IETF Discussion Archive - Date Index

[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Thread Index]

May 25 2012

MalcolmBETTS90013533 is out of the office., Malcolm . BETTS

May 25 2012

Re: WG Review: Recharter of Behavior Engineering for Hindrance Avoidance (behave), Cullen Jennings
RFP for IETF Meeting Agenda Scheduling Tool, IETF Administrative Director
Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-bis-updates-18, Richard L . Barnes
Re: [Emu] Updated secdir review of draft-ietf-emu-chbind-16.txt, Sean Turner
Weekly posting summary for ietf at ietf.org, Thomas Narten
Re: Last Call: <draft-polk-ipr-disclosure-03.txt> (Promoting Compliance with Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) Disclosure Rules) to Informational RFC, Peter Saint-Andre

May 24 2012

Re: Last Call: <draft-polk-ipr-disclosure-03.txt> (Promoting Compliance with Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) Disclosure Rules) to Informational RFC, SM
Re: Last Call: <draft-polk-ipr-disclosure-03.txt> (Promoting Compliance with Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) Disclosure Rules) to Informational RFC, Peter Saint-Andre
Vancouver IETF Codesprint, IETF Chair
Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Russ Housley
Re: Inconsistent behavior of IETF meeting registration page, Bob Hinden
Inconsistent behavior of IETF meeting registration page, Vinayak Hegde
Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-sakane-dhc-dhcpv6-kdc-option, Jeffrey Hutzelman
Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Carsten Bormann
Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Marshall Eubanks
Updated secdir review of draft-ietf-emu-chbind-16.txt, Stephen Hanna
Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-13, Alexey Melnikov
Re: abnf discussion list?, Julian Reschke

May 23 2012

Question on DHCPv6 / RFC3315, pradeep ramachandran
secdir review of draft-sakane-dhc-dhcpv6-kdc-option, Samuel Weiler
abnf discussion list?, Dave Crocker
Re: [mile] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mile-template-04.txt> (Guidelines for Defining Extensions to IODEF) to Informational RFC, Brian Trammell
Re: RFC 2119 terms, ALL CAPS vs lower case, Abdussalam Baryun
Re: Last Call: <draft-polk-ipr-disclosure-03.txt> (Promoting Compliance with Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) Disclosure Rules) to Informational RFC, SM
RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-claise-export-application-info-in-ipfix-05, Roni Even

May 22 2012

Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-claise-export-application-info-in-ipfix-05, Benoit Claise
Re: Last Call: <draft-polk-ipr-disclosure-03.txt> (Promoting Compliance with Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) Disclosure Rules) to Informational RFC, Peter Saint-Andre
RE: Updated secdir review of draft-ietf-emu-chbind-15.txt, Stephen Hanna

May 21 2012

Re: Updated secdir review of draft-ietf-emu-chbind-15.txt, Sam Hartman
Re: [mile] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mile-template-04.txt> (Guidelines for Defining Extensions to IODEF) to Informational RFC, Peter Saint-Andre

May 20 2012

Re: [dnsext] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-bis-updates-18.txt> (Clarifications and Implementation Notes for DNSSECbis) to Proposed Standard, Mark Andrews
Re: RFC 2119 terms, ALL CAPS vs lower case, Yoav Nir
Re: RFC 2119 terms, ALL CAPS vs lower case, Marc Petit-Huguenin
Re: RFC 2119 terms, ALL CAPS vs lower case, Stephane Bortzmeyer
Re: RFC 2119 terms, ALL CAPS vs lower case, Brian E Carpenter
Re: RFC 2119 terms, ALL CAPS vs lower case, John C Klensin
Re: RFC 2119 terms, ALL CAPS vs lower case, Hector Santos
Re: RFC 2119 terms, ALL CAPS vs lower case, Stephen Farrell
Re: RFC 2119 terms, ALL CAPS vs lower case, Bill McQuillan
Re: RFC 2119 terms, ALL CAPS vs lower case, Brian E Carpenter
Gen-ART LC review of draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-13, Roni Even
RE: RFC 2119 terms, ALL CAPS vs lower case, Yaakov Stein

