[dnsext] CDS RRTYPE review - Comments period end Mar 29th
Roy Arends <roy@nominet.org.uk> Tue, 08 March 2011 19:32 UTC
Return-Path: <roy@nominet.org.uk>
X-Original-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22A093A692C for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 11:32:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ij5bCDbN5zRS for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 11:32:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx1.knowthenet.org.uk (mx1.knowthenet.org.uk [213.248.199.2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 793FC3A67F2 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 11:32:11 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: s=main.dk.nominet.selector; d=nominet.org.uk; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:Received:From:To:Subject: Thread-Topic:Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To: Accept-Language:Content-Language:X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:Content-Type:Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=xHMHFfIylT1c2/LV7BHu3J96m8Zjulgm86HsilWLdCbKFV7vQW07bvdj 15q50IErI9yH6mb9YfkM5/6WT3qUROSrsgkgvj+qTfHFEq+8PMJd1+pwp /FuCkBGR48Sk+ij;
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nominet.org.uk; i=roy@nominet.org.uk; q=dns/txt; s=main.dkim.nominet.selector; t=1299612808; x=1331148808; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Roy=20Arends=20<roy@nominet.org.uk>|Subject:=20C DS=20RRTYPE=20review=20-=20Comments=20period=20end=20Mar =2029th|Date:=20Tue,=208=20Mar=202011=2019:33:22=20+0000 |Message-ID:=20<C99C3502.72B1%roy@nominet.org.uk>|To:=20" dnsext@ietf.org"=20<dnsext@ietf.org>|MIME-Version:=201.0 |Content-Transfer-Encoding:=20quoted-printable |Content-ID:=20<2c2ea216-8403-4a6b-ac5d-907d281eb5a5> |In-Reply-To:=20<20101115231159.GA697@shinkuro.com>; bh=a01EQq0TXxUJFN0mtXsekFXNEns6ts1iguRbznnfz8g=; b=j/42GQxRpe+JWE6919hVbx+8J7ol+VlJXXd2cLnb+zPUPzj2f7hIJK2D bhKKOMO7myjM0RUGEesRMCLT+Nx3PiUiaQF6d6mbzzc/GxZz42sW6/76O 3HBeyUZYRPBhZkL;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.62,285,1297036800"; d="scan'208";a="31416164"
Received: from wds-exc2.okna.nominet.org.uk ([213.248.197.145]) by mx3.nominet.org.uk with ESMTP; 08 Mar 2011 19:33:25 +0000
Received: from WDS-EXC1.okna.nominet.org.uk ([fe80::1593:1394:a91f:8f5f]) by wds-exc2.okna.nominet.org.uk ([fe80::7577:eaca:5241:25d4%19]) with mapi; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 19:33:24 +0000
From: Roy Arends <roy@nominet.org.uk>
To: "dnsext@ietf.org" <dnsext@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: CDS RRTYPE review - Comments period end Mar 29th
Thread-Index: AQHL3cewrDa2/M5NO0iO/nIAjhSWZw==
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 19:33:22 +0000
Message-ID: <C99C3502.72B1%roy@nominet.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20101115231159.GA697@shinkuro.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <2c2ea216-8403-4a6b-ac5d-907d281eb5a5>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [dnsext] CDS RRTYPE review - Comments period end Mar 29th
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 19:32:14 -0000
Dear Colleagues, Below is a resubmission of a completed template requesting a new RRTYPE assignment under the procedures of RFC5395. This message starts a 3 weeks period for an expert-review of the DNS RRTYPE parameter allocation for URI specified in http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-barwood-dnsop-ds-publish-01.txt If you have any new comments regarding this request that have not yet being made, please post them here before Mar 29th 18:00 UTC. Kind Regards, Roy Arends --begin 5395 template URI-- A. Submission Date: 15 November 2010 B. Submission Type: [X] New RRTYPE [ ] Modification to existing RRTYPE C. Contact Information for submitter: Name: George Barwood Email Address: george.barwood@blueyonder.co.uk International telephone number: +44 1452 722670 Other contact handles: N/A D. Motivation for the new RRTYPE application? To allow a copy of the DS RRset [RFC4034] to be published in the child zone, which is used to update the parent DS RRset. It is expected that this will allow the rollover of a key signing key to be automated. E. Description of the proposed RR type. The format is identical to the DS record. However there is no special processing for servers/resolvers. F. What existing RRTYPE or RRTYPEs come closest to filling that need and why are they unsatisfactory? None. G. What mnemonic is requested for the new RRTYPE (optional)? CDS to stand for "Child DS". H. Does the requested RRTYPE make use of any existing IANA Registry or require the creation of a new IANA sub-registry in DNS Parameters? It uses the same registries as the DS record. I. Does the proposal require/expect any changes in DNS servers/resolvers that prevent the new type from being processed as an unknown RRTYPE (see [RFC3597])? No. J. Comments: An RFC describing in detail how the CDS RRset may be used to update the parent DS RRset is anticipated. The current draft is draft-barwood-dnsop-ds-publish-01. --end 5395 template URI--
- [dnsext] CDS RRTYPE review - Comments period end … Roy Arends
- Re: [dnsext] CDS RRTYPE review - Comments period … Tony Finch
- Re: [dnsext] CDS RRTYPE review - Comments period … George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] CDS RRTYPE review - Comments period … Miek Gieben
- Re: [dnsext] CDS RRTYPE review - Comments period … Jelte Jansen
- Re: [dnsext] CDS RRTYPE review - Comments period … George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] CDS RRTYPE review - Comments period … Miek Gieben
- Re: [dnsext] CDS RRTYPE review - Comments period … George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] CDS RRTYPE review - Comments period … Scott Schmit
- Re: [dnsext] CDS RRTYPE review - Comments period … Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] CDS RRTYPE review - Comments period … George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] CDS RRTYPE review - Comments period … Olafur Gudmundsson
- Re: [dnsext] CDS RRTYPE review - Comments period … Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [dnsext] CDS RRTYPE review - Comments period … Tony Finch
- Re: [dnsext] CDS RRTYPE review - Comments period … Tony Finch
- Re: [dnsext] CDS RRTYPE review - Comments period … Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [dnsext] CDS RRTYPE review - Comments period … Matthew Pounsett
- Re: [dnsext] CDS RRTYPE review - Comments period … Olafur Gudmundsson
- Re: [dnsext] CDS RRTYPE review - Comments period … Miek Gieben
- Re: [dnsext] CDS RRTYPE review - Comments period … Paul Wouters
- Re: [dnsext] CDS RRTYPE review - Comments period … Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] CDS RRTYPE review - Comments period … Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] CDS RRTYPE review - Comments period … Stephan Lagerholm
- Re: [dnsext] CDS RRTYPE review - Comments period … Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] CDS RRTYPE review - Comments period … George Barwood
- Re: [dnsext] CDS RRTYPE review - Comments period … Samuel Weiler
- Re: [dnsext] CDS RRTYPE review - Comments period … Stephan Lagerholm
- Re: [dnsext] CDS RRTYPE review - Comments period … Olafur Gudmundsson
- Re: [dnsext] CDS RRTYPE review - Comments period … Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] CDS RRTYPE review - Comments period … Stephan Lagerholm
- Re: [dnsext] CDS RRTYPE review - Comments period … Stephan Lagerholm
- Re: [dnsext] CDS RRTYPE review - Comments period … Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] CDS RRTYPE review - Comments period … Roy Arends