Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-hao-schnorr-06

The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> Mon, 26 June 2017 17:35 UTC

Return-Path: <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-announce@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietf-announce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90ECD1292FD; Mon, 26 Jun 2017 10:35:56 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: Nevil Brownlee <rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org>, draft-hao-schnorr@ietf.org, rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org
Subject: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-hao-schnorr-06
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.55.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Cc: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, iana@iana.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <149849855655.18327.5693908767850759402.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 10:35:56 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/Wd1ZXNHPusY1olQ9OTIISVxQVL8>
X-BeenThere: ietf-announce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: "IETF announcement list. No discussions." <ietf-announce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-announce>, <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-announce/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-announce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce>, <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 17:35:56 -0000

The IESG has completed a review of draft-hao-schnorr-06 consistent with
RFC5742.

The IESG has no problem with the publication of 'Schnorr NIZK Proof:
Non-interactive Zero Knowledge Proof for Discrete Logarithm'
<draft-hao-schnorr-06.txt> as an Informational RFC.

The IESG has concluded that there is no conflict between this document and
IETF work.

The IESG would also like the Independent Submissions Editor to review the
comments in the datatracker related to this document and determine whether or
not they merit incorporation into the document. Comments may exist in both
the ballot and the history log.

The IESG review is documented at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/conflict-review-hao-schnorr/

A URL of the reviewed Internet Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hao-schnorr/

The process for such documents is described at
https://www.rfc-editor.org/indsubs.html

Thank you,

The IESG Secretary