Re: [Diffserv] EF RFC and loss
Anurag <anurag@ust.hk> Mon, 15 November 1999 17:28 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA18567; Mon, 15 Nov 1999 12:28:36 -0500 (EST)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA19587; Mon, 15 Nov 1999 11:58:48 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA19558 for <diffserv@optimus.ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Nov 1999 11:58:43 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailgw.ust.hk (mailgw.ust.hk [143.89.14.35]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA04530 for <diffserv@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Nov 1999 11:58:48 -0500 (EST)
Received: from uxmail.ust.hk (root@uxmail.ust.hk [143.89.14.30]) by mailgw.ust.hk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA23501; Tue, 16 Nov 1999 00:53:33 +0800 (HKT)
Received: from ust.hk (dmy239.resnet.ust.hk [143.89.67.39]) by uxmail.ust.hk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA23765; Tue, 16 Nov 1999 00:55:51 +0800 (HKT)
Message-ID: <3830233A.44D1449C@ust.hk>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 1999 23:14:02 +0800
From: Anurag <anurag@ust.hk>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (Win98; I)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Omar Elloumi <Omar.Elloumi@alcatel.be>
CC: "diffserv@ietf.org" <diffserv@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Diffserv] EF RFC and loss
References: <38301BAB.8051BA38@alcatel.be>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: diffserv-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: diffserv-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <diffserv.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: diffserv@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi As I understand, according to the present RFC on EF PHB, there is no way to distinguish between packet losses due to buffer over flow or attack. Both shall trigger alarm. regards Anurag Omar Elloumi wrote: > > Hello, > > I went through the emails on EF and losses but I'm still > confused. The original question was do we need absolute zero > loss in EF or not? > Some of you responded no (few losses are tolerated), > in that case how can we distinguish packet losses due > to possible attacks from tolerated losses??? do we > need to have a threshold above it we trigger an alarm > to check a possible attack? > > My intention is NOT to trigger a new discussion but just > to have in few lines a definitive (formal if possible) answer to this. > > kind regards. > > -- > ____________________________________________________________ > Omar Elloumi > > Alcatel Research - Network Architecture - Traffic Technology > > Francis Wellesplein 1, 2018 Antwerp, Belgium > > Phone: + 32 3 240 78 33 > Fax: + 32 3 240 99 32 > http://www.alcatel.com/crc/ > ____________________________________________________________ > > Opinions expressed are those of the sender and do not reflect Alcatel > policy or agreement > > _______________________________________________ > diffserv mailing list > diffserv@ietf.org > http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/diffserv > Archive: http://www-nrg.ee.lbl.gov/diff-serv-arch/ _______________________________________________ diffserv mailing list diffserv@ietf.org http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/diffserv Archive: http://www-nrg.ee.lbl.gov/diff-serv-arch/
- EF RFC and loss Emmanuel.Desmet
- Re: [Diffserv] EF RFC and loss Anurag
- Re: [Diffserv] EF RFC and loss Emmanuel.Desmet
- Re: [Diffserv] EF RFC and loss Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Diffserv] EF RFC and loss Grenville Armitage
- Re: [Diffserv] EF RFC and loss Emmanuel.Desmet
- Re: [Diffserv] EF RFC and loss Emmanuel.Desmet
- Re: [Diffserv] EF RFC and loss Grenville Armitage
- Re: [Diffserv] EF RFC and loss Emmanuel.Desmet
- Re: [Diffserv] EF RFC and loss Grenville Armitage
- Re: [Diffserv] EF RFC and loss Albert Manfredi
- Re: [Diffserv] EF RFC and loss Albert Manfredi
- Re: [Diffserv] EF RFC and loss Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Diffserv] EF RFC and loss Kathleen Nichols
- Re: [Diffserv] EF RFC and loss Stefano Salsano
- Re: [Diffserv] EF RFC and loss Scott W Brim
- Re: [Diffserv] EF RFC and loss Emmanuel.Desmet
- Re: [Diffserv] EF RFC and loss Emmanuel.Desmet
- Re: [Diffserv] EF RFC and loss Grenville Armitage
- Re: [Diffserv] EF RFC and loss Kathleen Nichols
- RE: [Diffserv] EF RFC and loss Shahram Davari
- Re: [Diffserv] EF RFC and loss Kathleen Nichols
- RE: [Diffserv] EF RFC and loss Shahram Davari
- Re: [Diffserv] EF RFC and loss Kathleen Nichols
- Re: [Diffserv] EF RFC and loss Scott W Brim
- Re: [Diffserv] EF RFC and loss Scott W Brim
- RE: [Diffserv] EF RFC and loss Shahram Davari
- Re: [Diffserv] EF RFC and loss Kathleen Nichols
- Re: [Diffserv] EF RFC and loss Ion Stoica
- Re: [Diffserv] EF RFC and loss Stefano Salsano
- Re: [Diffserv] EF RFC and loss Ion Stoica
- Re: [Diffserv] EF RFC and loss Kathleen Nichols
- Re: [Diffserv] EF RFC and loss Stefano Salsano
- Re: [Diffserv] EF RFC and loss Enrique J. Hernandez-Valencia
- Re: [Diffserv] EF RFC and loss Constantinos
- Re: [Diffserv] EF RFC and loss Stefano Salsano
- Re: [Diffserv] EF RFC and loss Panos GEVROS
- Re: [Diffserv] EF RFC and loss Ion Stoica
- Re: [Diffserv] EF RFC and loss Constantinos
- Re: [Diffserv] EF RFC and loss Siamack Ayandeh
- Re: [Diffserv] EF RFC and loss Omar Elloumi
- Re: [Diffserv] EF RFC and loss Grenville Armitage
- Re: [Diffserv] EF RFC and loss Anurag
- Re: [Diffserv] EF RFC and loss Panos GEVROS
- Re: [Diffserv] EF RFC and loss Kathleen Nichols
- RE: [Diffserv] EF RFC and loss Albert Manfredi
- Re: [Diffserv] EF RFC and loss Stefano Salsano
- RE: [Diffserv] EF RFC and loss Li, Renwei
- Re: [Diffserv] EF RFC and loss Panos GEVROS
- RE: [Diffserv] EF RFC and loss Albert Manfredi
- Re: [Diffserv] EF RFC and loss Kathleen Nichols
- Re: [Diffserv] EF RFC and loss Frank Kastenholz
- Re: [Diffserv] EF RFC and loss Siamack Ayandeh
- Re: [Diffserv] EF RFC and loss Siamack Ayandeh