| < draft-lear-iana-timezone-database-03.txt | draft-lear-iana-timezone-database-04.txt > | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Network Working Group E. Lear | Network Working Group E. Lear | |||
| Internet-Draft Cisco Systems GmbH | Internet-Draft Cisco Systems GmbH | |||
| Intended status: BCP P. Eggert | Intended status: BCP P. Eggert | |||
| Expires: October 13, 2011 UCLA | Expires: November 20, 2011 UCLA | |||
| April 11, 2011 | May 19, 2011 | |||
| IANA Procedures for Maintaining the Timezone Database | IANA Procedures for Maintaining the Timezone Database | |||
| draft-lear-iana-timezone-database-03 | draft-lear-iana-timezone-database-04 | |||
| Abstract | Abstract | |||
| Timezone information serves as a basic protocol element in protocols, | Timezone information serves as a basic protocol element in protocols, | |||
| such as the calendaring suite and DHCP. The Timezone (TZ) Database | such as the calendaring suite and DHCP. The Timezone (TZ) Database | |||
| specifies the indices used in various protocols, as well as their | specifies the indices used in various protocols, as well as their | |||
| semantic meanings, for all localities throughout the world. This | semantic meanings, for all localities throughout the world. This | |||
| database has been meticulously maintained and distributed free of | database has been meticulously maintained and distributed free of | |||
| charge by a group of volunteers, coordinated by a single volunteer | charge by a group of volunteers, coordinated by a single volunteer | |||
| who is now planning to retire. This memo specifies IANA procedures | who is now planning to retire. This memo specifies IANA procedures | |||
| skipping to change at page 1, line 43 ¶ | skipping to change at page 1, line 43 ¶ | |||
| Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering | Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering | |||
| Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute | Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute | |||
| working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- | working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- | |||
| Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. | Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. | |||
| Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months | Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months | |||
| and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any | and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any | |||
| time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference | time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference | |||
| material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." | material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." | |||
| This Internet-Draft will expire on October 13, 2011. | This Internet-Draft will expire on November 20, 2011. | |||
| Copyright Notice | Copyright Notice | |||
| Copyright (c) 2011 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the | Copyright (c) 2011 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the | |||
| document authors. All rights reserved. | document authors. All rights reserved. | |||
| This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal | This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal | |||
| Provisions Relating to IETF Documents | Provisions Relating to IETF Documents | |||
| (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of | (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of | |||
| publication of this document. Please review these documents | publication of this document. Please review these documents | |||
| skipping to change at page 2, line 26 ¶ | skipping to change at page 2, line 26 ¶ | |||
| The IETF has specified several standards that make use of timezone | The IETF has specified several standards that make use of timezone | |||
| information. Timezone names are used in DHCP to configure devices | information. Timezone names are used in DHCP to configure devices | |||
| with correct local time [RFC4833]. Timezone names can appear in the | with correct local time [RFC4833]. Timezone names can appear in the | |||
| TZID field of VEVENTs [RFC5545]. The normative reference for these | TZID field of VEVENTs [RFC5545]. The normative reference for these | |||
| values is the TZ Database [TZDB]. Since the early 1980s, that | values is the TZ Database [TZDB]. Since the early 1980s, that | |||
| database, which has been in use on nearly all UNIX systems, Java | database, which has been in use on nearly all UNIX systems, Java | |||
| systems, and other sorts of systems has been hosted at the National | systems, and other sorts of systems has been hosted at the National | |||
