IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communication Security Work in ACE

"Smith, Ned" <ned.smith@intel.com> Wed, 20 July 2016 14:47 UTC

Return-Path: <ned.smith@intel.com>
X-Original-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF67412D7D4 for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 07:47:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.208
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.208 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3MKy09qQ9zGe for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 07:47:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD26612D7CC for <Ace@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 07:47:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 20 Jul 2016 07:47:50 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,394,1464678000"; d="scan'208";a="1025614490"
Received: from orsmsx106.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.22.225.133]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 20 Jul 2016 07:47:50 -0700
Received: from orsmsx109.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.11.206]) by ORSMSX106.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.1.43]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 07:47:50 -0700
From: "Smith, Ned" <ned.smith@intel.com>
To: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>, "Ace@ietf.org" <Ace@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communication Security Work in ACE
Thread-Index: AQHR4pWv5Cs9lwb1s0OJl6sZ68oibA==
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 14:47:50 +0000
Message-ID: <D3B4DA69.529C2%ned.smith@intel.com>
References: <578F4D59.8050005@gmx.net>
In-Reply-To: <578F4D59.8050005@gmx.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.6.6.160626
x-originating-ip: [10.252.197.218]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <6E3AA51F89D986468CC6BC1D4B12BB41@intel.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ace/Nyw_MNCz7ipor6LKNhiAhwypbSk>
Subject: Re: [Ace] Adoption of Low Latency Group Communication Security Work in ACE
X-BeenThere: ace@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments \(ace\)" <ace.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ace/>
List-Post: <mailto:ace@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 14:47:54 -0000

Agree with the direction toward group communication. This roughly aligns
with goals of 
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hardjono-ace-fluffy/> which is
inclusive of group key management for symmetric. Fluffy has broader key
management goals, but symmetric group key management is a great place to
start. 

It also aligns with directions the OCF are heading as they see value in
the use of group keys for doing secure discovery.

Ned Smith
Principal IoT Security Architect
Intel SSG-OTC
Ned.smith@intel.com
+1.503.712.3695




On 7/20/16, 3:07 AM, "Hannes Tschofenig" <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> wrote:

>Hi all,
>
>at the ACE meeting today I asked the participants whether they are in
>favor of adding low latency group communication security work in the ACE
>group.
>
>20 persons were in favor of doing the work.
>
>5 people argued against doing this work.
>
>If you haven't been at the meeting please contribute your thoughts here
>on the list. If you believe you do not have enough information please
>also speak up.
>
>Ciao
>Hannes
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email