< draft-ietf-ipngwg-uni-based-mcast-01.txt   draft-ietf-ipngwg-uni-based-mcast-02.txt >
IPNGWG Working Group B. Haberman IPNGWG Working Group B. Haberman
Internet Draft Nortel Networks Internet Draft Nortel Networks
draft-ietf-ipngwg-uni-based-mcast-01.txt D. Thaler draft-ietf-ipngwg-uni-based-mcast-02.txt D. Thaler
January 2001 Microsoft June 2001 Microsoft
Expires July 2001 Expires December 2001
Unicast-Prefix-based IPv6 Multicast Addresses Unicast-Prefix-based IPv6 Multicast Addresses
Status of this Memo Status of this Memo
This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance with This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance with
all provisions of Section 10 of RFC2026 [RFC 2026]. all provisions of Section 10 of RFC2026 [RFC 2026].
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that
skipping to change at line 34 skipping to change at line 34
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt. http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html. http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
Abstract Abstract
This specification defines an extension to the multicast addressing This specification defines an extension to the multicast addressing
architecture of the IP Version 6 protocol. The extension presented architecture of the IP Version 6 protocol. The extension presented
in this document allows for unicast-prefix-based allocation of in this document allows for unicast-prefix-based allocation of
multicast addresses. multicast addresses. By delegating multicast addresses at the same
time as unicast prefixes, network operators will be able to identify
their multicast addresses without needing to run an inter-domain
allocation protocol.
Table of Contents
Status of this Memo................................................1
Abstract...........................................................1
1. Introduction....................................................2
2. Terminology.....................................................2
3. Multicast Address Format........................................2
4. Source-Specific Multicast Addresses.............................3
5. Security Considerations.........................................3
6. References......................................................3
AuthorĘs Address...................................................5
Haberman, Thaler 1
1. Introduction 1. Introduction
This document specifies an extension to the multicast portion of the This document specifies an extension to the multicast portion of the
IPv6 addressing architecture [RFC 2373]. The current architecture IPv6 addressing architecture [RFC 2373]. The current architecture
does not contain any built-in support for dynamic address does not contain any built-in support for dynamic address
allocation. This proposal introduces encoded information in the allocation. This proposal introduces encoded information in the
multicast address to allow for dynamic, network prefix-based multicast address to allow for dynamic, unicast prefix-based
allocation of IPv6 multicast addresses, as well as allocation of allocation of IPv6 multicast addresses, as well as allocation of
source-specific multicast addresses. source-specific multicast addresses.
2. Multicast Address Format 2. Terminology
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in
this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC 2119].
3. Multicast Address Format
Section 2.7.2 of RFC 2373 defines the following operational format Section 2.7.2 of RFC 2373 defines the following operational format
of IPv6 multicast addresses: of IPv6 multicast addresses:
Haberman, Thaler 1
| 8 | 4 | 4 | 80 | 32 | | 8 | 4 | 4 | 80 | 32 |
+--------+----+----+--------------------------------+------------+ +--------+----+----+--------------------------------+------------+
|11111111|flgs|scop| reserved must be zero | group ID | |11111111|flgs|scop| reserved must be zero | group ID |
+--------+----+----+--------------------------------+------------+ +--------+----+----+--------------------------------+------------+
This document introduces a new format that incorporates unicast This document introduces a new format that incorporates unicast
prefix information in the multicast address. The following prefix information in the multicast address. The following
illustrates the new format: illustrates the new format:
| 8 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 8 | 64 | 32 | | 8 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 8 | 64 | 32 |
skipping to change at line 74 skipping to change at line 95
+--------+----+----+--------+--------+----------------+----------+ +--------+----+----+--------+--------+----------------+----------+
+-+-+-+-+ +-+-+-+-+
flgs is a set of 4 flags: |0|0|P|T| flgs is a set of 4 flags: |0|0|P|T|
+-+-+-+-+ +-+-+-+-+
o P = 0 indicates a multicast address that is not assigned o P = 0 indicates a multicast address that is not assigned
based on the network prefix. based on the network prefix.
o P = 1 indicates a multicast address that is assigned o P = 1 indicates a multicast address that is assigned
based on the network prefix. based on the network prefix.
o The setting of the T bit is defined in Section 2.7 of RFC o If P = 1, T MUST be set to 1, otherwise the setting of
2373 the T bit is defined in Section 2.7 of RFC 2373.
The reserved field MUST be zero. The reserved field MUST be zero.
plen indicates the actual length of the network prefix portion of Haberman, Thaler 2
the address when P = 1. This field is required in order to plen indicates the actual number of bits in the network prefix field
determine the number of bits to include as part of the unicast that identify the subnet when P = 1.
prefix.
network prefix identifies the network prefix of the unicast subnet network prefix identifies the network prefix of the unicast subnet
owning the multicast address. If P = 1, this field contains the owning the multicast address. If P = 1, this field contains the
unicast network prefix defined in [RFC 2374] and assigned to the unicast network prefix defined in [RFC 2374] and assigned to the
domain owning, or allocating, the multicast address. domain owning, or allocating, the multicast address.
With the network prefix-based architecture and the current unicast With the network prefix-based architecture and the current unicast
address architecture [RFC 2374], the network prefix portion of the address architecture [RFC 2374], the network prefix portion of the
multicast address will be at most 64 bits. multicast address will be at most 64 bits.
The scope of the unicast-prefix based multicast address must not The scope of the unicast-prefix based multicast address MUST NOT
exceed the scope of the unicast prefix embedded in the multicast exceed the scope of the unicast prefix embedded in the multicast
address. address.