| Institutes of Health. The database consists of both historic and | Institutes of Health. The database consists of both historic and | |||
| current entries for geographies throughout the world. Associated | current entries for geographies throughout the world. Associated | |||
| with the database is a reference implementation of functions that can | with the database is a reference implementation of ISO/IEC 9899 C and | |||
| be used to convert time values. | IEEE 1003.1 POSIX time functions that can be used to convert time | |||
| values. | ||||
| The database has been maintained by volunteers who participate in a | The database has been maintained by volunteers who participate in a | |||
| mailing list that is also hosted at the NIH. The database itself is | mailing list [1] that is also hosted at the NIH. The database itself | |||
| updated approximately twenty times per year, depending on the year, | is updated approximately twenty times per year, depending on the | |||
| based on information these experts provide to the maintainer. Arthur | year, based on information these experts provide to the maintainer. | |||
| David Olson has maintained the database, coordinated the mailing | Arthur David Olson has maintained the database, coordinated the | |||
| list, and provided a release platform since the database's inception. | mailing list, and provided a release platform since the database's | |||
| With his retirement now approaching it is necessary to provide a | inception. With his retirement now approaching it is necessary to | |||
| means for this good work to continue. | provide a means for this good work to continue. | |||
| The IANA provides registry services to the Internet community. Those | The IANA provides registry services to the Internet community. Those | |||
| registries are coordinated by technical experts who are designated by | registries are coordinated by technical experts who are designated by | |||
| the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). The IANA is also | the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). The IANA is also | |||
| well suited as a distribution platform for the TZ Database itself. | well suited as a distribution platform for the TZ Database itself. | |||
| The IANA has for quite some time had the capability to maintain | The IANA has for quite some time had the capability to maintain | |||
| designated expert mailing lists. The TZ mailing list would fit | designated expert mailing lists. The TZ mailing list would fit | |||
| nicely just as such a list. | nicely as just such a list. | |||
| 1.1. Terminology | 1.1. Terminology | |||
| The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", | The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", | |||
| "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this | "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this | |||
| document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119]. | document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119]. | |||
| TZ Database: The TimeZone Database, sometimes referred to as the | TZ Database: The TimeZone Database, sometimes referred to as the | |||
| Olson Database. This database consists of information about | Olson Database. This database consists of information about | |||
| offsets from UTC for different localities, including daylight | offsets from UTC for different localities, including daylight | |||
| saving time (DST) transition information. | saving time (DST) transition information. | |||
| TZ Coordinator: The person or people who maintain and manage release | TZ Coordinator: The person or people who maintain and manage release | |||
| of the TZ Database. The TZ Coordinator also has responsibility | of the TZ Database. The TZ Coordinator also has responsibility | |||
| for maintaining the TZ mailing list. The TZ Coordinator is an | for managing the TZ mailing list. The TZ Coordinator is an IANA | |||
| IANA Designated Expert, as defined in Section 3.2 of [RFC5226]. | Designated Expert, as defined in Section 3.2 of [RFC5226], except | |||
| Roughly speaking, this means that the IESG will choose one or more | as regards to appeals, as discussed in Section 5. Roughly | |||
| experts to manage the TZ database, code, and mailing list. The TZ | speaking, this means that the IESG will choose one or more experts | |||
| to manage the TZ database, code, and mailing list. The TZ | ||||
| Coordinator will also work with the IANA to develop appropriate | Coordinator will also work with the IANA to develop appropriate | |||
| service metrics. There SHALL be a single lead individual and at | service metrics. There SHALL be a single lead individual and at | |||
| least one backup individual for this function. | least one backup individual for this function. | |||
