idnits 2.17.1 draft-ietf-avt-rtp-ipmr-01.txt: Checking boilerplate required by RFC 5378 and the IETF Trust (see https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info): ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ** The document seems to lack a License Notice according IETF Trust Provisions of 28 Dec 2009, Section 6.b.i or Provisions of 12 Sep 2009 Section 6.b -- however, there's a paragraph with a matching beginning. Boilerplate error? -- It seems you're using the 'non-IETF stream' Licence Notice instead Checking nits according to https://www.ietf.org/id-info/1id-guidelines.txt: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- == It seems as if not all pages are separated by form feeds - found 0 form feeds but 11 pages Checking nits according to https://www.ietf.org/id-info/checklist : ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ** The document seems to lack an IANA Considerations section. (See Section 2.2 of https://www.ietf.org/id-info/checklist for how to handle the case when there are no actions for IANA.) ** There are 58 instances of too long lines in the document, the longest one being 535 characters in excess of 72. ** There are 24 instances of lines with control characters in the document. Miscellaneous warnings: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- == The copyright year in the IETF Trust and authors Copyright Line does not match the current year == Line 81 has weird spacing: '... be set to 0....' == Line 171 has weird spacing: '...A) then there...' == The document seems to lack the recommended RFC 2119 boilerplate, even if it appears to use RFC 2119 keywords. (The document does seem to have the reference to RFC 2119 which the ID-Checklist requires). -- The document seems to lack a disclaimer for pre-RFC5378 work, but may have content which was first submitted before 10 November 2008. If you have contacted all the original authors and they are all willing to grant the BCP78 rights to the IETF Trust, then this is fine, and you can ignore this comment. If not, you may need to add the pre-RFC5378 disclaimer. (See the Legal Provisions document at https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info for more information.) -- The document date (February 10, 2009) is 5551 days in the past. Is this intentional? Checking references for intended status: Informational ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Looks like a reference, but probably isn't: 'RFC4566' on line 308 -- Looks like a reference, but probably isn't: 'RFC3550' on line 320 == Unused Reference: '2' is defined on line 327, but no explicit reference was found in the text == Unused Reference: '3' is defined on line 328, but no explicit reference was found in the text == Unused Reference: '4' is defined on line 330, but no explicit reference was found in the text ** Obsolete normative reference: RFC 4566 (ref. '4') (Obsoleted by RFC 8866) Summary: 5 errors (**), 0 flaws (~~), 8 warnings (==), 5 comments (--). Run idnits with the --verbose option for more detailed information about the items above. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 Audio/Video Transport Working Group 3 Internet Draft SPIRIT DSP 4 Intended status: Informational February 10, 2009 6 RTP Payload Format for SPIRIT IP-MR Speech Codec Software draft-ietf-avt-rtp-ipmr-01.txt 8 Status of this Memo 10 This Internet-Draft is submitted to IETF in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. 12 Copyright (c) 2009 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. 14 This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. 16 Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. 18 Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." 20 The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/1id-abstracts.html 22 The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html 24 This Internet-Draft will expire on August 10, 2009. 26 Abstract 28 This document specifies the payload format for packetization of SPIRIT IP-MR encoded speech signals into the Real-time Transport Protocol (RTP). The payload format supports transmission of multiple frames per payload, introduced redundancy for robustness against packet loss, and payload format extension for future versions compatibility. 30 Table of Contents 32 1. Introduction 2 33 2. IP-MR RTP Payload Formats 2 34 2.1. Standard Payload Format 3 35 2.1.1. Payload Format Structure 3 36 2.1.2. Payload Header 3 37 2.1.3. Speech Table of Contents 4 38 2.1.4. Speech Data 4 39 2.1.5. Redundancy Header 5 40 2.1.6. Redundancy Table of Contents 5 41 2.1.7. Redundancy Data 6 42 2.2. Payload Examples 6 43 2.2.1. Standard Payload Carrying a Single Frame 6 44 2.2.2. Standard Payload Carrying Multiple Frames with Redundancy 7 45 2.2.3. Extended Payload Carrying a Single Frame 8 46 3. Media Type Registration 8 47 3.1. Registration of MIME media type audio/ip-mr_v2.5 8 48 3.2. Mapping Media Type Parameters into SDP 9 49 4. Security Considerations 10 50 6. Normative References 10 51 Author's Addresses 10 52 Expiration date 10 53 Legal Terms 10 55 1. Introduction 56 This document specifies the payload format for packetization of SPIRIT IP-MR encoded speech signals into the Real-time Transport Protocol (RTP). The payload format supports transmission of multiple frames per payload, introduced redundancy for robustness against packet loss, and payload format extension for future versions compatibility. 