idnits 2.17.1 draft-khartabil-simple-filter-format-01.txt: Checking boilerplate required by RFC 5378 and the IETF Trust (see https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info): ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ** Looks like you're using RFC 2026 boilerplate. This must be updated to follow RFC 3978/3979, as updated by RFC 4748. Checking nits according to https://www.ietf.org/id-info/1id-guidelines.txt: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- == No 'Intended status' indicated for this document; assuming Proposed Standard Checking nits according to https://www.ietf.org/id-info/checklist : ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ** The document seems to lack a Security Considerations section. ** The document seems to lack separate sections for Informative/Normative References. All references will be assumed normative when checking for downward references. ** There are 32 instances of too long lines in the document, the longest one being 51 characters in excess of 72. ** There are 110 instances of lines with control characters in the document. Miscellaneous warnings: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- == The copyright year in the RFC 3978 Section 5.4 Copyright Line does not match the current year == The document seems to lack the recommended RFC 2119 boilerplate, even if it appears to use RFC 2119 keywords. (The document does seem to have the reference to RFC 2119 which the ID-Checklist requires). -- The document seems to lack a disclaimer for pre-RFC5378 work, but may have content which was first submitted before 10 November 2008. If you have contacted all the original authors and they are all willing to grant the BCP78 rights to the IETF Trust, then this is fine, and you can ignore this comment. If not, you may need to add the pre-RFC5378 disclaimer. (See the Legal Provisions document at https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info for more information.) -- The document date (October 24, 2003) is 7489 days in the past. Is this intentional? -- Found something which looks like a code comment -- if you have code sections in the document, please surround them with '' and '' lines. Checking references for intended status: Proposed Standard ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- (See RFCs 3967 and 4897 for information about using normative references to lower-maturity documents in RFCs) == Outdated reference: A later version (-10) exists of draft-ietf-simple-rpid-00 == Outdated reference: A later version (-07) exists of draft-ietf-simple-cipid-00 ** Obsolete normative reference: RFC 3265 (ref. '6') (Obsoleted by RFC 6665) == Outdated reference: A later version (-07) exists of draft-ietf-simple-event-list-04 == Outdated reference: A later version (-03) exists of draft-ietf-simple-pres-filter-reqs-02 -- Possible downref: Normative reference to a draft: ref. '9' == Outdated reference: A later version (-01) exists of draft-ietf-simple-winfo-filter-reqs-00 -- Possible downref: Normative reference to a draft: ref. '10' == Outdated reference: A later version (-01) exists of draft-khartabil-simple-filter-funct-00 -- Possible downref: Normative reference to a draft: ref. '11' == Outdated reference: A later version (-05) exists of draft-mealling-iana-xmlns-registry-04 ** Obsolete normative reference: RFC 2141 (ref. '13') (Obsoleted by RFC 8141) ** Downref: Normative reference to an Informational RFC: RFC 2648 (ref. '14') ** Obsolete normative reference: RFC 3023 (ref. '15') (Obsoleted by RFC 7303) -- Possible downref: Non-RFC (?) normative reference: ref. '16' -- Possible downref: Non-RFC (?) normative reference: ref. '17' ** Obsolete normative reference: RFC 2234 (ref. '18') (Obsoleted by RFC 4234) Summary: 10 errors (**), 0 flaws (~~), 10 warnings (==), 8 comments (--). Run idnits with the --verbose option for more detailed information about the items above. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 SIMPLE H. Khartabil 3 Internet-Draft M. Lonnfors 4 Expires: April 23, 2004 J. Costa-Requena 5 E. Leppanen 6 Nokia 7 October 24, 2003 9 An Extensible Markup Language (XML) Based Format for Event 10 Notification Filtering 11 draft-khartabil-simple-filter-format-01 13 Status of this Memo 15 This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance with 16 all provisions of Section 10 of RFC2026. 18 Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering 19 Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that other 20 groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. 22 Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months 23 and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any 24 time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference 25 material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." 