| TZ mailing list: The forum where matters relating to the TZ database | TZ mailing list: The forum where matters relating to the TZ database | |||
| and supporting code are discussed. | and supporting code are discussed. | |||
| The rest of this document specifies the following: | The rest of this document specifies the following: | |||
| 1. Transferring and maintenance of the TZ mailing list; | 1. Transferring and maintenance of the TZ mailing list; | |||
| 2. Procedures for selecting a technical expert for the technical | 2. Procedures for selecting a technical expert who will play the | |||
| expert who will play the role of TZ Coordinator and release | role of TZ Coordinator and release manager for the TZ database; | |||
| manager for the TZ database; | ||||
| 3. Procedures for updating the TZ database; | 3. Procedures for updating the TZ database; | |||
| 4. Maintenance and ownership of reference code; and | 4. Maintenance and ownership of reference code; and | |||
| 5. Ownership of the database. | 5. Ownership of the database. | |||
| 2. The TZ Mailing List | 2. The TZ Mailing List | |||
| For many years the TZ mailing list at the NIH has been the forum | For many years the TZ mailing list at the National Institutes of | |||
| where discussion of changes to the TZ database and support files | Health (NIH) has been the forum where discussion of changes to the TZ | |||
| would take place. In addition, the TZ mailing list is used to | database and support files would take place. In addition, the TZ | |||
| announce releases of the database. Currently the TZ mailing list is | mailing list is used to announce releases of the database. Currently | |||
| administered by the TZ Coordinator. | the TZ mailing list is administered by the TZ Coordinator. | |||
| This list membership will be transitioned to the IANA mail server. | This list membership will be transitioned to the IANA mail server. | |||
| The TZ Coordinator will continue to manage the list. While the TZ | The TZ Coordinator will continue to manage the list. While the TZ | |||
| Coordinator may establish other rules of governance for the list, | Coordinator may establish other rules of governance for the list, | |||
| members of that list will be informed that a condition of | members of that list will be informed that a condition of | |||
| participating on the list is that all contributions to the list are | participating on the list is that all contributions to the list are | |||
| released to the public domain, and that by placing their contribution | released to the public domain, and that by placing their contribution | |||
| in the public domain, contributors waive forever any intellectual | in the public domain, contributors waive forever any intellectual | |||
| property claims. | property claims. | |||
| The list will be used just as it has been, to learn of, discuss, and | The list will be used just as it has been: to learn of, discuss, and | |||
| confirm TZ definition changes, as well as an announcement list for | confirm TZ definition changes, as well as to serve as an announcement | |||
| new versions of the database. | list for new versions of the database. | |||
| 3. Making Updates to the TZ Database | 3. Making Updates to the TZ Database | |||
| Updates to the TZ database are made by the TZ Coordinator in | Updates to the TZ database are made by the TZ Coordinator in | |||
| consultation with the TZ mailing list. TZ Coordinator is empowered | consultation with the TZ mailing list. TZ Coordinator is empowered | |||
| to decide, as the designated expert, appropriate changes, but SHOULD | to decide, as the designated expert, appropriate changes, but SHOULD | |||
| take into account views expressed on the mailing list. | take into account views expressed on the mailing list. | |||
| The TZ Coordinator will also decide the timing of database releases. | The TZ Coordinator will also decide the timing of database releases. | |||
| The release itself today consists of several archive files that are | The release itself today consists of several archive files that are | |||
| downloaded from a well known location. | downloaded from a well known location. | |||
| Moving forward, the TZ database and supporting code SHOULD be signed | Moving forward, the TZ database, supporting code, and any appropriate | |||
| prior to release using a well known key, along with any appropriate | supporting information SHOULD be signed prior to release using well | |||
| supporting information and distributed from a well known location | known public keys, along with any appropriate supporting information | |||
| that is advertised by IANA in a manner of its choosing. | and distributed from a well known location that is advertised by IANA | |||