58 2. IP-MR RTP Payload Formats 59 The payload has two formats: standard optimized for current use-cases and extended for future versions compatibility. The payload format is defined by first bit of header. Both of these formats will be described bellow. 61 2.1. Standard Payload Format 63 2.1.1. Payload Format Structure 65 The standard payload consists of a payload header with general information about packet, a speech table of contents (TOC), and speech data. An optional redundancy section follows after speech data. The redundancy section consists of redundancy header, redundancy TOC and redundancy data payload. 67 The following diagram shows the standard payload format layout: 68 +---------+--------+--------+- - - - - - +- - - - - - +- - - - - - + 69 | payload | speech | speech | redundancy | redundancy | redundancy | 70 | header | TOC | data | header | TOC | data | 71 +---------+--------+--------+- - - - - - +- - - - - - +- - - - - - + 72 2.1.2. Payload Header 74 The payload header has the following format: 75 0 1 76 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 77 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ 78 |T| CR | BR |D|A|GR |R| 79 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ 81 o T (1 bit): Reserved compatibility with future extensions. Should be set to 0. 83 o CR (3 bits): coding rate of frame(s) in this packet, as per the following table: 84 +-------+--------------+ 85 | CR | avg. bitrate | 86 +-------+--------------+ 87 | 0 | 7.7 kbps | 88 | 1 | 9.8 kbps | 89 | 2 | 14.3 kbps | 90 | 3 | 20.8 kbps | 91 | 4 | 27.9 kbps | 92 | 5 | 34.2 kbps | 93 | 6 | (reserved) | 94 | 7 | NO_DATA | 95 +-------+--------------+ 96 Table 1 Coding rates of IP-MR codec 98 The CR value 7 (NO_DATA) indicates that there is no speech data (and speech TOC accordingly) in the payload. This MAY be used to transmit redundancy data only. The value 6 is reserved. If receiving this value the packet SHOULD be discarded. 100 o BR (3 bits): base rate for core layer of frame(s) in this packet. Values in the range 0-5 indicate bitrates for core layer, same as for CR. Values 6 and 7 are reserved. If one of these values is received the packet SHOULD be discarded. The base rate is the lowest rate for scalability, so speech payload can be scaled down not lower than BR value. If a received packet has BR > CR then during decoding it will be assumed that BR = CR. 102 o D (1 bit): indicates if the DTX mode is allowed or not. 104 o A (1 bit): byte-aligned payload. If A=1 then all speech frames MUST be byte-aligned. This mode speeds up speech data access. The A=0 value specifies bandwidth-efficient mode with no byte alignment (including end of header). 106 o GR (2 bits): number of frames in packet (grouping size). Actual grouping size is GR + 1, thus maximum grouping supported is 4. If greater grouping size is required the extended payload format (sec. 2.2) MAY be used. 108 o R (1 bit): redundancy presence bit. If R=1 then the packet contains redundancy information for lost packets recovery. In this case after speech TOC redundancy flags and TOC sections are present. If R=0 then speech TOC is the last section of payload header. 110 2.1.3. Speech Table of Contents 112 The speech TOC contains entries for each frame in packet (grouping size in total). Each entry contains a single field: 114 0 115 +-+ 116 |E| 117 +-+ 119 o E (1 bit): frame existence indicator. If set to 0, this indicates the corresponding frame is absent and the receiver should set the teRxFrType to LOST_FRAME. This can be followed by the lost frame itself or by empty frames generated by the encoder during silence intervals in DTX mode. 121 Note that if CR field from coding flags is 7 (NO_DATA) then speech TOC is empty. 123 2.1.4. Speech Data 125 Speech data of a payload contains one or more speech frames or comfort noise frames, as specified in the speech TOC of the payload. 127 Each speech frame represents 20 ms of speech encoded with the rate indicated in the CR and base rate indicated in BR field of the payload header. The length of the speech frame is variable due to the nature of the codec and can be calculated after decoding or by using GetFrameInfo function detailed in [1]. 129 2.1.5. Redundancy Header 131 If a packet contains redundancy (R field of payload header is 1) the speech data is followed by redundancy header: 133 0 1 2 3 4 5 134 +-+-+-+-+-+-+ 135 | CL1 | CL2 | 136 +-+-+-+-+-+-+ 138 Redundancy header consists of two fields. Each field contains class specifier for redundancy partly taken from the preceding packet (CL1) and pre-preceding packet (CL2), e.g. distant from the current packet by 1 and 2 packets accordingly. The values are listed in the table below: 140 +-------+-------------------+ 141 | CL | amount redundancy | 142 +-------+-------------------+ 143 | 0 | NONE | 144 | 1 | CLASS A | 145 | 2 | CLASS B | 146 | 3 | CLASS C | 147 | 4 | CLASS D | 148 | 5 | CLASS E | 149 | 6 | CLASS F | 150 | 7 | (reserved) | 151 +-------+-------------------+ 153 Each specifier takes 3 bits, thus the total redundancy header size is 6 bits. In case of redundancy usage followed by preceding (or pre- preceding) packet loss the receiver sets the special flag for decoder with CL class specifier. 155 2.1.6. Redundancy Table of Contents 157 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ 158 | Pkt1 Entries| Pkt2 Entries| 159 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ 161 The redundancy TOC contains entries for redundancy frames from preceding and pre-preceding packets. Each entry takes 1 bit like speech TOC entry (2.1.3): 162 0 163 +-+ 164 |E| 165 +-+ 167 o E (1 bit): frame existence indicator. If set to 0, this indicates the corresponding frame is absent. 