27 The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at http:// 28 www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt. 30 The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at 31 http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html. 33 This Internet-Draft will expire on April 23, 2004. 35 Copyright Notice 37 Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2003). All Rights Reserved. 39 Abstract 41 The SIP event notification framework describes the usage of the 42 Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) for subscriptions and notifications 43 of changes to a state of a resource. The document does not describe a 44 mechanism of how filtering of event notification information can be 45 achieved. 47 In order to enable this, a format is needed to enable the subscriber 48 to choose when notifications are to be sent to it and what they are 49 to contain. This document presents a solution in the form of an XML 50 document format. 52 Table of Contents 54 1. Conventions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 55 2. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 56 3. Structure of XML-Encoded Filter Criteria . . . . . . . . . 3 57 3.1 The Root Element . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 58 3.2 The Element . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 59 3.3 The Element . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 60 3.3.1 The Element . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 61 3.3.1.1 The "base-element" Attribute . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 62 3.3.2 The Element . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 63 3.3.2.1 The "type" Attribute . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 64 3.3.2.2 The "level" Attribute . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 65 3.3.3 The Element . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 66 3.4 The Element . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 67 3.4.1 The Element . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 68 3.4.1.1 The "changed-from" Attribute . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 69 3.4.1.2 The "changed-to" Attribute . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 70 3.4.1.3 The "changed-by" Attribute . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 71 3.4.1.4 Combination of Attributes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 72 3.4.2 The Element . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 73 3.4.3 The Element . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 74 4. Syntax for Referencing XML Items and Making Logical 75 Expressions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 76 5. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 77 6. Examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 78 6.1 Filter Criteria Using Element . . . . . . . . . . . 11 79 6.2 Filter Criteria Using Element . . . . . . . . . 12 80 6.3 Filter Criteria Using and Elements . . . 12 81 6.4 Content Filter Using Namespaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 82 6.5 Content Filter Using Only Elements . . . . . . . 13 83 6.6 Two Content Filters as Filter Criteria . . . . . . . . . . 14 84 7. XML Schema for Filter Criteria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 85 8. Security Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 86 9. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 87 10. Changes from version 00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 88 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 89 Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 90 Intellectual Property and Copyright Statements . . . . . . 21 92 1. Conventions 94 In this document, the key words 'MUST', 'MUST NOT', 'REQUIRED', 95 'SHALL', 'SHALL NOT', 'SHOULD', 'SHOULD NOT', 'RECOMMENDED', 'MAY', 96 and 'OPTIONAL' are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [1] 97 and indicate requirement levels for compliant implementations. 99 2. Introduction 101 Filtering is a mechanism for defining the preferred content to be 102 delivered and for specifying the rules for when the content should be 103 delivered. See requirements in [9] and [10]. 105 The filtering mechanism is expected to be particularly valuable to 106 users of mobile wireless access devices. The characteristics of the 107 devices typically include high latency, low bandwidth, low data 108 processing capabilities, small display, and limited battery power. 109 Such devices can benefit from the ability to filter the amount of 110 information generated at the source of the event notification. 112 The SIP event notification framework [6] describes the usage of the 113 Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) for subscriptions and notifications 114 of changes to a state of a resource. The document does not describe a 115 mechanism of how filtering of event notification information can be 116 achieved. 118 The structure of the filter criteria is described using the XML 119 Schema. The filter criteria is presented as an XML document. The XML 120 document contains the user's preference when notifications are to be 121 sent to it and what they are to contain. The scope of the "when" part 122 is triggering. 124 The triggering is defined as enabling a subscriber to specify 125 triggering rules for notifications where the criteria are based on 126 changes of the package specific state information, e.g., for the 127 presence information document [5] the change in the value of the 128 element. 130 The functionality of the filtering regarding the SIP event 131 notifications is specified in [11]. 133 3. Structure of XML-Encoded Filter Criteria 135 The filter criteria is an XML document [16] that MUST be well-formed 136 and MUST be valid. The filter criteria XML documents MUST have the 137 XML declaration and it SHOULD contain an encoding declaration in the 138 XML declaration, for example; "". This specification makes use of XML namespaces 140 for identifying the XML schema of the filter criteria instance 141 documents and document fragments. 143 The namespace identifier for elements defined by this specification 144 is a URN [13], using the namespace identifier 'ietf' defined by [14] 145 and extended by [12]. This urn is: 146 urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:simple-filter+xml. 148 This namespace declaration indicates the namespace on which the 149 filter criteria are based on. 151 3.1 The Root Element 153 The root element of the filter criteria is . 155 The element MUST contain the namespace definition 156 mentioned above. With the optional "package" attribute it is possible 157 to define the package to which the filter criteria is applied. This 158 might be especially useful in cases where the XML document containing 159 the filter criteria is separated from the events that makes use of it 160 or from the protocol that usually carries it. 162 The element MUST contain one or more elements. 164 3.2 The Element 166 The element is used to specify the content of an individual 167 filter. 169 The MUST have an 'id' attribute. The value of the 'id' 170 attribute MUST be unique within the element. The 171 MAY have an 'uri' attribute. The value of the 'uri' 172 attribute is the URI of the resource which information is requested 173 for. 175 The URI of the resource is useful in cases where the 'eventlist' 176 extension [7] is used with a package and different filters are 177 defined for one or more members of the list. The 'uri' attribute in 178 the element identifies either the URI of the list (or nested 179 sub-list) or the URI of an individual member within the list to whom 180 that specific filter applies. If the does not contain the 181 'uri' attribute, the filter applies to all the members in the list 182 unless a member of the list has its own filter attributed by the 183 'uri' attribute. 185 The MAY have a 'remove' attribute which indicates together 186 with the 'id' attribute the existing filter to be removed. The value 187 of the 'remove' attribute is of the type "Boolean". The default value 188 is 'false'. 190 The element MAY contain a element and MAY contain one 191 or more elements, but MUST contain either the 192 element or the element. 194 3.3 The Element 196 The element is used to specify the content to be delivered to 197 the user. It does not specify the exact content but the rules that 198 are used to construct that information. 200 The element MAY contain a element, one or more 201 elements and one or more elements. However, the 202 element MUST contain at least one element. 204 3.3.1 The Element 206 The element is used to select "base elements" using 207 values of XML elements or XML attributes related to the base 208 elements. The base element is defined by a mandatory XML attribute 209 ("base-element"). The value of the element consists of 210 comparison and logical expressions that has a Boolean outcome. The 211 syntax for the expressions is defined in Section 4 (see the 212 definition of the "expression"). The base element is selected if the 213 expression is positive. 215 The following example selects the tuples that have a element 216 of the value 'open': 218 status/basic="open". 220 A couple of example expressions are listed below: 222 o Comparison expressions using XML elements: 224 * /status/basic="open" 226 * */basic="open" 228 o Comparison expressions using XML attributes: 230 * @duration-subscribed<500 232 * @event="rejected" 234 o Logical expressions using values of two XML elements: 236 * status/basic="open" and type="device". 238 3.3.1.1 The "base-element" Attribute 240 The "base-element" attribute defines the base element selected by the 241 expression. The "base-element" attribute is used to identify the 242 element itself or an ancestor element of the XML element or attribute 243 that used in the expression. The syntax of the value of the 244 "base-element" is defined in Section 4 (see the definition of the 245 "reference"). 