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-16 (work in progress), draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-16 (work in progress),
March 2019. March 2019.
[I-D.ietf-spring-segment-routing-central-epe] [I-D.ietf-spring-segment-routing-central-epe]
Filsfils, C., Previdi, S., Dawra, G., Aries, E., and D. Filsfils, C., Previdi, S., Dawra, G., Aries, E., and D.
Afanasiev, "Segment Routing Centralized BGP Egress Peer Afanasiev, "Segment Routing Centralized BGP Egress Peer
skipping to change at page 23, line 41 skipping to change at page 23, line 41
[I-D.ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc] [I-D.ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc]
Filsfils, C., Previdi, S., Dawra, G., Aries, E., and P. Filsfils, C., Previdi, S., Dawra, G., Aries, E., and P.
Lapukhov, "BGP-Prefix Segment in large-scale data Lapukhov, "BGP-Prefix Segment in large-scale data
centers", draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc-11 (work centers", draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc-11 (work
in progress), November 2018. in progress), November 2018.
[I-D.ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy] [I-D.ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy]
Filsfils, C., Sivabalan, S., daniel.voyer@bell.ca, d., Filsfils, C., Sivabalan, S., daniel.voyer@bell.ca, d.,
bogdanov@google.com, b., and P. Mattes, "Segment Routing bogdanov@google.com, b., and P. Mattes, "Segment Routing
Policy Architecture", draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing- Policy Architecture", draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-
policy-02 (work in progress), October 2018. policy-03 (work in progress), May 2019.
[I-D.xu-idr-neighbor-autodiscovery] [I-D.xu-idr-neighbor-autodiscovery]
Xu, X., Talaulikar, K., Bi, K., Tantsura, J., and N. Xu, X., Talaulikar, K., Bi, K., Tantsura, J., and N.
Triantafillis, "BGP Neighbor Discovery", draft-xu-idr- Triantafillis, "BGP Neighbor Discovery", draft-xu-idr-
neighbor-autodiscovery-10 (work in progress), October neighbor-autodiscovery-11 (work in progress), April 2019.
2018.
[RFC2328] Moy, J., "OSPF Version 2", STD 54, RFC 2328, [RFC2328] Moy, J., "OSPF Version 2", STD 54, RFC 2328,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2328, April 1998, DOI 10.17487/RFC2328, April 1998,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2328>. <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2328>.
[RFC3630] Katz, D., Kompella, K., and D. Yeung, "Traffic Engineering [RFC3630] Katz, D., Kompella, K., and D. Yeung, "Traffic Engineering
(TE) Extensions to OSPF Version 2", RFC 3630, (TE) Extensions to OSPF Version 2", RFC 3630,
DOI 10.17487/RFC3630, September 2003, DOI 10.17487/RFC3630, September 2003,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3630>. <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3630>.
 End of changes. 12 change blocks. 
21 lines changed or deleted 20 lines changed or added

This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.48. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/