169 o For each preceding and pre-preceding packet the number of entries is equal to the grouping size of the current packet. E.g. maximum number of entries is 4*2 = 8. 171 o If class specifier in the redundancy header is CL=0 (NO_DATA) then there is no entries for corresponding packet redundancy. 173 2.1.7. Redundancy Data 175 Redundancy data of a payload contains redundancy information for one or more speech frames or comfort noise frames that may be lost during transition, as specified in the redundancy TOC of the payload. Actually redundancy is the most important part of preceding frames representing 20 ms of speech. The length of redundancy frame is variable and can be calculated after decoding or by using GetFrameInfo function detailed in [1]. 177 2.2. Payload Examples 179 2.2.1. Standard Payload Carrying a Single Frame 181 The following diagram shows a standard IP-MR payload carrying a 182 single speech frame without redundancy: 184 0 1 2 3 185 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 186 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ 187 |0|CR=1 |BR=0 |0|0|0 0|0|1|sp(0) | 188 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ 189 | | 190 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ 191 | | 192 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ 193 | | 194 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ 195 | | 196 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ 197 | | 198 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ 199 | sp(193)|P| 200 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ 202 In the payload the speech frame is not damaged at the IP origin (E=1), the coding rate is 9.7 kbps (CR=1), the base rate is 7.8 kbps (BR=0), and the DTX mode is off. There is no byte alignment (A=0) and no redundancy (R=0). The encoded speech bits - s(0) to s(193) - are placed immediately after TOC. Finally, one zero bit is added at the end as padding to make the payload byte aligned. 204 2.2.2. Standard Payload Carrying Multiple Frames with Redundancy 206 The following diagram shows a payload that contains three frames, one of them with no speech data. The coding rate is 7.7 kbps (CR=0), the base rate is 7.7 kbps (BR=0), and the DTX mode is on. The speech frames are byte aligned (A=1), so 1 zero bit is added at the end of the header. Besides the speech frames the payload contains six redundancy frames (three per each delayed packet). 208 The first speech frame consists of bits sp1(0) to sp1(92). After that 3 bits are added for byte alignment. The second frame does not contain any speech information that is represented in the payload by its TOC entry. The third frame consists of bits sp3(0) to sp3(171). 210 The redundancy header follows after speech data. The one-packet- delayed redundancy contains class A+B bits (CL1=2), and two-packet- delayed redundancy contains class A bits (Cl2=1). The one-packet- delayed redundancy contains three frames with 20, 39 and 35 bits respectively. The first frame of two-packet-delayed redundancy is absent, it is represented in its TOC entry, and two other frames have sizes 15 and 19 bits. 212 Note that all speech frames are padded with zero bits for byte alignment. 214 0 1 2 3 215 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 216 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ 217 |0|CR=2 |BR=1 |1|1|1 0|1|1 0 1|P|sp1(0) | 218 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ 219 | | 220 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ 221 | | 222 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ 223 | sp1(92)|P|P|P| 224 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ 225 |sp3(0) | 226 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ 227 | | 228 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ 229 | | 230 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ 231 | | 232 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ 233 | sp3(171)|P|P|P|P| 234 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ 235 |CL1=2|CL2=1|1 1 1|0 1 1|red1_1(0) red1_1(19)| 236 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ 237 |red1_2(0) 238 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ 239 | red1_2(38)|red1_3(0) | 240 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ 241 | red1_3(34)|red2_2(0) red2_2(14)|red2_3(0) | 242 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ 243 | red2_3(18)|P|P|P|P| 244 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ 246 2.2.3. Extended Payload Carrying a Single Frame 248 The following diagram shows an extended IP-MR payload carrying a single speech frame without redundancy: 250 0 1 2 3 251 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 252 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ 253 |1|CR=1 |BR=0 |0|0|0 0|0|1|P|P|P|0 1 1|0| header extension data | 254 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ 255 | |sp(0) | 256 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ 257 | | 258 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ 259 | | 260 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ 261 | | 262 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ 263 | | 264 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ 265 | | 266 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ 267 | sp(193)| optional payload extenson ... 268 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 270 The standard header is the same as in example 2.3.1 except for the first bit that is set to 1 to reflect extended payload type. The standard header is padded with zeros to achieve byte alignment. After that the size of header extension follows (HESZ=3). Then the header extension data is placed. In 3 bytes (HESZ) from header extension beginning, the standard speech payload starts. After that, the optional payload extension MAY be added. 272 3. Media Type Registration 274 This section describes the media types and names associated with this payload format. 276 3.1. Registration of MIME media type audio/ip-mr_v2.5 278 Type name: audio 280 Subtype name: ip-mr_v2.5 282 Required parameters: none 284 Optional parameters: 286 o ptime: Gives the length of time in milliseconds represented by the media in a packet. Allowed values are: 20, 40, 60 and 80. 288 Encoding considerations: 290 This media type is framed binary data (see RFC 4288, Section 4.8). 292 Security considerations: See RFC 3550 294 Applications that use this media type: 296 Audio and video streaming and conferencing tools. 298 Additional information: none 300 Intended usage: COMMON 302 Restrictions on usage: 304 This media type depends on RTP framing, and hence is only defined for transfer via RTP (RFC 3550). 306 3.2. Mapping Media Type Parameters into SDP 308 The information carried in the media type specification has a specific mapping to fields in the Session Description Protocol (SDP) [RFC4566], which is commonly used to describe RTP sessions. When SDP is used to specify sessions employing the IP-MR codec, the mapping is as follows: 310 * The media type ("audio") goes in SDP "m=" as the media name. 312 * The media subtype (payload format name) goes in SDP "a=rtpmap" as the encoding name. The RTP clock rate in "a=rtpmap" MUST 16000. 314 * The parameters "ptime" and "maxptime" go in the SDP "a=ptime" and "a=maxptime" attributes, respectively. 316 Any remaining parameters go in the SDP "a=fmtp" attribute by copying them directly from the media type parameter string as a semicolon- separated list of parameter=value pairs. 318 4. Security Considerations 320 RTP packets using the payload format defined in this specification are subject to the security considerations discussed in the RTP specification [RFC3550], and any appropriate RTP profile. This implies that confidentiality of the media streams is achieved by encryption. Encryption may be performed after compression so there is no conflict between the two operations. 322 This payload format does not exhibit any significant non-uniformity in the receiver side computational complexity for packet processing, and thus is unlikely to pose a denial-of-service threat due to the receipt of pathological data. 324 6. Normative References 326 [1] SPIRIT IP-MR v2.5 User Guide, website http://spiritdsp.com 327 [2] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. 328 [3] Schulzrinne, H., Casner, S., Frederick, R., and V. Jacobson, 329 "RTP: A Transport Protocol for Real-Time Applications", STD 64, RFC 3550, July 2003. 330 [4] Handley, M., Jacobson, V., and C. Perkins, "SDP: Session Description Protocol", RFC 4566, July 2006. 331 Author's Addresses 333 SPIRIT DSP 334 Russia 335 109004 B.Kommunisticheskaya st. 27 336 Tel: +7 495 661-2178 337 Fax: +7 495 912-6786 338 Email: Elena Berlizova berlizova@spiritdsp.com 340 Expiration date 342 This Internet-Draft will expire on August 09, 2009. 343 Legal Terms 344 All IETF Documents and the information contained therein are provided on an "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY, THE IETF TRUST AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION THEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. 346 The IETF Trust takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in any IETF Document or the extent to which any license under such rights might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has made any independent effort to identify any such rights. 348 Copies of Intellectual Property disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at http://www.ietf.org/ipr. 350 The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement any standard or specification contained in an IETF Document. Please address the information to the IETF at ietf-ipr@ietf.org. 352 The definitive version of an IETF Document is that published by, or under the auspices of, the IETF. Versions of IETF Documents that are published by third parties, including those that are translated into other languages, should not be considered to be definitive versions of IETF Documents. The definitive version of these Legal Provisions is that published by, or under the auspices of, the IETF. Versions of these Legal Provisions that are published by third parties, including those that are translated into other languages, should not be considered to be definitive versions of these Legal Provisions. 354 For the avoidance of doubt, each Contributor to the IETF Standards Process licenses each Contribution that he or she makes as part of the IETF Standards Process to the IETF Trust pursuant to the provisions of RFC 5378. No language to the contrary, or terms, conditions or rights that differ from or are inconsistent with the rights and licenses granted under RFC 5378, shall have any effect and shall be null and void, whether published or posted by such Contributor, or included with or in such Contribution.