247 Examples of values of the "base-element" attribute are listed as 248 follows: 250 o //tuple 252 o /presence/tuple 254 o //* 256 o /*/tuple. 258 3.3.2 The Element 260 The element is used to select the content to be delivered. 261 The value of the element depends on the "type" attribute. 262 The value is allowed to be a reference to an XML element or 263 attribute, a namespace or another value related to the "type" 264 attribute. Another XML attribute in the is "level". The 265 optional "level" attribute is used to select elements related to the 266 element identified in the body of the element. 268 Note that in addition to the content defined using the 269 elements also other mandatory XML items may become selected to make 270 the resulting XML document valid. 272 The following example selects descendants of the element. 273 Thus, it selects the element according to [2]. 275 //tuple/status. 278 If both the and the elements are defined in a 279 content filter, the value of the element relates to the 280 base element in such a way that the value of the element 281 MUST be either the defined base element or one of the lower level 282 ("child") elements of the base element. 284 3.3.2.1 The "type" Attribute 286 The "type" attribute is used to describe the value of the 287 element. The following values are pre-defined: 'xml-element', 288 'namespace' and 'token'. Other values of the "type" attribute may be 289 defined later. The "type" attribute is optional, and, if omitted, the 290 default value is 'xml-element'. 292 The 'xml-element' is used when the element contains a 293 reference of an XML element or attribute. Section 4 defines the 294 syntax for the reference (see the definitions of the "reference" for 295 referencing the XML elements and "attr-reference" for referencing the 296 XML attributes). 298 Example references are listed as follows: 300 o Referencing XML elements giving the full hierarchical path: / 301 presence/tuple/status/basic 303 o Referencing XML elements from any level by its name: //basic 305 o Referencing XML attributes of an XML element: //watcher/ 306 @duration-subscribed 308 o Referencing XML attributes of any element: //@expiration. 310 The "namespace" value is used when the element contains a 311 value of a namespace. The value is the URI of the namespace. 313 The "token" is used to define the content by a value referring to a 314 certain pre-defined set of elements (e.g., elements which are 315 semantically close to each other) supported by a entity intepreting 316 the filter. 318 Example: location. 320 3.3.2.2 The "level" Attribute 322 The "level" attribute is used to select the related elements of the 323 element identified in the element, along with the 324 identified element itself. The following values are pre-defined: 325 'self', 'ancestor' and 'descendant'. If the attribute is omitted the 326 default value is 'self'. 328 Note that only the 'self' value makes sense to the include 329 definitions of the types 'namespace' and 'token'. 331 The 'self' value indicates the selection of the given XML element. 332 The 'ancestor' value indicates the selection of the parent elements 333 of the given XML element. The 'descendant' value indicates the 334 selection of the sub-tree ("child elements") of the given XML 335 element. The Section 4 defines the syntax for referencing the XML 336 element. 338 3.3.3 The Element 340 The element is used to define exceptions to the set of XML 341 elements and/or attributes selected by the elements. Thus, 342 those XML elements (including their lower level "child" elements) 343 and/or attributes defined by the element are not delivered. 344 The element has the optional "type" attribute (see the 345 definition of the "type" in Section 3.3.2.1). 347 The element can be used only if one or more 348 element(s) have been included in the same content filter. 350 3.4 The Element 352 The element is used to identify the package specific 353 changes that a resource has to encounter before the content is 354 delivered to the subscriber. It can appear more than once in a filter 355 document. Multiple appearances of this element denotes the "OR" 356 operation. This means that updates to a resource that satisfy any of 357 the elements criteria constitute the content to be 358 delivered. 360 The element MAY contain the element, the 361 element or the , but MUST contain at least one of the three 362 elements. Any combination of the 3 elements is possible. Multiple 363 appearances of those element within a element denotes the 364 "AND" operation. This means that updates to a resource that satisfy 365 ALL of the , and elements' criteria within 366 the element constitute the content to be delivered. 