| in a manner of its choosing. | ||||
| The criteria for updates to the database are as follows: | The criteria for updates to the database include the following: | |||
| 1. New keys are only to be created when the region a key was | 1. New TZ names (e.g. locations) are only to be created when the | |||
| envisioned to cover is not accurately reflected by an existing | scope of the region a name was envisioned to cover is no longer | |||
| key. | accurate. | |||
| 2. In order to correct historical inaccuracies, a new key MAY be | 2. In order to correct historical inaccuracies, a new TZ name MAY be | |||
| added when it is necessary to indicate what was the consensus | added when it is necessary to indicate what was the consensus | |||
| view at given time and location. Such keys are usually not added | view at a given time and location. Such TZ names are usually not | |||
| when the inaccuracy was prior to 1970. | added when the inaccuracy was prior to 1970. | |||
| 3. Changes to existing entries SHALL reflect the consensus on the | 3. Changes to existing entries SHALL reflect the consensus on the | |||
| ground in the region covered by that entry. | ground in the region covered by that entry. | |||
| To be clear, the TZ Coordinator SHALL NOT set timezone policy policy | To be clear, the TZ Coordinator SHALL NOT set timezone policy for a | |||
| for a region but use judgment and whatever available sources exist to | region but use judgment and whatever available sources exist to | |||
| assess what the average person on street would think the time | assess what the average person on street would think the time | |||
| actually is, or in case of historical corrections, was. | actually is, or in case of historical corrections, was. | |||
| 4. Selecting or Replacing a TZ Coordinator | 4. Selecting or Replacing a TZ Coordinator | |||
| From time to time it will be necessary to appoint a new TZ | From time to time it will be necessary to appoint a new TZ | |||
| Coordinator. This could occur for a number of reasons: | Coordinator. This could occur for a number of reasons: | |||
| o The TZ Coordinator is retiring (as Arthur Olson is) or has | o The TZ Coordinator is retiring (as Arthur Olson is) or has | |||
| announced that he or she will be unable to continue to perform the | announced that he or she will be unable to continue to perform the | |||
| function; | function; | |||
| o The Coordinator is missing, has become incapacitated, or has died; | ||||
| or | o The TZ Coordinator is missing, has become incapacitated, or has | |||
| o The Coordinator is not performing the function in accordance with | died; or | |||
| community wishes. | o The TZ Coordinator is not performing the function in accordance | |||
| with community wishes. | ||||
| In any of these cases, members of the community should raise the | In any of these cases, members of the community should raise the | |||
| issue on the TZ list. If a rough consensus can be formed easily, and | issue on the TZ mailing list and attempt to reach consensus on a new | |||
| quickly, then the results should be presented to the IESG for comment | candidate to fulfill the role of TZ Coordinator. If rough consensus | |||
| and review. The IESG selects the TZ Coordinator(s). The IESG will | cannot be reached easily, the Area Directors of the IETF Applications | |||
| use rough consensus of the TZ mailing list as their primary guide to | Area should attempt to guide the members of the community to rough | |||
| further action, when it exists, and whatever other means they have at | consensus. The candidate that is agreed upon by the community | |||
| their disposal, when rough consensus cannot be found. | through rough consensus shall be presented to the IESG for | |||
| confirmation. If rough consensus cannot be reached even with | ||||
| guidance from the Applications Area Directors, the IESG shall use | ||||
| whatever means it has at its disposal to choose a candidate who in | ||||
| its best judgment will be able to fulfill the role of TZ Coordinator. | ||||
| 5. Appealing Database Decisions | 5. Appealing Database Decisions | |||
| The TZ Coordinator makes decisions based on expertise, as well as | The TZ Coordinator makes decisions based on expertise, as well as | |||
| with guidance from the TZ mailing lists. While individual decisions | with guidance from the TZ mailing list. If a member of the community | |||
| MAY be appealed to the IESG, the IESG MUST give great deference to | has a concern with an individual decision made by the TZ Coordinator | |||
| the designated expert in its considerations. In particular, | with regard to the TZ database, the individual shall proceed as | |||
| apellants MUST show material harm from the decision, and that the | follows: | |||
