Re: [Diffserv] EF RFC and loss

Anurag <anurag@ust.hk> Mon, 15 November 1999 17:28 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA18567; Mon, 15 Nov 1999 12:28:36 -0500 (EST)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA19587; Mon, 15 Nov 1999 11:58:48 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA19558 for <diffserv@optimus.ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Nov 1999 11:58:43 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailgw.ust.hk (mailgw.ust.hk [143.89.14.35]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA04530 for <diffserv@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Nov 1999 11:58:48 -0500 (EST)
Received: from uxmail.ust.hk (root@uxmail.ust.hk [143.89.14.30]) by mailgw.ust.hk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA23501; Tue, 16 Nov 1999 00:53:33 +0800 (HKT)
Received: from ust.hk (dmy239.resnet.ust.hk [143.89.67.39]) by uxmail.ust.hk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA23765; Tue, 16 Nov 1999 00:55:51 +0800 (HKT)
Message-ID: <3830233A.44D1449C@ust.hk>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 1999 23:14:02 +0800
From: Anurag <anurag@ust.hk>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (Win98; I)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Omar Elloumi <Omar.Elloumi@alcatel.be>
CC: "diffserv@ietf.org" <diffserv@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Diffserv] EF RFC and loss
References: <38301BAB.8051BA38@alcatel.be>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: diffserv-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: diffserv-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <diffserv.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: diffserv@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi

As I understand, according to the present RFC on EF PHB, there is no way
to distinguish between packet losses due to buffer over flow or attack.
Both shall trigger alarm. 

regards
Anurag

Omar Elloumi wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I went through the emails on EF and losses but I'm still
> confused. The original question was do we need absolute zero
> loss in EF or not?
> Some of you responded no (few losses are tolerated),
> in that case how can we distinguish packet losses due
> to possible attacks from tolerated losses??? do we
> need to have a threshold above it we trigger an alarm
> to check a possible attack?
> 
> My intention is NOT to trigger a new discussion but just
> to have in few lines a definitive (formal if possible) answer to this.
> 
> kind regards.
> 
> --
> ____________________________________________________________
> Omar Elloumi
> 
> Alcatel Research - Network Architecture - Traffic Technology
> 
> Francis Wellesplein 1, 2018 Antwerp, Belgium
> 
> Phone: + 32 3 240 78 33
> Fax:   + 32 3 240 99 32
> http://www.alcatel.com/crc/
> ____________________________________________________________
> 
> Opinions expressed are those of the sender and do not reflect Alcatel
> policy or agreement
> 
> _______________________________________________
> diffserv mailing list
> diffserv@ietf.org
> http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/diffserv
> Archive: http://www-nrg.ee.lbl.gov/diff-serv-arch/

_______________________________________________
diffserv mailing list
diffserv@ietf.org
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/diffserv
Archive: http://www-nrg.ee.lbl.gov/diff-serv-arch/