| < draft-ietf-ospf-multi-area-adj-08.txt | draft-ietf-ospf-multi-area-adj-09.txt > | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Network Working Group S. Mirtorabi | Network Working Group S. Mirtorabi | |||
| Internet-Draft Nuova Systems | Internet-Draft Nuova Systems | |||
| Intended status: Standards Track P. Psenak | Intended status: Standards Track P. Psenak | |||
| Expires: September 2, 2008 Cisco Systems | Expires: October 25, 2008 Cisco Systems | |||
| A. Lindem (Editor) | A. Lindem (Editor) | |||
| A. Oswal | A. Oswal | |||
| Redback Networks | Redback Networks | |||
| March 2008 | April 23, 2008 | |||
| OSPF Multi-Area Adjacency | OSPF Multi-Area Adjacency | |||
| draft-ietf-ospf-multi-area-adj-08.txt | draft-ietf-ospf-multi-area-adj-09.txt | |||
| Status of this Memo | Status of this Memo | |||
| By submitting this Internet-Draft, each author represents that any | By submitting this Internet-Draft, each author represents that any | |||
| applicable patent or other IPR claims of which he or she is aware | applicable patent or other IPR claims of which he or she is aware | |||
| have been or will be disclosed, and any of which he or she becomes | have been or will be disclosed, and any of which he or she becomes | |||
| aware will be disclosed, in accordance with Section 6 of BCP 79. | aware will be disclosed, in accordance with Section 6 of BCP 79. | |||
| Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering | Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering | |||
| Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that | Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that | |||
| skipping to change at page 1, line 38 ¶ | skipping to change at page 1, line 38 ¶ | |||
| and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any | and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any | |||
| time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference | time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference | |||
| material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." | material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." | |||
| The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at | The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at | |||
| http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt. | http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt. | |||
| The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at | The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at | |||
| http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html. | http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html. | |||
| This Internet-Draft will expire on September 2, 2008. | This Internet-Draft will expire on October 25, 2008. | |||
| Copyright Notice | Copyright Notice | |||
| Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2008). | Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2008). | |||
| Abstract | Abstract | |||
| This document describes an extension to the Open Shortest Path First | This document describes an extension to the Open Shortest Path First | |||
| (OSPF) protocol to allow a single physical link to be shared by | (OSPF) protocol to allow a single physical link to be shared by | |||
| multiple areas. This is necessary to allow the link to be considered | multiple areas. This is necessary to allow the link to be considered | |||
| skipping to change at page 4, line 37 ¶ | skipping to change at page 4, line 37 ¶ | |||
| operation over LAN in link-state routing protocols" [P2PLAN], it may | operation over LAN in link-state routing protocols" [P2PLAN], it may | |||
| not be acceptable to configure the link as unnumbered due to network | not be acceptable to configure the link as unnumbered due to network | |||
| management policies. Many popular network management applications | management policies. Many popular network management applications | |||
| individually test the path to each interface and an IP address | individually test the path to each interface and an IP address | |||
| facilitates this task. | facilitates this task. | |||
| 1.4. Proposed Solution | 1.4. Proposed Solution | |||
| ABRs will simply establish multiple adjacencies belonging to | ABRs will simply establish multiple adjacencies belonging to | |||
| different areas. Each multi-area adjacency is announced as a point- | different areas. Each multi-area adjacency is announced as a point- | |||
| to-point unnumbered link in the configured area. This point-to-point | to-point link in the configured area. However, unlike numbered | |||
| link will provide a topological path for that area. The first or | point-to-point links, no type 3 link is advertised for multi-area | |||
| primary adjacency using the link will operate and advertise the link | adjacencies. This point-to-point link will provide a topological | |||
| in a manner consistent with RFC 2328 [OSPF]. | path for that area. The first or primary adjacency using the link | |||
| will operate and advertise the link in a manner consistent with RFC | ||||
| 2328 [OSPF]. | ||||
| 2. Functional Specifications | 2. Functional Specifications | |||
| 2.1. Multi-Area Adjacency Configuration and Neighbor Discovery | 2.1. Multi-Area Adjacency Configuration and Neighbor Discovery | |||
| Multi-area adjacencies are configured between two routers having a | Multi-area adjacencies are configured between two routers having a | |||
| common interface. On point-to-point interfaces, there is no need to | common interface. On point-to-point interfaces, there is no need to | |||
| configure the neighbor's address since there can be only one | configure the neighbor's address since there can be only one | |||
| neighbor. For all other network types, the neighbor address of each | neighbor. For all other network types, the neighbor address of each | |||
| multi-area adjacency must be configured or automatically discovered | multi-area adjacency must be configured or automatically discovered | |||
| skipping to change at page 6, line 50 ¶ | skipping to change at page 6, line 50 ¶ | |||
| The interface FSM will be the same as a point-to-point link | The interface FSM will be the same as a point-to-point link | |||
| irrespective of the underlying physical link. | irrespective of the underlying physical link. | |||
| 2.6. Neighbor Data Structure and Neighbor FSM | 2.6. Neighbor Data Structure and Neighbor FSM | |||
| Both the neighbor data structure and neighbor FSM are the same as for | Both the neighbor data structure and neighbor FSM are the same as for | |||
| standard OSPF, specified in section 10 of [OSPF]. | standard OSPF, specified in section 10 of [OSPF]. | |||
| 2.7. Advertising Multi-Area Adjacencies | 2.7. Advertising Multi-Area Adjacencies | |||
| Multi-area adjacencies are announced as unnumbered point-to-point | Multi-area adjacencies are announced as point-to-point links. Once | |||
| links. Once the router's multi-area adjacency reaches the FULL state | the router's multi-area adjacency reaches the FULL state it will be | |||
| it will be added as a link type 1 to the Router Link State | added as a link type 1 to the Router Link State Advertisement (LSA) | |||
| Advertisement (LSA) with: | with: | |||
| Link ID = Remote's Router ID | Link ID = Remote's Router ID | |||
| Link Data = Neighbor's IP Address or IfIndex (if the underlying | Link Data = Neighbor's IP Address or IfIndex (if the underlying | |||
| interface is unnumbered). | interface is unnumbered). | |||
| This will announce a topological path through the corresponding area. | Unlike numbered point-to-point links, no type 3 link is advertised | |||
| While advertising the neighbor's IP address in the link data isn't | for multi-area adjacencies. | |||
| consistent with the unnumbered link model, it is required to | ||||
| eliminate ambiguity when there are parallel point-to-point | ||||
| adjacencies. | ||||
| 3. Compatibility | 3. Compatibility | |||
| All mechanisms described in this document are backward compatible | All mechanisms described in this document are backward compatible | |||
| with standard OSPF implementations [OSPF]. | with standard OSPF implementations [OSPF]. | |||
| 3.1. Adjacency Endpoint Compatibility | 3.1. Adjacency Endpoint Compatibility | |||
| Since multi-area adjacencies are modeled as unnumbered point-to-point | Since multi-area adjacencies are modeled as unnumbered point-to-point | |||
| links, it is only necessary for the router at the other end of the | links, it is only necessary for the router at the other end of the | |||
| skipping to change at page 13, line 21 ¶ | skipping to change at page 13, line 21 ¶ | |||
| Thanks to Padma Pillay-Esnault for her last call review and comments. | Thanks to Padma Pillay-Esnault for her last call review and comments. | |||
| Also thanks to Padma for comments on the OSPFv3 applicability section | Also thanks to Padma for comments on the OSPFv3 applicability section | |||
| that was last called separately. | that was last called separately. | |||
| Thanks to Nischal Seth for pointing out that the document | Thanks to Nischal Seth for pointing out that the document | |||
| inadvertently precluded point-to-point over LAN interfaces. | inadvertently precluded point-to-point over LAN interfaces. | |||
| Thanks to Ben Campbell for performing the General Area Review. | Thanks to Ben Campbell for performing the General Area Review. | |||
| Thanks to Jari Arkko for comments during the IESG review. | ||||
| The RFC text was produced using Marshall Rose's xml2rfc tool. | The RFC text was produced using Marshall Rose's xml2rfc tool. | |||
| Authors' Addresses | Authors' Addresses | |||
| Sina Mirtorabi | Sina Mirtorabi | |||
| Nuova Systems | Nuova Systems | |||
| 3 West Plumeria Drive | 3 West Plumeria Drive | |||
| San Jose, CA 95134 | San Jose, CA 95134 | |||
| USA | USA | |||
| End of changes. 8 change blocks. | ||||
| 17 lines changed or deleted | 18 lines changed or added | |||
This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.48. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/ | ||||