Re: The death John McCarthy

Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net> Fri, 28 October 2011 09:23 UTC

Return-Path: <ggx@gigix.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B959121F8AD6 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 02:23:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tKIrMEjgpJLY for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 02:23:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-bw0-f44.google.com (mail-bw0-f44.google.com [209.85.214.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03DAB21F8713 for <IETF@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 02:23:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by bkbzu17 with SMTP id zu17so1847437bkb.31 for <IETF@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 02:23:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.204.137.73 with SMTP id v9mr1533645bkt.81.1319793797883; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 02:23:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dyn112.net.t-labs.tu-berlin.de ([130.149.220.112]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u18sm6716335bkn.6.2011.10.28.02.23.16 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 28 Oct 2011 02:23:17 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1)
Subject: Re: The death John McCarthy
From: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>
In-Reply-To: <4EAA54C6.1060706@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 11:23:15 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <5158E96C-75FB-47D5-8086-D0C7C1946937@gigix.net>
References: <552F103D-2C46-44E6-8CE4-6793DC326E87@gmail.com> <4EA9EF9C.4060108@gmail.com> <7A3CBCEB3F7E80FC15706A46@PST.JCK.COM> <4EAA2DE0.5040506@bogus.com> <4EAA4BB4.4070100@piuha.net> <4EAA4C18.8050607@piuha.net> <4EAA54C6.1060706@gmail.com>
To: IETF@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1)
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 09:23:19 -0000

Hi,

Like Jari and others I do not see the name as disrespectful and it is unrealistic to believe that the loc/ID speration protocol can be renamed. It has been around for more than 5 years it is just too late.

On the other hand, the name  can be considered an homage by itself.

Luigi Iannone

On Oct 28, 2011, at 09:07 , Hector wrote:

> Jari Arkko wrote:
>> First, as someone who chartered the working group, who has implemented Lisp (the programming language) at least four times, and who views Dr. McCarthy as a hero I disagree that name is problematic or disrespectful. And I almost take offense in the claim that this is a generational thing.
> 
> Well you shouldn't and my apology for stated that. I was informed off list it was an intentional tribute to the language.  It was just one of those things where you saw something that caught your eye and only as a passing thought, "don't these people know its a well known acronym?"  I think I saw there was some relationship, but thought about the long run usage of "LISP" in reference to this work might be confusing.  In other words, should people refer to this work as LISP?  Its rhetorical.
> 
> I'm out.
> 
> --
> HLS
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf