| < draft-song-pppext-mipv6-ppp-support-00.txt | draft-song-pppext-mipv6-ppp-support-01.txt > | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JunHyuk Song | JUNHYUK SONG | |||
| INTERNET DRAFT ChaeYong Chong | INTERNET DRAFT CHAEYOUNG CHONG | |||
| September 2001 SAMSUNG Elec. | October 2001 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS | |||
| DONGKIE LEIGH | ||||
| SK TELECOM | ||||
| MIPv6 IPCP configuration option for PPP IPv6CP | MIPv6 IPCP configuration option for PPP IPv6CP | |||
| draft-song-pppext-mipv6-ppp-support-00.txt | draft-song-pppext-mipv6-ppp-support-01.txt | |||
| Status of This Memo | Status of This Memo | |||
| Distribution of this memo is unlimited. | Distribution of this memo is unlimited. | |||
| This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance with | This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance with | |||
| all provisions of Section 10 of RFC2026. Internet-Drafts are working | all provisions of Section 10 of RFC2026. Internet-Drafts are working | |||
| documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas, | documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas, | |||
| and its working groups. Note that other groups may also distribute | and its working groups. Note that other groups may also distribute | |||
| working documents as Internet-Drafts. | working documents as Internet-Drafts. | |||
| skipping to change at page 1, line 40 ¶ | skipping to change at page 1, line 43 ¶ | |||
| The Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) [1] provides a standard method for | The Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) [1] provides a standard method for | |||
| transporting multi-protocol datagrams over point-to-point links. PPP | transporting multi-protocol datagrams over point-to-point links. PPP | |||
| defines an extensible Link Control Protocol (LCP) for establishing, | defines an extensible Link Control Protocol (LCP) for establishing, | |||
| configuring, and testing the data-link connection; and a family of | configuring, and testing the data-link connection; and a family of | |||
| Network Control Protocols (NCPs) for establishing and configuring | Network Control Protocols (NCPs) for establishing and configuring | |||
| different network-layer protocols. | different network-layer protocols. | |||
| The MIPv6 link local router that support Mobile Node connection via | The MIPv6 link local router that support Mobile Node connection via | |||
| PPP, need to know whether the PPP client is MIPv6 node or not. | PPP, need to know whether the PPP client is MIPv6 node or not. | |||
| Because the link operator may have different local policy for MIPv6 | Because the local operator may have different local access policy | |||
| node (ex. support of user mobility). Currently, the IPv6CP option [2] | such as user authentication for the user mobility support [5] over | |||
| supports establishment and configuration of the IPv6 over PPP. | MIPv6 [6]. Currently, the IPv6CP option [2] supports establishment | |||
| However, MIPv6 link local router cannot differentiate IPv6 node and | and configuration of the IPv6 over PPP. However, MIPv6 link local | |||
| MIPv6 node which is connected over PPP. This document defines the | router cannot differentiate between IPv6 node and MIPv6 mobile node | |||
| new IPCP opton for the MIPv6 support. | which is connected over PPP. This document defines the new IPCP | |||
| option for the MIPv6 support. | ||||
| 1. Problem Statement | 1. Introduction | |||
| The MIPv6 Link local router which may be providing PPP connetion, | The MIPv6 link local router that support Mobile Node connection via | |||
| currently cannot identify whether the connection is requested by | PPP, need to know whether the PPP client is MIPv6 node or not. | |||
| Mobile IPv6 Node or IPv6 node. The MIPv6 service is value added | Because the local operator may have different local access policy | |||
| service for the operator, and the operator may want to support user | such as user authentication for the user mobility support [5] over | |||
| mobility service over Mobile IPv6. Therefore it is important to let | MIPv6 [6]. Currently, the IPv6CP option [2] supports establishment | |||
| local router which is a PPP termination point to be able to identify | and configuration of the IPv6 over PPP. However, MIPv6 link local | |||
| MIPv6 service. | router cannot differentiate between IPv6 node and MIPv6 mobile node | |||
| which is connected over PPP. This document defines the new IPCP | ||||
| option for the MIPv6 support. | ||||
| 2. Configuration Options | 2. Configuration Options | |||
| The Configuration Option format and basic options are already defined | The Configuration Option format and basic options are already defined | |||
