< draft-polk-tsvwg-new-dscp-assignments-01.txt		draft-polk-tsvwg-new-dscp-assignments-02.txt >
	Network WG James Polk		Network WG James Polk
	Internet-Draft Cisco		Internet-Draft Cisco
	Intended status: Standards Track (PS) Oct 22, 2012		Intended status: Standards Track (PS) Feb 25, 2013
	Expires: April 22, 2013		Expires: August 25, 2013
	New Differentiated Services Code Point Assignments		New Differentiated Services Code Point Assignments
	for Rich Media Traffic		for Rich Media Traffic
	draft-polk-tsvwg-new-dscp-assignments-01.txt		draft-polk-tsvwg-new-dscp-assignments-02.txt
	Abstract		Abstract
	This document requests five new Differentiated Services Code Point		This document requests five new Differentiated Services Code Point
	(DSCP) values (DSCP) from the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority		(DSCP) values (DSCP) from the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority
	(IANA) for new classes of rich media traffic and one additional DSCP		(IANA) for new classes of rich media traffic and one additional DSCP
	value for the signaling of multimedia sessions.		value for the signaling of multimedia sessions.
	Status of this Memo		Status of this Memo
	skipping to change at page 1, line 34 ¶		skipping to change at page 1, line 34 ¶
	Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering		Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
	Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute		Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
	working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-		working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
	Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.		Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
	Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six		Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six
	months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents		months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents
	at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as		at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as
	reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."		reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
	This Internet-Draft will expire on April 22, 2013.		This Internet-Draft will expire on August 25, 2013.
	Copyright Notice		Copyright Notice
	Copyright (c) 2012 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the		Copyright (c) 2013 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
	document authors. All rights reserved.		document authors. All rights reserved.
	This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal		This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
	Provisions Relating to IETF Documents		Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
	(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of		(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
	publication of this document. Please review these documents		publication of this document. Please review these documents
	carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with		carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with
	respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this		respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this
	document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in		document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in
	Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without		Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without
	skipping to change at page 9, line 8 ¶		skipping to change at page 9, line 8 ¶
	IANA is requested to make the following registry assignments from		IANA is requested to make the following registry assignments from
	Pool 1 and Pool 3 from the dscp-parameters section within IANA.		Pool 1 and Pool 3 from the dscp-parameters section within IANA.
	Justification for assigning from Pool 3 is in Section 3 of this		Justification for assigning from Pool 3 is in Section 3 of this
	document, and are the only possible parallel assignments to existing		document, and are the only possible parallel assignments to existing
	assignments of similar registries - very much for the reason		assignments of similar registries - very much for the reason
	Voice-Admit [RFC5865] was assigned a codepoint similar to EF. That		Voice-Admit [RFC5865] was assigned a codepoint similar to EF. That
	aspect is the main point of this document.		aspect is the main point of this document.
	6.1 DSCP Assignments from Pool 1		6.1 DSCP Assignments from Pool 1
	The code points described in this document is referred to as the		The code point described in this document is requested to be added
	following from Pool 1 and has been requested as follows:		to the Pool 1 Codepoint table as follows:
	Sub-registry: Pool 1 Codepoints		Sub-registry: Pool 1 Codepoints
	Reference: [RFC2474]		Reference: [RFC2474]
	Registration Procedures: Standards Action		Registration Procedures: Standards Action
	Registry:		Registry:
	Name Space Reference		Name Space Reference
	--------- ------- ---------		--------- ------- ---------
	A/V-Sig 010010 [this document]		A/V-Sig 010010 [this document]
	6.2 DSCP Assignments from Pool 3		6.2 DSCP Assignments from Pool 3
	The code points described in this document is referred to as the		A new "Pool 3 Codepoints" table is requested to be built by IANA
	following from Pool 3 and has been requested as follows:		similar to the Pool 1 Codepoint table in the form:
	Sub-registry: Pool 3 Codepoints		Sub-registry: Pool 3 Codepoints
	Reference: [RFC2474]		Reference: [RFC2474]
	Registration Procedures: Standards Action		Registration Procedures: Standards Action
	Registry:		Registry:
	Name Space Reference		Name Space Reference
	--------- ------- ---------		--------- ------- ---------
	CS5-Admit 101001 [this document]		CS5-Admit 101001 [this document]
	CS4-Admit 100001 [this document]		CS4-Admit 100001 [this document]
	skipping to change at page 10, line 6 ¶		skipping to change at page 10, line 6 ¶
	5865 it is parallel to the existing (at the time) EF.		5865 it is parallel to the existing (at the time) EF.
	The A/V-Sig merely has a new DSCP name, RFC 4594 currently has this		The A/V-Sig merely has a new DSCP name, RFC 4594 currently has this
	service class called "Signaling", serving the same purpose.		service class called "Signaling", serving the same purpose.
	8. References		8. References
	8.1 Normative References		8.1 Normative References
	[ID-4594-UP] J. Polk, "Standard Configuration of DiffServ Service		[ID-4594-UP] J. Polk, "Standard Configuration of DiffServ Service
	Classes", "work in progress", March 2012		Classes", "work in progress", February 2013
	[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate		[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
	Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.		Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
	[RFC2205] R. Braden, Ed., L. Zhang, S. Berson, S. Herzog, S. Jamin,		[RFC2205] R. Braden, Ed., L. Zhang, S. Berson, S. Herzog, S. Jamin,
	"Resource ReSerVation Protocol (RSVP) -- Version 1		"Resource ReSerVation Protocol (RSVP) -- Version 1
	Functional Specification", RFC 2205, September 1997		Functional Specification", RFC 2205, September 1997
	[RFC2474] K. Nichols, S. Blake, F. Baker, D. Black, "Definition of the		[RFC2474] K. Nichols, S. Blake, F. Baker, D. Black, "Definition of the
	Differentiated Services Field (DS Field) in the IPv4 and		Differentiated Services Field (DS Field) in the IPv4 and
End of changes. 7 change blocks.
	10 lines changed or deleted		10 lines changed or added
This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.48. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/