| decision is materially in error. The IESG is not a normal avenue for | ||||
| appeals of specific decisions of the TZ Coordinator, but rather a | 1. Attempt to resolve the concern directly with the TZ Coordinator. | |||
| last resort when a TZ Coordinator is thought not to be functioning in | 2. If a resolution cannot be reached directly with the TZ | |||
| an appropriate way. | Coordinator, express the concern to the community and attempt to | |||
| achieve rough consensus regarding a resolution on the TZ mailing | ||||
| list. The Area Directors of the IETF Applications Area may at | ||||
| their discretion attempt to guide the members of the community to | ||||
| rough consensus. | ||||
| 3. As a last resort if a resolution cannot be reached on the TZ | ||||
| mailing list, appeal to the IESG for a resolution. The appellant | ||||
| must show that the decision made by the TZ Coordinator (a) was | ||||
| materially in error and (b) has caused material harm. In its | ||||
| deliberations regarding an appeal, the IESG shall weigh all the | ||||
| evidence presented to it and use its best judgment in determining | ||||
| a resolution. | ||||
| 6. Maintenance and Distribution of Reference Code | 6. Maintenance and Distribution of Reference Code | |||
| Currently the maintainer of the TZ database also maintains reference | Currently the maintainer of the TZ database also maintains reference | |||
| code, most of which is public domain. Several files from this | code, most of which is public domain. Several files from this | |||
| software are currently distributed under license. Where they exist, | software are currently distributed under license. Where they exist, | |||
| licenses SHALL NOT be changed. IANA SHALL allow for the downloading | licenses SHALL NOT be changed. IANA SHALL allow for the downloading | |||
| of this reference code. The reference implementation shall be | of this reference code. The reference implementation shall be | |||
| distributed along with an associated cryptographic signature of an | distributed along with an associated cryptographic signature | |||
| identity that IANA will publish. | verifiable by a public key that IANA will publish. | |||
| 7. Database Ownership | 7. Database Ownership | |||
| The database itself is public domain. Should claims be made and | The TZ database itself is not an IETF Contribution or an IETF | |||
| substantiated against the database, the IANA will act in accordance | Document. Rather it is a pre-existing and regularly updated work | |||
| with all competent court orders. No ownership claims will be made by | that is in the public domain, and is intended to remain in the public | |||
| IANA or the IETF Trust on the database or the code. Any person | domain. Therefore, BCP 78 and BCP 79 do not apply to the TZ Database | |||
| making a contribution to the database or code waives all rights to | or contributions that individuals make to it. Should any claims be | |||
| future claims. | made and substantiated against the database, the IANA will act in | |||
| accordance with all competent court orders. No ownership claims will | ||||
| be made by IANA or the IETF Trust on the database or the code. Any | ||||
| person making a contribution to the database or code waives all | ||||
| rights to future claims. | ||||
| 8. IANA Considerations | 8. IANA Considerations | |||
| The IANA SHALL assist the IESG, as required, in filling of the TZ | If requested to do so, the IANA SHALL assist the IESG in selection of | |||
| Coordinator, based on the procedures set forth above. The IANA SHALL | the TZ Coordinator, based on the procedures set forth above. The | |||
| act as a repository for the TZ database and associated reference | IANA SHALL act as a repository for the TZ database and associated | |||
| code. The TZ Coordinator SHALL be named by the IESG as described | reference code. The TZ Coordinator SHALL be named by the IESG as | |||
| above, and will act as the maintainer of the database and code, as | described above, and will act as the maintainer of the database and | |||
| described above. The IANA SHALL provide the TZ Coordinator with | code, as described above. The IANA SHALL provide the TZ Coordinator | |||
| appropriate access to maintain the database, as well as necessary | with appropriate access to maintain the database, as well as | |||
| tooling that may be required, so long as no direct software costs are | necessary tooling that may be required, so long as no direct software | |||
| incurred. Both current and historical versions of the database will | costs are incurred. Both current and historical versions of the | |||
| be stored and distributed via HTTP/HTTPs. IANA will be operationally | database will be stored and distributed via HTTP/HTTPs. IANA will be | |||