3. Source-Specific Multicast Addresses The lifetime of a unicast prefix-based multicast addresses MUST be
less than or equal to the Valid Lifetime field in the Prefix
Information option, corresponding to the unicast prefix being used,
contained in the Neighbor Discovery Router Advertisement message
[RFC 2461].
Haberman, Thaler 2 4. Source-Specific Multicast Addresses
The network prefix-based IPv6 multicast address format supports
Source-specific multicast addresses, as defined by [IANA]. This is
accomplished by:
o Setting P = 1 The unicast prefix-based IPv6 multicast address format supports
o Setting plen = 0 Source-specific multicast addresses, as defined by [SSM ARCH]. To
o Setting network prefix = 0 accomplish is, a node MUST:
4. Security Considerations o Set P = 1.
o Set plen = 0.
o Set network prefix = 0.
These settings indicate that the multicast address is being used in
source-specific multicast transmission. The source address field in
the IPv6 header identifies the owner of the multicast address.
5. Security Considerations
Using unicast network-prefix based multicast addresses can sometimes Using unicast network-prefix based multicast addresses can sometimes
aid in identifying the allocation domain of a given multicast aid in identifying the allocation domain of a given multicast
address, although no guarantee is provided. address, although no guarantee is provided.
Using source-specific multicast addresses can sometimes aid in the Using source-specific multicast addresses can sometimes aid in the
prevention of denial-of-service attacks by arbitrary sources, prevention of denial-of-service attacks by arbitrary sources,
although no guarantee is provided. although no guarantee is provided.
5. IANA Considerations
Well-known, fixed-scope and variable-scope multicast addresses with
the prefix FF2x (unicast-prefix based, permanent) may be created and
used as follows.
Group IDs are defined and registered by the IANA. Such well-known
group IDs may be used to create unicast-prefix based multicast
addresses by any domain or network by embedding their local unicast
prefix. Hence, given an IANA-assigned group ID, and a unicast
network prefix, an application could derive and join that network's
group used for the well-known purpose associated with the group ID.
6. References 6. References
Haberman, Thaler 3
[RFC 2026] S. Bradner, "The Internet Standards Process -- [RFC 2026] S. Bradner, "The Internet Standards Process --
Revision 3", BCP 9, RFC 2026, October 1996. Revision 3", BCP 9, RFC 2026, October 1996.
[RFC 2460] S. Deering and R. Hinden, "Internet Protocol, Version 6 [RFC 2460] S. Deering and R. Hinden, "Internet Protocol, Version 6
(IPv6) Specification", RFC 2460, December 1998. (IPv6) Specification", RFC 2460, December 1998.
[RFC 2373] R. Hinden and S. Deering, "IP Version 6 Addressing [RFC 2373] R. Hinden and S. Deering, "IP Version 6 Addressing
Architecture", RFC 2373, July 1998. Architecture", RFC 2373, July 1998.
[RFC 2119] S. Bradner, "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate [RFC 2119] S. Bradner, "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", RFC 2119, BCP14, March 1999. Requirement Levels", RFC 2119, BCP14, March 1999.
[RFC 2374] R. Hinden, M. OĘDell, and S. Deering, "An IPv6 [RFC 2374] R. Hinden, M. OĘDell, and S. Deering, "An IPv6
Aggregatable Global Unicast Address Format", RFC 2374, Aggregatable Global Unicast Address Format", RFC 2374,
Haberman, Thaler 3
July 1998. July 1998.
[RFC 2464] M. Crawford, "Transmission of IPv6 Packets over Ethernet [RFC 2461] Narten, T., Nordmark, E., Simpson, W., "Neighbor
Networks", RFC 2464, December 1998. Discovery for IP Version 6 (IPv6)", RFC 2461, December
1998.
[RFC 2470] M. Crawford, T. Narten, and S. Thomas, "Transmission of
IPv6 Packets over Token Ring Networks", RFC 2470,
December 1998.
[RFC 2375] R. Hinden and S. Deering, "IPv6 Multicast Address
Assignments", RFC 2375, July 1998.
[RFC 2365] D. Meyer, "Administratively Scoped IP Multicast",
BCP 23, RFC 2365, July 1998.
[IANA] D. Cheriton, "Single-source IP Multicast Address Range", [SSM ARCH] H. Holbrook and B. Cain, "Source-Specific Multicast
http://www.isi.edu/in-notes/iana/assignments/single- for IP", Work In Progress, March 2001.
source-multicast, October 1998.
Haberman, Thaler 4 Haberman, Thaler 4
AuthorĘs Address AuthorĘs Address
Brian Haberman Brian Haberman
Nortel Networks Nortel Networks
4309 Emperor Blvd. 4309 Emperor Blvd.
Suite 200 Suite 200
Durham, NC 27703 Durham, NC 27703
1-919-992-4439 1-919-992-4439
Email : haberman@nortelnetworks.com haberman@nortelnetworks.com
Dave Thaler Dave Thaler
Microsoft Corporation Microsoft Corporation
One Microsoft Way One Microsoft Way
Redmond, WA 48105-6399 Redmond, WA 48105-6399
1-425-703-8835 1-425-703-8835
Email: dthaler@microsoft.com dthaler@microsoft.com
Haberman, Thaler 5 Haberman, Thaler 5
 End of changes. 20 change blocks. 
55 lines changed or deleted 61 lines changed or added

This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.48. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/