Re: [decade] Reviews of the Decade Survey draft

"Strandberg, Ove (NSN - FI/Espoo)" <ove.strandberg@nsn.com> Wed, 12 January 2011 12:02 UTC

Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CBB250.D8B9C895"
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 14:04:16 +0200
Message-ID: <AC126D9A37B1EF4DAE0A39C02E94E64703AC1AF5@FIESEXC015.nsn-intra.net>
In-Reply-To: <1CA25301D2219F40B3AA37201F0EACD1063FAD@PACDCEXMB05.cable.comcast.com>
Thread-Topic: [decade] Reviews of the Decade Survey draft
Thread-Index: AcuclJdof7II0b1bR9GixOWzuqDcEAQnUi7gAUbpC0A=
References: <1CA25301D2219F40B3AA37201F0EACD104CB25@PACDCEXMB05.cable.comcast.com> <1CA25301D2219F40B3AA37201F0EACD1063FAD@PACDCEXMB05.cable.comcast.com>
From: "Strandberg, Ove (NSN - FI/Espoo)" <ove.strandberg@nsn.com>
To: "ext Woundy, Richard" <Richard_Woundy@cable.comcast.com>, decade@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [decade] Reviews of the Decade Survey draft
Precedence: list

Hi Decaders,

 

I would like to add additional review of the survey document with this
email. Thanks for a good survey document! Further the previous reviews
have been very good and my additions are few. 

 

Generally in section Discovery Mechanism there could be a mention that
DNS is ultimately used as way to configure data access. This is could be
stated for instance when the section describes the use of host name,
here the addition of DNS is easy. However, not all systems use DNS and
an explicit way to make this clear would be beneficial. 

 

I am unsure of the right "protocol" for authorship, in Acknowledgement
section is a bunch of names that more or less has text directly in the
survey document. Should these names be included as authors? My
perception has been that Acknowledgement is used for other purposes.

 

Nits:

 

4.7, para 3, line 3: "ued" should be "used"

4.7.2, line 3: "ID make" should be "ID to make"

 

Regarding the review comment of user-controlled / network-controlled,
the concern might be better to address in other documents like design
documents etc..

 

Br,

 

+Ove

 

From: decade-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:decade-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
Of ext Woundy, Richard
Sent: 06 January, 2011 01:47
To: 'decade@ietf.org'
Subject: Re: [decade] Reviews of the Decade Survey draft

 

I would like to express my thanks to the reviewers of the survey draft!

 

David Bryan

http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/decade/current/msg00342.html

Yunfei Zhang

http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/decade/current/msg00340.html

 

I would like to see at least one more review posted to the mailing list,
before the authors incorporate this feedback into the next draft.

 

I check this draft with idnits
(http://tools.ietf.org/idnits?url=http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-de
cade-survey-02.txt), and I believe the only significant issue there has
already identified by David Bryan:

 

  == Outdated reference: A later version (-01) exists of

     draft-ietf-decade-problem-statement-00

 

-- Rich

 

From: Woundy, Richard 
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 3:14 PM
To: 'decade@ietf.org'
Cc: Songhaibin; Woundy, Richard
Subject: Reviews of the Decade Survey draft

 

Folks,

 

We would like to prepare the survey draft, draft-ietf-decade-survey-01
<http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-decade-survey/> , for
working group last call in January.

 

The chairs are looking for document reviews to be sent to the mailing
list by Wednesday December 29. We already have three volunteers from our
session in Beijing. Additional draft reviews by the deadline would be
timely and greatly appreciated.

 

After the authors incorporate the feedback from the reviews in a new
draft iteration, the chairs expect to take the draft to WGLC.

 

-- Rich

[decade] Reviews of the Decade Survey draft Woundy, Richard
Re: [decade] Reviews of the Decade Survey draft Rahman, Akbar
Re: [decade] Reviews of the Decade Survey draft Woundy, Richard
[decade] WG Reviews of the Decade Survey draft zhangyunfei
Re: [decade] WG Reviews of the Decade Survey draft Rahman, Akbar
Re: [decade] WG Reviews of the Decade Survey draft Richard Alimi
Re: [decade] WG Reviews of the Decade Survey draft zhangyunfei
Re: [decade] WG Reviews of the Decade Survey draft Richard Alimi
Re: [decade] Reviews of the Decade Survey draft Woundy, Richard
Re: [decade] Reviews of the Decade Survey draft Strandberg, Ove (NSN - FI/Espoo)
Re: [decade] Reviews of the Decade Survey draft Woundy, Richard
Re: [decade] Reviews of the Decade Survey draft Tao Ma
Re: [decade] Reviews of the Decade Survey draft Woundy, Richard
Re: [decade] Reviews of the Decade Survey draft Rahman, Akbar
Re: [decade] Reviews of the Decade Survey draft Richard Alimi
Re: [decade] Reviews of the Decade Survey draft Tao Ma
Re: [decade] Reviews of the Decade Survey draft Rahman, Akbar