idnits 2.17.1
draft-ietf-calsch-ical-03.txt:
-(1017): Line appears to be too long, but this could be caused by non-ascii characters in UTF-8 encoding
-(1024): Line appears to be too long, but this could be caused by non-ascii characters in UTF-8 encoding
-(1043): Line appears to be too long, but this could be caused by non-ascii characters in UTF-8 encoding
-(1057): Line appears to be too long, but this could be caused by non-ascii characters in UTF-8 encoding
-(1069): Line appears to be too long, but this could be caused by non-ascii characters in UTF-8 encoding
-(1073): Line appears to be too long, but this could be caused by non-ascii characters in UTF-8 encoding
-(1074): Line appears to be too long, but this could be caused by non-ascii characters in UTF-8 encoding
-(1075): Line appears to be too long, but this could be caused by non-ascii characters in UTF-8 encoding
-(1099): Line appears to be too long, but this could be caused by non-ascii characters in UTF-8 encoding
-(1107): Line appears to be too long, but this could be caused by non-ascii characters in UTF-8 encoding
-(1112): Line appears to be too long, but this could be caused by non-ascii characters in UTF-8 encoding
-(1117): Line appears to be too long, but this could be caused by non-ascii characters in UTF-8 encoding
-(1132): Line appears to be too long, but this could be caused by non-ascii characters in UTF-8 encoding
-(1139): Line appears to be too long, but this could be caused by non-ascii characters in UTF-8 encoding
-(1146): Line appears to be too long, but this could be caused by non-ascii characters in UTF-8 encoding
-(1151): Line appears to be too long, but this could be caused by non-ascii characters in UTF-8 encoding
-(2827): Line appears to be too long, but this could be caused by non-ascii characters in UTF-8 encoding
Checking boilerplate required by RFC 5378 and the IETF Trust (see
https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info):
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
** Looks like you're using RFC 2026 boilerplate. This must be updated to
follow RFC 3978/3979, as updated by RFC 4748.
Checking nits according to https://www.ietf.org/id-info/1id-guidelines.txt:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
** Missing expiration date. The document expiration date should appear on
the first and last page.
** The document seems to lack a 1id_guidelines paragraph about
Internet-Drafts being working documents.
** The document seems to lack a 1id_guidelines paragraph about 6 months
document validity -- however, there's a paragraph with a matching
beginning. Boilerplate error?
** The document seems to lack a 1id_guidelines paragraph about the list of
current Internet-Drafts.
** The document seems to lack a 1id_guidelines paragraph about the list of
Shadow Directories.
== There are 64 instances of lines with non-ascii characters in the
document.
== No 'Intended status' indicated for this document; assuming Proposed
Standard
== The page length should not exceed 58 lines per page, but there was 79
longer pages, the longest (page 21) being 79 lines
Checking nits according to https://www.ietf.org/id-info/checklist :
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
** The document seems to lack an IANA Considerations section. (See Section
2.2 of https://www.ietf.org/id-info/checklist for how to handle the case
when there are no actions for IANA.)
** The document seems to lack separate sections for Informative/Normative
References. All references will be assumed normative when checking for
downward references.
** There are 5 instances of too long lines in the document, the longest one
being 54 characters in excess of 72.
** The abstract seems to contain references ([ICMS], [RFC2048], [ITIP]),
which it shouldn't. Please replace those with straight textual mentions
of the documents in question.
Miscellaneous warnings:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
== The copyright year in the RFC 3978 Section 5.4 Copyright Line does not
match the current year
== Line 2225 has weird spacing: '...ld this meeti...'
== The document seems to lack the recommended RFC 2119 boilerplate, even if
it appears to use RFC 2119 keywords -- however, there's a paragraph with
a matching beginning. Boilerplate error?
(The document does seem to have the reference to RFC 2119 which the
ID-Checklist requires).
-- The document seems to lack a disclaimer for pre-RFC5378 work, but may
have content which was first submitted before 10 November 2008. If you
have contacted all the original authors and they are all willing to grant
the BCP78 rights to the IETF Trust, then this is fine, and you can ignore
this comment. If not, you may need to add the pre-RFC5378 disclaimer.
(See the Legal Provisions document at
https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info for more information.)
-- The document date (Mary 1998) is 9627 days in the past. Is this
intentional?
Checking references for intended status: Proposed Standard
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(See RFCs 3967 and 4897 for information about using normative references
to lower-maturity documents in RFCs)
== Missing Reference: 'RFC 2119' is mentioned on line 223, but not defined
== Missing Reference: 'ICAL' is mentioned on line 286, but not defined
== Missing Reference: 'IRIP' is mentioned on line 297, but not defined
== Missing Reference: 'MIME-DIR' is mentioned on line 2260, but not defined
== Unused Reference: 'ISO 9070' is defined on line 3864, but no explicit
reference was found in the text
== Unused Reference: 'RFC 1738' is defined on line 3882, but no explicit
reference was found in the text
== Unused Reference: 'RFC 1872' is defined on line 3888, but no explicit
reference was found in the text
== Unused Reference: 'RFC1983' is defined on line 3891, but no explicit
reference was found in the text
== Unused Reference: 'RFC 2045' is defined on line 3893, but no explicit
reference was found in the text
== Unused Reference: 'RFC 2047' is defined on line 3900, but no explicit
reference was found in the text
== Unused Reference: 'RFC2119' is defined on line 3908, but no explicit
reference was found in the text
== Unused Reference: 'VCARD' is defined on line 3915, but no explicit
reference was found in the text
== Unused Reference: 'XAPIA' is defined on line 3923, but no explicit
reference was found in the text
-- Possible downref: Non-RFC (?) normative reference: ref. 'ICMS'
-- Possible downref: Non-RFC (?) normative reference: ref. 'IMIP'
-- Possible downref: Non-RFC (?) normative reference: ref. 'ISO 8601'
-- Possible downref: Non-RFC (?) normative reference: ref. 'ISO 9070'
-- Possible downref: Non-RFC (?) normative reference: ref. 'ITIP'
-- Possible downref: Non-RFC (?) normative reference: ref. 'MIME DIR'
** Obsolete normative reference: RFC 822 (Obsoleted by RFC 2822)
** Obsolete normative reference: RFC 1738 (Obsoleted by RFC 4248, RFC 4266)
** Obsolete normative reference: RFC 1766 (Obsoleted by RFC 3066, RFC 3282)
** Obsolete normative reference: RFC 1872 (Obsoleted by RFC 2112)
** Downref: Normative reference to an Informational RFC: RFC 1983
** Obsolete normative reference: RFC 2048 (Obsoleted by RFC 4288, RFC 4289)
-- Possible downref: Non-RFC (?) normative reference: ref. 'UTF-8'
-- Possible downref: Non-RFC (?) normative reference: ref. 'VCARD'
-- Possible downref: Non-RFC (?) normative reference: ref. 'VCAL'
-- Possible downref: Non-RFC (?) normative reference: ref. 'XAPIA'
Summary: 16 errors (**), 0 flaws (~~), 19 warnings (==), 12 comments
(--).
Run idnits with the --verbose option for more detailed information about
the items above.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 Network Working Group Frank Dawson, Lotus
3 Internet Draft Derik Stenerson, Microsoft
4 Project XYZ Review Meeting will include the following
647 agenda items: