idnits 2.17.1 draft-ietf-xcon-common-data-model-06.txt: Checking boilerplate required by RFC 5378 and the IETF Trust (see https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info): ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ** It looks like you're using RFC 3978 boilerplate. You should update this to the boilerplate described in the IETF Trust License Policy document (see https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info), which is required now. -- Found old boilerplate from RFC 3978, Section 5.1 on line 19. -- Found old boilerplate from RFC 3978, Section 5.5, updated by RFC 4748 on line 3011. -- Found old boilerplate from RFC 3979, Section 5, paragraph 1 on line 3022. -- Found old boilerplate from RFC 3979, Section 5, paragraph 2 on line 3029. -- Found old boilerplate from RFC 3979, Section 5, paragraph 3 on line 3035. Checking nits according to https://www.ietf.org/id-info/1id-guidelines.txt: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- No issues found here. Checking nits according to https://www.ietf.org/id-info/checklist : ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- No issues found here. Miscellaneous warnings: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- == The copyright year in the IETF Trust Copyright Line does not match the current year -- The document seems to lack a disclaimer for pre-RFC5378 work, but may have content which was first submitted before 10 November 2008. If you have contacted all the original authors and they are all willing to grant the BCP78 rights to the IETF Trust, then this is fine, and you can ignore this comment. If not, you may need to add the pre-RFC5378 disclaimer. (See the Legal Provisions document at https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info for more information.) -- The document date (October 31, 2007) is 6015 days in the past. Is this intentional? -- Found something which looks like a code comment -- if you have code sections in the document, please surround them with '' and '' lines. Checking references for intended status: Proposed Standard ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- (See RFCs 3967 and 4897 for information about using normative references to lower-maturity documents in RFCs) ** Obsolete normative reference: RFC 2445 (ref. '3') (Obsoleted by RFC 5545) == Outdated reference: A later version (-11) exists of draft-ietf-xcon-framework-09 -- Obsolete informational reference (is this intentional?): RFC 4582 (ref. '5') (Obsoleted by RFC 8855) -- Obsolete informational reference (is this intentional?): RFC 3265 (ref. '6') (Obsoleted by RFC 6665) -- Obsolete informational reference (is this intentional?): RFC 4583 (ref. '12') (Obsoleted by RFC 8856) Summary: 2 errors (**), 0 flaws (~~), 2 warnings (==), 11 comments (--). Run idnits with the --verbose option for more detailed information about the items above. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 XCON O. Novo 3 Internet-Draft G. Camarillo 4 Intended status: Standards Track Ericsson 5 Expires: May 3, 2008 D. Morgan 6 Fidelity Investments 7 R. Even 8 Polycom 9 October 31, 2007 11 Conference Information Data Model for Centralized Conferencing (XCON) 12 draft-ietf-xcon-common-data-model-06.txt 14 Status of this Memo 16 By submitting this Internet-Draft, each author represents that any 17 applicable patent or other IPR claims of which he or she is aware 18 have been or will be disclosed, and any of which he or she becomes 19 aware will be disclosed, in accordance with Section 6 of BCP 79. 21 Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering 22 Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that 23 other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet- 24 Drafts. 26 Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months 27 and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any 28 time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference 29 material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." 31 The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at 32 http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt. 34 The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at 35 http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html. 37 This Internet-Draft will expire on May 3, 2008. 39 Copyright Notice 41 Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2007). 43 Abstract 45 This document defines an Extensible Markup Language (XML)-based 46 conference information data model for centralized conferencing 47 (XCON). A conference information data model is designed to convey 48 information about the conference and about participation in the 49 conference. The conference information data model defined in this 50 document constitutes an extension of the data format specified in the 51 Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Event Package for Conference State. 53 Table of Contents 55 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 56 2. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 57 3. Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 58 3.1. Data Model Format . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 59 3.2. Data Model Namespace . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 60 3.3. The Conference Object Identifier . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 61 3.4. Data Model Structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 62 4. Data Model Definition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 63 4.1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 64 4.2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 65 4.2.1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 66 4.2.2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 67 4.2.3. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 68 4.2.4. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 69 4.2.5. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 70 4.2.6. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 71 4.2.7. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 72 4.2.8. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 73 4.2.9. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 74 4.2.10. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 75 4.3. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 76 4.4. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 77 4.4.1. . . . . . . . . 18 78 4.4.2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 79 4.4.3. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 80 4.4.4. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 81 4.5. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 82 4.5.1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 83 4.5.2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 84 4.5.3. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 85 4.5.4. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 86 4.6. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 87 4.6.1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 88 4.6.2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 89 4.6.3. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 90 4.6.4. and Its Sub-elements . . . . . . . . . . 22 91 4.6.4.1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 92 4.6.4.2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 93 4.6.4.3. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 94 4.6.4.4. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 95 4.6.4.5. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 96 4.6.4.6. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 97 4.6.4.7. . . . . . . . . . 24 98 4.6.4.8. . . . . . . . . . 24 99 4.6.4.9. . . . . . . . . . 25 100 4.6.4.10. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 101 4.7. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 102 4.8. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 103 5. RELAX NG Schema . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 104 6. XML Schema Extensibility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 105 7. XML Example . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 106 8. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 107 8.1. Authentication . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 108 8.2. Confidentiality . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 109 8.3. Integrity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 110 9. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 111 9.1. Conference Relax NG Schema Registration . . . . . . . . . 42 112 9.2. Conference Namespace Registration . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 113 9.3. Conference Object Identifier Registration . . . . . . . . 42 114 9.4. Conference User Identifier Registration . . . . . . . . . 43 115 10. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 116 11. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 117 11.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 118 11.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 119 Appendix A. Appendix A. Non-Normative RELAX NG Schema in XML 120 Syntax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 121 Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63 122 Intellectual Property and Copyright Statements . . . . . . . . . . 65 124 1. Introduction 126 There is a core data set of conference information that is utilized 127 in any conference, independent of the specific conference media. 128 This core data set called the 'conference information data model' is 129 defined in this document using an Extensible Markup Language (XML)- 130 based. The conference information data model defined in this 131 document is logically represented by the conference object. 133 Conference objects are a fundamental concept in Centralized 134 Conferencing, as described in the Centralized Conferencing Framework 135 [4]. A conference object contains data that represents a conference 136 during each of its various stages (e.g., created/creation, reserved/ 137 reservation, active/activation, completed/completion). A conference 138 object can be manipulated using a conference control protocol at a 139 conference server. The conference object represents a particular 140 instantiation of a conference information data model. Consequently, 141 conference objects follow the XML format defined in this document. 143 A conference object contains the core information of a conference 144 (i.e., capabilities, membership, call control signaling, media, etc.) 145 and specifies who, and in which way that information can be 146 manipulated. 148 Figure 1 shows the logical functional elements of a conference server 149 as defined by the Centralized Conferencing Framework [4]. They are a 150 Conference Control Server, a Floor Control Server, a number of Foci, 151 and a Notification Service. A conference control protocol provides 152 the interface between a conference control client and the conference 153 control server. A floor control protocol (e.g., BFCP [5]) provides 154 the interface between a floor control client and the floor control 155 server. A call signaling protocol (e.g., SIP, H.323, Q.931, ISUP, 156 etc.) provides the interface between a call signaling client and a 157 Focus. A notification protocol (e.g., SIP-based event notifications 158 [6]) provides the interface between the conferencing client and the 159 Notification Service. Within a conference, the conference control 160 server, floor control server, and focus can modify the information in 161 the conference object. 