May 19 2012

Re: RFC 2119 terms, ALL CAPS vs lower case, Randy Bush
Re: RFC 2119 terms, ALL CAPS vs lower case, Eliot Lear
Re: RFC 2119 terms, ALL CAPS vs lower case, Ofer Inbar
Re: RFC 2119 terms, ALL CAPS vs lower case, Carsten Bormann
Re: RFC 2119 terms, ALL CAPS vs lower case, Randy Bush
Re: RFC 2119 terms, ALL CAPS vs lower case, Brian E Carpenter

May 18 2012

Re: RFC 2119 terms, ALL CAPS vs lower case, Randy Bush
Updated secdir review of draft-ietf-emu-chbind-15.txt, Stephen Hanna
Re: RFC 2119 terms, ALL CAPS vs lower case, Ralph Droms
Re: RFC 2119 terms, ALL CAPS vs lower case, Randy Bush
Re: RFC 2119 terms, ALL CAPS vs lower case, Ralph Droms
Re: RFC 2119 terms, ALL CAPS vs lower case, ned+ietf
Re: RFC 2119 terms, ALL CAPS vs lower case, Randy Bush
Re: RFC 2119 terms, ALL CAPS vs lower case, Eric Rosen
Re: RFC 2119 terms, ALL CAPS vs lower case, Marshall Eubanks
Re: RFC 2119 terms, ALL CAPS vs lower case, Ralph Droms
Re: RFC 2119 terms, ALL CAPS vs lower case, ned+ietf
Re: RFC 2119 terms, ALL CAPS vs lower case, Marshall Eubanks
Re: [mile] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mile-template-04.txt> (Guidelines for Defining Extensions to IODEF) to Informational RFC, Brian Trammell
Re: RFC 2119 terms, ALL CAPS vs lower case, Hector Santos
Weekly posting summary for ietf at ietf.org, Thomas Narten

May 17 2012

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art last call review of draft-ietf-codec-opus-12.txt (completed), Elwyn Davies
RE: RFC 2119 terms, ALL CAPS vs lower case, Lee Howard
Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art last call review of draft-ietf-codec-opus-12.txt (completed), Jean-Marc Valin
Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art last call review of draft-ietf-codec-opus-12.txt (completed), Cullen Jennings
Re: RFC 2119 terms, ALL CAPS vs lower case, Julian Reschke
Re: RFC 2119 terms, ALL CAPS vs lower case, Tony Finch
Re: RFC 2119 terms, ALL CAPS vs lower case, Tony Finch
Re: RFC 2119 terms, ALL CAPS vs lower case, t . p .
Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-mile-template-04.txt> (Guidelines for Defining Extensions to IODEF) to Informational RFC, SM
Re: RFC 2119 terms, ALL CAPS vs lower case, Doug Barton
Re: [mile] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mile-template-04.txt> (Guidelines for Defining Extensions to IODEF) to Informational RFC, Peter Saint-Andre
Re: RFC 2119 terms, ALL CAPS vs lower case, ned+ietf

May 16 2012

Re: RFC 2119 terms, ALL CAPS vs lower case, Hector Santos
Re: RFC 2119 terms, ALL CAPS vs lower case, Jaap Akkerhuis
Re: RFC 2119 terms, ALL CAPS vs lower case, Dave Crocker
Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art last call review of draft-ietf-codec-opus-12.txt (completed), Elwyn Davies
Re: RFC 2119 terms, ALL CAPS vs lower case, Ralph Droms
Re: RFC 2119 terms, ALL CAPS vs lower case, ned+ietf
Re: [IETF] RE: RFC 2119 terms, ALL CAPS vs lower case, Warren Kumari
Re: RFC 2119 terms, ALL CAPS vs lower case, Dave Cridland
RE: RFC 2119 terms, ALL CAPS vs lower case, Worley, Dale R (Dale)
Re: RFC 2119 terms, ALL CAPS vs lower case, Randy Bush
RE: RFC 2119 terms, ALL CAPS vs lower case, John C Klensin
Re: RFC 2119 terms, ALL CAPS vs lower case, Ole Jacobsen
RE: RFC 2119 terms, ALL CAPS vs lower case, Adrian Farrel
Re: RFC 2119 terms, ALL CAPS vs lower case, Peter Saint-Andre
Re: RFC 2119 terms, ALL CAPS vs lower case, Ole Jacobsen
Re: RFC 2119 terms, ALL CAPS vs lower case, Brian E Carpenter
Re: RFC 2119 terms, ALL CAPS vs lower case, Mary Barnes
Re: RFC 2119 terms, ALL CAPS vs lower case, Peter Saint-Andre
Re: RFC 2119 terms, ALL CAPS vs lower case, Hector Santos
Re: RFC 2119 terms, ALL CAPS vs lower case, Sam Hartman
Re: RFC 2119 terms, ALL CAPS vs lower case, Dave Crocker
Re: RFC 2119 terms, ALL CAPS vs lower case, Simon Perreault
Re: RFC 2119 terms, ALL CAPS vs lower case, Andrew Sullivan
Re: RFC 2119 terms, ALL CAPS vs lower case, Dave Crocker
RE: RFC 2119 terms, ALL CAPS vs lower case, Adrian Farrel
Re: RFC 2119 terms, ALL CAPS vs lower case, Randy Bush
Re: RFC 2119 terms, ALL CAPS vs lower case, Randy Bush
Re: RFC 2119 terms, ALL CAPS vs lower case, Dave Crocker
Re: RFC 2119 terms, ALL CAPS vs lower case, Edward Lewis
Re: RFC 2119 terms, ALL CAPS vs lower case, Scott Kitterman
Re: RFC 2119 terms, ALL CAPS vs lower case, Dave Crocker
Re: RFC 2119 terms, ALL CAPS vs lower case, Randy Bush
Re: RFC 2119 terms, ALL CAPS vs lower case, Dave Crocker
RFC 2119 terms, ALL CAPS vs lower case, Barry Leiba
Re: Gen-art last call review of draft-ietf-codec-opus-12.txt (completed), Jean-Marc Valin

May 15 2012

Re: Gen-art last call review of draft-ietf-codec-opus-12.txt (completed), Elwyn Davies

May 14 2012

Re: Gen-art last call review of draft-ietf-codec-opus-12.txt (completed), Cullen Jennings
Re: Gen-art last call review of draft-ietf-codec-opus-12.txt (completed), SM
Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-ccamp-assoc-info-03, Ben Campbell
Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-emu-chbind-14, Sam Hartman
Gen-art last call review of draft-ietf-codec-opus-12.txt (completed), Elwyn Davies

May 13 2012

RE: SecDir review of draft-ietf-ccamp-assoc-info-03, Adrian Farrel
SecDir review of draft-ietf-ccamp-assoc-info-03, Yoav Nir

May 12 2012

Re: [IETF] Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Peter Sylvester

May 11 2012

Re: Query to the community -- An additional IETF Meeting event?, Alessandro Vesely
Weekly posting summary for ietf at ietf.org, Thomas Narten

