< draft-ietf-isis-wg-mesh-group-00.txt		draft-ietf-isis-wg-mesh-group-01.txt >
	Internet Engineering Task Force R. Balay		Internet Engineering Task Force R. Balay
	INTERNET DRAFT Ericsson		INTERNET DRAFT Ericsson
	D. Katz		D. Katz
	Juniper Networks		Juniper Networks
	J. Parker		J. Parker
	Lucent Technology		Lucent Technology
	Feb 21, 2000		July 7, 2000
	IS-IS Mesh Groups		IS-IS Mesh Groups
	<draft-ietf-isis-wg-mesh-group-00.txt>		<draft-ietf-isis-wg-mesh-group-01.txt>
	1. Status of this Memo		1. Status of this Memo
	This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance		This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance
	with all provisions of Section 10 of RFC 2026.		with all provisions of Section 10 of RFC 2026.
	Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet		Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet
	Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working		Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working
	groups. Note that other groups may also distribute working		groups. Note that other groups may also distribute working
	documents as Internet-Drafts.		documents as Internet-Drafts.
	skipping to change at page 2, line ? ¶		skipping to change at page 2, line ? ¶
	with implementations that do not support this feature.		with implementations that do not support this feature.
	This document is provided to the IETF working group on IS-IS.		This document is provided to the IETF working group on IS-IS.
	Table of Contents		Table of Contents
	1. Status of this Memo.................................. 1		1. Status of this Memo.................................. 1
	2. Abstract............................................. 2		2. Abstract............................................. 2
	3. Overview............................................. 2		3. Overview............................................. 2
	4. Definitions of Mesh Groups........................... 4		4. Definitions of Mesh Groups........................... 4
	5. Drawbacks of Mesh Groups............................. 5		5. Drawbacks of Mesh Groups............................. 6
	6. Interoperation with Mesh Groups...................... 7		6. Interoperation with Mesh Groups...................... 7
	7. Acknowledgments...................................... 7		7. Acknowledgments...................................... 7
	8. References........................................... 7		8. References........................................... 7
	9. Security Considerations.............................. 7		9. Security Considerations.............................. 8
	10. Authors' Address..................................... 8		10. Authors' Address..................................... 8
	11. Full Copyright Statement............................. 9		11. Full Copyright Statement............................. 9
	3. Overview		3. Overview
	In ATM or frame relay networks Intermediate Systems are		In ATM or frame relay networks Intermediate Systems are
	inter-connected using virtual circuits (VCs) which are logical		inter-connected using virtual circuits (VCs) which are logical
	point-to-point links. Some organizations attach multiple		point-to-point links. Some organizations attach multiple
	Intermediate Systems to form a full "mesh" topology, where		Intermediate Systems to form a full "mesh" topology, where
	every pair of Intermediate Systems are connected by a point-		every pair of Intermediate Systems are connected by a point-
	skipping to change at page 8, line 12 ¶		skipping to change at page 8, line 12 ¶
	Connectionless-mode Network Service (ISO 8473)", June		Connectionless-mode Network Service (ISO 8473)", June
	1992.		1992.
	9. Security Considerations		9. Security Considerations
	This document raises no new security issues for IS-IS.		This document raises no new security issues for IS-IS.
	10. Authors' Address		10. Authors' Address
	Rajesh Balay		Rajesh Balay
	Ericsson IP Infrastructure, Inc.		CoSine Communications
	920 Main Campus Drive, Suite 500		1200 Bridge Parkway
	Raleigh, NC 27606		Redwood City, CA 94065
	email: balay@torrentnet.com		email: Rajesh.Balay@cosinecom.com
	Dave Katz		Dave Katz
	Juniper Networks		Juniper Networks
	385 Ravendale Drive		385 Ravendale Drive
	Mountain View, CA 94043		Mountain View, CA 94043
	email: dkatz@juniper.net		email: dkatz@juniper.net
	Jeff Parker		Jeff Parker
	Lucent Technologies,		Lucent Technologies,
	200 Nickerson Road,		200 Nickerson Road,
End of changes. 5 change blocks.
	8 lines changed or deleted		8 lines changed or added
This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.48. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/