| responsible for the security of the system upon which the database | operationally responsible for the security of the system upon which | |||
| resides. | the database resides. | |||
| The IANA SHALL also maintain a cryptographic identity that is used to | The IANA SHALL also securely maintain a cryptographic private key | |||
| sign the database, and that will survive a change of TZ Coordinators. | that is used to sign the database, and that will survive a change of | |||
| TZ Coordinator. | ||||
| 9. Security Considerations | 9. Security Considerations | |||
| The distribution of the database is currently not secured. This memo | The distribution of the database is currently not secured. This memo | |||
| states that moving forward the TZ database SHOULD be distributed with | states that moving forward the TZ database SHOULD be distributed with | |||
| a valid cryptographic signature. | a valid cryptographic signature. | |||
| 10. Acknowledgments | 10. Acknowledgments | |||
| The authors would like to thank the TZ mailing list for their | The authors would like to thank the TZ mailing list for their | |||
| remarkable achievements over the many years. Thanks also to Marshall | remarkable achievements over the many years. Thanks also to Marshall | |||
| Eubanks, S. Moonesamy, Peter Saint-Andre, Alexey Melenkov, Tony | Eubanks, S. Moonesamy, Peter Saint-Andre, Alexey Melenkov, Tony | |||
| Finch, Elwin Davies, Alfred Hoenes, and Ted Hardie for the | Finch, Elwyn Davies, Alfred Hoenes, Ted Hardie, and Barry Leiba for | |||
| improvements they made to this document. A special acknowledgment | the improvements they made to this document. A special | |||
| should be given to Arthur David Olson for his excellent stewardship. | acknowledgment should be given to Arthur David Olson for his | |||
| excellent stewardship. | ||||
| 11. Normative References | 11. Normative References | |||
| [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate | [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate | |||
| Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. | Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. | |||
| [RFC4833] Lear, E. and P. Eggert, "Timezone Options for DHCP", | [RFC4833] Lear, E. and P. Eggert, "Timezone Options for DHCP", | |||
| RFC 4833, April 2007. | RFC 4833, April 2007. | |||
| [RFC5226] Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an | [RFC5226] Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an | |||
| skipping to change at page 7, line 6 ¶ | skipping to change at page 7, line 35 ¶ | |||
| May 2008. | May 2008. | |||
| [RFC5545] Desruisseaux, B., "Internet Calendaring and Scheduling | [RFC5545] Desruisseaux, B., "Internet Calendaring and Scheduling | |||
| Core Object Specification (iCalendar)", RFC 5545, | Core Object Specification (iCalendar)", RFC 5545, | |||
| September 2009. | September 2009. | |||
| [TZDB] Eggert, P. and A. Olson, "Sources for Time Zone and | [TZDB] Eggert, P. and A. Olson, "Sources for Time Zone and | |||
| Daylight Saving Time Data", | Daylight Saving Time Data", | |||
| <http://www.twinsun.com/tz/tz-link.htm>. | <http://www.twinsun.com/tz/tz-link.htm>. | |||
| [1] <mailto:tz@elsie.nci.nih.gov> | ||||
| Appendix A. Changes | Appendix A. Changes | |||
| o 03: Take out ATTENTION: comment. Add backup coordinator. | RFC-EDITOR: Please remove this section prior to publication. | |||
| editorial nits. Add discussion of metrics. | ||||
| o 03: Reviewer comments. Take out ATTENTION: comment. Add backup | ||||
| coordinator. editorial nits. Add discussion of metrics. Modify | ||||
| both TZ Coordinator selection process and appeal process per | ||||
| Adrian's comments. Clarify process rules per Russ' comments. | ||||
| Clarify that the criteria are not an exhaustive list. | ||||
| o 02: Separate out from RFC5226 a bit; Simplify language around | o 02: Separate out from RFC5226 a bit; Simplify language around | |||
| submissions; host list to IANA; spelling corrections; clarify here | submissions; host list to IANA; spelling corrections; clarify here | |||
| and there. | and there. | |||
| o 01: Proper reference to RFC5226, add acknowledgments, several | o 01: Proper reference to RFC5226, add acknowledgments, several | |||
| rewordings. | rewordings. | |||
| o Initial Revision | o Initial Revision | |||
| Authors' Addresses | Authors' Addresses | |||
| Eliot Lear | Eliot Lear | |||
| Cisco Systems GmbH | Cisco Systems GmbH | |||
| Richtistrasse 7 | Richtistrasse 7 | |||
| Wallisellen, ZH CH-8304 | Wallisellen, ZH CH-8304 | |||
| End of changes. 26 change blocks. | ||||
| 87 lines changed or deleted | 119 lines changed or added | |||
This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.48. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/ | ||||