163 ............................................................... 164 . Conferencing Server . 165 . +---------------------------------------------------+ . 166 . | C o n f e r e n c e o b j e c t | . 167 . +-+--------------------------------------------------+| . 168 . | C o n f e r e n c e o b j e c t || . 169 . +-+---------------------------------------------------+|| . 170 . | C o n f e r e n c e o b j e c t ||| . 171 . | +--------------------------------------------------+||| . 172 . | | Conference Information Data Model |||| . 173 . | | +----------------------------------------------+ |||| . 174 . | | | Conference description (times, duration) | |||| . 175 . | | +----------------------------------------------+ |||| . 176 . | | +----------------------------------------------+ |||| . 177 . | | | Host information | |||| . 178 . | | +----------------------------------------------+ |||| . 179 . | | +----------------------------------------------+ |||| . 180 . | | | Conference state | |||| . 181 . | | +----------------------------------------------+ |||| . 182 . | | +----------------------------------------------+ |||| . 183 . | | | Floor information | |||| . 184 . | | +----------------------------------------------+ |||| . 185 . | | +----------------------------------------------+ |||| . 186 . | | | Membership (users, capacity) | |||| . 187 . | | +----------------------------------------------+ |||| . 188 . | | +----------------------------------------------+ |||| . 189 . | | | Sidebars, Etc. | |||| . 190 . | | +----------------------------------------------+ |||| . 191 . | | +----------------------------------------------+ |||| . 192 . | | | Etc. | |||| . 193 . | | +----------------------------------------------+ |||+ . 194 . | +--------------------------------------------------+|+ . 195 . +----^------------------^-------------^--------|------+ . 196 . | | | | . 197 . +------v-------+ +--------v-----+ +-----v-+ +----v-------+ . 198 . | Conference | | Floor | | | | | . 199 . | Control | | Control | |Foci | |Notification| . 200 . | Server | | Server | | | |Service | . 201 . +-----^--------+ +---^----------+ +-^-----+ +------------+ . 202 ........|..............|..............|..........|............. 203 |Conference |Binary Floor |Call |Notification 204 |Control |Control |Signaling |Protocol 205 |Protocol |Protocol |Protocol | 206 ........v..............v..............v..........v............. 207 . C o n f e r e n c i n g C l i e n t . 208 ............................................................... 210 Figure 1: Conference Server Architecture 212 The Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Event Package for Conference 213 State, specified in RFC4575 [1], already defines a data format for 214 conferences. However, that model is SIP specific and lacks elements 215 related to some of the functionality defined by the Centralized 216 Conferencing Framework [4] (e.g., floor control). The data model 217 defined in this document constitutes a superset of the data format 218 defined in RFC4575 [1]. The result is a data format that supports 219 more call signaling protocols besides SIP and that covers all the 220 functionality defined in the Centralized Conferencing Framework [4]. 222 2. Terminology 224 The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", 225 "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this 226 document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [2]. 228 This document uses the terminology defined in the Centralized 229 Conferencing Framework [4], the SIPPING conferencing framework [7] 230 and the BFCP (Binary Floor Control Protocol) specification [5]. 231 Readers of this document should be familiar with the terminology used 232 in those documents. 234 3. Overview 236 The data model specified in this document is the result of extending 237 the data format defined in RFC4575 [1] with new elements. Examples 238 of such extensions include scheduling elements, media control 239 elements, floor control elements, non-SIP URIs, and addition of 240 localization extensions to text elements. This data model can be 241 used by conference servers providing different types of basic 242 conferences. It is expected that this data model can be further 243 extended with new elements in the future in order to implement 244 additional advanced features. 246 3.1. Data Model Format 248 A conference object document is an XML [8] document that MUST be well 249 formed and SHOULD be valid. Conference object documents MUST be 250 based on XML 1.0 and SHOULD be encoded using UTF-8. 252 3.2. Data Model Namespace 254 This specification defines a new namespace specification for 255 identifying the elements defined in the data model. This namespace 256 is as follows: 258 urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xcon-conference-info 260 3.3. The Conference Object Identifier 262 The conference object identifier (XCON-URI) can be viewed as a key to 263 accessing a specific conference object. It can be used, for 264 instance, by the conference control protocol to access, manipulate 265 and delete a conference object. A conference object identifier is 266 provided to the conferencing client by the conference notification 267 service or through out-of-band mechanisms (e.g. E-Mail). 269 A conferencing system may maintain a relationship between the 270 conference object identifiers and the identifiers associated with 271 each of the complementary centralized conferencing protocols (e.g., 272 call signaling protocols, BFCP, etc.). To facilitate the maintenance 273 of these relationships, the conference object identifier acts as a 274 top level identifier within the conferencing system for the purpose 275 of identifying the interfaces for these other protocols. This 276 implicit binding provides a structured mapping of the various 277 protocols with the associated conference object Identifier. Figure 2 278 illustrates the relationship between the identifiers used for the 279 protocols and the general conference object identifier (XCON-URI). 