368 3.4.1 The Element 370 The element is used to identify the XML element or 371 attribute, from the package specific XML document, that must change, 372 compared to the previous XML document, in order to activate the 373 trigger and cause the content to be delivered. The XML element or 374 attribute is indicated using the syntax defined in Section 4 for the 375 "reference" and "attr-reference". The indication MUST only point to 376 one XML element or attribute. 378 The element MAY contain the "changed-from" attribute, 379 "changed-to" attribute, "changed-by" attribute, or any combination of 380 the three. 382 3.4.1.1 The "changed-from" Attribute 384 A trigger is active when the XML element or attribute identified with 385 the element has changed from the value indicated by this 386 attribute to a different value. 388 3.4.1.2 The "changed-to" Attribute 390 A trigger is active when the XML element or attribute identified with 391 the element has changed to the value indicated by this 392 attribute from a different value. 394 3.4.1.3 The "changed-by" Attribute 396 A trigger is active when the XML element or attribute identified with 397 the element has changed by the value indicated by this 398 attribute from a different value. 400 3.4.1.4 Combination of Attributes 402 Any combination of the "changed-from", "changed-to", and "changed-by" 403 attributes in the element is possible. For example, if the 404 "changed-from" attribute was combined with the "changed-to" attribute 405 it is interpreted as: the trigger is active when the XML element or 406 attribute identified with the element has changed from the 407 "changed-from" value to the "changed-to" value. Note that if the 408 "changed-by" attribute is used in combination with the other 409 attributes, the other attribute types MUST match the "changed-by" 410 type of decimal. 412 3.4.2 The Element 414 The element is used to trigger the content delivery when the 415 XML element or attribute, identified in it, has been added to the new 416 XML document in comparison to the previous XML document. It can be 417 used, for example, to learn of new services and/or capabilities 418 subscribed to by the user, or services and/or capabilities that the 419 user has now allowed the subscriber to see. The XML element or 420 attribute is indicated using the syntax defined in Section 4 for the 421 "reference" and "attr-reference". 423 Note that if a filter includes both the content filter () part 424 and the element then the definitions of the part 425 SHOULD cover also the added elements, or otherwise the content is 426 delivered without the items defined in the element. 428 3.4.3 The Element 430 The element is used to trigger the content to be delivered 431 when the XML element or attribute, identified in it, has been removed 432 from the new XML document in comparison to the previous XML document. 433 The XML element or attribute is indicated using the syntax defined in 434 Section 4 for the "reference" and "attr-reference". 436 4. Syntax for Referencing XML Items and Making Logical Expressions 438 The ABNF [18] is used to describe the syntax for the references and 439 expressions. The syntax is defined to be XPATH [17] compatible, but 440 has only a restricted set of capabilities of the XPATH. More 441 information about the meaning of the items of the syntax can be found 442 in [17]. The "abbreviated syntax" of the "node test" is used in the 443 references ("reference" and "attr-reference"). The expression in the 444 syntax relates to the predicate, comparision and logical expressions 445 of the XPATH. The square brackets of predicate expression are left 446 out. 448 expression = (elem-expr / attr-expr) 1*[oper (elem-expr / attr-expr)] 449 elem-expr = (elem-path / ".") compar value 450 elem-path = (element / "*") 1*["/" / "*" / element] ["*" / element] 451 attr-expr = [elem-path "/"] attribute compar value 453 reference = "/" 1*("/" / "/*" / ("/" element)) 454 attr-reference = reference attribute 456 oper = "and" / "or" 457 compar = "=" / "<" / ">" 458 element = [ns] string 459 attribute = "@" [ns] string 460 ns = string ":" 461 string = 462 value = 464 5. IANA Considerations 466 A new content type "application/simple-filter+xml" is defined to 467 represent an XML MIME for the filter criteria. 469 This specification follows the guidelines of RFC3023 [15] 471 OPEN ISSUE: IANA registration template must be added later. 473 6. Examples 475 The XML Schema for the XML document examples is specified in the 476 Section 7. 478 6.1 Filter Criteria Using Element 480 This example shows two ways for defining a content filter where the 481 whole content and upper level elements of the tuples of the presence 482 information are selected based on a condition defined by a logical 483 expression. The condition is: select elements that have a 484 value "MMS", "SMS" or "IM". 486 The element is defined in [3] as extension to PIDF [2]. The 487 first filter definition includes optional elements while the second 488 filter definition shows only the minimum set of definitions. 