May 10 2012

Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, SM
Re: Query to the community -- An additional IETF Meeting event?, IETF Chair
Re: [IETF] Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Martin Rex
Re: [IETF] Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Warren Kumari
Re: Leverage Patent Search API to reduce BCP79 related issues [was:, Dave Crocker
Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Martin Rex
Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, John C Klensin
Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Yoav Nir
Re: Leverage Patent Search API to reduce BCP79 related issues [was:, ned+ietf
Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Melinda Shore
Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Martin Rex
URI listing (was: Leverage Patent Search API to reduce BCP79 related issues), SM
Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Ted Hardie
Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Melinda Shore
Re: Leverage Patent Search API to reduce BCP79 related issues [was:, Martin Rex
Re: Leverage Patent Search API to reduce BCP79 related issues [was: Re: Last Call: draft-farrresnickel-ipr-sanctions-05.txt], Russ Housley
Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Martin Rex
Re: Leverage Patent Search API to reduce BCP79 related issues [was: Re: Last Call: draft-farrresnickel-ipr-sanctions-05.txt], Nick Hilliard
Re: Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-ipr-sanctions-05.txt> (Sanctions Available for Application to Violators of IETF IPR Policy) to Informational RFC, Livingood, Jason
Leverage Patent Search API to reduce BCP79 related issues [was: Re: Last Call: draft-farrresnickel-ipr-sanctions-05.txt], Hector Santos
Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Peter Sylvester
Re: Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-ipr-sanctions-05.txt> (Sanctions Available for Application to Violators of IETF IPR Policy) to Informational RFC, Hector Santos
Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Tobias Gondrom
Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Tobias Gondrom
Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Yoav Nir
Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, David Morris
Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Doug Barton
Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Tobias Gondrom
Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, John C Klensin
Re: Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-ipr-sanctions-05.txt> (Sanctions Available for Application to Violators of IETF IPR Policy) to Informational RFC, SM
Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Tobias Gondrom
Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, John C Klensin
Re: Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-ipr-sanctions-05.txt> (Sanctions Available for Application to Violators of IETF IPR Policy) to Informational RFC, Brian E Carpenter
Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Tobias Gondrom
Re: Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-ipr-sanctions-05.txt> (Sanctions Available for Application to Violators of IETF IPR Policy) to Informational RFC, Peter Saint-Andre
Re: Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-ipr-sanctions-05.txt> (Sanctions Available for Application to Violators of IETF IPR Policy) to Informational RFC, Randy Bush
Re: Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-ipr-sanctions-05.txt> (Sanctions Available for Application to Violators of IETF IPR Policy) to Informational RFC, Mark Andrews
Re: Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-ipr-sanctions-05.txt> (Sanctions Available for Application to Violators of IETF IPR Policy) to Informational RFC, Pete Resnick
Re: Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-ipr-sanctions-05.txt> (Sanctions Available for Application to Violators of IETF IPR Policy) to Informational RFC, Randy Bush

May 09 2012

May 08 2012

Re: a favor from the list about Jon Postel, SM
Re: a favor from the list about Jon Postel, Joe Touch
Re: a favor from the list about Jon Postel, Fred Baker
a favor from the list about Jon Postel, Joe Touch
Re: IETF posting delays, Glen
Re: [Fwd: IETF posting delays], Randy Bush
RE: [Fwd: IETF posting delays], Murray S. Kucherawy
Re: [Fwd: IETF posting delays], Marshall Eubanks
Re: [Fwd: IETF posting delays], SM
Re: Last Call: <draft-kucherawy-marf-source-ports-03.txt> (Source Ports in ARF Reports) to Proposed Standard, Douglas Otis
Re: [Fwd: IETF posting delays], Andrew Sullivan
Re: Gender diversity in engineering, Yoav Nir
[Fwd: IETF posting delays], Hector Santos
RE: Gender diversity in engineering, Yaakov Stein
RE: Last Call: <draft-kucherawy-marf-source-ports-03.txt> (Source Ports in ARF Reports) to Proposed Standard, Murray S. Kucherawy
RE: Last Call: <draft-kucherawy-marf-source-ports-03.txt> (Source Ports in ARF Reports) to Proposed Standard, Scott Kitterman
RE: Last Call: <draft-kucherawy-marf-source-ports-03.txt> (Source Ports in ARF Reports) to Proposed Standard, Murray S. Kucherawy
Re: Last Call: <draft-kucherawy-marf-source-ports-03.txt> (Source Ports in ARF Reports) to Proposed Standard, Douglas Otis