281 +--------------------------+ 282 | Conference | 283 | Object | 284 | Identifier | 285 +--------------------------+ 286 | xcon:Ji092i@example.com | 287 +------+-------------------+ 288 | 289 | 290 | 291 +-----------------+---------------+ 292 | | 293 +-----------+-----------+ +----------+---------+ 294 | CSP Conference IDs | |BFCP 'Conference ID'| 295 +-----------------------+ +--------------------+ 296 |h323:Ji092i@example.com| | Ji092i | 297 |tel:+44(0)2920930033 | +----------+---------+ 298 |sip:Ji092i@example.com | | 299 +-----------------------+ +-------|--------+ 300 | BFCP 'Floor ID'| 301 +----------------+ 302 | 543 | 303 | 09cnJk | 304 +----------------+ 306 Figure 2: Conference Object Mapping 308 In Figure 2, the conference object identifier acts as the top level 309 key in the identification process. The call signaling protocols have 310 an associated conference user identifier, often represented in the 311 form of URIs. The binary floor control protocol, as defined in [5], 312 defines the 'conference ID' identifier which represents a conference 313 instance within floor control. When created within the conferencing 314 system, the 'conference ID' has a 1:1 mapping to the unique 315 conference object Identifier(XCON-URI). Operations associated with 316 the conference control protocols are directly associated with the 317 conference object, thus the primary identifier associated with these 318 protocols is the conference object identifier(XCON-URI). The 319 mappings between additional protocols/interface is not strictly 1:1 320 and does allow for multiple occurrences. For example, multiple call 321 signaling protocols will each have a representation that is 322 implicitly linked to the top level conference object identifier e.g. 323 H323 and SIP URIs that represent a conference instance. It should be 324 noted that a conferencing system is free to structure such 325 relationships as required and this information is just included as a 326 guideline that can be used. 328 Further elements can be added to the tree representation in Figure 2 329 to enable a complete representation of a conference instance within a 330 conferencing system. 332 3.4. Data Model Structure 334 The information in this data model is structured in the following 335 manner. All the information related to a conference is contained in 336 a element. The element contains 337 the following child elements: 339 o The element describes the conference as a 340 whole. It has, for instance, information about the URI of the 341 conference, maximum users allowed in the conference, media 342 available in the conference, or the time the conference will 343 start. 344 o The element contains information about the entity 345 hosting the conference (e.g., its URI). 346 o The element informs the subscribers about the 347 changes in the overall conference information. 348 o The element contains information about the 349 status of the different floors in the conference. 350 o The element describes the membership information as a 351 whole. The element contains a set of child 352 elements, each describing a single participant in the conference. 354 o If a participant in the main conference joins a sidebar, a new 355 element is created in the conference referenced from the 356 element or under one of the 357 elements. 359 Note that some of the elements described above such , , , or are not defined in the data model but are defined in the data 362 format of RFC 4575 [1]. We describe them here because they are part 363 of the basic structure of the data model. 365 4. Data Model Definition 367 The following non-normative diagram shows the structure of conference 368 object documents. The operator "!" preceding an element indicates 369 that the element is mandatory in the data model. The operator "*" 370 following an element indicates that the element is introduced and 371 defined in this document. That is, elements without a "*" have 372 already been defined in RFC 4575 [1]. 374 ! 375 | 376 |--! 377 | |-- 378 | |-- 379 | |-- 380 | |-- 381 | |--* 382 | |--* 383 | | |--* 384 | | | |--* 385 | | | |--* 386 | | | |--* 387 | | | |--* 388 | | | |--* 389 | | | |--* 390 | | | |--* 391 | | | |--* 392 | | ... 393 | |-- 394 | | |-- 395 | | | |-- 396 | | | |-- 397 | | | |-- 398 | | ... 399 | |-- 400 | | |-- 401 | | | |-- 402 | | | |-- 403 | | | |-- 404 | | ... 405 | |-- 406 | | ... 407 | |-- 408 | | |--! 409 | | | |-- 410 | | | |-- 411 | | | |-- 412 | | | |--* 413 | | | |--* 414 | | | | |--* 415 | | | | |--* 416 | | | | ... 417 | | | |--* 418 | | | | |--* 419 | | | | |--* 420 | | | | ... 421 | | |-- 422 | | | |-- 423 | | | |-- 424 | | | |-- 425 | | | |--* 426 | | | |--* 427 | | | | |--* 428 | | | | |--* 429 | | | | ... 430 | | | |--* 431 | | | | |--* 432 | | | | |--* 433 | | | | ... 434 | | ... 435 | 436 |-- 437 | |-- 438 | |-- 439 | |-- 440 | | |-- 441 | | | |-- 442 | | | |-- 443 | ... 444 |-- 445 | |--* 446 | |-- 447 | |-- 448 | |-- 449 | 450 |--* 451 | |--* 452 | |--* 453 | |--* 454 | |--* 455 | | |--* 456 | | | |--!* 457 | | | |--!* 458 | | | |--* 459 | | | |--* 460 | | | ... 461 | | ... 462 | 463 |--! 464 | |--* 465 | |--* 466 | |--* 467 | | |--* 468 | | |-- ... 469 | | 470 | | 471 | |-- 472 | | |-- 473 | | |-- 474 | | |--* 475 | | |-- 476 | | | | 477 | | | ... 478 | | |-- 479 | | |-- 480 | | |--* 481 | | |--* 482 | | |--* 483 | | |--! 484 | | | |-- 485 | | | |-- 486 | | | |-- 487 | | | |-- 488 | | | |-- 489 | | | |-- 490 | | | |-- 491 | | | |-- 492 | | | | |-- 493 | | | | |-- 494 | | | | |--