< draft-zhang-trans-ct-binary-codes-00.txt   draft-zhang-trans-ct-binary-codes-01.txt >
Network Working Group D. Zhang Network Working Group D. Zhang
Internet-Draft Huawei Internet-Draft Huawei
Intended status: Experimental October 27, 2014 Intended status: Experimental D. Gillmor
Expires: April 30, 2015 Expires: June 26, 2015 CMRG
D. He
Huawei
December 23, 2014
CT for Binary Codes CT for Binary Codes
draft-zhang-trans-ct-binary-codes-00 draft-zhang-trans-ct-binary-codes-01
Abstract Abstract
This document proposes a solution to use CT for publishing softwares/ This document proposes a solution to use CT for publishing softwares/
binary codes and their signatuers. binary codes and their signatuers.
Requirements Language Requirements Language
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
skipping to change at page 1, line 37 skipping to change at page 1, line 40
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on April 30, 2015. This Internet-Draft will expire on June 26, 2015.
Copyright Notice Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2014 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the Copyright (c) 2014 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved. document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents publication of this document. Please review these documents
skipping to change at page 2, line 24 skipping to change at page 2, line 27
3.2. Another Scenarios . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 3.2. Another Scenarios . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
4. Log Format and Operation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 4. Log Format and Operation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
4.1. Log Entries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 4.1. Log Entries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
4.2. Structure of the Signed Certificate Timestamp . . . . . . 5 4.2. Structure of the Signed Certificate Timestamp . . . . . . 5
5. Log Client Messages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 5. Log Client Messages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
5.1. Add Binary and Certificate Chain to Log . . . . . . . . . 6 5.1. Add Binary and Certificate Chain to Log . . . . . . . . . 6
6. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 6. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
7. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 7. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
8. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 8. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
9. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 9. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
1. Introduction 1. Introduction
Digital signatures have been widely used in software distributions to Digital signatures have been widely used in software distributions to
demonstrate the authenticity of softwares. Through verifying demonstrate the authenticity of softwares. Through verifying
signatures, end users can could ensure that the softwares they got signatures, end users can could ensure that the softwares they got
are provided by legal organizations and never modified during the are provided by legal organizations and never modified during the
delivery. If an end user does not have a direct trust relationship delivery. If an end user does not have a direct trust relationship
with the software provider, an authentication chain need to be with the software provider, an authentication chain need to be
generated from the key used for generating the signature to a trust generated from the key used for generating the signature to a trust
skipping to change at page 8, line 5 skipping to change at page 8, line 5
Laurie, B., Langley, A., Kasper, E., and R. Stradling, Laurie, B., Langley, A., Kasper, E., and R. Stradling,
"Certificate Transparency", draft-ietf-trans- "Certificate Transparency", draft-ietf-trans-
rfc6962-bis-04 (work in progress), July 2014. rfc6962-bis-04 (work in progress), July 2014.
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[RFC5652] Housley, R., "Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)", STD 70, [RFC5652] Housley, R., "Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)", STD 70,
RFC 5652, September 2009. RFC 5652, September 2009.
Author's Address Authors' Addresses
Dacheng Zhang Dacheng Zhang
Huawei Huawei
Email: zhangdacheng@huawei.com Email: zhangdacheng@huawei.com
Daniel Kahn Gillmor
CMRG
Email: dkg@fifthhorseman.net
Danping He
Huawei
Email: ana.hedanping@huawei.com
 End of changes. 6 change blocks. 
6 lines changed or deleted 9 lines changed or added

This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.48. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/