| < draft-xu-ipsecme-esp-in-udp-lb-01.txt | draft-xu-ipsecme-esp-in-udp-lb-02.txt > | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Network Working Group X. Xu | Network Working Group X. Xu | |||
| Internet-Draft D. Zhang | Internet-Draft D. Zhang | |||
| Intended status: Standards Track L. Xia | Intended status: Standards Track L. Xia | |||
| Expires: May 28, 2018 Huawei | Expires: July 13, 2018 Huawei | |||
| November 24, 2017 | January 9, 2018 | |||
| Encapsulating IPsec ESP in UDP for Load-balancing | Encapsulating IPsec ESP in UDP for Load-balancing | |||
| draft-xu-ipsecme-esp-in-udp-lb-01 | draft-xu-ipsecme-esp-in-udp-lb-02 | |||
| Abstract | Abstract | |||
| IPsec Virtual Private Network (VPN) is widely used by enterprises to | IPsec Virtual Private Network (VPN) is widely used by enterprises to | |||
| interconnect their geographical dispersed branch office locations | interconnect their geographical dispersed branch office locations | |||
| across IP Wide Area Network (WAN) or the Internet, especially in the | across IP Wide Area Network (WAN) or the Internet, especially in the | |||
| Software-Defined-WAN (SD-WAN) era. To fully utilize the bandwidth | Software-Defined-WAN (SD-WAN) era. To fully utilize the bandwidth | |||
| available in IP WAN or the Internet, load balancing of traffic | available in IP WAN or the Internet, load balancing of traffic | |||
| between different IPsec VPN sites over Equal Cost Multi-Path (ECMP) | between different IPsec VPN sites over Equal Cost Multi-Path (ECMP) | |||
| and/or Link Aggregation Group (LAG) is attractive to those | and/or Link Aggregation Group (LAG) is attractive to those | |||
| skipping to change at page 1, line 41 ¶ | skipping to change at page 1, line 41 ¶ | |||
| Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering | Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering | |||
| Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute | Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute | |||
| working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- | working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- | |||
| Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. | Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. | |||
| Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months | Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months | |||
| and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any | and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any | |||
| time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference | time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference | |||
| material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." | material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." | |||
| This Internet-Draft will expire on May 28, 2018. | This Internet-Draft will expire on July 13, 2018. | |||
| Copyright Notice | Copyright Notice | |||
| Copyright (c) 2017 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the | Copyright (c) 2018 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the | |||
| document authors. All rights reserved. | document authors. All rights reserved. | |||
| This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal | This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal | |||
| Provisions Relating to IETF Documents | Provisions Relating to IETF Documents | |||
| (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of | (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of | |||
| publication of this document. Please review these documents | publication of this document. Please review these documents | |||
| carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect | carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect | |||
| to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must | to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must | |||
| include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of | include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of | |||
| the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as | the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as | |||
| skipping to change at page 5, line 21 ¶ | skipping to change at page 5, line 21 ¶ | |||
| UDP encapsulation by an IPsec VPN gateway, ordinary ESP encapsulation | UDP encapsulation by an IPsec VPN gateway, ordinary ESP encapsulation | |||
| procedure is performed and then a formatted UDP header is inserted | procedure is performed and then a formatted UDP header is inserted | |||
| between ESP header and IP header. The Source Port field of the UDP | between ESP header and IP header. The Source Port field of the UDP | |||
| header is filled with an entropy value which is generated by the | header is filled with an entropy value which is generated by the | |||
| IPsec VPN gateway. Upon receiving these UDP encapsulated packets, | IPsec VPN gateway. Upon receiving these UDP encapsulated packets, | |||
| remote IPsec VPN gateway MUST decapsulate these packets by removing | remote IPsec VPN gateway MUST decapsulate these packets by removing | |||
| the UDP header and then perform ordinary ESP decapsulation procedure | the UDP header and then perform ordinary ESP decapsulation procedure | |||
| consequently. | consequently. | |||
| Similar to all other IP-based tunneling technologies, ESP-in-UDP | Similar to all other IP-based tunneling technologies, ESP-in-UDP | |||
| encapsualtion introduces overheads and reduces the effective Maximum | encapsulation introduces overheads and reduces the effective Maximum | |||
| Transmision Unit (MTU) size. ESP-in-UDP encapsulation may also | Transmission Unit (MTU) size. ESP-in-UDP encapsulation may also | |||
| impact Time-to-Live (TTL) or Hop Count (HC) and Differentiated | impact Time-to-Live (TTL) or Hop Count (HC) and Differentiated | |||
| Services (DSCP). Hence, ESP-in-UDP MUST follow the corresponding | Services (DSCP). Hence, ESP-in-UDP MUST follow the corresponding | |||
| procedures defined in [RFC2003]. | procedures defined in [RFC2003]. | |||
| Encapsulators MUST NOT fragment ESP packet, and when the outer IP | Encapsulators MUST NOT fragment ESP packet, and when the outer IP | |||
| header is IPv4, encapsulators MUST set the DF bit in the outer IPv4 | header is IPv4, encapsulators MUST set the DF bit in the outer IPv4 | |||
| header. It is strongly RECOMMENDED that IP transit core be | header. It is strongly RECOMMENDED that IP transit core be | |||
| configured to carry an MTU at least large enough to accommodate the | configured to carry an MTU at least large enough to accommodate the | |||
| added encapsulation headers. Meanwhile, it is strongly RECOMMENDED | added encapsulation headers. Meanwhile, it is strongly RECOMMENDED | |||
| that Path MTU Discovery [RFC1191] [RFC1981] or Packetization Layer | that Path MTU Discovery [RFC1191] [RFC1981] or Packetization Layer | |||
| skipping to change at page 7, line 36 ¶ | skipping to change at page 7, line 36 ¶ | |||
| [RFC3948] Huttunen, A., Swander, B., Volpe, V., DiBurro, L., and M. | [RFC3948] Huttunen, A., Swander, B., Volpe, V., DiBurro, L., and M. | |||
| Stenberg, "UDP Encapsulation of IPsec ESP Packets", | Stenberg, "UDP Encapsulation of IPsec ESP Packets", | |||
| RFC 3948, DOI 10.17487/RFC3948, January 2005, | RFC 3948, DOI 10.17487/RFC3948, January 2005, | |||
| <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3948>. | <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3948>. | |||
| Authors' Addresses | Authors' Addresses | |||
| Xiaohu Xu | Xiaohu Xu | |||
| Huawei | Huawei | |||
| Email: xuxiaohu@huawei.com | Email: xuxh.mail@gmail.com | |||
| Dacheng Zhang | Dacheng Zhang | |||
| Huawei | Huawei | |||
| Email: dacheng.zhang@huawei.com | Email: dacheng.zhang@huawei.com | |||
| Liang Xia | Liang Xia | |||
| Huawei | Huawei | |||
| Email: frank.xialiang@huawei.com | Email: frank.xialiang@huawei.com | |||
| End of changes. 6 change blocks. | ||||
| 8 lines changed or deleted | 8 lines changed or added | |||
This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.48. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/ | ||||