490 The first filter definition: 492 493 496 497 498 rpid:class="IM" or rpid:class="SMS" or rpid:class="MMS" 499 500 //tuple 501 //tuple 502 //tuple 503 504 505 507 Another alternative definition is presented below. Note that one of 508 the elements is omitted which means that it is assumed that 509 the data format (PIDF [2]) mandates, e.g., the upper level elements 510 of the selected tuples to be delivered. 512 513 515 516 class="IM" or class="SMS" or class="MMS" 517 //tuple 518 //tuple 519 520 521 523 6.2 Filter Criteria Using Element 525 This filter criteria selects the content to be delivered to the 526 subscriber when a certain PIDF [2] tuple changes its status 527 from 'CLOSED' to 'OPEN'. 529 530 531 532 533 /presence/tuple/status/basic 534 535 536 538 6.3 Filter Criteria Using and Elements 540 This filter criteria selects watcher information notifications [8] to 541 be sent when the pending subscription status has changed from 542 "pending" to "terminated". In the notification, only the watchers 543 that have a status of "terminated" and an event of "rejected" are 544 included. 546 547 549 550 551 552 @status="terminated" and @event="rejected" 553 554 //watcher 555 //watcher 556 557 558 //watcher/@status 559 560 561 563 6.4 Content Filter Using Namespaces 565 This filter criteria selects XML elements belonging to certain 566 namespaces. 568 569 571 572 573 urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:cpim-pidf 574 575 576 577 579 6.5 Content Filter Using Only Elements 581 This filter criteria selects certain XML elements. 583 584 586 587 588 //status 589 //icon 590 /presence/tuple/note 591 //vcard 592 593 594 596 6.6 Two Content Filters as Filter Criteria 598 This filter criteria defines two content filters: the first one to be 599 used for a list of "buddies" and the second one to get more 600 information about one of the friends. The PIDF extension elements 601 defined in [4] are filtered out. 603 604 608 609 610 rpid:type="service" or rpid:type="device" 611 612 //contact 613 //status 614 //status 615 //status 616 617 619 620 621 rpid:type="service" or rpid:type="device" 622 623 //tuple 624 //tuple 625 //tuple 626 urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:cipid 627 628 629 631 7. XML Schema for Filter Criteria 633 XML Schema Implementation (Normative) 635 637 640 643 644 645 XML Schema Definition for Filter Criteria. 646 647 649 651 652 653 655 656 657 659 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 669 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 707 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 751 753 8. Security Requirements 755 The filters in the body in a SIP message has a significant effect on 756 the ways in which the request is handled at a server. As a result, it 757 is especially important that messages containing this extension be 758 authenticated and authorised. 760 Processing of requests and looking up filter criteria requires a set 761 of operations and searches, which can require some amount of 762 computation. This enables a DoS attack whereby a user can send 763 requests with substantial number of messages with large contents, in 764 the hopes of overloading the server. To counter this, the server 765 SHOULD only allow filters with no more than about 20 occurances of 766 the , , and elements. 768 Requests can reveal sensitive information about a UA's capabilities. 769 If this information is sensitive, it SHOULD be encrypted using SIP S/ 770 MIME capabilities. 772 All filtering related security measures discussed in [6] MUST be 773 followed along with package specific security. 775 9. Acknowledgements 777 The authors would like to thank Jonathan Rosenberg, Henning 778 Schulzrinne, Tim Moran, Jari Urpalainen, Sreenivas Addagatla and all 779 the active SIMPLE mailing list contributors for their valuable input. 781 10. Changes from version 00 783 o Usage of exact XPATH support restricted (XPATH compatible syntax 784 still used). 786 o New solution for the content filter. Examples and XML Schema 787 updated accordingly. 789 o ABNF based syntax for data referencing and expressions added. 791 o More examples added. 793 o Terminology harmonized and references updated. 795 o Minor updates concerning the triggering part. 797 References 799 [1] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement 800 Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. 802 [2] Sugano, H., "CPIM Presence Information Data Format", 803 draft-ietf-impp-cpim-pidf-08.txt (work in progress), May 2003. 805 [3] Schulzrinne, H., "RPID -- Rich Presence Information Data 806 Format", draft-ietf-simple-rpid-00.txt (work in progress), 807 July 2003. 809 [4] Schulzrinne, H., "CIPID: Contact Information in Presence 810 Information Data Format", draft-ietf-simple-cipid-00.txt (work 811 in progress), August 2003. 813 [5] Rosenberg, J., "Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Extensions 814 for Presence", draft-ietf-simple-presence-10.txt, January 815 2003. 