May 07 2012

Re: IETF posting delays, SM
Re: [IETF] Re: IETF posting delays, Warren Kumari
Re: Last Call: <draft-kucherawy-marf-source-ports-03.txt> (Source Ports in ARF Reports) to Proposed Standard, Scott Kitterman
Re: IETF posting delays, Hector Santos
Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based, Paul Wouters
Re: IETF posting delays, Dave Crocker
Re: IETF posting delays, SM
Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Doug Barton
Re: IETF posting delays, John C Klensin
Re: IETF posting delays, Mary Barnes
Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, IETF Chair
Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Ted Hardie
Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based, Stephen Farrell
Re: IETF posting delays, John C Klensin
Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, IETF Chair
RE: Is the IETF aging?, Worley, Dale R (Dale)
Re: IETF posting delays, John Levine
Re: IETF posting delays, Dave Crocker
Re: IETF posting delays, Ofer Inbar
Re: IETF posting delays, Dave Crocker
Re: IETF posting delays, Fred Baker
Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based, Markku Savela
Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based, Phillip Hallam-Baker
Re: IETF posting delays, Hector Santos
Re: IETF posting delays, Randy Bush
Re: IETF posting delays, Jaap Akkerhuis
Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, David Morris
Re: IETF posting delays, Randy Bush
Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, IETF Chair
Re: IETF posting delays, Hector Santos

May 06 2012

Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, David Morris
Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Russ Housley
Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Doug Barton
Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, IETF Chair
Re: Is the IETF aging?, Brian E Carpenter
Re: IETF posting delays, Hector
Re: Is the IETF aging?, Hannes Tschofenig
Re: IETF posting delays, Marshall Eubanks
Re: Is the IETF aging?, Hannes Tschofenig
Re: Is the IETF aging?, Hannes Tschofenig
Re: IETF posting delays, Randy Bush

May 05 2012

IETF posting delays, Hector
Re: Is the IETF aging?, Hector Santos
Re: Is the IETF aging?, Yoav Nir
Re: Last Call: <draft-levine-application-gzip-02.txt> (The application/zlib and application/gzip media types) to Informational RFC, John C Klensin
Re: Last Call: <draft-levine-application-gzip-02.txt> (The application/zlib and application/gzip media types) to Informational RFC, ned+ietf
Re: Is the IETF aging?, Marshall Eubanks
Re: Is the IETF aging?, Phillip Hallam-Baker

May 04 2012

Re: Gender diversity in engineering, Yoav Nir
Re: Is the IETF aging?, SM
Re: Last Call: <draft-levine-application-gzip-02.txt> (The application/zlib and application/gzip media types) to Informational RFC, John Levine
Re: Is the IETF aging?, John C Klensin
Re: Is the IETF aging?, Ted Hardie
RE: Last Call: <draft-levine-application-gzip-02.txt> (The application/zlib and application/gzip media types) to Informational RFC, John C Klensin
Re: Is the IETF aging?, John C Klensin
RE: Gender diversity in engineering, Worley, Dale R (Dale)
Re: Gender diversity in engineering, Allison Mankin
Re: Gender diversity in engineering, Eric Burger
Weekly posting summary for ietf at ietf.org, Thomas Narten
RE: Last Call: <draft-levine-application-gzip-02.txt> (The application/zlib and application/gzip media types) to Informational RFC, ned+ietf

May 03 2012

RE: Last Call: <draft-levine-application-gzip-02.txt> (The application/zlib and application/gzip media types) to Informational RFC, Murray S. Kucherawy
RE: Last Call: <draft-levine-application-gzip-02.txt> (The application/zlib and application/gzip media types) to Informational RFC, ned+ietf
RE: Last Call: <draft-levine-application-gzip-02.txt> (The application/zlib and application/gzip media types) to Informational RFC, Murray S. Kucherawy
RE: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register, Worley, Dale R (Dale)
Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based, OndÅej SurÃ
IETF Trust Minutes since August 2011, SM
Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register, Rumbidzayi Gadhula

