< draft-ietf-urlreg-procedures-07.txt   draft-ietf-urlreg-procedures-08.txt >
Ian King <iking@microsoft.com>
Speech Product Group
MICROSOFT CORPORATION
INTERNET-DRAFT R. Petke INTERNET-DRAFT R. Petke
<draft-ietf-urlreg-procedures-07.txt> UUNET Technologies <draft-ietf-urlreg-procedures-08.txt> UUNET Technologies
I. King I. King
Microsoft Corporation Microsoft Corporation
August 12, 1999 September 26, 1999
Registration Procedures for URL Scheme Names Registration Procedures for URL Scheme Names
Status of this Memo Status of this Memo
This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance with This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance with
all provisions of Section 10 of RFC2026. Internet-Drafts are all provisions of Section 10 of RFC2026. Internet-Drafts are
working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its
areas, and its working groups. Note that other groups may also areas, and its working groups. Note that other groups may also
distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. Internet-Drafts distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. Internet-Drafts
skipping to change at line 33 skipping to change at line 29
cite them other than as "work in progress." cite them other than as "work in progress."
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt. http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html. http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
Distribution of this Internet-Draft is unlimited. Distribution of this Internet-Draft is unlimited.
This Internet-Draft expires March 12, 2000. This Internet-Draft expires April 26, 2000.
Copyright Notice Copyright Notice
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1999). All Rights Reserved. Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1999). All Rights Reserved.
Abstract Abstract
This document defines the process by which new URL scheme names are This document defines the process by which new URL scheme names are
registered. registered.
skipping to change at line 129 skipping to change at line 125
3.1 General Requirements 3.1 General Requirements
All new URL schemes, regardless of registration tree, MUST conform All new URL schemes, regardless of registration tree, MUST conform
to the generic syntax for URLs as specified in RFC 2396. to the generic syntax for URLs as specified in RFC 2396.
3.2 The IETF Tree 3.2 The IETF Tree
Registration in the IETF tree requires publication of the URL scheme Registration in the IETF tree requires publication of the URL scheme
syntax and semantics in either an Informational or Standards Track syntax and semantics in either an Informational or Standards Track
RFC. RFC. In general, the creation of a new URL scheme requires a
Standards Track RFC. An Informational RFC may be employed for
registration only in the case of a URL scheme which is already in
wide usage and meets other standards set forth in [RFC-GUIDELINES],
such as "demonstrated utility" within the Internet Architecture; the
IESG shall have broad discretion in determining whether an
Informational RFC is suitable in any given case, and may either
recommend changes to such document prior to publication, or reject
it for publication. An Informational RFC purporting to describe a
URL scheme shall not be published without IESG approval. This is a
departure from practice for Informational RFCs as set forth in RFC
2026, for the purpose of ensuring that the registration of URL
schemes shall serve the best interests of the Internet community.
The NAMES of schemes registered in the IETF tree MUST NOT contain The NAMES of schemes registered in the IETF tree MUST NOT contain
the dash (also known as the hyphen and minus sign) character ('-') the dash (also known as the hyphen and minus sign) character ('-')
USASCII value 2Dh. Use of this character can cause confusion with USASCII value 2Dh. Use of this character can cause confusion with
schemes registered in alternative trees (see section 3.3). schemes registered in alternative trees (see section 3.3).
An analysis of the security issues inherent in the new URL scheme An analysis of the security issues inherent in the new URL scheme
is REQUIRED. (This is in accordance with the basic requirements for is REQUIRED. (This is in accordance with the basic requirements for
all IETF protocols.) URL schemes registered in the IETF tree should all IETF protocols.) URL schemes registered in the IETF tree should
not introduce additional security risks into the Internet Architec- not introduce additional security risks into the Internet Architec-
 End of changes. 5 change blocks. 
8 lines changed or deleted 16 lines changed or added

This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.48. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/