Re: [Idr] 2 Week WG LC draft-ietf-idr-add-paths-implementation-00 (4/6 to 4/20/2015)

"Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com> Mon, 20 April 2015 08:25 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C9891ACF1C for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 01:25:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m-xMGxpNJkW5 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 01:25:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-7.cisco.com (alln-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.142.94]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 150F11ACF19 for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 01:25:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1415; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1429518342; x=1430727942; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=Mfb+eW2e1mOgvZ47Fs4i0We4/Ef4lMBEV+TyiEHIIAo=; b=SeOT6ZNcow24dr0Rf3UMv1ZGC0vaJkjP4H+MXYvMJSgGUK7R3d340lh7 He7J1rc2ykPvk6KMrS8XUE7ma/JWOfPnhyKZaYBd112sefEEjqzwA8bm8 WijtfrUEnJbRetTI8kqHpDiIPCfUZ8SZQtXs43aR1iqDBAUYqxv0nxK3o w=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CTBABmtzRV/5xdJa1bgwyBLrUWkDwJh1ICgS44FAEBAQEBAQF9hBcKAQEEeRACAQgDAQoxBzIUEQIEDgWIK8kKAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBF4s3hQQHgxeBFgWPDYIeiiEBlSEigjeBPG+CRAEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,608,1422921600"; d="scan'208,217";a="142723183"
Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by alln-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP; 20 Apr 2015 08:25:41 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x01.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x01.cisco.com [173.37.183.75]) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t3K8PfAS019104 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 20 Apr 2015 08:25:41 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x15.cisco.com ([169.254.9.6]) by xhc-rcd-x01.cisco.com ([173.37.183.75]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 03:25:40 -0500
From: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] 2 Week WG LC draft-ietf-idr-add-paths-implementation-00 (4/6 to 4/20/2015)
Thread-Index: AQHQe0OWJx+S361LU0C3HAqzUWDtaw==
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 08:25:41 +0000
Message-ID: <EB3C951C-9F66-4BDC-A7A4-0EB9ED216980@cisco.com>
References: <002601d07b40$308aa3a0$919feae0$@ndzh.com>
In-Reply-To: <002601d07b40$308aa3a0$919feae0$@ndzh.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_EB3C951C9F664BDCA7A40EB9ED216980ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/pT6FZx2UqbG8RD_2hD2fKGGZN2s>
Cc: "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] 2 Week WG LC draft-ietf-idr-add-paths-implementation-00 (4/6 to 4/20/2015)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 08:25:43 -0000

I don't know of any IPR on this draft.

Thanks!

Alvaro.

Sent from my iPad

On Apr 20, 2015, at 4:01 AM, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com<mailto:shares@ndzh.com>> wrote:

This WG LC is complete, but we need to hear each author with their IPR Statement.   Would each author indicated if they know of IPR on this draft.