| for IPCP [3]. | for IPCP [3]. | |||
| The most updated value of the IPCP Option Type field are specified in | The most updated value of the IPCP Option Type field are specified in | |||
| the IANA website [4]. This document concerns the following values: | the IANA web site [4]. This document concerns the following values: | |||
| [?] Mobile IPv6 (Pending for the IANA number assignment) | [?] Mobile IPv6 (Pending for the IANA number assignment) | |||
| 2.1. Mobile IPv6 Option | 2.1. Mobile IPv6 Option | |||
| Description | Description | |||
| Some operator may want to differentiate IPv6 node and MIPv6 node. | Some operator may want to differentiate IPv6 node and MIPv6 node. | |||
| This mechanism let Mobile Node to specify MIPv6 service. | This mechanism will let Mobile Node to specify MIPv6 service. | |||
| A summary of the Configuration Option format is shown | A summary of the Configuration Option format is shown | |||
| below. The fields are transmitted from left to right. | below. The fields are transmitted from left to right. | |||
| The Mobile-IPv6 Configuration Option for IPCP is defined as follows: | The Mobile-IPv6 Configuration Option for IPCP is defined as follows: | |||
| 0 1 2 3 | 0 1 2 3 | |||
| 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 | 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 | |||
| +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | |||
| | Type | Length | Interface-Identifier (MS Bytes) | | Type | Length | Interface-Identifier (MS Bytes) | |||
| +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | |||
| skipping to change at page 3, line 39 ¶ | skipping to change at page 3, line 27 ¶ | |||
| Default | Default | |||
| If no valid interface identifier can be successfully negotiated, | If no valid interface identifier can be successfully negotiated, | |||
| no default Interface-Identifier value should be assumed. The | no default Interface-Identifier value should be assumed. The | |||
| procedures for recovering from such a case are unspecified. | procedures for recovering from such a case are unspecified. | |||
| One approach is to manually configure the interface identifier of | One approach is to manually configure the interface identifier of | |||
| the interface. [2] | the interface. [2] | |||
| 3. IANA Considerations | 3. IANA Considerations | |||
| Requires IPCP option number assignemnt | Requires IPCP option number assignment | |||
| 4. Acknowledgements | ||||
| Special thanks to Prof. Murali Venkatesh of Syracuse University. | ||||
| References | References | |||
| [1] Simpson, W., "The Point-to-Point Protocol", STD 51, RFC | [1] Simpson, W., "The Point-to-Point Protocol", STD 51, RFC | |||
| 1661, July 1994. | 1661, July 1994. | |||
| [2] Dimitry Haskin and Ed Allen, "IP version 6 over PPP", RFC 2472 | [2] Dimitry Haskin and Ed Allen, "IP version 6 over PPP", RFC 2472 | |||
| December 1998 | December 1998 | |||
| [3] G. McGregor, "The PPP Internet Protocol Control Protocol (IPCP) | [3] G. McGregor, "The PPP Internet Protocol Control Protocol (IPCP) | |||
| May 1992 | May 1992 | |||
| [4] www.iana.org | [4] www.iana.org | |||
| [5] JH SONG, CY CHONG, DK LEE, "IP user Mobility Support model" | ||||
| October 2002, draft-song-network-user-mobility-00.txt | ||||
| [6] David B. Johnson and C. Perkins. "Mobility Support in IPv6" | ||||
| draft-ietf-mobileip-ipv6-14.txt | ||||
| Addresses | Addresses | |||
| Questions about this memo can be directed to the authors: | Questions about this memo can be directed to the authors: | |||
| JUNHYUK SONG | JUNHYUK SONG | |||
| SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS. | SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS. | |||
| Mobile Development Team | Mobile Development Team | |||
| Network Systems Division | Network Systems Division | |||
| Phone: +82-31-779-6822 | Phone: +82-31-779-6822 | |||
| Email: santajun@lycos.co.kr | Email: santajun@lycos.co.kr | |||
| FAX: +82-31-7798769 | FAX: +82-31-7798769 | |||
| CHAE YONG CHONG | CHAE YONG CHONG | |||
| SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS. | SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS. | |||
| Mobile Development Team | Mobile Development Team | |||
| Network Systems Division | Network Systems Division | |||
| Phone: +82-31-779-6822 | Phone: +82-31-779-6822 | |||
| Email:cychong@samsung.com | Email:cychong@samsung.com | |||
| DONGKIE LEIGH | ||||
| SK TELECOM | ||||
| Core Network Development Team | ||||
| Network R&D Center | ||||
| Phone +82-2-829-4640 | ||||
| Email: galahad@netsgo.com | ||||
| FAX:+82-2-829-4612 | ||||
| End of changes. 12 change blocks. | ||||
| 22 lines changed or deleted | 38 lines changed or added | |||
This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.48. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/ | ||||