Re: [16NG] SFID's
"yw_chen" <ywchen@ee.ncu.edu.tw> Sat, 24 March 2007 13:57 UTC
Return-path: <16ng-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HV6kD-0003gf-HK; Sat, 24 Mar 2007 09:57:21 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HV6kD-0003ga-36 for 16ng@ietf.org; Sat, 24 Mar 2007 09:57:21 -0400
Received: from webmail.ee.ncu.edu.tw ([140.115.70.10]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HV6k7-0006ig-0j for 16ng@ietf.org; Sat, 24 Mar 2007 09:57:21 -0400
Received: from ee.ncu.edu.tw (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by webmail.ee.ncu.edu.tw (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l2OEEUpD056953; Sat, 24 Mar 2007 22:14:30 +0800 (CST) (envelope-from ywchen@ee.ncu.edu.tw)
From: yw_chen <ywchen@ee.ncu.edu.tw>
To: vasanth varathan varathan <vasanth.varathan@gmail.com>, 16ng@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [16NG] SFID's
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2007 22:14:30 +0800
Message-Id: <20070324141232.M23710@ee.ncu.edu.tw>
In-Reply-To: <595262710703240635m68b1bda0va062899f6dc34511@mail.gmail.com>
References: <595262710703240635m68b1bda0va062899f6dc34511@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Open WebMail 2.51 20050228
X-OriginatingIP: 61.224.120.161 (ywchen)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 10ba05e7e8a9aa6adb025f426bef3a30
Cc:
X-BeenThere: 16ng@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: 16ng working group discussion list <16ng.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/16ng>, <mailto:16ng-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/16ng>
List-Post: <mailto:16ng@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:16ng-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/16ng>, <mailto:16ng-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0994781989=="
Errors-To: 16ng-bounces@ietf.org
Hi, depends on the QoS parameter set of scheduling types and the number is the network deployment and service planning issue. Yen-Wen Chen On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 19:05:27 +0530, vasanth varathan varathan wrote > Hi all, > > I have a doubt in SFID assigning.... > > whether the number of service flow indentifier's (SFID's) assigned to a SS depends on > > 1. The number of service flow Scheduling types (i.e UGS, Rtps, Nrtps, BE) supported by the SS??? > (or) > 2. Different Qos parameter set(like MSR,MRR,latency,jitter,etc...) values of same service flow scheduling type (i.e UGS, Rtps, Nrtps, BE)????? > > Thanks in advance > Vasanth -- Open WebMail Project (http://openwebmail.org)
_______________________________________________ 16NG mailing list 16NG@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/16ng
- [16NG] SFID's vasanth varathan varathan
- Re: [16NG] SFID's yw_chen