idnits 2.17.1 

draft-les-white-intersectional-dots-00.txt:

  Checking boilerplate required by RFC 5378 and the IETF Trust (see
  https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info):
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

  ** Cannot find the required boilerplate sections (Copyright, IPR, etc.) in
     this document.

     Expected boilerplate is as follows today (2024-04-26) according to
     https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info :

     IETF Trust Legal Provisions of 28-dec-2009, Section 6.a:
        This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions
        of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

     IETF Trust Legal Provisions of 28-dec-2009, Section 6.b(i), paragraph 2:
        Copyright (c) 2024 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document
        authors.  All rights reserved.

     IETF Trust Legal Provisions of 28-dec-2009, Section 6.b(i), paragraph 3:
        This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions
        Relating to IETF Documents
        (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
        publication of this document.  Please review these documents
        carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with
        respect to this document.  Code Components extracted from this
        document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in
        Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided
        without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.


  Checking nits according to https://www.ietf.org/id-info/1id-guidelines.txt:
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

  ** Missing document type: Expected "INTERNET-DRAFT" in the upper left hand
     corner of the first page

  ** Missing expiration date.  The document expiration date should appear on
     the first and last page.

  ** The document seems to lack a 1id_guidelines paragraph about
     Internet-Drafts being working documents. 

  ** The document seems to lack a 1id_guidelines paragraph about 6 months
     document validity. 

  ** The document seems to lack a 1id_guidelines paragraph about the list of
     current Internet-Drafts. 

  ** The document seems to lack a 1id_guidelines paragraph about the list of
     Shadow Directories. 

  ** Expected the document's filename to be given on the first page, but
     didn't find any

  == No 'Intended status' indicated for this document; assuming Proposed
     Standard


  Checking nits according to https://www.ietf.org/id-info/checklist :
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

  ** The document seems to lack an Abstract section.

  ** The document seems to lack an Introduction section.

  ** The document seems to lack a Security Considerations section.

  ** The document seems to lack an IANA Considerations section.  (See Section
     2.2 of https://www.ietf.org/id-info/checklist for how to handle the case
     when there are no actions for IANA.)

  ** The document seems to lack an Authors' Addresses Section.

  ** There are 7 instances of too long lines in the document, the longest one
     being 7 characters in excess of 72.


  Miscellaneous warnings:
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

  == Couldn't figure out when the document was first submitted -- there may
     comments or warnings related to the use of a disclaimer for pre-RFC5378
     work that could not be issued because of this.  Please check the Legal
     Provisions document at https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info to determine
     if you need the pre-RFC5378 disclaimer.

  -- Couldn't find a document date in the document -- date freshness check
     skipped.


  Checking references for intended status: Proposed Standard
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

     (See RFCs 3967 and 4897 for information about using normative references
     to lower-maturity documents in RFCs)

  -- Missing reference section? '1' on line 14 looks like a reference

  -- Missing reference section? '2' on line 15 looks like a reference


     Summary: 14 errors (**), 0 flaws (~~), 2 warnings (==), 3 comments (--).

     Run idnits with the --verbose option for more detailed information about
     the items above.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1	The Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) prides itself on its open
2	philosophy, where anyone can submit a proposal or comment on work in progress,
3	regardless of financial resources, industry credentials, race, gender, sexual
4	orientation, or national origin, without any review by the organization.
5	Regrettably, sometimes individuals abuse that openness by submitting texts that
6	are disrespectful of others, in violation of the IETF Code of Conduct [1] and
7	anti-harassment policy [2].

9	On 1 April 2021, there were two examples of anonymous proposals that were both
10	racist and deeply disrespectful, thus violating policy. The Internet
11	Engineering Steering Group (IESG) has accordingly removed these documents from
12	the IETF website.

14	[1] https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7154.html
15	[2] https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/anti-harassment-policy/