< draft-winterbottom-ecrit-priv-loc-02.txt   draft-winterbottom-ecrit-priv-loc-03.txt >
ECRIT J. Winterbottom ECRIT J. Winterbottom
Internet-Draft CommScope Internet-Draft CommScope
Intended status: Standards Track H. Tschofenig Updates: I-D.ietf.ecrit.phonebcp H. Tschofenig
Expires: April 19, 2013 Nokia Siemens Networks (if approved) Nokia Siemens Networks
L. Liess Intended status: Standards Track L. Liess
Deutsche Telekom Expires: April 19, 2013 Deutsche Telekom
October 16, 2012 October 16, 2012
Out of Jurisdiction Emergency Routing Out of Jurisdiction Emergency Routing
draft-winterbottom-ecrit-priv-loc-02.txt draft-winterbottom-ecrit-priv-loc-03
Abstract Abstract
Some countries and regions require location information be Some countries and regions require location information be
constrained to emergency service applications and do not permit constrained to emergency service applications and do not permit
location information to traverse the end-point at all. This document location information to traverse the end-point at all. This document
describes the requirements of these countries and provides a solution describes the requirements of these countries and provides a solution
based on an extension to the HELD location protocol. based on an extension to the HELD location protocol.
Status of this Memo Status of this Memo
skipping to change at page 11, line 43 skipping to change at page 11, line 43
| | +-----------+ | | | +-----------+ |
| +--(7)-locReq(Auth)--+ | | | +--(7)-locReq(Auth)--+ | |
| | ESRP/PSAP |<--(6)-Call(locURI)-+ | | ESRP/PSAP |<--(6)-Call(locURI)-+
+---(8)-locResp(Loc)--->| | +---(8)-locResp(Loc)--->| |
+-----------+ +-----------+
Figure 5: Emergency Call Domains Figure 5: Emergency Call Domains
7. HELD Extensions to Support Emergency Routing Information 7. HELD Extensions to Support Emergency Routing Information
Figure 4 describes the enhancements needed to support the new calling Figure 4 shows the enhancements needed to support the new calling
model. Since the VSP has no means of determining if the LIS in the model. If the LIS implements this specification then it responds as
access network supports this modified calling model or not, there is shown in Figure 4, otherwise it responds with standard HELD [RFC5985]
no need to modify the syntax of locationRequest message sent to the [RFC6155] semantics. Consequently, the locationRequest message is
LIS. The location request MUST include a responseTime of not modified.
It is recommended that the location request include a responseTime of
emergencyRouting to ensure that the LIS provides a response to the emergencyRouting to ensure that the LIS provides a response to the
VSP as quickly as possible. When using IP related information VSP as quickly as possible.
identify the UA to the LIS then the identify information MUST be
expressed using the IP flow representation specified in
[I-D.ietf-geopriv-flow-identity]. This approach ensures that any
issues caused by address translation entities in the path can be
mitigated as far as possible. It also supports the LIS returning a
location allowing invocation of the standard switch-centric calling
procedures. A new optional "emergencyRoutingInformation" element is
added to the locationResponse message containing the relevant
destination URLs.
The list of destination URLs provided in the When using IP related information to identify the UA to the LIS then
"emergencyRoutingInformation" element MUST conform to the same the identity information MUST be expressed using the IP flow
contraints as the service URLs returned in the LoST [RFC5222] in the representation specified in [I-D.ietf-geopriv-flow-identity]. This
findServiceResponse. For clarity these constraints are repreated minimizes any issues caused by address translation entities in the
here: location path.
A new optional "emergencyRoutingInformation" element containing the
relevant destination URLs is added to the locationResponse message.
The list of destination URLs provided MUST conform to the same
contraints as the service URLs returned in the LoST protocol
[RFC5222] in the findServiceResponse. For clarity these constraints
are repreated here:
1. The URLs MUST be absolute URLs 1. The URLs MUST be absolute URLs
2. The ordering of the URLs has no particular significance 2. The ordering of the URLs has no particular significance
3. Each URL scheme MUST only appear at most once 3. Each URL scheme MUST only appear at most once
4. It is permissible to include both secured and regular versions of 4. It is permissible to include both secured and regular versions of
a protocol a protocol
This specification updates the switch-centric call model in
[I-D.ietf-ecrit-phonebcp]. In addition to supporting the return of a
location value or location URI set from the LIS, the VSP MUST support
receiving only a location URI set and a set of URLs identifying the
emergency service routing proxies associated with the UA's location.
7.1. HELD Schema Extension 7.1. HELD Schema Extension
This section describes the schema extension to HELD. This section describes the schema extension to HELD.
<?xml version="1.0"?> <?xml version="1.0"?>
<xs:schema <xs:schema
targetNamespace="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:held:eri" targetNamespace="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:held:eri"
xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
xmlns:eri="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:held:eri" xmlns:eri="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:held:eri"
xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace"
 End of changes. 6 change blocks. 
25 lines changed or deleted 31 lines changed or added

This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.48. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/