[core] WG interest in Sleepy Node topic
"Rahman, Akbar" <Akbar.Rahman@InterDigital.com> Fri, 08 November 2013 02:36 UTC
Return-Path: <Akbar.Rahman@InterDigital.com>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CF7C11E81BA for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 18:36:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.198
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.198 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.200, BAYES_50=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4JnTtYlUqXTN for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 18:36:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp-out1.interdigital.com (smtp-out1.interdigital.com [64.208.228.135]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2A5121E814B for <core@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 18:36:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from SAM.InterDigital.com ([10.30.2.11]) by smtp-out1.interdigital.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 7 Nov 2013 21:36:34 -0500
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CEDC2B.57333473"
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 21:36:32 -0500
Message-ID: <D60519DB022FFA48974A25955FFEC08C0561B74B@SAM.InterDigital.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: WG interest in Sleepy Node topic
Thread-Index: Ac7cK1YqMzRJhdYORw+JQXBuUFLKkg==
From: "Rahman, Akbar" <Akbar.Rahman@InterDigital.com>
To: Core <core@ietf.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Nov 2013 02:36:34.0493 (UTC) FILETIME=[57321ED0:01CEDC2B]
Subject: [core] WG interest in Sleepy Node topic
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/core>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 02:36:43 -0000
Hi All, Once again we ran out of time on the agenda to discuss the WG interest on the topic of Sleepy Nodes http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-rahman-core-sleepy-nodes-do-we-need-00.txt However, Carsten did suggest that we carry the discussion that we would have had in the meeting forward to the WG list. The key questions that we need WG feedback on are: 1. Does the WG want to keep discussing Sleepy Nodes in CORE? The Sleepy Node support could be in: a. CoAP Protocol b. CORE Link Format c. CORE Resource Directory d. Etc. 2. Sub-Question: a. Does the WG want to see some immediate development of the Mirror Server concept (which seems to have near unanimous support and is well correlated to Sleepy Node support)? Any and all comments are appreciated! Please write back even if you answered earlier Emails on this topic as we need to gauge WG interest. Thanks, Akbar
- [core] WG interest in Sleepy Node topic Rahman, Akbar
- Re: [core] WG interest in Sleepy Node topic weigengyu
- Re: [core] WG interest in Sleepy Node topic Thomas Fossati
- Re: [core] WG interest in Sleepy Node topic Dijk, Esko
- Re: [core] WG interest in Sleepy Node topic Abhijan Bhattacharyya
- Re: [core] WG interest in Sleepy Node topic Carsten Bormann
- Re: [core] WG interest in Sleepy Node topic weigengyu
- Re: [core] WG interest in Sleepy Node topic Pete St. Pierre
- Re: [core] WG interest in Sleepy Node topic weigengyu