May 02 2012

Re: Is the IETF aging?, Avri Doria
Re: Is the IETF aging?, Martin Rex
Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register, Mary Barnes
Re: Is the IETF aging?, Dave Crocker
Re: Is the IETF aging?, Kevin P. Fleming
Re: Is the IETF aging?, Hannes Tschofenig
Mailing list for LGBTQ participants in the IETF, Ted Hardie
Re: Mailing list for IETF women, Eggert, Lars
Re: Is the IETF aging?, Dave Crocker
Re: Is the IETF aging?, Scott Brim
Mailing list for IETF women, Mary Barnes
Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register, Mary Barnes
Re: Is the IETF aging?, Melinda Shore
RE: Is the IETF aging?, Worley, Dale R (Dale)
RE: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register, Richard Shockey
Re: Gender diversity in engineering, Cameron Byrne

May 01 2012

Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register, Janet P Gunn
Re: Gender diversity in engineering, Janet P Gunn
RE: Is the IETF aging?, SM
Gender diversity in engineering, James M. Polk
RE: Is the IETF aging?, John C Klensin
Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register, Yoav Nir
RE: Is the IETF aging?, Worley, Dale R (Dale)
Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register, Thomas Narten
Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register, Hector
Scared away from tech industry?, Worley, Dale R (Dale)
Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register, Janet P Gunn
Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register, Hector
Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register, Melinda Shore
Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register, Hector
Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register, John C Klensin
Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register, Hector Santos
Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register, Melinda Shore
Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register, Randy Presuhn
Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register, Yoav Nir
Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-opus-12.txt> (Definition of the Opus Audio Codec) to Proposed Standard, Sam Hartman
Re: [IETF] Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register, Warren Kumari
Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register, Monique Morrow
Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register, Scott Brim
Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register, Mary Barnes
Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register, t . p .
RE: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register, Yaakov Stein
Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) Protocol for Transport Layer Security (TLS)) to Proposed Standard, Stephen Farrell
Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-opus-12.txt> (Definition of the Opus Audio Codec) to Proposed Standard, Ron
Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register, Riccardo Bernardini
Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-opus-12.txt> (Definition of the Opus Audio Codec) to Proposed Standard, SM
Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register, Monique Morrow
Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register, Yoav Nir
Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register, Yoav Nir
Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register, Glen Zorn
Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Henning Schulzrinne
Re: Is the IETF aging?, Alia Atlas
Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-opus-12.txt> (Definition of the Opus Audio Codec) to Proposed Standard, Ron
Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Richard L. Barnes
Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register, Fred Baker
Re: Is the IETF aging?, Mary Barnes
Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, John C Klensin
Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register, Ofer Inbar

Apr 30 2012

Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-opus-12.txt> (Definition of the Opus Audio Codec) to Proposed Standard, Stephan Wenger
Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register, Fred Baker
RE: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register, ned+ietf
Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register, Richard L. Barnes
Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register, Janet P Gunn
RE: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register, Worley, Dale R (Dale)
Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Richard L. Barnes
Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register, Mary Barnes
Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-opus-12.txt> (Definition of the Opus Audio Codec) to Proposed Standard, SM
Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-pwe3-static-pw-status-10, Ben Campbell
Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-pwe3-static-pw-status-10, Stewart Bryant
Re: Last Call: <draft-polk-ipr-disclosure-03.txt> (Promoting Compliance with Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) Disclosure Rules) to Informational RFC, Stephan Wenger
Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register, Melinda Shore
FW: I-D Action: draft-sprecher-mpls-tp-oam-considerations-03.txt, Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)
Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register, Riccardo Bernardini
Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register, Huub van Helvoort
RE: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register, Worley, Dale R (Dale)
Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register, Mary Barnes
Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register, Monique Morrow
Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register, Riccardo Bernardini
Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register, Stephane Bortzmeyer
Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register, Monique Morrow
Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register, Stephane Bortzmeyer
'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry â The Register, Brian E Carpenter

