IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-rtr-19.txt> (The RPKI/Router Protocol) to Proposed Standard

Keyur Patel <keyupate@cisco.com> Wed, 21 December 2011 22:21 UTC

Return-Path: <keyupate@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCF6D11E80B5 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 14:21:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.532
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.532 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO=2.067]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X+xvhn9YwYlw for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 14:21:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mtv-iport-2.cisco.com (mtv-iport-2.cisco.com [173.36.130.13]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF61011E8081 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 14:21:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=keyupate@cisco.com; l=1098; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1324506115; x=1325715715; h=date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=lZ5pZhOKogRjXgopeAWS5uo/bveVR9CykS5HMSmybvg=; b=GD3FZUWGSPAK2WblpIXdfSsO0r4jQqE5GtT8+HzAZoUe8hs266/hzMRe Mb1ZhiRry+5CTj7PYpb8KUGfwfjIuFcQMkE1f4rE7kiNzSSbjSG2cnDf6 X/annvBZmyySLsrJhqsWnACV6YhyzCWVqkSeaKi8ZdzyzztrwyWoPBIXH k=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArQFAGpb8k6rRDoI/2dsb2JhbABDqQeDGQKBBYFyAQEBAwEBAQEPAQUiAgExCwUNAQhtMAEBBAENBSKHWAiZHwGeMASMDwSIN4xIjhqEOg
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,390,1320624000"; d="scan'208";a="21964423"
Received: from mtv-core-3.cisco.com ([171.68.58.8]) by mtv-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 21 Dec 2011 22:21:55 +0000
Received: from xbh-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-211.cisco.com [171.70.151.144]) by mtv-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id pBLMLtbc009040; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 22:21:55 GMT
Received: from xmb-sjc-239.amer.cisco.com ([128.107.191.105]) by xbh-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 21 Dec 2011 14:21:55 -0800
Received: from 128.107.163.124 ([128.107.163.124]) by xmb-sjc-239.amer.cisco.com ([128.107.191.105]) via Exchange Front-End Server email.cisco.com ([128.107.191.114]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 22:21:54 +0000
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.31.0.110725
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 14:22:46 -0800
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-rtr-19.txt> (The RPKI/Router Protocol) to Proposed Standard
From: Keyur Patel <keyupate@cisco.com>
To: Hannes Gredler <hannes@juniper.net>, ietf@ietf.org
Message-ID: <CB179C36.11F43%keyupate@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-rtr-19.txt> (The RPKI/Router Protocol) to Proposed Standard
Thread-Index: AczALxCEoHMetNq7d0mRESzazgktXg==
In-Reply-To: <20111221072743.GB13885@juniper.net>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Dec 2011 22:21:55.0290 (UTC) FILETIME=[F24A83A0:01CCC02E]
Cc: jgs@juniper.net, Mohapatra Pradosh <pmohapat@cisco.com>, afarrel@juniper.net
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 22:21:57 -0000

Folks,

I like to voice my support (on behalf of Cisco Systems) as well. Cisco
Systems has recently shipped RPKI Router protocol implementation (in IOS
software release). 

Our implementation has been tested with two different RPKI cache
implementations (RIPE, RPKI.NET) and is currently going through lab tests
with our customers.

We are also in process of writing an implementation survey for this
protocol.

Regards,
Keyur

On 12/20/11 11:27 PM, "Hannes Gredler" <hannes@juniper.net> wrote:

> hi,
> 
> hereby i want to declare (by myself and on behalf of Juniper Networks Inc.),
> support for the the rpki-rtr protocol. Juniper Networks Inc. has got an
> implementation
> of the protocol based on, draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-rtr-19. Our implementation
> passed interop testing with 3 different rpki caches (BBN, RIPE, ISC) and got
> a exposure to a couple of our tier-1 SP customers for labe test purposes.
> 
> thanks !
> 
> /hannes
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email