| < draft-thubert-6lo-rfc6775-update-reqs-00.txt | draft-thubert-6lo-rfc6775-update-reqs-01.txt > | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6Lo P. Thubert, Ed. | 6Lo P. Thubert, Ed. | |||
| Internet-Draft cisco | Internet-Draft cisco | |||
| Intended status: Standards Track June 19, 2014 | Intended status: Standards Track June 19, 2014 | |||
| Expires: December 19, 2014 | Expires: December 19, 2014 | |||
| Requirements for an update to 6LoWPAN ND | Requirements for an update to 6LoWPAN ND | |||
| draft-thubert-6lo-rfc6775-update-reqs-00 | draft-thubert-6lo-rfc6775-update-reqs-01 | |||
| Abstract | Abstract | |||
| Work presented at the 6TiSCH and 6MAN working groups suggest a number | Work presented at the 6TiSCH and 6MAN working groups suggest a number | |||
| of enhancements to the 6LoWPAN ND mechanism. This document | of enhancements to the 6LoWPAN ND mechanism. This document | |||
| elaborates on such requirements. | elaborates on such requirements. | |||
| Status of this Memo | Status of this Memo | |||
| This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the | This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the | |||
| skipping to change at page 8, line 53 ¶ | skipping to change at page 8, line 53 ¶ | |||
| refrain from sending gratuitous NA(O) or other form of distributed | refrain from sending gratuitous NA(O) or other form of distributed | |||
| ND cache clean-up over the backbone. For instance, the flag | ND cache clean-up over the backbone. For instance, the flag | |||
| should be reset after the DAD operation upon address formation. | should be reset after the DAD operation upon address formation. | |||
| 5. Security Considerations | 5. Security Considerations | |||
| This specification expects that the link layer is sufficiently | This specification expects that the link layer is sufficiently | |||
| protected, either by means of physical or IP security for the | protected, either by means of physical or IP security for the | |||
| Backbone Link or MAC sublayer cryptography. In particular, it is | Backbone Link or MAC sublayer cryptography. In particular, it is | |||
| expected that the LLN MAC provides secure unicast to/from the | expected that the LLN MAC provides secure unicast to/from the | |||
| Backbone Router and secure 6BBRoadcast from the Backbone Router in a | Backbone Router and secure broadcast from the Backbone Router in a | |||
| way that prevents tempering with or replaying the RA messages. | way that prevents tempering with or replaying the RA messages. | |||
| The use of EUI-64 for forming the Interface ID in the link local | The use of EUI-64 for forming the Interface ID in the link local | |||
| address prevents the usage of Secure ND ([RFC3971] and [RFC3972]) and | address prevents the usage of Secure ND ([RFC3971] and [RFC3972]) and | |||
| address privacy techniques. Considering the envisioned deployments | address privacy techniques. Considering the envisioned deployments | |||
| and the MAC layer security applied, this is not considered an issue | and the MAC layer security applied, this is not considered an issue | |||
| at this time. | at this time. It is envisioned that the device could form a single | |||
| CGA-based Unique Interface ID (CUID) to securely bind all of its | ||||
| addresses. The CUID would be used as Unique Interface Identifier in | ||||
| the ARO option and the Secure ND procedures would be changed to use | ||||
| it as opposed to the source IPv6 address. | ||||
| 6. IANA Considerations | 6. IANA Considerations | |||
| A new type is requested for an ND option. | A new type is requested for an ND option. | |||
| 7. Acknowledgments | 7. Acknowledgments | |||
| TBD | Samita, Erik, JP, Eric, Thomas, you will all recognize your influence | |||
| in this work... | ||||
| 8. References | 8. References | |||
| 8.1. Normative References | 8.1. Normative References | |||
| [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate | [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate | |||
| Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. | Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. | |||
| [RFC2460] Deering, S.E. and R.M. Hinden, "Internet Protocol, Version | [RFC2460] Deering, S.E. and R.M. Hinden, "Internet Protocol, Version | |||
| 6 (IPv6) Specification", RFC 2460, December 1998. | 6 (IPv6) Specification", RFC 2460, December 1998. | |||
| skipping to change at page 10, line 40 ¶ | skipping to change at page 10, line 44 ¶ | |||
| Palattella, M., Thubert, P., Watteyne, T. and Q. Wang, | Palattella, M., Thubert, P., Watteyne, T. and Q. Wang, | |||
| "Terminology in IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE | "Terminology in IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE | |||
| 802.15.4e", Internet-Draft draft-ietf-6tisch- | 802.15.4e", Internet-Draft draft-ietf-6tisch- | |||
| terminology-00, November 2013. | terminology-00, November 2013. | |||
| [I-D.ietf-roll-terminology] | [I-D.ietf-roll-terminology] | |||
| Vasseur, J., "Terms used in Routing for Low power And | Vasseur, J., "Terms used in Routing for Low power And | |||
| Lossy Networks", Internet-Draft draft-ietf-roll- | Lossy Networks", Internet-Draft draft-ietf-roll- | |||
| terminology-13, October 2013. | terminology-13, October 2013. | |||
| [I-D.van-beijnum-multi-mtu] | ||||
| Beijnum, I., "Extensions for Multi-MTU Subnets", Internet- | ||||
| Draft draft-van-beijnum-multi-mtu-03, July 2010. | ||||
| [RFC3963] Devarapalli, V., Wakikawa, R., Petrescu, A. and P. | [RFC3963] Devarapalli, V., Wakikawa, R., Petrescu, A. and P. | |||
| Thubert, "Network Mobility (NEMO) Basic Support Protocol", | Thubert, "Network Mobility (NEMO) Basic Support Protocol", | |||
| RFC 3963, January 2005. | RFC 3963, January 2005. | |||
| [RFC3971] Arkko, J., Kempf, J., Zill, B. and P. Nikander, "SEcure | [RFC3971] Arkko, J., Kempf, J., Zill, B. and P. Nikander, "SEcure | |||
| Neighbor Discovery (SEND)", RFC 3971, March 2005. | Neighbor Discovery (SEND)", RFC 3971, March 2005. | |||
| [RFC3972] Aura, T., "Cryptographically Generated Addresses (CGA)", | [RFC3972] Aura, T., "Cryptographically Generated Addresses (CGA)", | |||
| RFC 3972, March 2005. | RFC 3972, March 2005. | |||
| End of changes. 5 change blocks. | ||||
| 8 lines changed or deleted | 9 lines changed or added | |||
This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.48. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/ | ||||