Apr 27 2012

Re: Is the IETF aging?, John C Klensin
Re: Is the IETF aging?, Bjoern Hoehrmann

Apr 27 2012

Re: Is the IETF aging?, SM
Re: Is the IETF aging?, Melinda Shore
RE: Is the IETF aging?, Robin Uyeshiro
Re: Is the IETF aging?, Joel jaeggli
Re: Is the IETF aging?, Alissa Cooper
Re: Is the IETF aging?, Paul Hoffman
Re: Is the IETF aging?, John C Klensin
RE: Is the IETF aging?, Murray S. Kucherawy
Re: Is the IETF aging?, Phillip Hallam-Baker
Re: Is the IETF aging?, Margaret Wasserman
Re: Is the IETF aging?, John C Klensin
Re: Is the IETF aging?, SM
Re: Is the IETF aging?, Robert Raszuk
RE: Is the IETF aging?, John E Drake
RE: [nvo3] WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 25-Apr-2012 update, Linda Dunbar
Re: Is the IETF aging?, Melinda Shore
Re: Is the IETF aging?, Randy Bush
Re: Is the IETF aging?, Melinda Shore
Re: Is the IETF aging?, Harald Alvestrand
RE: Is the IETF aging?, Murray S. Kucherawy
RE: Is the IETF aging?, Worley, Dale R (Dale)
RE: Is the IETF aging?, Worley, Dale R (Dale)
Re: Is the IETF aging?, Marc Blanchet
Re: Is the IETF aging?, Yoav Nir
Re: Is the IETF aging?, Phillip Hallam-Baker
Re: Is the IETF aging?, Michael Richardson
Re: Is the IETF aging?, Mary Barnes
Re: Is the IETF aging?, Carsten Bormann
Re: Is the IETF aging?, Dave Cridland
Re: Is the IETF aging?, Yoav Nir
Is the IETF aging?, Phillip Hallam-Baker
weekly, Thomas Narten
Weekly posting summary for ietf at ietf.org, Thomas Narten

Apr 26 2012

Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-pwe3-static-pw-status-10, Ben Campbell
Re: [MBONED] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mboned-64-multicast-address-format-01.txt> (IPv4-Embedded IPv6 Multicast Address Format) to Proposed Standard, SM
RE: [nvo3] WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 25-Apr-2012 update, Alan Kavanagh
Re: [MBONED] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mboned-64-multicast-address-format-01.txt> (IPv4-Embedded IPv6 Multicast Address Format) to Proposed Standard, Jacni Qin
Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments, ned+ietf
Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments, David Conrad
Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments, ned+ietf
Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments, David Conrad
RE: [nvo3] WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 25-Apr-2012 update, Joe Pelissier (jopeliss)
RE: [nvo3] WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 25-Apr-2012 update, Pat Thaler
Re: [nvo3] WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 25-Apr-2012 update, Stewart Bryant

Apr 25 2012

Re: [nvo3] WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 25-Apr-2012 update, Stewart Bryant
RE: [nvo3] WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 25-Apr-2012 update, david.black
RE: [nvo3] WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 25-Apr-2012 update, Joe Pelissier (jopeliss)
Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, SM
RE: [nvo3] WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 25-Apr-2012 update, Pat Thaler
Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Eric Burger
WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 25-Apr-2012 update, Stewart Bryant
Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based, Phillip Hallam-Baker
Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based, Phillip Hallam-Baker
Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt>, =JeffH
Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments, Phillip Hallam-Baker
Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments, Phillip Hallam-Baker
RE: [MBONED] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mboned-64-multicast-address-format-01.txt> (IPv4-Embedded IPv6 Multicast Address Format) to Proposed Standard, SM
Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments, ned+ietf
Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments, David Conrad
Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based, Paul Wouters
Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based, Andrew Sullivan
RE: [MBONED] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mboned-64-multicast-address-format-01.txt> (IPv4-Embedded IPv6 Multicast Address Format) to Proposed Standard, mohamed.boucadair
Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Samuel Weiler
Re: [nvo3] Key difference between DCVPN and L2VPN/L3VPN, Stewart Bryant
Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments, Phillip Hallam-Baker
RE: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-emu-chbind-14, Stephen Hanna
Re: [nvo3] Key difference between DCVPN and L2VPN/L3VPN, Marshall Eubanks
Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based, Phillip Hallam-Baker
Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> - Referring to the DANE protocol and DANE-denoted certificate associations, Phillip Hallam-Baker
Re: [IAOC] IAOC and permissions [Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets], Marshall Eubanks
Re: IAOC and permissions [Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets], Brian E Carpenter
RE: Questions: WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 23-Apr-2012 update, Adrian Farrel
RE: Questions: WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 23-Apr-2012 update, Adrian Farrel
RE: [nvo3] Key difference between DCVPN and L2VPN/L3VPN, Adrian Farrel
RE: IAOC and permissions [Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets], Christian Huitema
IAOC and permissions [Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets], Brian E Carpenter
Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Martin Rex
Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-emu-chbind-14, Joe Salowey
Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Martin Rex
NVO3 Charter Review, Thomas Narten
Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Martin Rex