817 [6] Roach, A., "Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)-Specific Event 818 Notification", RFC 3265, June 2002. 820 [7] Roach, A., "A Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Event 821 Notification Extension for Resource Lists", 822 draft-ietf-simple-event-list-04.txt, June 2003. 824 [8] Rosenberg, J., "An Extensible Markup Language (XML) Based 825 Format for Watcher Information", 826 draft-ietf-simple-winfo-format-04.txt, January 2003. 828 [9] Khartabil, H., "Requirements for Presence Specific Event 829 Notification Filtering", 830 draft-ietf-simple-pres-filter-reqs-02.txt (work in progress), 831 August 2003. 833 [10] Kiss, K., "Requirements for Filtering of Watcher Information", 834 draft-ietf-simple-winfo-filter-reqs-00.txt (work in progress), 835 April 2003. 837 [11] Khartabil, H., "Functional Description of Event Notification 838 Filtering", draft-khartabil-simple-filter-funct-00.txt (work 839 in progress), May 2003. 841 [12] Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", 842 draft-mealling-iana-xmlns-registry-04.txt, June 2002. 844 [13] Moats, R., "The URN Syntax", RFC 2141, May 1997. 846 [14] Moats, R., "The URN Namespace for IETF Documents", RFC 2648, 847 August 1999. 849 [15] Murata, M., "XML Media Types", RFC 3023, March 1997. 851 [16] Bray, T., "Exensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (Second 852 Edition)", W3C CR CR-xml11-20011006, October 2000. 854 [17] Clark, J., "XML Path Language (XPath) Version 1.0", W3C REC 855 REC-xpath-19991116, November 1999. 857 [18] Crocker, D., "Augmented BNF for Syntax Specifications: ABNF", 858 RFC 2234, November 1997. 860 Authors' Addresses 862 Hisham Khartabil 863 Nokia 864 P.O. Box 321 865 Helsinki 866 Finland 868 Phone: +358 7180 76161 869 EMail: hisham.khartabil@nokia.com 871 Mikko Lonnfors 872 Nokia 873 Itamerenkatu 00180 874 Helsinki 875 Finland 877 Phone: + 358 50 4836402 878 EMail: mikko.lonnfors@nokia.com 880 Jose Costa-Requena 881 Nokia 882 P.O. Box 321 883 FIN-00045 NOKIA GROUP 884 FINLAND 886 Phone: +358 71800 8000 887 EMail: jose.costa-requena@nokia.com 889 Eva Leppanen 890 Nokia 891 P.O BOX 785 892 Tampere 893 Finland 895 Phone: +358 7180 77066 896 EMail: eva-maria.leppanen@nokia.com 898 Intellectual Property Statement 900 The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any 901 intellectual property or other rights that might be claimed to 902 pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in 903 this document or the extent to which any license under such rights 904 might or might not be available; neither does it represent that it 905 has made any effort to identify any such rights. Information on the 906 IETF's procedures with respect to rights in standards-track and 907 standards-related documentation can be found in BCP-11. Copies of 908 claims of rights made available for publication and any assurances of 909 licenses to be made available, or the result of an attempt made to 910 obtain a general license or permission for the use of such 911 proprietary rights by implementors or users of this specification can 912 be obtained from the IETF Secretariat. 914 The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any 915 copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary 916 rights which may cover technology that may be required to practice 917 this standard. Please address the information to the IETF Executive 918 Director. 920 Full Copyright Statement 922 Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2003). All Rights Reserved. 924 This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to 925 others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it 926 or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published 927 and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any 928 kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are 929 included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this 930 document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing 931 the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other 932 Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of 933 developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for 934 copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be 935 followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than 936 English. 938 The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be 939 revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assignees. 941 This document and the information contained herein is provided on an 942 "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING 943 TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING 944 BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION 945 HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF 946 MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. 948 Acknowledgement 950 Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the 951 Internet Society.