Apr 24 2012

Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, James M. Polk
Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, SM
Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Stephan Wenger
Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, John C Klensin
Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Stephen Farrell
Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, John C Klensin
RE: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, John C Klensin
Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, James M. Polk
Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, John C Klensin
RE: Key difference between DCVPN and L2VPN/L3VPN, Linda Dunbar
RE: [PWE3] Last Call: <draft-ietf-pwe3-redundancy-bit-06.txt> (Pseudowire Preferential Forwarding Status Bit) to Proposed Standard, Aissaoui, Mustapha (Mustapha)
Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> - Referring to the DANE protocol and DANE-denoted certificate associations, =JeffH
Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Martin Rex
Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Lixia Zhang
Re: Key difference between DCVPN and L2VPN/L3VPN, James M. Polk
Re: Key difference between DCVPN and L2VPN/L3VPN, Stewart Bryant
RE: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Robin Uyeshiro
Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Martin Rex
Re: Questions: WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 23-Apr-2012 update, Stewart Bryant
Key difference between DCVPN and L2VPN/L3VPN, Linda Dunbar
Re: Questions: WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 23-Apr-2012 update, Stewart Bryant
Re: Questions: WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 23-Apr-2012 update, Stewart Bryant
Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, John C Klensin
Re: Questions: WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 23-Apr-2012 update, Stewart Bryant
Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, John C Klensin
RE: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, John C Klensin
RE: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-emu-chbind-14, Stephen Hanna
Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Martin Rex
Questions: WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 23-Apr-2012 update, Adrian Farrel
Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Martin Rex
RE: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Christian Huitema
Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Martin Rex
Nits: WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 23-Apr-2012 updates, Adrian Farrel
Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Sam Hartman
Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Stephan Wenger
Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Michael StJohns
Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Martin Rex
Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Joel jaeggli
Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Michael StJohns
Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Michael StJohns
Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Martin Rex
Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-about-uri-scheme-04.txt> (The "about" URI Scheme) to Proposed Standard, Barry Leiba
Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, David Morris
Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Donald Eastlake
Re: SMTP question - a session containing multiple transactions, Tony Finch
RE: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-emu-chbind-14, Stephen Hanna
GenART LC review of draft-ietf-mboned-mcaddrdoc-03, Roni Even
Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Brian E Carpenter
Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, SM
Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-about-uri-scheme-04.txt> (The "about" URI Scheme) to Proposed Standard, Mykyta Yevstifeyev
Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments, t . p .
RE: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)
Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Yoav Nir
Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Avri Doria
Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Avri Doria
Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Bob Hinden
Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Fernando Gont
Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Dave Crocker
Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Brian E Carpenter
Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Brian E Carpenter
Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, John C Klensin
Re: [nvo3] WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 23-Apr-2012 update, Benson Schliesser
Re: [nvo3] WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 23-Apr-2012 update, Joel jaeggli
Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-emu-chbind-14, Sam Hartman
Re: [nvo3] WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 23-Apr-2012 update, Anoop Ghanwani
Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments, Fernando Gont
Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Fernando Gont
Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets, Fernando Gont

Apr 23 2012

Re: Audio recordings for IETF 83, SM

Mail converted by MHonArc